Valley Import Constraint Resmi Surendran. Valley Import Constraint Range of SFs – -0.95 to -0.97 in valley area – 0.03 to 0.045 outside valley area Not.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Valley Import Constraint John Dumas 1. Objective Establish an appropriate Shadow Price for the Valley Import limit – Consistent with the methodology established.
Advertisements

Outage Cost Study Market Analysis and Design Outage Coordination Improvement Task Force 3/23/2015.
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
SCED Power Balance Penalty Curve
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
February 2012 CMWG Constraints Competitiveness Tests (CCT)
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
Utah Schedule 37 Update June 25, Schedule 37 Background Schedule 37 – Published rates for standard power purchase agreements with qualifying facilities.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
Load Resource Inputs to the Multi-Interval Real-Time Market ERCOT is requesting input from LRs and QSEs to enable running meaningful MIRTM simulations.
ERCOT RMR Deployment and Cost Proposals By: Matt Mereness and Ino Gonzalez.
December 2, 2011 QMWG Summary of Potential Issues with NPRR385 Price Floor ERCOT.
Real Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Cost Events.
July 30, 2015 TAC Meeting Update to COPS Michelle Trenary August 12, 2015.
Proposed Revision to the Shadow Price Cap and Power Balance Penalties in SCED Same Transmission Element.
Market Mitigation Concept Group Update Jim Galvin April 26, 2004.
Options to Manage Electricity Demand and Increase Capacity in Santa Delano County Jon Cook Jeff Kessler Gabriel Lade Geoff Morrison Lin’s Lackeys.
April, 2008 Maximum Shadow Price. April, 2008 Protocol Requirement: Transmission Constraint Management (2)ERCOT shall establish a maximum Shadow.
Mitigated Offer Cap Presented to: NATF Date: September 29, 2009 By: Mark Patterson, Manager Market Operations Support (ERCOT) 1September 29 NATF Meeting.
SCED Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Linear vs. Quadratic Programming Model.
Bill Hellinghausen EDF Trading North America
Transmission Reliability Program Review Market Monitoring Tools Bernie Lesieutre and Bob Thomas Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Cornell University.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
RCWG Update to WMS December 5, General Update Agenda Items for Today: Verifiable Cost Manual clarifications (vote) White Paper on Long Term Fuel.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
CMWG Update to WMS Report of CMWG Meeting of M Wagner Edison Mission Marketing & Trading.
Slack Bus Change and Impact to Market Market Analysis, ERCOT QMWG Sep. 4, 2015.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
CMWG Update WMS September 2015 Meeting. CRR Balancing Account Fund Discussion The CRR Balancing Account fund appears to be working as expected The cap.
Congestion Management Working Group WMS update 11/7/2012.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
2% Shift Factor rule and associated price discrepancies Kris Dixit 1.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino.
Wholesale Market Subcommittee Update May 2 nd, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
Price Correction Process Resmi Surendran QMWG 04/10/2015.
ERCOT Public 1 Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services Co-ordination of Power Balance Penalty Curve, VOLL, SWOC for AS Demand Curves.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting June 20 th, 2008 Austin, TX.
WMS Meeting, October 10, RCWG Continuing Efforts  NPRR 747 Price Correction No consensus on this issue  RCWG needs additional guidance on the.
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Nov 18, 2009.
MIRTM Temporal Constraints Discussion Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Jan. 8, 2016.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April 2007 (which is in March)
MISUG TAC Update Jackie Ashbaugh ERCOT 3/7/ TAC3/7/ /22/2011 Meeting Focus on the high priority items from MISUG: Review task list prioritization.
Analysis of August 13, 2015: ORDC, RRS & PRC Changes Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) November 13, 2015.
Appeal of Proposed Real Time Market Mitigation Measures Texas Nodal Market May 18, 2004.
2% Shift Factor dispatchable rule discussion and alternatives for the 2% rule Kris Dixit 1.
Update: 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS) Pilot Project Mark Patterson, ERCOT October 7, 2013.
September 23, 2011 Report On ERCOT Action Items From September 6, 2011 RTDF Meeting John Dumas ERCOT.
RDTF June 1, Purpose “The effect of the Shadow Price cap for the Power Balance Constraint is to limit the cost calculated by the SCED optimization.
NPRR 520 Resmi Surendran ERCOT. Current CCT Process Annual CCT (ACCT) is run every year to feed the results to Monthly CCT (MCCT) MCCT is run every month.
RCWG Update to WMS March 7, Draft NPRR, Caps and Floors for Energy Storage Resources Chair of ETWG gave high level overview ERCOT had questions.
Proposal for Consideration Regarding Holistic Solution to Congestion Irresolvable in SCED Issue:How do you identify when constraint is irresolvable Proposal:Adopt.
Multi-Interval Real-Time Market (MIRTM) Updates SAWG Sean Chang Market Analysis February 22, 2016 ERCOT Public Version
Money Transfer Due to Real-Time Irresolvable Constraint Resmi Surendran ERCOT.
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
Day Ahead Market QSE’s Credit Requirements Concerns and Solutions August 14, 2008.
IMM Report on MISO South Integration Presented by: David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent Market Monitor Presented to: Entergy Regional State Committee April.
NPRR784 Mitigated Offer Caps for RMR Units Protocol Revision Subcommittee June 16,
Principal Load Profiling and Modeling
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
NPRR833 Workshop: Contingency Processing in CRR, DAM and SCED
General Overview Of Resource Costs
PRS Rejection of NPRR Mitigated Offer Caps for RMR Units
Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services
PJM & Midwest ISO Market-to-Market Coordination (APEx Conference 2007)
Presentation transcript:

Valley Import Constraint Resmi Surendran

Valley Import Constraint Range of SFs – to in valley area – 0.03 to outside valley area Not a competitive constraint and hence the Resource are moved based on offers capped by higher of Reference LMP & Mitigated Offer Cap curve Basecase constraint and hence has a default Max Shadow Price of $5000/MWh

Issue Highest Shadow Price when not violated is less than $100/MWh (more than 28hrs after go live) – Constraint can not be resolved many times even with all the generation available South LZ SPP when the constraint is violated ranges from $1500/MWh to $1850/MWh (roughly 15 hrs after go live) – Demand response in majority of that load zone with the high price have no impact to the constraint. Constraint is manually handled after been violated for more than an hour in SCED (roughly 65 hrs after go live)

Potential Long Term Solution Develop transmission network to support load growth. Create a Load Zone for Valley to encourage demand participation that has impact on the constraint

Short Term Solution Reduce Max Shadow Price and let the constraint be managed by SCED and provide price signal to encourage new generation development or load participation – Import from DC tie is limited during peak hours – Demand participation would be less since the deployment would be for long hours and payments would be based on the South LZ SPP Revalidate the limit calculations in planning and operations

Proposed Max Shadow Price - $350/MWh Should be able to move existing or new Resources to resolve cosntraint with out manual action The highest offer from a new resource with no verifiable cost that needs be moved is – 14.5 * high FIP/ lowest SF = 14.5 *10 /0.95 ~ 150 The highest offer from a new resource with verifiable cost that needs be moved is – (high Heat Rate * High FIP + correspondinghigh O&M) * highest multiplier/ lowest SF – (14.5* )*1.5/0.95 ~ $350/MWh