Mark Wheeldon, Formedix CDISC UK Network June 7, 2016 PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF DEFINE.XML.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dimitri Kutsenko (Entimo AG)
Advertisements

CDISC Open Source and low-cost Solutions
CDASH Initiative: Status Update
Experience and process for collaborating with an outsource company to create the define file. Ganesh Sankaran TAKE Solutions.
A Coherent and Practical End-to-End Metadata Strategy using Existing Standards and Tools for Clinical Research Stephane AUGER Danone Research, FRANCE.
Managing and Analyzing Clinical Data
What’s New with CDISC Wayne R. Kubick CDISC CTO.
Quick tour of CDISC’s ADaM standard
Robust approach to create Define.xml v2.0
Cross Check between Define.xml and blankcrf.pdf
CDISC (CDASH/SDTM) integration into OC/RDC
© 2008 Octagon Research Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 PhUSE 2010 Berlin * Accessing the metadata from the define.xml using XSLT transformations.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Define.xml - Tips and Techniques for Creating CRT - DDS Julie Maddox Mark Lambrecht SAS Institute.
Monika Kawohl Statistical Programming Accovion GmbH Tutorial: define.xml.
Accenture Accelerated R&D Standards Metadata Management – version control and its governance Kevin Lee CDISC NJ Meeting at 01/28/2015 We help our Clients.
Beyond regulatory submission - Standards Metadata Management Kevin Lee CDISC NJ Meeting at 06/17/2015 We help our Clients deliver better outcomes, so.
23 August 2015Michael Knoessl1 PhUSE 2008 Manchester / Michael Knoessl Implementing CDISC at Boehringer Ingelheim.
PhUSE SDE, 28-May A SAS based Solution for define.xml Monika Kawohl Statistical Programming Accovion.
Qian Zhao, J&J Consumer Companies, Inc. Jun (John) Wang, J&J Consumer China Ltd Ruofei Hao, J&J Consumer Companies, Inc. PharmaSUG 2015 Paper #BB11.
English Speaking User Group The ‘Metadatacentric’ approach – End to End demonstration and discussion Jason Housley Associate Director, Data Management.
Contents Integrating clinical trial data Working with CROs
CDISC Implementation Strategies: Lessons Learned & Future Directions MBC Biostats & Data Management Committee 12 March 2008 Kathleen Greene & A. Brooke.
Vertex and CDISC / MBC / 12March Vertex and CDISC Accomplishments and Strategy 12 March 2008 Lynn Anderson Associate Director Statistical Programming/Biometrics.
© 2008 Octagon Research Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2 Octagon Research Solutions, Inc. Leading the Electronic Transformation of Clinical R&D ©
ODM-SDTM mapping Nicolas de Saint Jorre, XClinical June 20, 2008 French CDISC User Group Bagneux/Paris © CDISC & XClinical, 2008.
Antje Rossmanith, Roche 14th German CDISC User Group, 25-Sep-2012
CDASh : A Primer and Guide to Implementation
1CDISC 2002 RCRIM – Standard Domains Agenda NCI Presentation Standard Domains Working Group Goals Introduction to FDA Information Model (FIM) Discussion:
Overview and feed-back from CDISC European Interchange 2008 (From April 21 st to 25 th, COPENHAGEN) Groupe des Utilisateurs Francophones de CDISC Bagneux.
Confidential - Property of Navitas Accelerate define.xml using defineReady - Saravanan June 17, 2015.
SDTM Validation Delaware Valley CDISC user network Ketan Durve Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Reasearch and Development May 11 th 2009.
RCRIM Projects: Protocol Representation and CDISC Message(s) January 2007.
Implementation of CDISC Standards at Nycomed PhUSE, Basel (19-21 October 2009) Nycomed GmbH, Dr. B Traub CDISC Implementation at Nycomed.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Overview of CDISC standards and use cases along the E2E data management process Dr. Philippe Verplancke ESUG Marlow, UK 27 May 2009.
