Criminal Justice Policy Development and Resource Reinvestment Len Engel, Esq. December 10, 2010 What Works Conference Portland, OR Crime and Justice Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2007 General Assembly.
Advertisements

Sentencing Structure Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” MLK “The time.
1 Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections  Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988,
Chapter 12 Preparing for Prisoner Reentry: Discretionary Parole and Mandatory Release.
Slide 1 Recent Developments in Sentencing and Corrections Reform Presentation to the Nevada Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice January.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” - MLK.
Goals of Justice Reinvestment Manage growth of the prison population and reduce spending on corrections Increase the cost- effectiveness of existing criminal.
1 _____ March 5, 2009 SC Sentencing Reform Commission Presenter South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster S206/H3166 _____.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Study of Virginia’s Parole- Eligible Inmate Population.
“Justice Reinvestment through Policy Analysis in South Carolina” South Carolina State Senator Gerald Malloy 1.
Bernard Warner, Secretary.  Over 7 million people in the US are under community supervision.  More than 50% of parolees and 37% of probationers fail.
Presentation by: Andrew Clark Director of the Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice and the Institute for Municipal and Regional Policy at CCSU Institute.
Reducing the Prison Population: The Sentencing Project
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Community Corrections.  Community Corrections are the subfield of corrections in which offenders are supervised and provided services outside jail or.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Commission on Criminal Justice and Sentencing Reform : System-wide Criminal Justice Spending June 3, 2015.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
When Does Criminal Justice Realignment Take Effect? 1 Eligible felonies sentenced to county jail: applies to any person sentenced on or after October 1,
State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.
Where Texas is Today and Where Texas Needs to Be DOWD Conference Dallas, Texas Tuesday, April 6, 2010, from 10:45 am - 12:15 pm A-6 Re-Entry Policy Highlights.
September 8, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION Two Decades of Truth-in- Sentencing in Virginia Update.
State Board of Corrections An Overview of Public Law 2008 Chapter 653.
Results First Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Analyze State Policy August 6, 2012.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
11 Beyond the Bench 2013 “Juvenile Justice Reform– where are we now?” CALIFORNIA JUVENILE JUSTICE TRENDS UPDATE December 2, 2013 – Anaheim, CA Presented.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” MLK “The time.
Making Communities Safer Population Management/Control Strategies ASCA All Directors Training Session 2 December 3, 2010 CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS COMMISSIONER.
12 Research and the Future of Probation and Parole.
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
1 A Presentation to Senate Judiciary B And Judiciary C Committees February 15, 2000 Kari Belvin, Senate Fiscal Services Chris Keaton, Legislative Fiscal.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Public Safety Improvement Act. Criminal Justice Initiative Work Group Process 35+ stakeholder meetings 6 meetings from July through October 2012 – Analyzed.
Michigan Department of Corrections Updated Prison Bed Space Projections Impact from Probation, Community Corrections, Parole and the MPRI Presentation.
Probation and Parole: Theory and Practice CHAPTER Probation and Parole: Theory and Practice, 12e Howard Abadinsky Copyright © 2015, © 2012 by Pearson Education,
EL PASO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SERVICES Dr. Henry Sontheimer Department Director & Criminal Justice Planner.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
1 Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2005 Virginia General Assembly.
Presentation of Sentence Credits for Persons Convicted of Certain B Felonies Materials to Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice (NRS )
Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2008 General Assembly.
HB 3194 CRAIG PRINS3/5/14 OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION NEVADA ADVISORY COMMISSION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
Justice Alternatives for Wisconsin: Reducing the Costs of the Criminal Justice System Presentation to the Wisconsin Joint Legislative Council May 9, 2007.
Prison: The Last Resort? - an examination of the expansion of the Australian Prison Population over 25 years Adjunct Professor Peter Norden AO Australian.
Realignment: The Role of the BSCC and the Composition of Local Detention Facilities Patricia Mazzilli, Executive Director Board of State and Community.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System CJUS 101 Community-Based Corrections.
September Board Meeting FY08 and FY09 Spending Plan.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
Slide 1 Examining Kansas SB 123: Mandatory Probation and Treatment Don Stemen, Loyola University Chicago The Honorable Richard Smith, Kansas Sentencing.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
State Sentencing Policy Roundup Carl Reynolds Director, Office of Court Administration, Austin Texas.
The Impact of Mandatory Supervised Release (MSR) Violators & Time Served on IDOC’s Population David E. Olson, Ph.D. & Donald Stemen, Ph.D. Department of.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Mass Incarceration: Prospects for Reform American Friends Service Committee, Arizona.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
When Discrimination is Legal: The Social Costs of Felony Convictions
North Dakota Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Prison Population and Prison Closures in Pennsylvania
Texas Budget Process GOVT 2306, Module 12.
Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry
Reducing the Prison Population: The Sentencing Project
Juvenile Justice Technical Assistance
History (Continued) In May, 2011, Federal Court required that the prison population of California be decreased from 180% of prison capacity to no more.
12 Research and the Future of Probation and Parole.
Presentation transcript:

