A TeV-gamma ray observatory implemented with water Cherenkov array at YBJ Huihai He, IHEP, CAS 2013/2/1 LAWCA (Large Area Water Cherenkov Array)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Latest results from ARGO-YBJ P. Camarri University of Roma “Tor Vergata” And INFN Roma Tor Vergata P. Camarri - WAPP Darjeeling, India - Dec 17-19,
Advertisements

October 20-21, 2005 “Towards the Future” Workshop Andrew Smith mini- High Altitude Water Cherenkov experiment e   145 meters 4 meters  Andrew Smith.
Gus Sinnis HAWC Review December 2007 Milagro a TeV Gamma-Ray Observatory Gus Sinnis Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Gus Sinnis Los Alamos National Laboratory EAS Arrays in the GLAST Era.
Jamie Holder School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, U.K Optical SETI at Leeds Using Cherenkov Light Buckets as Optical SETI Detectors RAS.
HAWC Gus Sinnis VHE Workshop UCLA October, 2005 HAWC: A Next Generation Wide-Field VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope.
The Spectrum of Markarian 421 Above 100 GeV with STACEE Jennifer Carson UCLA / Stanford Linear Accelerator Center February MeV 1 GeV 10 GeV 100.
On A Large Array Of Midsized Telescopes Stephen Fegan Vladimir Vassiliev UCLA.
The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Mieke Bouwhuis 27/03/2006.
J.P. Gómez-González. Outline Introduction: The ANTARES neutrino telescope Time calibration Muon track residuals based method: Description and implementation.
Julie McEnery GLAST Science Lunch Milagro: A Wide Field of View Gamma-Ray Telescope Julie McEnery.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Alexander Kappes UW-Madison 4 th TeVPA Workshop, Beijing (China) Sep. 24 – 28, 2008 The Hunt for the Sources of the Galactic Cosmic Rays — A multi-messenger.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
Incontri di Fisica delle Alte Energie IFAE 2006 Pavia Vincenzo Vitale Recent Results in Gamma Ray Astronomy with IACTs.
Gus Sinnis CTA Workshop, Paris, March 2007 Synoptic TeV Telescopes: Recent Results & Future Plans Gus Sinnis Los Alamos National Laboratory.
1/8-10/2007M.A. Huang CRTNT Experiment Status  Introduction  Two prototype telescopes  Test run on ARGO-YBJ site, Tibet  Full scale experiment: 2008.
CEA DSM Irfu The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope A status report Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 44 th Rencontres de Moriond February.
Gus Sinnis RICAP, Rome June 2007 High Altitude Water Cherenkov Telescope  Gus Sinnis Los Alamos National Laboratory for the HAWC Collaboration.
Milagro Gus Sinnis Milagro NSF Review July 18-19, 2005 Milagro: A Synoptic VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope Gus Sinnis Los Alamos National Laboratory.
X.-X. Li, H.-H. He, F.-R. Zhu, S.-Z. Chen on behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics Nanjing GRB Conference,Nanjing,
Long-term monitor on Mrk 421 using ARGO-YBJ experiment S.Z Chen (IHEP/CAS/China, On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration  1. Introduction.
Cosmic-Ray Detection at the ARGO-YBJ observatory P. Camarri University of Roma “Tor Vergata” INFN Roma Tor Vergata.
Moriond 2001Jordan GoodmanMilagro Collaboration The Milagro Gamma Ray Observatory The Physics of Milagro Milagrito –Mrk 501 –GRB a Milagro –Description.
Development of Ideas in Ground-based Gamma-ray Astronomy, Status of Field and Scientific Expectations from HESS, VERITAS, MAGIC and CANGAROO Trevor C.
Moon shadow analysis -- Using ARGO experiment Wang Bo, Zhang Yi, Zhang Jianli, Guo Yiqing, Hu Hongbo Apri for NanJing Meeting
Design and optimization of Electromagnetic particle Detectors (EDs) in LHAASO-KM2A Xiangdong Sheng, Jia Liu, Jing Zhao on behalf of the LHAASO collaboration.
CTA The next generation ultimate gamma ray observatory M. Teshima Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
M.Teshima MPI für Physik, München (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut) for MAGIC collaboration MAGIC.
P. Bernardini September 10, 2006 ARGO-YBJ experiment and TeV gamma astronomy.
Gus Sinnis Asilomar Meeting 11/16/2003 The Next Generation All-Sky VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