Research based, people driven CDISC ADaM Datasets - from SDTM to submission CDISC Experience Exchange and ADaM Workshop 15 Dec 2008 Zoë Williams, LEO Pharma.
WG4: Standards Implementation Issues with CDISC Data Models Data Guide Subteam Summary of Review of Proposed Templates and Next Steps July 23, 2012.
How to improve quality control in a data conversion process? By extended usage of metadata! Dimitri Kutsenko Entimo AG - Berlin/Germany.
1 © Assero Limited, 2015 CDISC Standards and the Semantic Web Dave Iberson-Hurst 12 th October 2015 PhUSE Annual Conference, Vienna.
Copyright © 2015, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Future Drug Applications with No Tables, Listings and Graphs? PhUSE Annual Conference 2015, Vienna.
Open GSBPM compliant data processing system in Statistics Estonia (VAIS) 2011 MSIS Conference Maia Ennok Head of Data Warehouse Service Data Processing.
Data Cleaning Using ODM CDISC ESUG Meeting Andrew Newbigging Vice President, Integrations Development 13 th July 2010 Medidata Solutions, Inc. Proprietary.
Emerging Technologies Semantic Web and Data Integration This meeting will start at 5 min past the hour As a reminder, please place your phone on mute unless.
Copyright © 2014, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. SAS® TOOLS FOR WORKING WITH DATASET-XML FILES Lex Jansen Principal Software SAS CDISC.
ICON CD04 - Ensuring Compliant and Consistent Data Mappings for SDTM-based Studies – an ICON Approach Jennie Mc Guirk 11 th October 2011.
April ADaM define.xml - Metadata Design Analysis Results Metadata List of key analyses (as defined in change order) Analysis Results Metadata per.
© CDISC 2015 Paul Houston CDISC Europe Foundation Head of European Operations 1 CTR 2 Protocol Representation Implementation Model Clinical Trial Registration.
Metadata Driven Clinical Data Integration – Integral to Clinical Analytics April 11, 2016 Kalyan Gopalakrishnan, Priya Shetty Intelent Inc. Sudeep Pattnaik,
Generation of real-time SDTM datasets and metadata through a generic SDTM converter mechanism CDISC (CDASH/SDTM) integration into OC/RDC Peter Van Reusel.
Submission Standards: The Big Picture Gary G. Walker Associate Director, Programming Standards, Global Data Solutions, Global Data Management.
End-to-End With Standards – A Regulatory Reviewer’s Perspective
A need for prescriptive define.xml
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Monika Kawohl Statistical Programming Accovion GmbH
Practical Implementation of Define.xml
Experience and process for collaborating with an outsource company to create the define file. Ganesh Sankaran TAKE Solutions.
Accelerate define.xml using defineReady - Saravanan June 17, 2015.
Beyond regulatory submission - Standards Metadata Management Kevin Lee CDISC NJ Meeting at 06/17/2015 We help our Clients deliver better outcomes, so.
Accenture Accelerated R&D Standards Metadata Management – version control and its governance Kevin Lee CDISC NJ Meeting at 01/28/2015 We help our Clients.
Monika Kawohl Statistical Programming Accovion GmbH
MAKE SDTM EASIER START WITH CDASH !
Traceability between SDTM and ADaM converted analysis datasets
Quality Control of SDTM Domain Mappings from Electronic Case Report Forms Noga Meiry Lewin, MS Senior SAS Programmer The Emmes Corporation Target: 38th.
Freundschaft Konferenz
CDISC UK Network Jun-16 – Welwyn
To change this title, go to Notes Master
Visualizing Subject Level Data in Clinical Trial Data
Monika Kawohl Statistical Programming Accovion GmbH
Data Submissions Douglas Warfield, Ph.D. Technical Lead, eData Team
PhilaSUG Spring Meeting June 05, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Mark Wheeldon, Formedix CDISC UK Network June 7, 2016 PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF DEFINE.XML

