Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth Using meaningful evaluation to increase effectiveness of teachers and leaders.
Advertisements

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Public Schools of Robeson County ASW Analysis of Student Work ASW Analysis of Student Work The Standard 6 Process: What Teachers Need to Know Now The Standard.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 August 2014.
LOGO August The Basics What is the Analysis of Student Work (ASW)? ASW is the process North Carolina has decided to implement in order to obtain.
Analysis of Student Work Coordinator and Think Tank Update Broadcast: Wednesday, July 16 1:00 – 3:00 p.m.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Rubric
Educator Effectiveness in Colorado State Policy Framework & Approach October 2014.
NC Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Online Tool 1.
NC Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Online Tool 1.
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Student Impact Rating Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Daviess County Public Schools.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Fall 2012 LEP Coordinator Meeting Helga Fasciano Section Chief, K-12 Programs Federal Update.
Every Student READY. North Carolina Educator Evaluation A process for professional growth.
The North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards (NCPTS) & Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) “ Beginning the School Year” Facilitated by Brian Foster.
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview Jessica Garner Professional Development Lead Region 6
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
N.C. Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Teacher Evaluation Process January 28, 2013.
Setting the Context 10/26/2015 page 1. Getting Students READY The central focus of READY is improving student learning... by enabling and ensuring great.
NC Professional Teaching Standards. North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Common Core State Standards & North Carolina Essential Standards Support for School Executives 1.
Using the Online Evaluation Tool with Fidelity Mary Keel, Ed.D. Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D. Region 2 Professional Development Leads.
2015 NCAAHPERD-SM ASW What We Learned in Year One Today’s ppt is available on the Professional Development page of Healthful Living Wiki at
North Carolina Healthful Living Leaders Webinar May 29, :30 – 4:30 p.m.
Principals and Assistant Principals New to the NCEES Process September 28, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Beaufort County Schools April 19, 2012.
NCEES Train the Trainer September 25, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Analyzing Student Work to Change Teacher Practice.
EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
Welcome to READY Principals Spring 2015 NC Department of Public Instruction Educator Effectiveness Division
[School Name]’s Student Perception Survey Results This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context of your school.
North Carolina Student Growth Portfolio Spring 2013 Pilot Arts Education, Healthful Living, World Languages February 25, 2013.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards These standards serve as the basis for teacher preparation, teacher evaluation, and professional development.
Draft – March Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Using the Snyder Student Rubric Presentation Link:
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Evaluation Summary Sheet
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Effectiveness:
EVAAS EVALUATION EFFECTIVENESS …AND WHAT DOES IT SAY???
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System
NORTH CAROLINA Educator Effectiveness Update to PD Leads
NORTH CAROLINA Educator Effectiveness Update
Setting the Context As teachers prepare to administer the Measures of Student Learning, it is helpful to have some context about the assessments and how.
Update on Educator Effectiveness August 2012
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
Measures of Student Learning
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
What Teachers Need to Know Now
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students

Overview The central focus of READY is improving student learning... by enabling and ensuring great teaching. 7/1/2016 page 2

What is our goal? Student Readiness Achievement and growth for all students Great Teachers and Leaders An effective teacher in every classroom and leader in every school Before Teaching and Leading Develop effective teachers and leaders in preparation programs During Teaching and Leading Use meaningful evaluation and professional development to increase effectiveness of teachers and leaders 7/1/2016 page 3

Teacher Ratings Categories Teachers Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Contribute to Academic Success 5 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished 3 Rating Categories Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

Online Tool Reports

Available Reports

Overall Observation Report

Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities

Summary Report

Standard 4: Teachers Facilitate Learning for Students

Artifact Report

Rubric Report

Evaluation Comparison Chart

Username: principaldemo9 Password:

Solo Practice Log into the demo site or the live online tools Review the reports What conclusions can you make from the data as it relates to district/school/teacher EVAAS data? Username: principaldemo15 Password:

What do we need? Standard 6 and 8 We need a state-adopted growth model and a fair 6 & 8 rating strategy Status We need an overall method to determine educator effectiveness status Measures of Student Learning (MSLs) For those grades and subjects that are currently non- tested, we need ways to measure growth Observation + Other Measures 7/1/2016 page 16

Standard 6 is a measure of Growth

Teacher Ratings Categories Teachers Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Contribute to Academic Success 5 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished 3 Rating Categories Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

Key Notes

Ratings Teachers Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Contribute to Academic Success 5 Rating Categories3 Ratings Categories Why the difference? Identifying only three rating categories on standard 6 & 8 improves certainty of categorization.

What is the difference between ratings and a status?

RatingStatus

Three Years of Data 7/1/2016 page 26 Any three years of data attributable to a teacher or principal will be combined and used: Any grades Any subjects Any schools Any districts The three years of data do not start until they are specific to that teacher and his or her students

Status The Three Status Categories are 1.In Need of Improvement 2.Effective 3.Highly Effective 7/1/2016 page 27

Teacher Status In Need of Improvement Effective Highly Effective Standards 1-5 In the year Standard 6 Three-year rolling average years ago 1 year ago This year ++ / 3 ) ) Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Any rating lower than proficient And/Or Does Not Meet Expected Growth Proficient or Higher on Standards 1-5 And Meets or Exceeds Expected Growth Accomplis hed or Higher on Standards 1-5 And Exceeds Expected Growth

What will teachers see?

Detail on the Sixth Standard Rating

Measures of Student Learning Measures of Student Learning are being designed for non-tested subjects for district use to populated Standard 6 7/1/2016 page 34

NC’s experienced teachers know their students and their content NC teachers are best-qualified to provide input on meaningful assessment of currently non-tested grades and subjects Valid measures of what students know and are able to do will likely exceed traditional multiple- choice assessment Guiding Principles 7/1/2016 page 35

Measures of what students know and are able to do after completing a course or grade Tightly linked to the instruction that a teacher delivers One part of how North Carolina will evaluate the effectiveness of its teachers Similar to the common summative assessments that many districts already have in place What MSLs Are 7/1/2016 page 36

Multiple-choice standardized exams for all areas of the Standard Course of Study Assessments that need to be delivered with the same level of security as EOCs and EOGs Designed without teacher input The only source of data used to make decisions about a teacher’s effectiveness Part of the school accountability model What MSLs Are Not 7/1/2016 page 37