NESCAUM MAC Meeting May 16 and 17, 2006 Newport, RI Mercury Trends Network (MTN) Is it MDN? Is it NADP? Is it USDA? Is it BLM? Is it F&WS Is it NPS? Is.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
| © 2006 LenovoLenovo Protection Services. | © 2007 LenovoLenovo ThinkPad Protection and LenovoCare Protection Service Accidental Damage Protection 1,2,3,
Advertisements

Todd Geerdes Period 1 WA ME MT ND OR MN WI NY ID SD MI WY IA PA NV NE
U.S. States Abbreviations Directions: Type the state abbreviation in the box on each slide. “The English language website where everything.
Company LOGO U. S. EPA, Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
Company LOGO U. S. EPA, Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
Contaminated Fish: The Mercury Connection. Natural Sources: Occurs naturally in soils, sediments, and rocks Volcanic eruptions Wildfires Man-Made Sources:
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
WA 2.ID 3.MT 4.OR 5.CA 6.NV 7.UT 8.WY 9.CO 10.AZ 11.NM 12.AK 13.HI 13 The West`
How to win a Presidential Election. The rules of the game Electoral College.
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
Wet Deposition of Mercury In The U.S. Results from the NADP Mercury Deposition Network, David Gay Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL,
Prevalence of Self-Reported Obesity Among U.S. Adults by State and Territory Definitions  Obesity: Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or higher.  Body Mass.
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
Trends in the Wet and Dry Deposition of Nitrogen and Sulfur Species
Southeast Region States Contained in the region: Alabama (AL) Florida (FL) Georgia (GA) Mississippi (MS) Louisiana (LA) Arkansas (AR) Tennessee (TN)
` ` Washington Oregon Idaho Montana Wyoming Utah Arizona New Mexico Nebraska Kansas Oklahoma South Dakota North Dakota Minnesota Iowa Wisconsin *Michigan.
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
1 Overview: The Federation of State Beef Councils.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting.
Let’s See What You Know: Draw the outline of the United States Draw California Identify and label our three major bodies of water Star the location of.
The United States.
Geography Bee Meeting 3: United States Cities and Landforms (While you wait, please insert your microphones and adjust your volume.)
From “Animaniacs”. LA Baton Rouge Louisiana IN Indianapolis Indiana.
States and Capitals Flash Cards Mrs. Miller 2008.
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
Alabama (AL) Capitol- Montgomery. Alaska (AK) Capitol- Juneau.
Punctuation for Business Letters
CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
2014 OVERVIEW: National Streamgage Network Design by USGS.
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
DIET = DIE T RESCRAMBLE LETTERS – what can you get?
Hawaii Alaska (not to scale) Alaska GeoCurrents Customizable Base Map text.
US MAP TEST Practice
The abbreviation for Texas is TX. The capital for South Dakota is Pierre.
NAPHSIS Making the Impossible a Reality by Garland Land NAPHSIS Executive Director.
TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
NOAA’s Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring in the Gulf of Mexico Region January 17,
AK – Alaska Juneau. AL – Alabama Montgomery AR – Arkansas Little Rock.
1st Hour2nd Hour3rd Hour Day #1 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5.
The United States Song Wee Sing America.
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
ecoprintQ NA Sales Coverage
The United States.
1 Washington, WA 2 Oregon, OR 3 California, CA 4 Arizona, AZ 5 Nevada, NE 6 Utah, UT 7 Idaho, ID 8 Montana, MT 9 Wyoming, WY 10 Colorado, CO 11 New Mexico,
Physicians per 1,000 Persons
USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA
EVVE Implementation – August 2013 Northern Mariana Islands
Name the State Flags Your group are to identify which state the flag belongs to and sign correctly to earn a point.
GLD Org Chart February 2008.
The States How many states are in the United States?
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
Identify the State & Capital
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Human Resources Regional Captain Map
Regions of the United States
U.S. FEDERAL CIRCUITS Cir State 11 Alabama AL
DO NOW: TAKE OUT ANY FORMS OR PAPERS YOU NEED TO TURN IN
Overview: The Federation of State Beef Councils
United States of America.
Introductions by Region…
Tennessee Texas What’s the capital city? What’s the abbreviation? Where is it located? Nashville What’s the capital city? What’s the abbreviation?
Name _____________________ Write the capital, state below. Augusta, Maine Montpelier, Vermont Concord, New Hampshire Abbreviations Below VT ME NH.
WASHINGTON MAINE MONTANA VERMONT NORTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA MICHIGAN
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)
Human Resources Region Captain Map
Percent of adults aged 18 years and older who have obesity †
Human Resources Region Captain Map
USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA
Presentation transcript:

NESCAUM MAC Meeting May 16 and 17, 2006 Newport, RI Mercury Trends Network (MTN) Is it MDN? Is it NADP? Is it USDA? Is it BLM? Is it F&WS Is it NPS? Is it TVA? Is it FDA? Is it USGS? Is it CASTNet? Is it NOAA-NMFS Is it Clean Air Markets?

