Introduction to China-ADS and the driver accelerator Jingyu Tang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS Beijing, China CEA-Saclay Seminar, March 29, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final Design of a CW Radio-Frequency Quadrupole (RFQ) for the Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE)* Abstract: The Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE)
Advertisements

ESS End-to-End Optics and Layout Integration Håkan Danared European Spallation Source Catania, 6 July 2011.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
Is an RFQ a good candidate for a next- generation underground accelerator? Underground Accelerator for Nuclear Astrophysics Workshop October 27-28, 2003.
Introduction to the China-ADS project and accelerator design Jingyu Tang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS Beijing, China FNAL Seminar, August 18,
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
LINAC4 STATUS Alessandra M. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 1.Motivation and goals 2.Status of Linac4 2 years after official start of the project ( )
Beam tolerance to RF faults & consequences on RF specifications Frédéric Bouly MAX 1 st Design Review WP1 - Task 1.2 Bruxelles, Belgium Monday, 12 th November.
FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Activities of Superconducting RF Accelerators at Nanjing University Sun An Proton Linear Accelerator Institute Institute of Energy Sciences, Nanjing University.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
CAS, BilbaoMueller, Ugena, Velez, Zerlauth May 31 st v0 SCC – Industrial ADS.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
June 23, 2005R. Garoby Introduction SPL+PDAC example Elements of comparison Linacs / Synchrotrons LINAC-BASED PROTON DRIVER.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
J. Alessi RF Structures EBIS Project Technical Review 1/27/05 RF Structures J. Alessi Some general thoughts on what our approach will be.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE) Sergei Nagaitsev Dec 19, 2011.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
FNAL 8 GeV SC linac / HINS Beam Dynamics Jean-Paul Carneiro FNAL Accelerator Physics Center Peter N. Ostroumov, Brahim Mustapha ANL March 13 th, 2009.
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
Overview and Status of the Fermilab High Intensity Neutrino Source R&D Program Giorgio Apollinari for Bob Webber.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
Copyright © 2015 SCKCEN ADS accelerator developments presently on-going for MYRRHA and possibly for the Chinese-ADS Dirk Vandeplassche 1 Eucard-2 — APAE.
Comparison of Fermilab Proton Driver to Suggested Energy Amplifier Linac Bob Webber April 13, 2007.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
The International Workshop on Thin Films. Padova 9-12 Oct of slides Present Status of the World- wide Fusion Programme and possible applications.
Concept Preliminary Estimations A. Kolomiets Charge to mass ratio1/61/8 Input energy (MeV/u) Output energy (MeV/u)2.5(3.5) Beam.
THE LINAC4 RFQ – Experience with Design, Fabrication and Tuning C. Rossi and the RFQ Project Team GSI Review – 20 November 2013.
A.Saini, K.Ranjan, N.Solyak, S.Mishra, V.Yakovlev on the behalf of our team Feb. 8, 2011 Study of failure effects of elements in beam transport line &
HISTORY OF SNS DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY CHOICES PROJECT X WORKSHOP NOVEMBER 12-13, 2007 R. KUSTOM.
Introduction to the effort on C-ADS accelerator physics and review charges Jingyu Tang For the Joint IHEP-IMP group on the C-ADS Accelerator Physics International.
Using step-like nonlinear magnets for beam uniformization at target in high intensity accelerarors Zheng Yang, Jing-Yu Tang, IHEP, China P.A. Phi Nghiem,
CW Linac Lattice August, 29 N.Solyak, B.Shteynas.
M. Munoz April 2, 2014 Beam Commissioning at ESS.
1 Superconducting linac design & associated MEBT Jean-Luc BIARROTTE CNRS-IN2P3 / IPN Orsay, France J-Luc Biarrotte, 1st Myrrha design review, Brussels,
Welcome to the RFQ Meeting
General Design of C-ADS Accelerator Physics
Physics design on the main linac
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Emanuele (ESS), Alessandro (CERN), Mikel (Tekniker), Hayley (ISIS)
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Challenges and Perspectives of Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS)
Part2: Cavities and Structures
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS
Beam operation status in C-ADS cryomodule at IMP/IHEP
EffiCAS Efficient Facility for Ions at CAS
CEPC RF Power Sources System
ADS Accelerator Program in China
Electron Source Configuration
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Considerations on Beam Diagnostics Physics
Part2: Cavities and Structures
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
Status of the JLEIC Injector Linac Design
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to China-ADS and the driver accelerator Jingyu Tang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS Beijing, China CEA-Saclay Seminar, March 29, 2012