Criminal Justice Policy Development and Resource Reinvestment Len Engel, Esq. December 10, 2010 What Works Conference Portland, OR Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ

Agenda National trends National trends Recent state-level responses Recent state-level responses Two states – systemic policy development Two states – systemic policy development The Kansas lesson The Kansas lesson Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA Kansas Takes a New Approach

Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA Problem 22% prison growth by 2016 $500 million in additional costs Analysis FY06: 65% of admissions were P&P violators, costing $53 million/year Solution Grant program to local community corrections to reduce revocations by 20% 60 day credit for risk-reduction programs Restore earned time for non-violent inmates Outcome Parole revocations down 46%; parole reconvictions down 26% Probation revocations down 28% Avert $80 million in costs over 5 years Kansas continued

Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA Texas Prison Population Texas Charts a New Direction

Texas continued Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA Problem Added 100,000 beds in past 20 years but still faced 14-17,000 bed shortfall by 2012 $523 million in additional costs for FY09 Analysis High recidivism rate, low parole grant rate Technical violators a primary driver Solutions Expand network of residential, community diversion/ treatment facilities ($241M) Comply with state parole rate statute Outcomes Probation revocations down 26% Parole revocations down 4% Actual savings of $512M in FY08/09. Est. savings much higher through FY Legislature continued $120M annual reinvestment in community corrections

Policy Development: stages of technical assistance Stage 1: Create vehicle Agree on goals, process, timeline, etc. Agree on goals, process, timeline, etc. Public announcement: Frame the issue Public announcement: Frame the issue Stage 2: Analysis Identify drivers of prison population growth Identify drivers of prison population growth Audit state correctional policy Audit state correctional policy Stage 3: Policy Development Develop policy options and model effects Develop policy options and model effects Stage 4: Consensus Building Draft report findings and recommendations and draft legislation Draft report findings and recommendations and draft legislation Stage 5: Passing legislation Education lawmakers, public and press Education lawmakers, public and press Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

South Carolina Prison population increased from 9,000 to 25,000 inmates, 1983 to Prison population increased from 9,000 to 25,000 inmates, 1983 to Prison costs increased from $63.7 million to $394 million in the same period. Prison costs increased from $63.7 million to $394 million in the same period. High rate of recidivism and violent crime. High rate of recidivism and violent crime. Prison population projected to grow by 3200 inmates by Prison population projected to grow by 3200 inmates by Growth = 2 new prisons Growth = 2 new prisons No money and no political appetite for redirecting state funds to construct more prisons. No money and no political appetite for redirecting state funds to construct more prisons. Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

South Carolina moves to change The Sentencing Reform Commission was established to: The Sentencing Reform Commission was established to: Analyze the state’s sentencing and corrections data, Identify the drivers of population and cost growth, Generate policy options to reduce recidivism and victimization, hold offenders accountable, and maximize limited financial resources in the state. Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

South Carolina: how it got here Data analysis indicated: Data analysis indicated: Sentencing: Sentencing: Broad violent crime list (prohibited probation and parole) Broad violent crime list (prohibited probation and parole) Restrictive drug sentence options Restrictive drug sentence options High prison admission rate for low-level, non-violent felonies High prison admission rate for low-level, non-violent felonies Supervision: Supervision: Most inmates max-out Most inmates max-out Low parole approval rate (11%) Low parole approval rate (11%) Limited supervision and programmatic options Limited supervision and programmatic options System coordination System coordination Limited data collection and information sharing Limited data collection and information sharing Isolated corrections agencies Isolated corrections agencies Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

5-Year Projected Prison Population Total Inmate Pop Projected Inmate Pop ,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 24,612 27,903

