Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator
E = T + V = ½mv 2 + ½kx 2
Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½mv 2 + ½kx 2 H = p x 2 /2m + ½kx 2
Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½mv 2 + ½kx 2 H = p x 2 /2m + ½kx 2 By a change of variables
Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½mv 2 + ½kx 2 H = p x 2 /2m + ½kx 2 By a change of variables x = q(mω) -½ ω = (k/m) ½
Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½mv 2 + ½kx 2 H = p x 2 /2m + ½kx 2 By a change of variables x = q(mω) -½ ω = (k/m) ½ We get a rather neater equation for the Hamiltonian
Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½mv 2 + ½kx 2 H = p x 2 /2m + ½kx 2 By a change of variables x = q(mω) -½ ω = (k/m) ½ We get a rather neater equation for the Hamiltonian H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 )
Let’s now consider this set of commutators
H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations
H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq
H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq From this set of quantum mechanical definitions
H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators
H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators ie operators that follow the form
H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators ie operators that follow the form AB – BA = kB
[q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq
AB – BA = kB [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq F + = q + ip
AB – BA = kB [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p]
AB – BA = kB [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p] = ω(–ip) + iω(iq)
AB – BA = kB [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p] = ω(–ip) + iω(iq) = ω(–ip – q) = – ωF +
AB – BA = kB [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p] = ω(–ip) + iω(iq) = ω(–ip – q) = – ωF + [H, F + ] = –ωF +
AB – BA = kB [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p] = ω(–ip) + iω(iq) = ω(–ip – q) = – ωF + [H, F + ] = –ωF + and [H, F – ] = +ωF –
[H, F + ] = – ωF +
HF + – F + H = – ωF +
[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction E n
[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction E n ie the n th eigenfunction defined by
[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction E n ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H E n = E n E n
[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction E n ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H E n = E n E n H F + E n – F + H E n = – ωF + E n
[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction E n ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H E n = E n E n H F + E n – F + H E n = – ωF + E n H F + E n – E n F + E n = – ωF + E n
[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction E n ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H E n = E n E n H F + E n – F + H E n = – ωF + E n H F + E n – E n F + E n = – ωF + E n H F + E n = (E n – ω) F + E n
[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Now let’s operate with both sides of this expression on a particular eigenfunction E n ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H E n = E n E n H F + E n – F + H E n = – ωF + E n H F + E n – E n F + E n = – ωF + E n H F + E n = (E n – ω) F + E n So F + has operated on E n to produce a new eigenfunction with eigenvalue E n – ω
EnEn EnEn
EnEn E n – ω EnEn
EnEn E n – 2ω EnEn
EnEn E n – ω E n – 2ω EnEn Let’s ladder down till we get to the last eigenvalue at which a next application of F + would produce an eigenstate with negative energy which we shall posutlate is not allowed and so F + must annihilate this last eigenstate ie F + E ↓ = 0
EnEn E n – ω E n – 2ω E↓E↓ EnEn Let’s ladder down till we get to the last eigenvalue at which a next application of F + would produce an eigenstate with negative energy which we shall posutlate is not allowed and so F + must annihilate this last eigenstate ie F + E ↓ = 0 Aaaaghhhhh…… F+F+ E↓E↓
F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip)
= q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2
F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2
F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p 2 + 1
F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2
F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 )
F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 ) H = ½ ω(F + F – – 1)
F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 ) H = ½ ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ ω(F – F + + 1)
F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 ) H = ½ ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ ω(F – F + + 1) H E ↓ = ½ ω(F – F + + 1) E ↓
F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 ) H = ½ ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ ω(F – F + + 1) H E ↓ = ½ ω(F – F + + 1) E ↓ F + E ↓ = 0
F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 ) H = ½ ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ ω(F – F + + 1) H E ↓ = ½ ω(F – F + + 1) E ↓ F + E ↓ = 0 H E ↓ = ½ ω E ↓ Zero Point Energy
