Effecting institutional change through the evaluation of e-learning Richard Walker & Rose Papworth E-Learning Development Team, University of York eLearning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some impressions from the school visits and the conference -No systematic report 1 st Some general wisdom 2 nd Key analysis questions of the project Conference.
Advertisements

Dr David Nicol Project Director Centre for Academic Practice University of Strathclyde Re-engineering Assessment Practices in Scottish.
Supporting further and higher education Setting the scene Rhona Sharpe Learner Experience Support Project.
Dr Catherine Bovill Academic Development Unit University of Glasgow Dr Kate Morss and Dr Cathy Bulley, Queen Margaret University.
A theory of institutional change, and what we learned through practice CETL Conference, Sheffield Hallam University, 20 th May 2010 Philippa Levy.
Dr. Cath Jones and Alice Lau Putting Assessment at the Heart of Learning – The Story at The University of Glamorgan.
Matariki Network of Universities Library Benchmarking Project.
Engaging Students in the Quality of Learning and Teaching [Your name] [Your role]
SCDOT Training Marketing Objectives. 1.Relevant and Timely Material 2.Opportunity for Feedback and Communication 3.Easy Access 4.Simple Navigation 5.Consistent.
Contents Blackboard: Sustaining Progress Be careful what you wish for – it may be granted Nicole Kipar & Phil Poole Learning and Teaching Enhancement Unit.
Embedding Learning Technologies a nationally recognised award within the SEDA Professional Development Framework (PDF)
CRICOS Provider No 00025B Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning: Reflections from Australia Merrilyn Goos Director Teaching and Educational Development.
Comparing departmental ‘baseline’ and ‘opt-in’ strategies for e-learning adoption across an institution Which works best? Richard Walker E-Learning Development.
Dr Tansy Jessop SEED Research Meeting 14 February
Quality assurance for e- learning Dr Tim Brown (formerly) Deputy Director, Validation Services, Open University UK.
Reflections on developments with learning technologies: York’s journey and some discussion on sector trends ( ) HeLF 10th anniversary meeting.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Carpe Diem E-learning course design and embedding 1.
Case Study Methodology & e-Learning: Reflections on Evaluation Activities for Blended Modules Richard Walker & Wendy Fountain University of York.
Designing for inclusion and the role of the disability practitioner Caroline Davies and Tina Elliott IMPACT Associates Eileen Laycock, Disability Manager.
The Student Experience Project Overview for Kosovo Higher Education visit Mark Wilkinson October 2014.
Project Manager Literacy and Learning Industry Training Federation
Peer Assisted Learning (PAL)
Implementation & Evaluation Regional Seminar ‘04 School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools”
DEVELOPING SECONDARY STRATEGY. 2 Staffordshire Context: County Council Mission Statement To make Staffordshire “A great place to live, work, visit and.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
EdTech 2009 – National College of Ireland May Sustainability through Staff Engagement: Applying a Community of Practice Model to Academic Staff.
Learning Technology MENTORS Research project Carmel Taddeo...University of South Australia Harry Postema...Glenunga International High School.
Help or Hindrance: A Blended Approach to Learner Engagement A presentation to The Ako Aotearoa ‘Research in Progress’ Colloquium.
Delivering your blended course Richard Walker E-Learning Development Team University of York Preparing, supporting & evaluating student learning.
A partnership of Halton, Knowsley, Liverpool, St Helens, Sefton, Warrington and Wirral Children & Young People’s Services Workforce Development Masterclass.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Continuous Improvement Monitoring (CIM) Collaborative Partner Forum Awareness Session June 2015.
Skills Online: Building Practitioner Competence in an Inter-professional, Virtual Classroom Canadian Public Health Association 2008 Annual Conference.
Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Teaching and Supporting Students with Vision Impairments An Australian Universities Teaching Committee Funded Project WAANU Conference March 2005.
Director, Office of Learning and Teaching October 29, 2014 Learning Analytics: Exploring Strengths-based Approaches.
1 WERT: WP 5 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010 Aim To pilot and evaluate the content and context of the course material with target groups To help women.
Contents Kay Hutchfield: Module Leader, IPL Skills for Professional Learning Journey to HE Conference: King’s Hill Facilitating student transition through.
Certificate IV in Project Management Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Evaluating E-Learning Efficacy University of York, UK Wayne Britcliffe and Simon Davis Edinburgh Napier Learning and Teaching conference 14 th June 2012.
1 Evaluating the Quality of the e-Learning Experience in Higher Education Anne Jelfs and Keir Thorpe, Institute of Educational Technology (IET), The Open.
Implementing an Online University-Wide Solution to Plagiarism Awareness R Walker, W Britcliffe & R Papworth E-Learning Development Team, University of.
E VALUATING YOUR E - LEARNING COURSE LTU Workshop 11 March 2008.
ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF THE E- LEARNING STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION AT WALTER SISULU UNIVERSITY Presenter: T. Mayisela E-learning Specialist Mthatha Campus;
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Faculty Development Models
Universities Scotland Retention Project Emerging findings Jane W. Denholm Project Consultant.
Background The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which the UN Members States jointly committed to in September 2015, provide an ambitious and long-term.
Blended Learning Workshop STRATEGIES FOR ASSURING THE QUALITY OF A BLENDED COURSE Richard Walker E-Learning Development Team University of York.
Transforming Practice Program Project Report. UWS Academic Careers & Development The Context: The UWS Academic Career project takes a holistic approach.
Stats group: Priorities for 2012 AIM: Improve the feedback we get as a statistical community by implementing the Dissemination Strategy, sharing and learning.
Strategies for blended learning in an undergraduate curriculum Benjamin Kehrwald, Massey University College of Education.
Implementing flexible curricula A workshop to explore approaches for: critically reflecting on changing drivers and needs for flexible curricula and for.
Applying Laurillard’s Conversational Framework to Blended Learning Blogging and Collaborative Activity Design R Papworth, R Walker & W Britcliffe E-Learning.
- Collaborative report writing - Bridging the divide between formal and informal learning Richard Walker & Wayne Britcliffe E-Learning Development Team,
Richard Walker E-Learning Development Team University of York Preparing, supporting & evaluating student learning Delivering your blended course.
Rannís Erasmus+ Data collection, analysis & impact studies.
Philip Russell Deputy Librarian, ITT Dublin CoPILOT, Glasgow, February 12 th 2014 Creating and Sharing Information Literacy OERs.
Some quality cycle planning monitoring and sharing examples 1.
Making wikis work How do we create the conditions for effective collaborative learning? Richard Walker & Wayne Britcliffe E-Learning Development Team,
Training Week, August 2016 Assessment for
Session 1. The Central Principles of HiAP WORKSHOP: PREPARING FOR TRAINING IN HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES (HiAP) USING THE NEWLY LAUNCHED WHO HiAP TRAINING.
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
L2L The Professional Development Framework through the lens of Libraries & Librarians.
PROGRESS AND CHANGES IN
Connecting Policy with Practice
Promoting Success for All through Inclusive Learning and Teaching
TLAP Partnership Meeting 7th June 2017
Presentation transcript:

Effecting institutional change through the evaluation of e-learning Richard Walker & Rose Papworth E-Learning Development Team, University of York eLearning in HE: A Symposium for FE/HE Strategists & Practitioners 26th February 2008

Key Questions  What are the drivers for e-learning in your institution?  How is e-learning activity managed?  What role does evaluation play in: –informing academic practice on e-learning course design and delivery? –shaping organisational learning on e-learning best practices?

Starting late  Late, phased roll-out of VLE –1 st round ca. 20 projects –2 nd round ca. 40 projects –3 rd round 50 projects Project Timeline

Drivers for e-learning  Enhancement of student learning experience through blended learning  Promotion of active student learning –skills development, personalised learning pathways, collaboration  Transformation of academic practice –student-focused course design –sharing & collaborative development of learning and teaching resources

Strategy  Institutional e- learning policy  Centrally managed platform  Close control over pilot projects  Departments develop local strategies (mature/developing/pilot)  Delegated training, admin and quality assurance  Departmental champions oversee long-term development in collaboration with central services Top Down Bottom Up

Pilot project cycle Training (Getting Started, Library Accessibility, Roll- Out + specialist workshops) Application procedure (project scope; aims & objectives; support; delivery & funding requirements; consultation with central services) Evaluation (case study research) Project review & dissemination of results (feedback to course team; dissemination via lunchtime 'show & tell' meetings, internal conference, departmental teaching committees) Delivery (staff / student support)

Rationale for case study research evaluation  Interpretive research agenda: focusing on student perceptions of their learning experience  Experiences of actors are important, the context of action is critical  Holistic & multi-dimensional picture of a real life context “to understand phenomena through accessing the meanings participants assign to them” (Orlikowski & Baroudi, 1991)

Key research questions  What are the students’ affective and attitudinal responses to the blended course experience?  How are the e-learning tools used by students to support their learning in formal/informal study activities?  How did the lecturer/tutor perceive students’ learning relative to previous performance? (What actions to be taken for future course development?)

Data collection methods (Informal progress checks) Entry survey Staff interview Focus group interviews Exit survey Activity logs

Case study template  Case Study Overview –Background –Description of approach –Learning activities & tools –Student profile –Experience with computers –Experience with computers for learning –Expectations towards the VLE –Outcomes of the pilot –Activity statistics –Focus group feedback –Exit survey feedback –Instructor and tutors’ feedback –Student skills required & developed –Staff skills required & developed –Actions for further development

Communicating the research  Target an audience of practitioners: dissemination and application a priority, reinforced in f2f gatherings  Are presented in a ‘ whole course ’ context with course artefacts such as module site and resources available to explore  Inform training activities, informally and formally in a virtuous cycle The case studies:

Impact on organisational learning  Case study research helps us to identify generalisable features of learning experience (adoption trends; characteristics of the student population)  Lessons learned contribute to evolving framework of instructional responsibilities (course design & delivery methods)  Outcomes inform departmental strategy & support activities  Outcomes inform staff training and support services and influence institutional policy (e.g. accessibility training)

DISCUSSION  What are the drivers for e-learning in your institution?  How is e-learning activity managed?  What role does evaluation play in: –informing academic practice on e-learning course design and delivery? –shaping organisational learning on e-learning best practices?

End