HAWC Andrew Smith - University of Maryland TeV Astrophysics II, August 28,2006 High Altitude Water Cherenkov experiment  HAWC Andrew Smith, University.
Multi-TeV  -ray Astronomy with GRAPES-3 Pravata K Mohanty On behalf of the GRAPE-3 collaboration Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai Workshop.
Gamma-Ray Astronomy with the ARGO-YBJ experiment G. Di Sciascio INFN – Sez. Roma “TorVergata” On behalf of ARGO-YBJ Collaboration 5th AGILE Workshop 2008.
Hadronic interaction studies with the ARGO-YBJ experiment (5,800 m 2 ) 10 Pads (56 x 62 cm 2 ) for each RPC 8 Strips (6.5 x 62 cm 2 ) for each Pad ( 
HAWC Science  Survey of 2  sr (half the sky) up to 100 TeV energies Probe knee in cosmic ray spectrum Identify sources of Galactic cosmic rays  Extended.
Hybrid measurement of CR light component spectrum by using ARGO-YBJ and WFCTA Shoushan Zhang on behalf of LHAASO collaboration and ARGO-YBJ collaboration.
ArgoYBJ: further steps for the next thfuture WAPP 2009 Bose Institute, Mayapuri, Darjeeling Dec 12 th 2009 By R. Santonico.
LHAASO-WCDA Design & Performance Zhiguo Yao for the LHAASO Collaboration IHEP, Beijing 2011/08/17.
Temporal and spatial structure of the Extensive Air Shower front with the ARGO- YBJ experiment 1 - INFN-CNAF, Bologna, Italy 2 - Università del Salento.
A Future All-Sky High Duty Cycle VHE Gamma Ray Detector Gus Sinnis/Los Alamos with A. Smith/UMd J. McEnery/GSFC.
LAWCA for Air Shower Detection at High Altitude IHEP, Beijing Zhiguo Yao VCI, 11-15/02/2013.
June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.
Astroparticle physics with large neutrino detectors  Existing detectors  Physics motivation  Antares project  KM3NeT proposal M. de Jong.
Sources emitting gamma-rays observed in the MAGIC field of view Jelena-Kristina Željeznjak , Zagreb.
Aous Abdo Ground-based Gamma-ray Astronomy: Towards the Future. Santa Fe, NM May 11–12, 2006 Detection of Tev  -rays from the Cygnus Region with Milagro.
Z. Cao, H.H. He, J.L. Liu, M. Zha Y. Zhang The 2 nd workshop of air shower detection at high altitude.
Detecting Air Showers on the Ground
Performances of the KM2A prototype array J.Liu for the LHAASO Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS 32nd International Cosmic Ray Conference,
A fast online and trigger-less signal reconstruction Arno Gadola Physik-Institut Universität Zürich Doktorandenseminar 2009.
Milagro at Tibet Gus Sinnis LANL/P-23. Challenge and Opportunity Milagro will run for ~2 more years (or less) No viable candidate to replace Milagro on.
The Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory LHAASO.
Gus Sinnis RICAP, Rome June 2007 The Milagro Observatory: Recent Results & Future Plans Gus Sinnis Los Alamos National Laboratory for the Milagro Collaboration.
Shoushan Zhang, ARGO-YBJ Collaboration and LHAASO Collaboration 4 th Workshop on Air Shower Detection at High Altitude Napoli 31/01-01/ IHEP (Institute.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
32 nd ICRC –Beijing – August 11-18, 2011 Silvia Vernetto IFSI-INAF Torino, ITALY On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration Observation of MGRO J with.
Measurement of the CR light component primary spectrum B. Panico on behalf of ARGO-YBJ collaboration University Rome Tor Vergata INFN, Rome Tor Vergata.
The dynamic range extension system for the LHAASO-WCDA experiment
On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS
astroparticle physics with ARGO-YBJ
LHAASO-WCDA: Design & Performance
HAWC Science Survey of 2p sr up to 100 TeV energies Extended Sources
Songzhan Chen Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Nanjing
VERITAS: Very High Energy γ-ray Astronomy
Estimation of Sensitivity to Gamma Ray point Sources above 30TeV
TeV γ-ray survey of the northern sky using the ARGO-YBJ experiment
"Physics and astronomy results with the ARGO-YBJ experiment"
Presentation transcript:

a TeV-gamma ray observatory implemented with water Cherenkov array at YBJ Huihai He, IHEP, CAS 2013/2/1 LAWCA (Large Area Water Cherenkov Array)

Outline  Introduction  Detector design  Performances and physics expectations  Prototype detector and array  Schedules  Summary

