Community Infrastructure Levy Project Planning and Infrastructure Evidence July 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Quality Plans Gillian Sandilands Director of Quality
Advertisements

Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Building blocks for adopting Performance Budgeting in Canada Bruce Stacey – Executive Director Results Based Management Treasury Board Secretariat, Canada.
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
Infrastructure Planning and Delivery Wealden Pilot Project Charles Lant Chief Executive Project Sponsor.
Savills.com CIL – An Industry View Philip Brown MRTPI Associate Director, Savills 16 October 2012.
Humanitarian Programme Cycle Updates
Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Gwyn Jones City Growth and Development Manager Sustainable Development Panel Briefing 27 July 2011.
A better place Karen Balfour Be Birmingham VCS Matters Summit 23 June 2010.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Pre-Project Planning Lessons from the Construction Industry Institute Construction Industry Institute Michael Davis, P. Eng, PMP Ontario Power Generation.
Monitoring Homelessness Prevention Duncan Gray & Dr. Andrew Waugh
Project Human Resource Management
FY2010 PEMP Notable Outcomes October 15, FRA, LLC Board of Directors 10/15-16/2009 Office of Quality and Best Practices Performance Evaluation Management.
Discussion Document By G How. History LeadershipStructureProcessesInformationEnvironment The path of Shared Services is littered with failed attempts.
Certificate IV in Project Management Introduction to Project Management Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
 Commissioners in Somerset wanted to test whether outcomes based commissioning would lead to better outcomes and greater financial sustainability  External.
Program Review In Student Affairs Office of the Vice President Division of Student Affairs Virginia Tech
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
Bowel Screening Project Overview Rhys Blake Head of Business and Service Development.
TEN-T Experts Briefing, March Annual Call Award Criteria.
June 2012 National Quality Framework Preparing for the assessment and rating visit Podcast Series: 3.
Community Infrastructure Levy Planning Advisory Service Gilian Macinnes October
Technology Transfer Execution Framework. 2 © 2007 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Relationship Between Your EPRI Value and.
Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval.
STEP 4 Manage Delivery. Role of Project Manager At this stage, you as a project manager should clearly understand why you are doing this project. Also.
PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) FRAMEWORK AND GUIDELINES Syed M. Ali Zaidi, P.Eng. PM(Stanford), Ph.D. Director, Strategic Partnerships Alberta Infrastructure.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson MAV Rate Capping Forum 26 November 2015.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
1 Performance Auditing ICAS & IRAS Officers NAAA 21 Jan 2016.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage the IT Portfolio World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 2 Diploma of Project Management.
Projects, Programmes and Best Practice. Geoff Reiss.
Implementing Program Management Standards at Duke Energy.
CIL : The Spending. Background and Context The levy cannot be expected to pay for all of the infrastructure required: – 10-30% – Consider CIL as just.
CIL – a local authority perspective Jeni Jackson, Woking BC.
Community Infrastructure Levy Implementation July 2014.
CIL vs S106 The Regulation 123 list. The levy cannot be expected to pay for all of the infrastructure required: – 10-30% – Consider CIL as just one part.
Community Infrastructure Levy S106 and S278 vs CIL July 2014.
Community Infrastructure Levy – Charging Schedule.
Implementing a CIL in Sheffield - Lessons Learned Richard Holmes Principal Planning Officer Forward and Area Planning Sheffield City Council.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
Neighbourhood Planning Examination and Referendum A Local Planning Authority Perspective 3 rd February 2015.
Community Infrastructure Levy S106 vs CIL July 2014.
Councillor briefing Developer contributions: Community Infrastructure Levy, S106 obligations, viability Date: July 2013www.pas.gov.uk.
Demystifying viability The local authority experience Dominick Mennie, Deputy Team Leader (Plan Making)
No.1 for Service and Value CIL – the experience Martin Howell, Group Planner – Policy & Information, Wandsworth Council
CIL Evidence. The Evidence Primary Evidence 1.Justification of infrastructure requirements 2.Justification of an infrastructure funding gap 3.Technical.
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
2017/18 SIP Request Process September 2016.
Dr Rosemary Foster MRC/NMMU
Program Management Office (PMO)
Public Health England – Our progress under the Sendai Framework
Guidance notes for Project Manager
By Jeff Burklo, Director
WGARM Appraisal Decision Assistance Phase 1, Dec. 2002
Program Management Office (PMO)
Program Management Office (PMO)
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Director Be Birmingham Third Sector Assembly, Annual Conference
Define Your IT Strategy
Director Be Birmingham Third Sector Assembly, Annual Conference
Financial Control Measures
Presentation transcript:

Community Infrastructure Levy Project Planning and Infrastructure Evidence July 2014

Project planning for CIL

What have we learnt so far? 1.You need a senior project sponsor and project manager 2.You need to sell the benefits of CIL 3.Keep focused; a CIL examination remains a relatively narrow affair

Setting the objectives, scope and deliverables Objectives, scope and deliverables Team and resources TimelineBudget objectives, scope and deliverables team and resources timeline budget. What comes first?

