Straw Tracker Crystal Calorimeter Stopping Target Robert K. Kutschke [1], Fermilab The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab is in the midst of its R&D and approval.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
Advertisements

Soudan 2 Peter Litchfield University of Minnesota For the Soudan 2 collaboration Argonne-Minnesota-Oxford-RAL-Tufts-Western Washington  Analysis of all.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
Measurement of lifetime for muons captured inside nuclei Advisors: Tsung-Lung Li Wen-Chen Chang Student: Shiuan-Hal Shiu 2007/06/27.
03 Aug NP041 KOPIO Experiment Measurement of K L    Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO collaborations Contents Physics Motivation.
Report from Low Background Experiments Geant4 Collaboration Workshop 10 September 2012 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
Progress on the final TWIST measurement of James Bueno, University of British Columbia and TRIUMF on behalf of the Triumf Weak Interaction Symmetry Test.
The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET) Experiment
14 User Documents and Examples I SLAC Geant4 Tutorial 3 November 2009 Dennis Wright Geant4 V9.2.p02.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
14 Overview of Geant4 Examples 2 nd Finnish Geant4 Workshop 6-7 June 2005 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
17-19 Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan 2007 Geant4 Japan.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
14 Overview of Geant4 Examples Geant4 Tutorial 8-10 March 2004 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
Measurement of through-going particle momentum by means of Multiple Scattering with the T600 TPC Talk given by Antonio Jesús Melgarejo (Universidad de.
Ivan Logashenko for Mu2e Collaboration
 A GEANT4-based simulation was performed of the production target, solenoid, selection channel, and spectrometer.  The acceptance was found to be 8.3x10.
The Mu2e experiment Zhengyun You University of California, Irvine (for the Mu2e Collaboration) 08/21/2013.
User Documents and Examples I Sébastien Incerti Slides thanks to Dennis Wrigth, SLAC.
1 Muon Physics Project X Workshop Fermilab 17 November 2007.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
Mu2e Experiment and Issues Rick Coleman, Fermilab RESMM’12, February 2012.
Project Overview Ron Ray Mu2e Project Manager Fermilab Sept. 26, 2008 Preliminary Director’s Review of mu2e Fermilab.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 1 The CMS Simulation Validation Suite V. Daniel Elvira (Fermilab) for the CMS Collaboration.
Detector Simulation Presentation # 3 Nafisa Tasneem CHEP,KNU  How to do HEP experiment  What is detector simulation?
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
Μ→e search using pulsed muon beam μ -  e - νν nuclear muon capture Muon Decay In Orbit  π - +(A,Z)→(A,Z-1)*, (A,Z-1)* →γ+(A,Z-1), γ→e + e - Prompt.
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
Dual Target Design for CLAS12 Omair Alam and Gerard Gilfoyle Department of Physics, University of Richmond Introduction One of the fundamental goals of.
COMET and DeeMe. Mu-e conversion search at J-PARC COMET Target sensitivity 10 C.L. using aluminum target – SINDRUM II 7x – MEG 2.4x
COMET. μ-e conversion search from muonic aluminium J-PARC pulsed proton beam to produce pulsed muon beam Forbidden in the Standard Model  clue to the.
Giovanni Onorato Fermilab University of Rome “Guglielmo Marconi” INFN Lecce Mu2e general presentation.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
1 Beam Extinction and Monitoring at the Upcoming Mu2e Experiment Ryan J. Hooper on behalf of the Mu2e Collaboration DPF 2015 August 5th, 2015.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Tracking in a TPC D. Karlen / U. Victoria & TRIUMF for the LCTPC collaboration.
 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.
COMET μ-e conversion search at J-PARC. μ-e conversion physics SUSY-GUT, SUSY-seesaw (Gauge Mediated process) – BR = = BR(μ→eγ) × O(α) – τ→lγ SUSY-seesaw.
Mu to e Meeting BNL, June 2006 Extinction requirement relaxation (Kevin O’Sullivan) Stopping Target Geometry (Cenap Ozben, David Morse) Yannis Semertzidis.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
The physics of Mu2e Bertrand Echenard California Institute of Technology Mu2e computing review doc-db XXXXX.
Mu2e Mu2e Backgrounds and Computing Robert Bernstein 5 March 2015 Mu2e-docdb 5223.