3 SNRs Cold Dark Matter Pulsars GRBs Test of the speed of light invariance cosmological  -Ray Horizon AGNs The VHE  -ray Physics Program Origin of Cosmic Rays Microquasars

VHE  -Astronomy: Air Shower Detection  IACTs: H.E.S.S., VERITAS, MAGIC, … fair angular resolution (~0.1  ); good background rejection power; short duty cycle (10%); narrow FOV (<5  );  Mainly focus on deep observation.  Ground particle array: AS , ARGO-YBJ, Milagro, …  not-so-good angular resolution (~0.5  );  not-so-good background rejection power (much improved by Water Cherenkov) ;  full duty cycle (>95% , 10  IACT);  Wide FOV ( >2/3  , 150  IACT);  Good at sky survey, extended sources, flares.

VHE  -Sky MILAGRO ARGO-YBJ 143 sources, 60% extra- galactic.  ~0.3 CRAB (ARGO, integral);  Limited by sensitivity: detected 4 galactic and 2 extra-galactic sources.  If the sensitivity is 10  improved (e.g., <0.06 CRAB), much more sources would be detected.

VHE  -Astronomy Whipple 0.2 Crab Crab detected! VERITAS Crab ARGO-YBJ 0.6 Crab Tibet-AS  1.5 Crab Milagro 0.9 Crab HAWC 0.06 Crab LAWCA 0.06 Crab 2004 H.E.S.S Crab MAGIC 0.02 Crab CTA Crab LHAASO-WCDA 0.02 Crab Pointing  difference! Survey 143 Sources 6 Sources 201? HEGRA, CANGAROO 10 years delay! past, present & future

Detector Design

Detector Layout  An L-shaped water pool: North-East of ARGO-YBJ hall; 23,000 m 2 ; 4.5 m depth; 916 cells, with an 8” PMT in each cell; Cells are partitioned with black curtains.

 Requirements: water-proof: loss <1/1000 volume/day; light-proof: luminous flux ( nm) <100k photons/m 2 /s; tolerance to snow, rain, wind, dust, earth-quake; anti-icing; clean water compatible; Water Pool

Water Purifying & Circulation  Purifying: Absorption length > nm;  Water in pool: Absorption length > nm; Uniformity: >85%.  Circulation speed: 30 days per pool volume.

Electronics DY10 DY8  Charge: analog shaping, digital peak detecting;  Timing: pulse front discrimination;  9 PMTs share 1 FEE board;  FEEs are synchronized with central station via White Rabbit protocol;  Hit signals are transferred to the central DAQ system via TCP/IP network, shared with WR;  DAQ: based on Atlas TDAQ software framework (soft trigger compatible).

Trigger  Cluster-based;  Neighboring clusters are half-overlapped;  Pattern: Multiplicity during 250 ns of any cluster  12; Noise trigger <1 kHz.  Hardware trigger has been designed as backup, while trigger will performed offline. Noise trigger

Trigger Rate & Data Volume  Trigger rate: ~17 kHz.  Data volume after trigger: 240 Mbps = 1 PB/year.  DAQ data volume (soft triger): 4.6 Gbps = 18 PB/year. Huge amount of data: an online- reconstruction solution is under investigation. Trigger rate Data volume

PMT Readout  Tapered voltage divider circuit;  A specialized decoupling circuit to reduce the effect of charge piled-up;  Two dynode outputs set for SPE resolution and dynamic range;  Dynamic range PE can be achieved with non-linearity<5%.

Calibration  Water attenuation length  Detector units Time  LED+Fiber  Characteristic plane method Charge: SPE (HG), muon peak (LG), overlap  Array Geometric pointing: shadow of the sun/bright star (<0.02 o ) Pointing: moon shadow PSF: moon shadow (cosmic ray), Crab Nebula (gamma) Shower energy: moon shadow (cosmic ray), Crab Nebula (gamma)  Cross check with ARGO-YBJ (event by event)

Time Calibration  Cluster-based, cross- calibrated: 2 fibers per PMT (naming: short & long); 2 LEDs per cluster; 2-4 fibers are crossed among neighboring clusters; Frequency of LED pulsing: 5-10 Hz.  Requirements: Time offset measurement: ~0.1 ns.

Performances and Physics expectations

Angular Resolution & Background Rejection  Good angular resolution: Optimized bin size: TeV; TeV.  Fair background rejection power: Q-factor: 1 TeV; 5 TeV.