2 Contents  Some information about Chinese nuclear power development  Roadmap of the C-ADS program  Organization of the C-ADS project phase I  Design considerations for the C-ADS accelerator  Key technology R&D on the C-ADS accelerator

Nuclear Power in China In 2010: Operating reactors : GW e /13 sets Constructing reactors : GW e /23 sets Prepare to construct : GW e /39 sets Propose to construct : GW e /120 sets GWe ( 5% total electricity ) GWe ( 10% total electricity ) GWe ( 22% total electricity ) May be more than total nuclear power in the world right now ! Probably too ambitious and affected by Fukushima nuclear accident

4 Nuclear waste accumulated by 2050 in China Year Power (GW) Spent fuel (t)7200>50000 Minor actinides (t)4>30 Long live fission products (t) 17>120

5 – The strategy of sustainable fission energy in China consoled by top Chinese scientists:  Gen-IV reactors for nuclear fuel breeding  ADS for transmutation – Nuclear waste is a bottleneck for nuclear power development. – ADS has been recognized as a good option for nuclear waste transmutation. As a long-term program, ADS and TMSR (Thorium-based Melten Salt Reactor) R&Ds will be supported by CAS. Budgets for C-ADS and TMSR (both Phase 1) have been allocated by the central government. Advanced Nuclear Energy Programs in China

Special Nuclear Energy Program in CAS TMSR - Diversify nuclear fuel resource (Thorium is richer than uranium and more dispersed on the earth, less waste etc.) ADS - Transmutation of long-lived nuclear waste ~2032, - Demo facilities for industrial applications

7 Schematic of C-ADS Proton Neutron Proton Linear Accelerator (IHEP, IMP) Liquid-metal Target (IMP) Reactor (PbBi coolant ) (IPP, USTC)

Roadmap of C-ADS program

9 R&D Team & Sites for C-ADS  Team CAS: IHEP, IMP, IPP, USTC, … 3 NP Com. + Univ. Local government cooperation International collaboration  Host of the future facility A new CAS institute will be established to host the C-ADS facility – Site candidate: Erdos (Inner Mongolia)  R&D infrastructure – Labs and infrastructure at the home institutes before the new institute is ready

Organization of C-ADS Phases I Three major systems – Accelerator: IHEP as leader, responsible for Injector Scheme-I R&D and the main linac IMP as collaborator, responsible for Injector Scheme-II R&D Joint IHEP-IMP group on accelerator physics – Target: IMP as leader – Reactor: IPP (Institute of Plasma Physics, as leader) and USTC (University of Science and Technology of China)

Infrastructure (to be built in leading institutes) – Superconducting RF test platform – Radio-chemistry study platform – Pb-Bi core simulation and mock-up platform – Nuclear database – Integrated test and general technical support platform

Main specifications of the C-ADS driver linac ParticleProton Energy1.5GeV Current10mA Beam power15MW Frequency162.5/325/650MHz Duty factor100% Beam loss<1 (or 0.3)W/m Beam trips /year <25000 <2500 <25 1s<t<10s 10s<t<5m t>5m

Design philosophy Accelerator choice: superconducting linac is preferred (only RFQ is room-temperature). – Straight trajectory: easy extraction and injection. – Easy upgrading: long term project by steps – Large aperture: low beam loss – Low power consumption: reducing RF cost and easing cooling problems. – Independently powered structures: increasing availability. To meet the very strict reliability requirement – De-rating of critical components (over-design). – Component redundancy and spares on line. – Component failure tolerance.