F + F – = (q + ip)(q – ip) = q 2 – iqp + ipq +p 2 = q 2 – i[q,p] + p 2 = q 2 + p F + F – – 1 = q 2 + p 2 H = ½ ω(q 2 + p 2 ) H = ½ ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ ω(F – F + + 1) H E ↓ = ½ ω(F – F + + 1) E ↓ F + E ↓ = 0 H E ↓ = ½ ω E ↓ Zero Point Energy E (v) = ω (v + ½)
They are F ± = q ± ip By inspection we can show that [H, F + ] = – ωF + [H, F – ] = + ωF – These are of the form [A, B] = kB So the Fs are B-type operators
Now H can be factorised as H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1) H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1)
Now H can be factorised as H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1) H{F + E n } = (E n – ω){F + E n } H{F – E n } = (E n – ω){F – E n }
Now H can be factorised as H F + E n = ½ω(F + F – – 1) F + E n H{F + E n } = (E n – ω){F + E n } H{F – E n } = (E n – ω){F – E n }
A A’ = A’ A’ AB A’ – BA A’ = kB A’ AB A’ – BA’ A’ = kB A’ A{B A’ } = (A’ + k){B A’ }
Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½m 2 + ½kx 2 H = p 2 /2m + ½kx 2 By a change of variables x = q(mω) -½ ω = (k/m) ½ We get a rather neater equation for the Hamiltonian H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 )
Let us discuss the harmonic oscillator E = T + V = ½m 2 + ½kx 2 H = p 2 /2m + ½kx 2 By a change of variables x = q(mω) -½ ω = (k/m) ½ We get a rather neater equation for the Hamiltonian H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 )
Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators ie one that follows the form AB – BA = ±kB
[q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(–ip) [H,p] = ω(iq) From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators ie one that follows the form AB – BA = ±kB F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p] = ω(–ip) + iω(iq) = ω(–ip – q) = – ωF + [H, F + ] = –ωF + and [H, F – ] = +ωF –
[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Operate on a particular eigenfunction E n ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H E n = E n E n with both sides H F + E n – F + H E n = – ωF + E n H F + E n – E n F + E n = – ωF + E n H F + E n = (E n – ω) F + E n
They are F ± = q ± ip By inspection we can show that [H, F + ] = – ωF + [H, F – ] = + ωF – These are of the form [A, B] = kB So the Fs are B-type operators
Now H can be factorised as H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1) H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1)
Now H can be factorised as H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1) H{F + E n } = (E n – ω){F + E n } H{F – E n } = (E n – ω){F – E n }
Now H can be factorised as H F + E n = ½ω(F + F – – 1) F + E n H{F + E n } = (E n – ω){F + E n } H{F – E n } = (E n – ω){F – E n }
A A’ = A’ A’ AB A’ – BA A’ = kB A’ AB A’ – BA’ A’ = kB A’ A{B A’ } = (A’ + k){B A’ }
H = ½ω(p 2 + q 2 ) Let’s now consider this set of commutators NB that I have set ħ = 1 to simplify the relations [q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(-ip) [H,p] = ωiq From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators ie one that follows the form AB – BA = ±kB
[q,p] = i [H,q] = ω(–ip) [H,p] = ω(iq) From this set of quantum mechanical definitions We can invent a couple of B-type operators ie one that follows the form AB – BA = ±kB F + = q + ip [H, F + ] = [H,q] + i[H,p] = ω(–ip) + iω(iq) = ω(–ip – q) = – ωF + [H, F + ] = –ωF + and [H, F – ] = +ωF –
[H, F + ] = – ωF + HF + – F + H = – ωF + Operate on a particular eigenfunction E n ie the n th eigenfunction defined by H E n = E n E n with both sides H F + E n – F + H E n = – ωF + E n H F + E n – E n F + E n = – ωF + E n H F + E n = (E n – ω) F + E n
EnEn E n – ω E n – 2ω E↓E↓ EnEn nn Let’s ladder down till we get to the last eigenvalue at which a next application of F + would produce an eigenstate with negative energy which we shall posutlate is not allowed and that must annihilate this last eigenstate ie F + E ↓ = 0 Aaaaghhhhh…… F+F+
They are F ± = q ± ip By inspection we can show that [H, F + ] = – ωF + [H, F – ] = + ωF – These are of the form [A, B] = kB So the Fs are B-type operators
Now H can be factorised as H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1) H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1)
Now H can be factorised as H = ½ω(F + F – – 1) H = ½ω(F – F + + 1) H{F + E n } = (E n – ω){F + E n } H{F – E n } = (E n – ω){F – E n }
Now H can be factorised as H F + E n = ½ω(F + F – – 1) F + E n H{F + E n } = (E n – ω){F + E n } H{F – E n } = (E n – ω){F – E n }
A A’ = A’ A’ AB A’ – BA A’ = kB A’ AB A’ – BA’ A’ = kB A’ A{B A’ } = (A’ + k){B A’ }
[A, B] = 0 If A and B commute there exist eigenfunctions that are simultaneously eigenfunctions of both operators A and B and one can determine simultaneously the values of the quantities represented by the two operators but if they do not commute one cannot determine the values of the quantities simultaneously
[A, B] = 0 [A, B] = k B A I A ’ › = A ’ I A ’ › A { B I A ’ › } = (A ’ + k ) { B I A ’ › }
[q, p] = i [H, q] = ω (-ip) [H, p] = ω (-iq)
F + = q + i p F − = q − i p [ H, F + ] = − ω F + [ H, F − ] = + ω F − H = − ½ ω ( F + F − − 1 ) H = + ½ ω ( F − F )
H { F + I E n › } = ( E n − ω ){ F + I E n › } H { F − I E n › } = ( E n − ω ){ F − I E n › }
F + I E ↓ › = 0 H I E ↓ › = ½ ω I E ↓ › E (v) = ω (v + ½ )
F + = q + i p [H, q] = ω (-ip) F ± = q ± i p F − = q − i p [ H,F ± ] = q ± i p