Closing it out TDES PRACTICE YEAR. What will I learn today? Answers to these questions: 1.What’s the status of the new portal? 2.How do I arrive at a.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mentoring New Educators
Advertisements

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
A Roadmap for Professional Development Planning
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson 4c: Communicating with Families 1 6/12/201 3.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 4/14/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
What’s new? What’s accepted? What’s the easiest way to do this? Tutorial created by Devin Arms, 2013.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
PRIDE Professional Rubrics Investing & Developing Educator Excellence
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Parent and Family Presentation Project
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Differentiated Supervision
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation System Natick Public Schools.
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
What Is Evidence? PRESENTED BY SCHAUNA FINDLAY, PH.D.
West Virginia Title I Online Document Storage A work in progress… collection/login.php.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Human Capital Management Office of Human Resources Office of Professional Development & Evaluation.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Getting Engaged in Evaluation: How to Develop an Evidence-based Offense for Your Evaluation Presented by Ellen Holmes, NBCT
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
What is the Educator Development Suite? Provides teachers with the results of classroom observations and student perception surveys Suggests contextualized.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
Marketing UpdateBoard of Directors Meeting – July 2008 Classroom Walkthrough version 3.0 An Introduction to.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Grade 6 Report Cards October Why Standards Based Report Cards  Standards based report cards give a better picture of a student's specific strengths.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
A Support & Supervision Model Joanne Hincks Eileen Paulsen Sharon Rajabi TESL Ontario Conference 2010.
South Dakota’s Teacher Effectiveness Model February 20, 2015 Presented by Dr. Sally Crowser and John Swanson, TIE.
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Professional Learning Teams Cascade High School September 18, 2015.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
KVEC Presents PGES Observation Calibration Are You On Target?
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
TESS & LEADS Implementation Awareness for End-of-Year Success Office of Educator Effectiveness Arkansas Department of Education Spring, 2016.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Refining Student Assessment Effective strategies for assessing student understanding.
Nuts & Bolts Tri 3 AHEP - Getting to the End of the Year!
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
JCC TDES Composite Process JCC TDES Composite Principal schedules self evaluation date and conference date.
1 Innovative Teaching and Learning (ITL) Research Corinne Singleton SRI International.
Cohort Training, Phase II November 29 – 30, 2012.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
TDES: Polishing Practice
The Unannounced observation
Presentation transcript:

Closing it out TDES PRACTICE YEAR

What will I learn today? Answers to these questions: 1.What’s the status of the new portal? 2.How do I arrive at a composite rating? 3.How are we expected to use TDES data from this year? 4.How much evidence is enough? 5.How do you rate artifacts? 6.What will support next year look like?

1. What’s the status of the new portal?

2. How do I arrive at a composite rating ? Attainment, sustainment and trajectory Not an average Teacher takes first pass Evaluator marks areas of agreement Composite conference focuses on remaining components Principal/evaluator has final say

3. How are we expected to use TDES data from this year? Make a spreadsheet of component ratings Identify trends Note “experts” in different components Match teachers to observe each other Offer building level PD on selected components if needed

4. How much evidence is enough? Enough to paint an accurate picture of the component. For artifacts, submit an exemplar: One, excellent sample that is representative Include an annotation for that exemplar

What is distinguished evidence? 4c ProficientDistinguished Teacher communicates frequently with families about the instructional program and conveys information about individual student progress. Teacher makes some attempts to engage families in the instructional program. Information to families is conveyed in a culturally appropriate manner. Teacher’s communication with families is frequent and sensitive to cultural traditions, with students contributing to the communication. Response to family concerns is handled with professional and cultural sensitivity. Teacher’s efforts to engage families in the instructional program are frequent and successful.

Family Communication Log What information would a communication log contain that would cause you to rate it distinguished? Be specific.

Family Communication Log Frequency of communication Nature of student contribution to the communication Family concerns raised Culturally sensitive adaptations Results of communication: successful

Exemplar Annotation, 4c “This is an example of my Family Communication Log. I have one for every month, on file, in my classroom. I highlighted some of the features that match with the distinguished features of 4c. The notes in red are for your convenience.”

5. How do you rate an artifact? Match the traits of the artifact with the traits in the rubric.

How would you rate this log? Refer to the distinguished level of 4c and rate this log. What does this suggest about evidence for other D4 components?

Reflecting on TDES What we did well... What we need to do better...

6. What will support next year look like? Increased academic supervision of progress via the portal Site visits Portal tools for building PD: TDES teams Face-to-face training: TDES teams

Looking Back: at Progress Glows Grows Most buildings completed 5 touches on time Most evidence is really evidence Most teachers understand the TDES process Many teachers report changes in their practice Expertise in rubrics can still grow (teachers/evaluators) Understanding of exemplars can grow Teacher submission of evidence can grow Match between evidence and rubrics can grow

Looking Ahead: at Expectations Portal data must be current DAILY The 10-day window will be strictly monitored: teacher and evaluator The data TDES provides must be USED to provide PD Individual Groups Building Support will continue to keep our rubrics in front of teachers all the time

What will I learn today? Answers to these questions: 1.What’s the status of the new portal? 2.How do I arrive at a composite rating? 3.How are we expected to use TDES data from this year? 4.How much evidence is enough? 5.How do you rate artifacts? 6.What will support next year look like?