Lattice design requirements Zero current phase advance per cell should be kept below 90 o for both transverse and longitudinal to avoid parametric resonance. Transverse and longitudinal focusing must change adiabatically. Avoid energy exchange between the transverse and longitudinal planes via space-charge resonances. Provide proper matching in the lattice transitions to avoid serious halo formation.  Low longitudinal emittance at RFQ exit: favored to obtain higher acceleration when keeping acceptance to emittance ratio

Layout of the C-ADS linac Main linac ‘ Hot stand-by ’ Local compensation Two identical injectors on line, either with scheme injector-1 or with scheme injector-2

RF cavities RF cavities based on Injector Scheme-I – RFQ frequency: 325 MHz – Single-cell spoke cavities (three types: one in injector, two in main linac) – RFQ output energy: 3.2 MeV, trade-off between RFQ and low- beta spoke cavities – After about 150 MeV, two 5-cell elliptical cavities (650 MHz) to reach 1.5 GeV RF cavities in Injector Scheme-II – RFQ frequency: MHz – HWR cavities to reach 10 MeV – RFQ output energy: 2.1 MeV, reducing radiation and RFQ requirement (length and vane voltage)

Merits for Injector-I – Better for main linac, only one time frequency jump – Half bunch charge compared with Injector-II – Consistent to spoke cavities in the main linac Merits for Injector-II – RFQ looks easier to success, lower heat deposit density – HWR is more mature than Spoke cavities, more collaboration chance with the international community – More efficient in low-beta acceleration

Low-beta acceleration: very difficult – Low-beta SC spoke cavities: no experience – Large phase advance per cell: low acceleration rate, sensitive to errors – Separation space between cryomodules: periodicity broken, resulting in emittance growth (long uninterrupted cryostat preferred for lowest-energy part)

The RFQs RFQs are the only accelerating components in room- temperature – It is very difficult to develop a CW proton RFQ due to very large heat load density – Four-rod structure – Different choice on RF frequency: or 325 MHz Design constraints from the previous RFQ experience at IHEP: – Section length: <1.2 – Number of sections: <4

ParametersValue Frequency (MHz)325 Injection energy (keV)35 Output energy (MeV) Pulsed beam current (mA)15 Beam duty factor100% Inter-vane voltage V (kV)55 Beam transmission98.7% Average bore radius r 0 /Vane tip curv. (mm)2.775 /2.775 Maximum surface field (MV/m)28.88 (1.62Kilp.) Cavity power dissipation (kW) [1.4* Psuperfish] Total power (kW) Avg. Copper power/Length (kW/m)41.68 Avg. Copper power/Area (W/cm 2 )3.25 Max. copper power/Area (W/cm 2 )3.77 Input norm. rms emittance(x,y,z)(πmm.mrad)0.2/0.2/0 Output norm. rms emittance(x/y/z) (πmm.mrad/MeV-deg) 0.2/0.2/ Vane length (cm) Gap (entrance/exit) (cm)1.10 / 1.10 Accelerator length (cm) Main design parameters for RFQ-I

Water cooling Tuning

MEBT2 Design Two injectors: one on-line, one hot-spare – Both longitudinal and transverse collimation needed – Achromatic to control emittance growth and beam jitter – Longitudinal matching difficult, cavity within the bending section makes dispersion matching much complicated, together with space charge effect.

Main linac design General design aspects – Derated performance for the nominal setting (local compensation) – Warm transitions between cryomodules – SC solenoids in spoke sections – Warm quadrupole triplets in elliptical sections – Keep phase advance per cell between 20  and 90  – Working point (Qx/Qy) resonant-free region (Hofmann chart) – Acceptance to emittance (6D water-bag) ratio: >10

Cavity type gg Freq.Uacc. MaxEmaxBmax MHzMVMV/mmT Single spoke / /58.2 Single spoke / / cell elliptical / / cell elliptical / /78.5 Specifications for SC cavities in main linac

Two spoke sections (Spoke021 and Spoke040) to cover energy from 10 MeV to MeV – Transverse lattice: RSR (Spoke021), RRSRR (Spoke040)

Two elliptical cavity sections (Ellip063 and Ellip082) to cover energy from MeV to 1.5 GeV – Transverse lattice: RRRRT (Ellip063), RRRRT (Ellip082)

Simulation results

RMS envelope along the main linac

Local compensation Beam trips are very critical in ADS system. Short beam trips less than 1 s are almost tolerated, but longer beam trips should be controlled very strictly. A very important measure to deal with beam trips due to component failures such RF cavities (different causes) and focusing elements, is “local compensation method” – Fast diagnosis of component failures, switch off beam – Detuning the failed cavity – Finding the compensation setting stored in database – Assign the data setting to relevant devices, switch on beam

Local compensation – Allowing fast setting (a few devices involved), and multiple local compensations along the linac – Spoke cavity failure is compensated by 4 neighbor cavities and 4 solenoids – Solenoid failure is compensated also by 4 neighbor cavities and 4 solenoids – Elliptical cavity failure is easier to be compensated due to its weak focusing effect – Quadrupole failure within a triplet is mainly compensated by the remaining two (doublet).