Introduction What is Define-XML? How can I Produce Define? Your Clinical Trials Automated. Everywhere. Dataset Libraries Stored with Define Streamlining Study Set-up with Define-XML Study Conduct & Analysis Optimized Biggest Change in Define-XML 2.0 Conclusions AGENDA

FORMEDIX INTRODUCTION

WHAT IS DEFINE-XML?

WHAT PEOPLE THINK IT IS

WHAT IS DEFINE-XML? WHAT IT ACTUALLY IS

Study -Name, Description, Link to Annotated CRF, Link to Supplemental Docs etc. Domains -Name, Description, Link to dataset etc. Variables -Name, Label, Data type, Origin, Role, Comment etc. Derivations Controlled Terminology SDTM Concepts -Split Domains, Supplemental Qualifiers, Value Level Metadata DEFINE-XML ALLOWS DESCRIPTION OF…

HOW CAN I PRODUCE DEFINE?

POSTHUMOUS DEFINE CREATION STUDY 3 STUDY 1 STUDY 2 CDISC DEFINE RIPPER CDISC DEFINE RIPPER 68 NEW DRUG APPLICATION (NDA) 68

SDTM Define.xml & ADaM Define.xml submission deliverables Commonest scenario -Piles of SDTM and ADaM Datasets -Define.xml is a “submission afterthought” Define.xml must be -Structurally and content compliant and match the data provided Strategies – specialist define editor, SAS or dataset ripper Dataset ripper & smart validator -Like CD to MP3 -Template driven – any conformant dataset to CDISC define.xml SCALING FOR LEGACY DEFINE.XML CREATION

UTOPIA TEMPLATES DATASET DESIGN TOOL

DEFINE CREATION AND APPROVAL PROCESS PROCESS STEP DELIVERABLES SOFTWARE USED OPTIMIZATION POSSIBILITIES 2345 Approval of Define specification Validate Define Validate SDTM, ADaM, SEND and CT content Automated Comparison and Report Creation Converters Excel to Define SAS to Define Define dataset specification “Gap” report 1 SAS.XPT or Excel source OR Create Define in Authoring tools Dataset design reuse in Define.xml Dedicated Dataset Design Tools Approved Define dataset specification Validation report in Excel format Comparison Tools Validators Define Structure Validators Content, Controlled Terms, SDTM Version, Your Standards Automated validation against Define rules and templates Automated validation against Content rules and templates Automated comparison between Define.xmls and/or between dataset data and Define.xml Validation report in Excel format QC / Validation processes Define.xml and reviewers guides delivered

YOUR CLINICAL TRIALS AUTOMATED. EVERYWHERE.

Libraries and Templates -Re-use of all dataset designs across end-to-end -Proprietary EDC, SDTM, ADaM -Standards Governance -Mappings and Presentation Study Set-up -Protocol to Submission Process -Dataset designs without the ambiguity Study Build -Automated configuration of ETL/data transformations -Automated configuration of EDC exporters YOUR CLINICAL TRIALS AUTOMATED. EVERYWHERE.

Study Conduct and Analysis -Execution of Metadata driven dataset conversions -Automated clinical data repository load -Automated comparison & validation ◦Define structure conformance ◦Content Conformance with External Standards ◦Compare Study vs. Standards ◦Compare “As specified” vs. “As delivered” Submission -Define.pdf and Define.html from Define.xml -TOC, bookmarking and hyperlinks automatically Who said Define was only about Submissions? YOUR CLINICAL TRIALS AUTOMATED. EVERYWHERE.

DATASET LIBRARIES STORED WITH DEFINE

Every dataset design you require -From EDC extract through SDTM to ADaM For SDTM -“Common to All” = SDTM-IG in define -“Therapeutic Specific” = SDTM superset (GOC) -Split domains lead to better metadata management ◦Multiple QS domains with multiple value lists So much more than dataset designs -Mappings -Presentation and named destinations Converters get you there quickly … -Bye Bye Excel … WHAT DOES A DEFINE LIBRARY CONTAIN?