Objectives: This initiative establishes a Mercury Trends Network (MTN) to serve scientists, modelers, policy makers, federal, state, and tribal government agencies, and the public. The MTN will be the part of the NADP-MDN and is intended to provide a more complete understanding of the fate of mercury emissions with respect to total (i.e., wet and dry) deposition. The MTN will measure atmospheric mercury species via automated (3-hour interval) and manual (6-day interval) gas and particulate measuring systems and event-based mercury wet deposition. Meteorological variables for computing mercury wet deposition and estimating mercury dry deposition will be measured or obtained from collocated programs. Data will be collected with standardized methods developed through USEPA research, quality-assured, and archived in an on-line database.

Specific objectives to be achieved with the MTN are to:  Determine the status and trends in the concentrations of ambient air mercury species: Reactive gaseous (RGM) Particulate bound (PHg) Elemental (Hg0) Wet, dry and total atmospheric deposition of mercury  Operate MTN stations to monitor the status and trends in mercury deposition for ecosystems that are influenced by local, regional, continental and global scale mercury sources. The priority will be to establish MTN stations to evaluate the efficacy of forthcoming mercury emission changes from implementation of state and federal regulations  Evaluate the status and trends in total deposition of atmospheric mercury to ecosystems with a high potential for mercury methylation and mercury bioaccumulation in fish and wildlife.  Provide the capability to link changes in mercury emissions to changes in atmospheric mercury concentrations and total deposition of atmospheric mercury  Improve the information base for models of atmospheric mercury chemistry, transport, and deposition

Duration: The MTN will begin operation in fiscal year 2007 (FY07, Oct 06 through Sept 07) and operate indefinitely. Potential Funding Sources It is anticipated that the MTN will attract a diversity of sponsors. Interested sponsors will include state agencies, tribal organizations, electric power industry partners, regional EPA offices, and the Canadian government. Long-term support is anticipated from the NADP’s primary federal sponsors, which include the USEPA, the USGS, and the National Park Service. A minimum 5-year commitment will be requested from individual station sponsors. Funds Transfers All fund transfers for the MTN will be handled through the Program Office. State agencies will sign individual Memoranda of Agreements with the University of Illinois. Federal partners within the NADP Interagency Agreement will transfer funds to the University of Illinois through that agreement. Sample analysis costs will be paid by the Illinois State Water Survey to the HAL.

Manual Sampling System

Automated Sampling System

Initial Network Design Analysis for MTN Station Locations

1 Grand Canyon Natl. Park, Arizona GRC474 2 Chiricahua Natl. Mon., Arizona CHA467 3 Sequoia Natl Park, California CA75 SEK402 4 Mesa Verde Natl. Park, Colorado CO99 MEV405 5 Everglades Natl. Park, Florida FL11 EVE419 6 Sumatra, Florida SUM156 7 Bondville, Illinois IL11 BVL130 8 Vincennes, Indiana VIN140 9 Indiana Dunes Natl Lakeshore, Indiana IN34 10 Acadia Natl. Park, Maine ME98 ACA Beltsville, Maryland BEL Ann Arbor, Michigan ANA Glacier Natl. Park, Montana MT05 GLR Great Basin Natl. Park, Nevada GRB Beaufort, North Carolina BFT Oxford, Ohio OXF Arendtsville, Pennsylvania PA00 ARE Penn State, Pennsylvania SCR Smoky Mts. National Park, Tennessee TN11 GRS Walker Branch, Tennessee ESP Shenandoah National Park, Virginia VA28 SHN Underhill, Vermont VT99 24 Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming WY08 YEL Longview, Texas TX21 26 Chase, Louisiana LA10 27 Coffeeville, Mississippi MS30 28 Erie, Pennsylvania PA30 29 Lake Geneva, Wisconsin WI99 30 Devils Lake, Wisconsin WI31 Locations for MTN stations based on preliminary network design analysis