Beam loss control With a beam power of 15 MW, beam loss should be controlled very strictly, or 1 W/m in RT devices or 0.3 W/m in cryomodules – All the mechanisms leading to beam losses should be studied very carefully: 10^8 particles for simulations of halo particles – Minimize emittance growth (halo) – Effective orbit correction – Collimation at low energy – No beam loss in cryomodules

5/10 MeV Test Stand for Injector-I A 5-MeV test stand for Injector-I is to be built at IHEP, which can be extended to 10 MeV with an additional cryostat. With the nominal cavity settings, it can accelerate the beam to 5.38 MeV with 6 cavities. With reduced cavity performance or even one cavity less, one can still obtain the output energy of 5 MeV by large synchronous phases (smaller -  s) with the tolerance of larger emittance growth. The beam line to the beam dump takes the same design in MEBT2.

33 Key technology R&D for C-ADS linac  Strategy  Parallel developments of different schemes or technical solutions for the injector (IHEP and IMP)  Development by steps (Phase I, II, III)  Some key technology R&D  Ion Source: stable operation  CW RFQ: cooling problem  SC Spoke cavities: development, unproven performance  High power couplers: especially for CW RFQ  Cryomodule: long cryomodule with many cavities and solenoids  RF power source (CW Klystron, CW SSA, LLRF)  Control & Instrumentation  …

34 R&D studies (Phase I) The budget has been approved (1.8 BCHY or 280 M$ in total) – Accelerator: 640 MCHY (425 M for IHEP and 215 M for IMP) – Physics design and technical designs – Developing CW RFQ, SC cavity prototypes (spoke, HWR and CH) for the injectors – CW test of first 5 MeV of two injectors – Infrastructure or laboratory building-up – Two different injectors testing with CW, 10-MeV and 10-mA – Construction of main linac section (10-50 MeV) – CW test of the 50-MeV linac

H + 、 H 2 + & H 3 + Beam profile Some R&D work already carried out 35 Ion Source: ECR & LEBT (IMP)

High-duty factor RFQ (IHEP) A 3.5 MeV - 40 mA RFQ of 7-15% duty factor (supported by “973” program) was constructed and commissioned at IHEP, one of the most powerful RFQs under operation condition. 973 RFQADS RFQ Frequency352MHz325MHz Energy3.5MeV3MeV Duty Factor~15%CW OperatingShort timeLong time 36

High power input couplers (IHEP) 37 ≥400kW (Supported by the BEPC SC cavity development program)

38 Cryomodules (IHEP) 38 Cryomodule named PXFEL1 was passed the cryogenic test at DESY in July Contract for delivering 50 for EXFEL Cryomodule for BEPCII 500MHz SC Cavity

Control & Instrumentation (IHEP) Controls : – Digitalized control system has been developed for the CSNS project, and can be used in the C-ADS – EPICS, XAL etc. developed with the CSNS project (BEPCII) Instrumentation – Many beam diagnostic devices have been developed or are under development under the “973” program and the CSNS project. They can be used in the C-ADS, such as BLM (including ion chamber, FBLM), BPM, BCT, Wire Scanner, double-slit emittance measurement system. 39

Summary Sustainable nuclear energy has high priority in China. The C-ADS program has been officially started under the coordination of CAS, and is led by three CAS institutes. The R&D phase for the driver linac is to build a SC linac with a CW beam of 50-MeV and 10-mA, and relevant infrastructure. It is a great challenge to build a high-performance CW proton linac. Strong collaboration with international leading laboratories is very important. This is not only an important step towards the ADS but also a contribution to the accelerator community. 40

Thanks for your attention ! 41