Data Quality Investigation LIGO-G030182-00-E John Zweizig Caltech/LIGO Liivingston, March 18, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E3/E4 Line Noise Investigation LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko Soma Mukherjee Bernard Whiting Bob Coldwell August 15, 2001 Outline  LLO line noise (E4.
Advertisements

1 Filters Definition: A filter is a frequency selective system that allows energy at certain frequencies and attenuates the rest.
GWDAW, Dec 2003 Shawhan, Christensen, Gonzalez1 LIGO Inspiral Veto Studies Peter Shawhan (LIGO Lab / Caltech) Nelson Christensen (Carleton College) Gabriela.
G Z 1 Block-Normal, Event Display and Q-scan Based Glitch and Veto Studies Shantanu Desai for Penn. State Burst Group And Glitch Working Group.
LIGO- G Z March 22, 2006March 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 S5 Spectral Line Catalogue Status Keith Thorne (PSU) for the Spectral Line Catalogue.
LIGO-G Z LSC March 2004 KYF1 Veto efficiency study of triple coincidence playground WaveBurst events using WaveMon and glitchMon S2 veto triggers.
LIGO-G Z RayleighMonitor Overview Patrick Sutton and Peter Saulson.
E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.
Noise Floor Non-stationarity Monitor Roberto Grosso*, Soma Mukherjee + + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernburg, Germany Detector.
LIG O HW S Introduction to Bicoherence Monitors: BicoViewer & BicoMon Steve Penn (HWS)
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M DMT Monitors: Beyond the FOM John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LLO August 18, 2006.
Frequency Response of LIGO Interferometers Andrew Weber University of Maryland (no relation) SURF Student Lecture Series Advisor: Andri Gretarsson.
LIGO-G W Summary of S1 at LIGO Hanford Observatory Fred Raab 9 September 02.
Current Noise at LHO Worst wire loss inferred from in situ violin mode measurements:  =
LIGO-G E ITR 2003 DMT Sub-Project John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Argonne, May 10, 2004.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Detector Characterization of GEO 600 during.
Results from TOBAs Results from TOBAs Cross correlation analysis to search for a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background University of Tokyo Ayaka Shoda.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
S4/S5 Calibration The Calibration team G Z.
3 May 2011 VESF DA schoolD. Verkindt 1 Didier Verkindt Virgo-LAPP CNRS - Université de Savoie VESF Data Analysis School Data Quality and vetos.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
LIGO-G Z E7 Correlations Nelson Christensen, Russ Bainer - Carleton College Adrian Ottewill - University College Dublin Steve Penn - Syracuse.
6. Results The accompanying histograms show the empirical PDF of z for each interferometer (H1, H2 at Hanford, WA; L1 at Livingston, LA). The green areas.
1 Data quality and veto studies for the S4 burst search: Where do we stand? Alessandra Di Credico Syracuse University LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor (UM) June.
S2 and S3 Correlation Studies Nelson Christensen Sarah Vigeland Physics and Astronomy Carleton College Detector Characterization Session LSC Meeting August.
Glitch Group S5 Activities Laura Cadonati for the Glitch Working Group LSC meeting, Hanford March 21, 2006 G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detchar Introduction (8/16/06)K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 StrainBandsMon and SixtyHertzMon Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
1 Proposed Control Room Figures of Merit for Pulsar Sensitivity Keith Riles (University of Michigan) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Livingston.
LIGO-G Z Status of MNFTmon Soma Mukherjee +, Roberto Grosso* + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernberg, Germany LSC Detector.
S.Klimenko, LSC March, 2001 Update on Wavelet Compression Presented by S.Klimenko University of Florida l Outline Ø Wavelet compression concept E2 data.
Gabriele Vajente ILIAS WG1 meeting - Frascati Noise Analysis Tools at Virgo.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.
S5 Data Quality John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech. Contents ● Segment Database ● Automatically generated segments ● Other segments ● Segment summary.
Multidimensional classification analysis of kleine Welle triggers in LIGO S5 run Soma Mukherjee for the LSC University of Texas at Brownsville GWDAW12,
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
Results From the Low Threshold, Early S5, All-Sky Burst Search Laura Cadonati for the Burst Group LSC MIT November 5, 2006 G Z.
DAQ Errors John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC Analysis Meeting Tufts June 6, 2004.
S.Klimenko, LSC, Marcht 2005, G Z BurstMon diagnostic of detector noise during S4 run S.Klimenko University of Florida l burstMon FOMs l S4 run.
LIGO-G050197LSC Collab. Mtg, LHO, August 16,20051 S4 Data Quality & S5 Preview John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO Livingston Observatory Commissioning Status and Proposed Commissioning Activities Prior to S1 Mark Coles May 13, 2002.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M DMT Monitor Verification with Simulated Data John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
Calibration/validation of the AS_Q_FAST channels Rick Savage - LHO Stefanos Giampanis – Univ. Rochester ( Daniel Sigg – LHO )
S.Klimenko, LSC March, 2001 Line Noise Investigation l Outline Ø Line Noise Investigation task Ø E2 data, line monitoring Ø Documentation Ø Lines observed.
LIGO-G E Data Simulation for the DMT John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO-G E S2 Data Quality Investigation John Zweizig Caltech/LIGO.
LIGO-G D S2 Glitch Investigation Report Laura Cadonati (MIT) on behalf of the Glitch Investigation Team LSC meeting, August 2003, Hannover.
LIGO-G E Lazzarini - 60Hz CorrelationsLIGO Laboratory at Caltech 1 60 Hz Mains Correlations for the U.S. Power Grids The Aspen Winter Conference.
S.Klimenko, LSC meeting, March 2002 LineMonitor Sergey Klimenko University of Florida Other contributors: E.Daw (LSU), A.Sazonov(UF), J.Zweizig (Caltech)
LIGO-G Z S5 calibration: time dependent coefficients  Myungkee Sung, Gabriela González, Mike Landry, Brian O’Reilly, Xavier Siemens,…
3/21/2007 LIGO-G Z S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session MIT, July 25, 2007.
1 InspiralMon Duncan Brown California Institute of Technology LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G D Glitch Investigation Update Laura Cadonati for the Glitch Investigation Group LSC meeting, Hanford November 12, 2003.
LIGO-G E S2/S3 Data Quality Flagging John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
Inspiral Glitch Veto Studies
Fletcher’s band-widening experiment (1940)
r-statistic performance in S2
Overview of E10 / S3 Hardware Injections
S3 Glitch Updates Laura Cadonati
A map of periodicity orthogonal to frequency representation in the cat auditory cortex.  Gerald Langner, Ben Godde, and Hubert R. Dinse Examples of auditory.
HARMONICS AND FILTERS.
WaveMon and Burst FOMs WaveMon WaveMon FOMs Summary & plans
Results from TOBAs Cross correlation analysis to search for a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background University of Tokyo Ayaka Shoda M. Ando, K. Okada,
Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
S2/S3 Glitch Investigation Update
Line tracking methods used in LineMon
First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1
Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates
John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech
Presentation transcript:

Data Quality Investigation LIGO-G E John Zweizig Caltech/LIGO Liivingston, March 18, 2003

Data Quality Investigation ● Monitor interferometer performance & noise. ● Summarize noise levels, glitch rates, etc. ● Select data quality criteria. ● Generate segments for different running modes

Data Quality Monitoring ● Data quality monitor running online – Narrow (20%) band RMS: 30 bands from 26Hz - 8kHz on channels Xn:LSC-AS_Q, Xn:IOO-MC_F, Xn:LSC- POB_Q and Xn:LSC-REFL_I. – Broad band RMS (10-100Hz, Hz, Hz, 400-1kHz, 1kHz-7kHz) on Xn:LSC-AS_Q only. – Glitch rates (4  6  thresholds, 100Hz & 500Hz high- pass filters) on AS_Q, MC_F, REFL_I, POB_I, POB_Q, DARM_CTRL, MICH_CTRL, PRC_CTRL – Very narrow bands around line features (1 st, 2 nd harmonic of violin modes, BS roll mode, etc).

Data Monitoring (cont'd) ● Generates trends of all calculated values (RMS, glitch rates) ● All quantities served for display by dmtviewer e.g. on Figure-of-Merit displays.

What do the 4  Glitch Rates Mean? Black - Pure Gaussian Red - Gaussian (  =1) + 2*sin(2  100t)

Data Quality Summaries ● 12-hour summaries available from dmtviewer viz Figure of Merit displays ● 3-day summaries at LHO available at

Summary RMS Histogram

Summary RMS Series

Glitch Rate Histogram

Glitch Rate Time-Series H1:LSC-AS_Q 4  100Hz h.p. filter glitch rate

Glitch Rate Summary H1:LSC-POB_I 4  500Hz h.p. filter glitch rate