LIBRARIES REDUCE DESIGN EFFORT &TIME

STREAMLINING STUDY SET-UP WITH DEFINE

Protocol Content to CRFs “Common to All” -CDASH Forms and SDTM Implementation Guide (IG) New Content? -Look to General Observation Classes (GOC) -Finding, Intervention or Event? -Gives you Identifier, Topic, Qualifier & Timing variables Create Form -Backfill question text SDTM target -SDTM Annotations and Mappings PROTOCOL TO SUBMISSION DEFINE AS A FORM DESIGNER

Human Readable Specification Been using this way since With CROs, Partners & Clinical Data Warehouses Eliminates ambiguity & variance -Datasets, variables, length, orders -Value lists & supplemental qualifiers -Controlled Terms (NCI and your own) -Variance between versions of SDTM Exploit Define.xml extensions -Reason for variables use, Pseudo-code for mappings User Defined Templates STUDY SET-UP THE EASY WAY WITH DEFINE

MULTIPLE SPECIFICATIONS AUTOGENERATED

LEGACY DATASET CONVERSIONS

Source to Target conversion -Source could be Lab, EDC, ECG and patient diaries -Multiple vendors = multiple output formats/datasets Specification issues -Hard to visualize source, target and mappings -Mappings require specialist knowledge across functional groups -Misunderstandings lead to re-programming= $$$s Conversion coding -Double code in SAS -QC check that same end result has been reached -In multi-study submissions hope some internal standards were used LEGACY DATASET CONVERSION MANUAL AND ERROR PRONE

Domain Mappings -Horizontal to Horizontal -Horizontal to Vertical -Filters -Joins Variable Mappings -Hardcoded strings -Choices – If, Then, Else -Function – concatenate, date conversions -Lookups – search values in other datasets MAPPING TYPES

CRF – SDTM DATA MAPPING HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL USUBJIDTEMPTEMP_UPULSEPULSE_U ° C 82 BPM ° C 79 BPM COLLECTION DB USUBJIDVSTESTCDVSORRESU 1001 TEMP BPM 1001 PULSE VSORRES ° C TEMP BPM 1002 PULSE ° C SDTM DATASET

BIGGEST CHANGE IN DEFINE-XML 2.0

WHAT’S NEW IN DEFINE 2.0

DEFINE-XML 1.0 VS. 2.0 VALUE LIST IMPROVEMENTS VITAL SIGNS DATASET – DEFINE-XML 1.0 USUBJID VSSEQ VSTESTCD VSTEST VSORRES VSORRESU VSSTRESC VSSTRESN VSSTRESU HR TEMP HR TEMP Heart Rate Temperature Heart Rate Temperature BPM F BPM F BPM C BPM C ValueList ‘Parent’ VariableValueList DescribesValues Define-XML 1.0 provides no way to describe ‘VSORRESU’

DEFINE-XML 1.0 VS. 2.0 VALUE LIST IMPROVEMENTS VITAL SIGNS DATASET – DEFINE-XML 2.0 USUBJID VSSEQ VSTESTCD VSTEST VSORRES VSORRESU VSSTRESC VSSTRESN VSSTRESU HR TEMP HR TEMP Heart Rate Temperature Heart Rate Temperature BPM F BPM F BPM C BPM C ValueList 1ValueList 2 Define-XML 2.0 provides ability to define contents of multiple variables. Values

DEFINE-XML 2.0 WHERE CLAUSES AND WHAT THEY MEAN TO YOU

USUBJID VSSEQ VSTESTCD VSTEST VSORRES VSORRESU VSSTRESC VSSTRESN VSSTRESU HR TEMP HR TEMP Heart Rate Temperature Heart Rate Temperature BPM F BPM F BPM C BPM C Define-XML 2.0 allows you to define where each value applies

Vendor Neutral Portable Dataset Libraries -Proprietary, SDTM, ADaM, Other … Auto-generate Study Set-up Specifications Streamline Downstream Data Transformations Machine Validate Study Deliverables/Standards Define-XML 2.0 -Allows Value Level Metadata for all Variables -Is more robust and machine readable -Is more interoperable than ever before Who said Define was only about Submissions? CONCLUSIONS

END-TO-END AUTOMATED PROPRIETARY DEFINE.XML CDISC MODELS OUTPUTS STUDY BUILD MULTI EDC BUILD SOURCE TARGET DATA ACQUISITION DESIGN PROPRIETARY DATASET DESIGN PROP DEFINE.HTML DEFINE.PDF SDTM DATASET DESIGN SDTM DEFINE.XML SDTM DEFINE.HTML DEFINE.PDF STUDY CONDUCT & ANALYSIS STUDY SETUP