The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab Jim Miller Boston University for the Mu2e Collaboration.
Event Mixing Rob Kutschke, Fermilab Software and Simulation Meeting October 5, 2011 Mu2e-doc-1874-v1.
The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab: Giovanni Onorato, Fermilab - INFN Lecce – Universita’ G. Marconi Mu2e Member Institutions: Boston University; Brookhaven.
The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab Finding a needle in a trillion haystacks Bertrand Echenard California Institute of Technology APS Meeting – April 2013.
The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab: Robert K. Kutschke, Fermilab Within the Standard Model, muons decay in a way that almost perfectly conserves lepton family.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
The Mu2e Experiment A search for charged lepton flavor violation at FNAL For the Mu2e Collaboration Kevin Lynch Boston University 2010 Fermilab Users'
Alex Howard, Imperial College Slide 1 July 2 nd 2001 Underground Project UNDERGROUND PROJECT – Overview and Goals Alex Howard Imperial College, London.
A New Sensitive Search for Muon to Electron Conversion Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab Mu2e Collaboration: Boston U, BNL, UC Berkeley & LBNL, UC Irvine, CUNY,
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
The COBRA Experiment: Future Prospects
Mu2e : 10 Minutes in Questions
The Transition Radiation Detector for the PAMELA Experiment
Search for CLFV at COMET experiment muon to electron conversion
Muon stopping target optimization
The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
User Documents and Examples I
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
What is μ-e Conversion ? μ μ-+(A,Z)→e-+(A,Z) muon decay in orbit
Background Simulations at Fermilab
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Presentation transcript:

Straw Tracker Crystal Calorimeter Stopping Target Robert K. Kutschke [1], Fermilab The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab is in the midst of its R&D and approval processes. To aid and inform this process, a small team has developed an end-to-end Geant4-based simulation package and has developed reconstruction code that is now at the stage of an advanced prototype. Having these tools available at an early stage allows design options and tradeoffs to be studied using high level physics quantities. A key to the success of this effort has been, as much as possible, to acquire software and customize it, rather than to build it from scratch in-house. Summary and Conclusions Introduction The Experiment Within the Standard Model, muon decays to final states that violate lepton family number (LFN) are too rare to be observed. Therefore any observation of an LFN violating muon decay is direct evidence for physics beyond the Standard Model. One such decay mode may occur when a negative muon is bound to an atomic nucleus, forming a muonic atom: coherent, neutrino- less muon to electron conversion in the Coulomb field of a nucleus. The final state is a mono-energetic electron plus an unobserved, recoiling, intact nucleus; all background processes produce electrons with a continuous energy spectrum. The Mu2e experiment will form muonic Aluminum, measure the energy spectrum of electtrons from its decay and ask if an excess is observed at the conversion energy, about 105 MeV. The above figure shows Mu2e apparatus. An 8 GeV proton beam enters from the right and strikes a production target, producing pions that decay to muons. A system of of three graded-field solenoids captures the backwards going muons and directs them onto a stopping target, a set of thin Al foils. Most muons range out in these foils and are captured to form muonic atoms. Electrons from the decay of the muonic atoms are directed by a graded magnetic field onto a tracking system and an electromagnetic calorimeter. Not shown are a system to monitor the extinction of the proton beam, a cosmic ray veto system and a system to measure the muonic X-ray spectrum from the stopping targets. The Software Tools A layer on top of GEANT4; hides most G4 complexity from end users Easy-to-learn language for geometry and run-time configuration Output: ROOT ntuples and text files Vital for a fast turn around for early designs of the muon beamline. Not sufficiently powerful for design of the detector and the extinction monitor, or for advanced studies of the muon beamline. G4beamline MARS Low energy neutrons critical for Mu2e: use MARS+MCNP Mu2e pioneered running MARS+MCNP on the grid Study heat and radiation load at the cryogenic solenoids, neutron sky- shine, and neutron fluxes throughout the detector. Critical calculations will be done with both MARS and GEANT4. FastSim A surface based, fast, parameterized simulation and track fitting package. Pedigree: BaBar and SuperB. Mu2e improved treatment of very thin materials and improved navigation for curling tracks. Fast turn-around studies of: acceptance and resolution for variants of tracking system, optimal size and dimensions of the calorimeter, tolerance of tracker momentum