South Carolina’s policy development process 1 year spent building knowledge of Commission and collecting and analyzing data 1 year spent building knowledge of Commission and collecting and analyzing data Extensive stakeholder involvement – testimony from more than 20 different organizations, agencies and criminal justice experts, multiple presentations to state and local groups and ongoing engagement of stakeholders. Extensive stakeholder involvement – testimony from more than 20 different organizations, agencies and criminal justice experts, multiple presentations to state and local groups and ongoing engagement of stakeholders. 3 work groups set up within Commission to examine specific areas and develop recommendations. Recommendations were adopted by the Commission. 3 work groups set up within Commission to examine specific areas and develop recommendations. Recommendations were adopted by the Commission. Omnibus legislation filed in support of the recommendations with a 4 month committee hearing process. Omnibus legislation filed in support of the recommendations with a 4 month committee hearing process. Legislation passed unanimously in Senate and in the House with only 4 dissenting votes. Legislation passed unanimously in Senate and in the House with only 4 dissenting votes. Signed into law by Governor Sanford in June, Signed into law by Governor Sanford in June, Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

South Carolina’s new law Redrafted drug and low-level felony offenses restricting the use of mandatory minimum sentences and enabling greater use of alternatives Redrafted drug and low-level felony offenses restricting the use of mandatory minimum sentences and enabling greater use of alternatives Requires supervision of all offenders returning to the community and allows work release for offenders serving serious felony sentences. Requires supervision of all offenders returning to the community and allows work release for offenders serving serious felony sentences. Requires the use of a validated risk-needs assessment in parole release decisions and supervision decisions. Requires the use of a validated risk-needs assessment in parole release decisions and supervision decisions. Reinvests savings in drug courts and community-based programs and eventually performance-incentive program. Reinvests savings in drug courts and community-based programs and eventually performance-incentive program. Increased knowledge and expertise in parole board and staff. Increased knowledge and expertise in parole board and staff. Requires Fiscal Impact Statements to relevant bills. Requires Fiscal Impact Statements to relevant bills. Established oversight committee to ensure follow-through. Established oversight committee to ensure follow-through. Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Arkansas “ the leaders of our State know that we must develop and implement policies that will safely and effectively manage the growth of our prison population.” Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA Bi-partisan, inter-branch Work Group established to:  Analyze sentencing laws and corrections policies  Develop tailored policy recommendations that will generate savings for the state  Suggest ways that the state can reinvest a portion of its savings to strengthen community corrections

Data Analysis What’s driving Arkansas's prison population Sentencing Trends Sentencing Trends o Sentencing guidelines o Offense definitions and classifications o Use of alternatives to incarceration Length of Stay Length of Stay o Parole eligibility and grant rates o “Good Time” credits o Correctional programming Community Supervision (Probation & Parole) Community Supervision (Probation & Parole) o Revocation policy o Earned discharge o Evidence-based practice Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Arkansas: the drivers High prison admissions rates and very low probation rates. High prison admissions rates and very low probation rates. Low-level felons with minimal criminal histories account for more than 30% of admissions. Low-level felons with minimal criminal histories account for more than 30% of admissions. 2,000 inmates held beyond their parole eligibility date. 2,000 inmates held beyond their parole eligibility date. 35% of parolees do not complete supervision 35% of parolees do not complete supervision Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Arkansas The Work Group is crafting consensus recommendations. The Work Group is crafting consensus recommendations. Recommendations will include legislative and administrative reforms. Recommendations will include legislative and administrative reforms. Significant public education effort will be deployed. Significant public education effort will be deployed. Legislation will be filed in anticipation of passage before the session ends this spring. Legislation will be filed in anticipation of passage before the session ends this spring. Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA

Caution from Kansas Recent data indicates: Prison population is climbing again. Prison population is climbing again. Probation revocations to prison have increased. Probation revocations to prison have increased.Why? Corrections spending decreased 8% or $23 million in FY Corrections spending decreased 8% or $23 million in FY % of the performance-based grant fund was cut and the remaining amount was wrapped into the base budget for community corrections. 25% of the performance-based grant fund was cut and the remaining amount was wrapped into the base budget for community corrections. The legislature continued to pass laws increasing penalties which increased admissions to prison and longer periods of imprisonment. The legislature continued to pass laws increasing penalties which increased admissions to prison and longer periods of imprisonment. Crime and Justice Institute at CRJ Boston, MA