PGES Updates Second Read of PGES KBE meeting April 1 st. Link to materials located herehere Highlights of Changes: Section 1(Definitions):

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

The Role of the Principal Going Forward. What Leon School District is Required to Do Florida Department of Educations Supports that might impact you What.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Amendments to TEACHNJ Educator Evaluation Regulations April 2014.
Parkview Elementary Audit findings and responses Dates of Visit: November 4, 5, 6, 2014.
Evaluating School Literacy Programs October 22, 2009 Presented by Pamela Wininger, Reading Consultant Carol Franks, Writing.
District Collaboration Implementation Grant Requirements November 21, 2013.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 9 Competitive.
Reconstitution Planning and Guidance Overview
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
The Nuts and Bolts The Role of the District Professional Development Coordinator Kentucky Department of Education Office of Next Generation Learners Division.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
The 2013 Legislative Session and You – Statute Changes Affecting Schools Iowa Department of Education.
Webcast October 11, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
ISLN Meeting March 10, PPGES Pilot Completion 0 2 nd Site Visit 0 Mid-Year Review 0 Student Growth Goals, 0 Working Condition Goals, 0 Professional.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
0 Module 2.3: Personnel Implications. 1 In this module, we’ll address several key areas. What are the proposed class specifications? How do they compare.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Webcast April 22, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Webcast January 28, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
School Writing Programs Kentucky Department of Education October 2009.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Statewide Systems of Support Oregon School Improvement Facilitators Carol Larson, Willamette ESD Christina Reagle, Oregon Dept. of Education.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Cheryl Simonson, CESA 6 Jacob Hollnagel, DPI. Guiding Successful Implementation of Educator Effectiveness Understand successful educator effectiveness.
March 15, :00pm Daryton A. Ramsey Educator Quality Grant Administrator.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Certified Evaluation Orientation Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System LaRue County.
Module 2: Joint Committee Decisions Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Certified Evaluation Orientation Non-Principal Administrative Certified Staff July 20, 2015 Complete Plan posted on District Website
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
Teacher Observations Summative or Formative? ( Glickman et. al.)
Implementing CIITS: Empowering Kentucky’s Teachers and Leaders for Success.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Educator Effectiveness Liaison Network Informational Webinar October 17, 2014.
Kentucky Department of Education Professional Growth and Effectiveness System PGES Webcast March 18, 2015.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Sustainable Educator Evaluation and Compensation Supported by the Teacher Incentive Fund Improved educator performance = Increased student growth seec.nefec.org.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Certified Evaluation Orientation
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
State Board of Education Progress Update
Presentation transcript:

PGES Updates Second Read of PGES KBE meeting April 1 st. Link to materials located herehere Highlights of Changes: Section 1(Definitions): added “other professionals” removed definition of preschool teachers Removed reference to certified administrators Updated SV Survey definition to address Other Professionals

Section 2: Timeline – OPGES piloted in all districts – OPGES fully implemented in all districts without personnel decisions or accountability – OPGES, certified administrators and teachers in ATCs fully implemented in all districts with personnel decisions and accountability Sections 3 & 4: No changes Section 5: Local Evaluation Procedures & Forms Removed reference to certified administrator All components of the system may be documented in the system except summative rating shall be documented in the system Allow districts to reduce the minimum number observations of a teacher or other professional evaluatee during the summative cycle for those who do not report for work for 60 or more consecutive days. Require districts to include plan for reduction in their Certified Evaluation Plan.

PGES Updates Added the clarifying statement that certified administrators, principals and assistant principals must have the evaluation criteria and process explained to them within the first thirty (30) days of reporting for employment. Section 6: minor wording changes Section 7: Prof. Practice Rating & Student Growth Rating for Teachers & Other Professionals Added clarity around the Professional Practice decision rules serving as the minimum Sections 8 & 9: No changes Section 10: Professional Practice Rating & Overall Student Growth Rating for Principals & Assistants. Added clarity around the Professional Practice decision rules serving as the minimum Sections 11 & 12: No changes Section 13: Evaluation of Certified Administrators at district level New section 13 outlines minimum requirements for evaluation Sections 14-19: Added word “system” for clarity in section 16, line 13

Empowering Effective Educators Grant (E3) Application deadline was 4 p.m. Awards are for the ‘15-’16 year. Purpose: To provide schools with funs to design & implement teacher leadership plan and promote use of highly effective teachers in leadership roles based on school needs. Activities: Use funds to learn about and plan for the implementation of a sustainable and integrated initiative for teachers to understand and take advantage of teacher leader roles Implement new or enhance existing teacher leadership opportunities Work collaboratively with KDE, ESPB, and KEA to learn about effective teacher leadership initiatives, and to develop a plan for implementation that will be enacted during the school year; Collaborate with other participating schools to develop a community of practice for supporting teacher leaders. Share the process of learning about and building teacher leaders, and serve as a spokesperson and model for other schools, districts, and partner agencies.