Leiden University. The university to discover. Session 2 - Topic 1: Bad faith & Intent-to-Use EU-China workshop on new issues in trademark filings, Beijing,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Genuine Use of Trademarks Proper Reasons for Non-use
Advertisements

PATENT OFFICE OF REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Introduction The provision in Article 108 (1) Council Regulation (EC) 40/94 on the Community trade mark (CTMR)
Use of a mark in a form differing in elements which do not alter its distinctive character - practice and examples - Мр Мирела Бошковић
WIPO: South-South Cooperation Cairo, May 7, 2013 Trademarks and the Public Domain Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Genuine Use in inter partes cases 4th Liaison Meeting on Trade Marks June 2009.
Copyright, 2010 Maryland’s New Power of Attorney Law Presented September 1, 2010 by Marjorie A. Corwin and Carla Stone Witzel Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman,
Got ®? Ted Landwehr Landwehr Law Offices th Street NE Columbia Heights, MN
Paradise Point Resort & Spa San Diego, CA October 19-21, 2011 Patenting Protein Therapeutics: In the Shadow of Uncertainty 4th Protein Discovery and Therapeutics.
Trade-Mark Infringement. Three Types of Infringement s.19 – Use of the same mark in respect of the same wares s.19 – Use of the same mark in respect of.
Maintaining Trademark Rights: Policing and Educational Efforts April 7, 2011.
Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine Activity October 2014.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Domain Disputes Overview of UDRP Procedures 6/5/2015.
Trademarks as a Business Asset and the Power of Branding Heinz Goddar / Ludwig Kouker April 26/28, /28HG-3 26/28/04/2014 – Trademarks in.
1 Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates Prepared by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board Audit Committee Prepared January.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association MADRID SYSTEM VS. DIRECT INTERNATIONAL FILINGS BY U.S. PARTIES JPO/AIPLA Joint Meeting.
International Trademark Treaties and Strategies Pamela C. Gavin, Esq. Gavin Law Offices, PLC GRIPLA October 28, 2010 International Trademark Treaties and.
CREATIVITY IN BLOOM A trademark of the Public Education Committee of the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) Trademark Expo 2010.
CHAPTERCHAPTER McGraw-Hill/Irwin©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Acceptance THREETHREE.
INTERNATIONAL LAW PARMA UNIVERSITY International Business and Development International Market and Organization Laws Prof. Gabriele Catalini.
European Parliament, 5 November 2013 Trademarks, Free Speech, Undistorted Competition Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird,
Commercialization of R&D Results: How to Prepare For The Early Stages.
Trademark II Infringement. Article 57 Infringement Article 57 Any of the following conduct shall be an infringement upon the right to exclusively use.
IP Translator perceived by the legal professionals Dr. Katalin Szamosi ECTA Member Attorney at Law Managing Partner of SBGK Patent and Law Offices ECTA.
Baker & McKenzie Presented by Gabriela Vendlova 3 December 2002 Intellectual Property Rights: Importance of Trademark Protection in the Digital World.
Oppositions and enforcement related to the European Community Trademarks - practical issues Markpatent Seminar, Ahmedabad, February 2010.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Request for Extension of Protection of International Registration to the United States.
University of Bayreuth Chair for Civil Law VIII: Private Law and Intellectual Property Law - The need to keep cultural subject.
Brand Protection In China Eligio Pimentel
Sam Funnell Managing Principal Solicitor Commercial & Property Branch Government Branding.
THE UK EXPERIENCE RELATED TO CASE C- 185/10, COMMISSION v REPUBLIC OF POLAND DOES A “SPECIAL NEED” ARISE FOR AN UNLICENSED MEDICINE IF THE LICENSED EQUIVALENT.
Domain Name Registration Sanjay Gupta August 29, 2008.
Appeals in patent examination and opposition in Germany Karin Friehe Judge, Federal Patent Court, Munich, Germany.
Infringement Claims and Defenses Professor Todd Bruno.
New Regulation on Plant Reproductive Material: main elements of the upcoming Commission proposal Yannis Karamitsios European Commission, DG SANCO.
TRADE MARKS: LATEST EU CASE LAW ON ENFORCEMENT By Annick Mottet Haugaard Attorney at law, 2nd Vice President ECTA International Baltic Conference on Intellectual.
1 Trademark Definition by the EC Court of Justice Trademark Definition by the EC Court of Justice.
Chapter 09 Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
REVIEW OF THE LISBON AGREEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS Florence Rojal Legal.
1 Trademark Infringement and Dilution Steve Baron March 6, 2003.
Conference on the Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol The Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol - the long.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
Boston New York San Francisco Washington, DC Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute Understanding Intellectual Property June 4, 2008.
EU-China Workshop on the Chinese Patent Law 24/25 September 2008 Topic IV: Legal Consequences of Invalidity of a Patent Prof. Dr. Christian Osterrieth.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
1 TOPIC III - PATENT INVALIDATION PROCEDURES EU-CHINA WORKSHOP ON THE CHINESE PATENT LAW HARBIN, SEPTEMBER 2008 Dr. Gillian Davies.
International Intellectual Property Prof. Manheim Spring, 2007 Trademark - Madrid Copyright © 2007.
Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk UK EXAMINATION SYSTEM: RELATIVE GROUNDS EXAMINATION Mark Jefferiss.
Leiden University. The university to discover. Session 2 - Topic 2: Bad faith as a ground for refusal / opposition EU-China workshop on new issues in trademark.
“Bad Faith” Trademark Filings/Registrations: TIPO’s Solution Jeffrey CHEN TIPO, Chinese Taipei 37 th IPEG Meeting in Medan 1.
Ip4inno 1 A.Copyright B. ‘Reputation’ and common law trade marks C. Unregistered designs D. Semiconductor topography right.
What is intellectual property and
CIPIL: Exhaustion Without Exasperation, 15 March 2014 Double Identity, Origin Function and International Exhaustion Prof. Dr.
The OHIM Sabina Rusconi, institutional affairs and external relations department, OHIM Roving Seminar on the Conmunity Trade Mark System in China,
THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS
Dr. Alexander Tsoutsanis
The Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market
International Trademark Treaties and Strategies Pamela C. Gavin, Esq
HOW TO AVOID INVALID U.S. TRADEMARK REGISTRATIONS BY BEING ABLE TO PROVE A BONA FIDE INTENT TO USE IN THE U.S. Presented by Howard J. Shire 13 October.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND CYBER PIRACY
Community protection of geographical indications :
Recent CJEU case law Fordham IP Conference, 25 April 2014 Prof. Dr
The EU trademark reform package – Back to status quo?
6th Trademark Law Institute Symposium
Trademark Veena (Siya) Ajay Lala, Company Secretary, LLB, MBA (Finance) Contact No id: VAL & Associates Legal.
Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
Presentation transcript:

Leiden University. The university to discover. Session 2 - Topic 1: Bad faith & Intent-to-Use EU-China workshop on new issues in trademark filings, Beijing, June 2011 Dr. Alexander Tsoutsanis

Leiden University. The university to discover. Topic 1  Is it possible to request proof of intent to use in China, if:  an applicant is registering for a wide variety of goods ('overbroad TM')  an applicant is registering for a large number of marks ('stockpiling')  an applicant is known to have acted in similar cases ('pattern of conduct') ?

Leiden University. The university to discover. Option 1 Impose full blown 'intent to use' requirement, in accordance with § 15-3 TRIPS, regardless of designated goods (US, India).

Leiden University. The university to discover. Option 2 Squeeze in lack of 'intent to use' as a factor for determining 'bad faith', in case of 'over wide' goods description (ECJ 2009 Goldhase; UK practice [2002>). Drawbacks: (a) not effective, as lack of 'intent to use' alone can not trigger 'bad faith' (ex ECJ) (b) slamming TM owner for lack of 'intent to use' during grace-period violates TRIPS

Leiden University. The university to discover. EU: background  1984: EU adopts 'bona fide intent to use' in draft CTMR  1987: EU drops 'intent-to-use'. Instead opts for 'bad faith'.  1988 TMD / 1993 CTMR: only contain 'soft' genuine use requirement: 5 year 'grace period' + (afterwards) allowing revocation for lack of genuine use.

Leiden University. The university to discover. EU - bad faith & 'intent-to-use' United Kingdom (≈ Ireland) -1994: legislator maintained 'intent-to- use' requirement in violation of directive (s 32(3) TMA) : High Court Decon : High Court Knoll AG's Trade Mark: of 'questionable validity' : Practice change: only applied in rare cases of over-wide specifications of goods and services.

Leiden University. The university to discover. EU - bad faith & 'intent-to-use' -Other EU Countries: reject UK practice OHIM CD Trillium: -rejects UK approach -but still allows invalidity on the basis of bad faith, if goods ‘do not have the slightest connection with his actual economic activity and where it might even appear unimaginable that said applicant would ever be able to expand’

Leiden University. The university to discover. EU - bad faith & 'intent-to-use' -2009: ECJ Goldhase: mentions lack of 'intent-to-use' as example of bad faith intention: -"(…) the intention to prevent a third party from marketing a product may, in certain circumstances, be an element of bad faith on the part of the applicant."

Leiden University. The university to discover. -"That is in particular the case when it becomes apparent, subsequently, that the applicant applied for registration of a sign as a Community trade mark without intending to use it, his sole objective being to prevent a third party from entering the market."

Leiden University. The university to discover. Option 3 Consider viable alternatives to get rid of 'dead/sleeping/inactive' marks: -Only impose 'grace-period' of 3 years (instead of 5 years in EU). -Require 'proof-of-use' upon renewal. -Don't follow OHIM-practice of allowing complete class headings to encompass all goods/services contained in such class.

Leiden University. The university to discover. -Adopt pay-per-class regime instead of EU practice of fixed-fee for three classes. -Develop liability doctrine for suing competitors within grace period, or -Only allow trade mark injunction in case of genuine use.

Leiden University. The university to discover. Conclusions 1.Yes, option 1 is possible. § 15-3 TRIPS does not bar China from imposing an 'intent-to-use' requirement. 2.Is it desirable? EU Study: acknowledges that Registry contains too much 'dead wood'. 4.But 2011 EU Study also proposes to maintain current EU system, in which 'intent-to-use' is not required and a mark can be revoked (only) after 5 years of lack of genuine use.

Leiden University. The university to discover. 5.Option 2: lack of 'intent-to-use' may point towards 'bad faith intent' of the TM applicant. 6.But not effective: lack of 'intent-to-use' alone is insufficient for bad faith, as other conditions (e.g. knowledge) should also be met. Also incompatible with TRIPS. 7.Option 3: consider (more suitable) alternatives !

Leiden University. The university to discover. Questions ? Thank you for your attention