NEPF Evaluation Scoring Guide: TLC Recommendations Nevada State Board of Education Meeting September 3, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. Research and Development The team: Porter, Murphy, Goldring, Elliott, Polikoff, May, OToole, Cravens Wallace Foundation.
Advertisements

Entry to Student Outcomes (ESO). Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS School Leader Effectiveness Evaluation Calculating The Overall Rating Office of Achievement and Accountability.
Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
World’s Largest Educational Community
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
8 Teacher Evaluation Criteria 8 Principal Evaluation Criteria 4-Tiered Rating System E2SSB 6696 (2010) 3 Criteria must include student growth Up to 3.
PUSD Site Administrator Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 23, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Systematic Assessment of Student Achievement February 5, 2007.
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 4 Component Five – Student Improvement.
Proposed Amendments to TEACHNJ Educator Evaluation Regulations August 2014.
Guidance Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation September 13, 2012.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
OverviewOverview Virginia Principal Performance Evaluation System February 2013.
6. Penilaian Kurikulum The Meaning of Evaluation 1.Evaluation is a process or group of processes by which evaluators gather data in order to make decisions.
AET/515 Spanish 101 Instructional Plan SofiaDiaz
Today’s website:
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
Road To Success Florida School Leader Assessment (FSLA)
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Using Data to Make Decisions Regarding Professional and Personalized Learning: WV General Summative Assessment – Part 1 County Chief Instructional Leadership.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Nevada Educator Evaluation Presented by: The Nevada Teachers and Leaders Council.
Educator Evaluation and Development System * Adopted by Middletown Public Schools, iddletown.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
AYP Changes for Percent Meeting Standard Elementary uniform bar (3-5)
Teacher Quality Standards Beginning of The Year Self-Assessment.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21 st Century Ready Administrators Unpacking Teacher Professional Responsibilities Standards.
Summative Jeopardy Summing Up Summative Decision- Making.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Summative Evaluation Configuration Washington Township Public Schools
SELF-ASSESSMENT SURVEY: TRADEWINDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21 st Century Ready Teachers Unpacking Teacher Professional Responsibilities Standards.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.
Student Achievement. AchieveNJ for Teachers Nothing impacts student learning in schools more than teachers. All New Jersey students deserve great teachers,
AchieveNJ: Principal and Assistant/ Vice Principal Evaluation Scoring Guide
AchieveNJ: Principal and Assistant/ Vice Principal Evaluation Scoring Guide
LEADERSHIP I & II SEPTEMBER 2011 Collaborative Planning.
Tuesday, November 27, 2015 Board of Education Meeting District MAP.
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
E VALUATION R ECOMMENDATIONS FOR O THER L ICENSED E DUCATIONAL P ERSONNEL (OLEP)/G ROUP 3 State Board of Education Meeting November 12, 2015.
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated Professional Practices, Measures of Student Learning/ Outcomes- Calculating Scores & Translating SLOs/SOOs.
Washoe County School District Application to use an Alternate Teacher Evaluation System State Board of Education Meeting April 28, 2016.
Teacher Growth and Evaluation Model Teacher Evaluation Work Group Model Feedback and Revision November 27 th, 2012 “Leading for educational excellence.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Nevada Nevada Educator Performance Framework – Other Licensed Personnel Recommendations Dr. Pamela Salazar, Chair, Nevada Teachers and Leaders Council.
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
Non-Educator Merit Pay Plan
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated
بنام خدا مقدم همکاران محترم شرکت کننده در کارگاه آموزشی راهنمایی ونظارت بالینی را خیر مقدم عرض می نماییم.
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
2014/15 Evaluation Summary October 6, 2015 Jordan Harris.
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
Presentation transcript:

NEPF Evaluation Scoring Guide: TLC Recommendations Nevada State Board of Education Meeting September 3, 2015

2 Scoring the Summative Rating Instruction Professional Responsibilities Summative Rating Overall evaluation score All teachers Educational Practice

3 Scoring the Summative Rating Leadership Professional Responsibilities Summative Rating Overall evaluation score All site administrators Educational Practice

4 Summary of Score Range Setting Process TLC: analyzed data from validation study results heard from stakeholders for recommendations based on experiences reviewed other state systems engaged in lengthy analysis and discussion and unanimously recommended the scale below for teachers and administrators: IneffectiveMinimally EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective

5 Summative Rating Example IneffectiveMinimally EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective 1.0 Points 1.91 Points Points Points 4.0 Points 3.63 Example 1: Highly Effective Educator ComponentRaw Ave ScoreWeightWeighted Score Instruction/Leadership Professional Responsibilities Sum of the Weighted Scores3.63

6 Summative Rating Example IneffectiveMinimally EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective 1.0 Points 1.91 Points Points Points 4.0 Points 3.38 ComponentRaw ScoreWeight Weighted Score Instruction/Leadership Professional Responsibilities Sum of the Weighted Scores3.38 Example 2: Effective Educator

7 Summative Rating Example IneffectiveMinimally EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective 1.0 Points 1.91 Points Points Points 4.0 Points 2.58 ComponentRaw ScoreWeight Weighted Score Instruction/Leadership Professional Responsibilities Sum of the Weighted Scores2.58 Example 3: Minimally Effective Educator

8 Summative Rating Example IneffectiveMinimally EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective 1.0 Points 1.91 Points Points Points 4.0 Points 1.82 ComponentRaw ScoreWeight Weighted Score Instruction/Leadership Professional Responsibilities Sum of the Weighted Scores1.82 Example 4: Ineffective Educator

9 Summative Rating TLC Recommendation – Teachers and Administrators Final RatingOverall Score Range Highly Effective 3.6 – 4.0 Effective 2.80 – 3.59 Minimally Effective 1.91 – 2.79 Ineffective 1 – 1.9

10 Scoring the Summative Rating ? Instruction/ Leadership Student Outcomes Professional Responsibilities Summative Rating Overall evaluation score All teachers/admin istrators Educational PracticeStudent Achievement TLC will revisit Summative Rating after Year 1 Implementation