resolution to B-field misalignment. Mu2e Offline The workhorse for detector simulations and advanced beamline studies. Taking over from G4beamline for routine beamline studies. Calibration, reconstruction and analysis will be done in his environment. Goal: use this software everywhere from the lowest level non-real-time layer in the trigger/DAQ, through calibration and reconstruction to final analyses. Acquired infrastructure software supported by Fermilab Computing Division (CD): the art framework, which drives the event loop; an event- data model, including persistency; run-time configuration; message logging; maintenance of random number engine state; management of singleton-like entities used for geometry and conditions data These tools are an evolution, starting from CMSSW. See talk for abstract 354 by Chris Green in “Event Processing (track 2)”, Monday afternoon. Acquired the battle-tested BaBar track fit code (Kalman filter based) and ported it to run in in this environment. All tracker results use this code. Authoritative geometry representation is optimized for reconstruction; the GEANT4 geometry is derived from this representation. Planning to derive MARS and G4beamline geometries from this same source. G4 used as an engine that creates a complete parent-child history plus collections of track steps in sensitive volumes. Conversion of G4 steps into DIGIs is done by Mu2e modules outside of G4. Merging in pileup events: in collaboration with the art team, Mu2e developed the technology to split the task into one part requiring detailed knowledge of persistency, but none of Mu2e, and a second part requiring detailed knowledge of Mu2e, but none of persistency. This process preserves complete MC truth information. Pileup is accumulated before analog to DIGI conversion Event displays: G4 display plus a ROOT based display that runs within art. Under construction: interfaces to file catalogs and other databases. Will leverage extensive CD experience; see poster for abstract 61 by Adam Lyon. Rates in the Tracker and Calorimeter Tracker Momentum Resolution Cosmic Ray Veto System The figure above shows a simulated event of one conversion electron plus all of the pileup associated with one cycle of the muon beamline. The figure shows the trajectories of all simulated particles that made at least one hit in the tracking system during the live gate during one cycle of he muon beamline. It also shows the individual hit wires in the tracker. The calorimeter vanes are shown in outline only. How well will the pattern recognition code do with such an event? The pattern recognition code, when run on this event, correctly identified a ±50 ns window around the conversion electron (red helix, below). The figure below shows the same event as above but it only shows the trajectories of, and hits from, those simulated particles that made a hit in the tracking system during the reconstructed ±50 ns window. With this background level, pattern recognition is manifestly tractable. The figures below show the tracker efficiency and momentum resolution for two sets of track quality cuts. Reconstruction run on events with the best available simulation of pile up. No use of MC truth in reconstruction. Illustrates possible tradeoffs between efficiency and the amount of high side tail; a critical background is minimized by control of the high side tail. Software For the Mu2e Experiment Selected Results [1] Representing the Mu2e Collaboration and the Scientific Software Infrastructure group within the Scientific Computing Division of Fermilab. The above figures show a study of detector rates for hits that arise from neutrons produced when muonic Al in the stopping target undergoes muon nuclear capture. The units are the number of hits in one straw(crystal) during one cycle of the muon beam line; a signal event is live for about 10% of one cycle. The top row shows the hit rates in the tracker for 3 different options for the neutron absorber, a doped polyethylene shield that lives inside the vacuum of the Detector Solenoid. The second row shows the hit rates in the calorimeter for the same variants of the neutron absorber Production Solenoid Transport Solenoid Detector Solenoid Production Target Collimators Stopping Target TrackerCalorimeter Proton Beam A small team has made rapid progress in the development of software for the Mu2e experiment: an end to end simulation and advanced prototype track reconstruction codes are in place. Calorimeter and Cosmic Ray Veto reconstruction in progress. Rapid progress was enabled by leveraging the work of others: as much as possible the software has been acquired and configured, not built. In the above figure, a cosmic ray muon (green) is incident on the earth above the detector. It penetrates into the hall from the left and interacts in a stopping target foil; one of the products of this interaction is an electron with an energy near the conversion energy (red helix). Such an electron can fake the signal. This event comes from a study done to determine the required rejection power of the cosmic ray veto system Track Pattern Recognition