Selling CIL Members and executives Regulations and timing Fellow officers Regulations and timing Development market Regulations and timing Likely increase in income Support to strategic planning approach Strategic infrastructure investment to support development Powerful tool to support growth Easier to administerTransparent, upfront cost Community Regulations and timing Community projects and reinvestment Greater involvement in priority setting Regulations and timing

CIL Project Team and Resources Project Sponsorship Project Management Infrastructure planning and funding gap Viability Planning and regulatory compliance Implementation - processes, procedures systems Project Quality Assurance Project structure and components Project direction and assurance

Model Programme

Programme - Building blocks

ACTIONS Collate infrastructure planning and cost evidence Prepare funding schedule Prepare development projections Collate viability evidence Prepare working hypothesis charging schedule Assess evidence gaps Fill gaps Procure external support, if required. DELIVERABLES Infrastructure and funding analysis that demonstrates a funding gap Development projections by usage (and potentially by area) Working hypothesis charging schedule Estimate of CIL income with sensitivity analysis ACTIONS Finalise evidence base Prepare consultation strategy Prepare statement on Installments Finalise preliminary draft charging schedule Undertake consultation for a minimum period of six weeks Analyse consultation responses and, if necessary, refine evidence base and rates. DELIVERABLES Preliminary draft charging schedule Supporting evidence base Consultation report Updated evidence base ACTIONS Prepare draft charging schedule Undertake representation for a minimum six week period Analyse representations s and, if necessary, refine evidence base and rates. Prepare statement of modifications, if required. Prepare information for Examiner DELIVERABLES Draft charging schedule Representation report Statement of modifications (if required) Information for examiner ACTIONS Procure a examiner Issue information to examiner and set examination date Undertake examination Receive and review examiners report Prepare adoption report for Full Council Take report and charging schedule to Full Council and gain approval DELIVERABLES Examination Examiners report Report to Full Council Evidence Base Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule and Consultation Draft Charging Schedule and Representation Examination and adoption Programme – Stages, actions and deliverables

Consultation and representation strategy Two elements: consultation on Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule representation on the Draft Charging Schedule. Our recommendations are: to make the consultation as meaningful and comprehensive as possible whilst containing it within the specified time period and to interested parties; by conducting it in this manner you will draw out and address the significant issues in advance of representation you want the representation to be quick, efficient and contained leading up to the examination.

Typical Project Risks Risks Likelihood of becoming issue Failure at examination due to insufficient evidence baseUnlikely Failure at examination due to unreasonable interpretation of viability evidence Unlikely Failure at examination due to incorrect interpretation or application of the regulations Unlikely Discouraging development through poor engagement or inappropriate rate setting Likely Disruption to project timeline due to poor/ inappropriate engagement with members/ senior managers Highly likely Not having the procedures, processes and systems in place for implementation and collection Highly likely

Five key points on successful CIL project delivery 1.CIL is a good news story; sell the project to make life easier. 2.Proper planning prevents poor performance. 3.Resource it properly with the correct expertise. 4.Know the regulations and guidance; there are no shortcuts. 5.Keep it simple and contained.

Infrastructure Planning

What have we learnt so far? 1.Still relatively minor component of examinations 2.All councils have an infrastructure funding gap 3.Greater emphasis on CIL vs S106 and ‘double dipping’

Infrastructure Funding Gap total cost of infrastructure funding from other sources aggregate funding gap projected CIL Income residual funding gap Projected CIL Income/ CIL Target Other sources Other sources Total Cost of Infrastructure Funding Residual Funding Gap Aggregate Funding Gap Funding

Golden thread Drawn from infrastructure evidence that underpins the plan Total cost of infrastructure for projects that are potential candidates for CIL funding Regulation 123 list Need to understand approach to S106 and S278 Relevant Plan Infrastructure Evidence CIL Infrastructure Evidence Regulation 123 List Funding GapProject List

Waltham Forest Case Study 2 (1) Context Adopted Core Strategy in 2012 CS supported by SIP produced 2009 PDCS consultation based on SIP Council commissioned update to support DCS consultation Considerations Should additional infrastructure planning be undertaken for CIL? How to align plan making process to delivery?

Waltham Forest Case Study 2 (2) Approach additional infrastructure planning undertaken in 2013 to align IDP to spending priorities work undertaken during a 12-week intense period. update to viability work undertaken concurrently Outcomes Updated IDP that can inform capital programme Successful CIL examination in spring 2014.

Approach by Councils

Feedback from examinations Relatively minor part of CIL examinations to date (2-3 paragraphs in the examiners report) Most authorities undertook additional bespoke infrastructure planning for CIL.

Infrastructure Evidence - Questions 1.Have you identified the total cost of infrastructure they wish to fund wholly or partly through the levy? (para.2:2:2:1) 2.In identifying your CIL target, have you considered what additional infrastructure is needed in your area to support development and what other funding sources are available? (para.2:2:2:1) 3.Is your information on infrastructure need directly related to the infrastructure assessment that underpins your plan (para.2:2:2:1)?

Questions