Effective Area & Sensitivity  Effective area: 500 m 100 GeV; 30,000 m 1 TeV; 60,000 m 5 TeV.  Sensitivity: TeV; TeV 。 ~10x better than ARGO-YBJ. 4 个 ¼ 阵列

Physics Goals  VHE gamma sky survey (100 GeV-30 TeV): Extragalactic sources & flares; VHE emission from Gamma Ray Bursts; Galactic sources; Diffused Gamma rays.  Cosmic Ray physics (1 TeV-10 PeV): Anisotropy of VHE cosmic rays; Cosmic electrons / positrons; Cosmic ray spectrum; Hadronic interaction models.  Miscellaneous: Gamma rays from dark matter; Sun storm & IMF.

Sky Survey ---Discovery of VHE  -sources (especially transient and extended)  Detection of Crab Nebula in 1 day  Reaching 30% Icrab in 10 days ARGO-YBJ accumulative sensitivity  Reaching 10% Icrab in 90 days  discovery? ARGO sky map in 3 years LAWCA one week!

MGRO J Extended Sources  Suffered from the narrow FOV, background estimation may be problematic. lower flux measurement?  For big extended sources (>0.1  ), the sensitivity of IACT turns worse; But no problem with Ground particle array;  Ground array works well on extended sources. MGRO J HAWC Expectation

Feb 16 Apr 28 Flares (AGN/GRB)  Time & position is not predictable: difficult for IACT to detect;  IACT’s following-up observation with other wavelenghths: But, more failure than success; In addition, only <1/2 flares is away from Sun; Furthermore, the population is biased.  Ground particle array can do better job! ARGO-YBJ MKN 421 MKN 501

26 sources  Real time alarm  Light curve: day  hour ARGO RXTE/ASM Mrk421 Whipple+VERYTAS

Improvements by ARGO  Improvement in sensitivity: ARGO will become a standard (even better) “water Cherenkov detector” with an area of >5500m 2 (a Q factor of >1.2 for LAWCA), a Q factor of >10 for  ~0.07 Icrab.

Improvements by ARGO  Better energy resolution: to see, to measure Events with core inside ARGO Events with core inside LAWCA: ARGO external showers with known core location SED of sources and flares Anisotropy vs. energy Moon and sun shadows Geomagnetic storm Cosmic rays …

Complementary with HAWC  Latitude: 30 o N (LAWCA) vs. 19 o N (HAWC) Sky coverage overlaps, cross-check  Longitude: 91.5 o E (LAWCA) vs o W (HAWC) Relay observation to transient phenomenon

Prototype Detector and Array

Prototype Detector ( ) Single rate: 16 kHz  kHz (4300 m a.s.l.) Single rate: 16 kHz  kHz (4300 m a.s.l.)  -peak is first observed. 2 layers of 1 m  1 m Scintillators 1 layer of 1 m  1 m Scintillator 5 m 7 m

Engineering Array (2010-now) 9 cells, effective area 225 m 2.

Installation 2011/03: dry run 2011/07: wet run 12 TB test and physics data obtained so far. 2011/03: dry run 2011/07: wet run 12 TB test and physics data obtained so far.

Charge Calibration: SPE  Method: single rate ~50 kHz; SPE signal dominated; Including PMT Gain + cable + pre-amp + electronics HG;  Precision: 2% per 30 seconds; Real time (hardware trigger): 2% per 30 minutes. Variation in a month Fitted with a convolution of power law  Poisson  Gaussian + SPE noise Consistent with PMT temperature effect

Charge Calibration: High Range  Method: muon peak ~10 Hz; muons hitting the photo-cathod; PMT gain + QE + CE + cable + pre-amp + electronics LG.  Precision: 2% per 30 minutes; Real time (hardware trigger): 2% per day. Variation in a month Consistent with PMT temperature effect

Time Calibration: Test Results Short fibers of 2 PMTs:  = 0.07 ns. Long fibers of 2 PMTs:  = 0.12 ns. Distribution of mean offset, 3 months. Mean value: 10 5 Hz. Distribution of mean offset, 3 months. Mean value: 10 5 Hz. unit: 5.6 ns

Event Reconstruction and Offline Coincidence with ARGO-YBJ

Design Hamamatsu: PMT production and coating (1/1.5 years) USTC PMT group: PMT test (16/day) USTC electronics group: electronics production IHEP DAQ group: DAQ IHEP calibration group: detector calibration IHEP computer center: networking, computing & storage Software structure, MC and data analysis groups LAWCA Schedules Start T2 T5T3 Field Prep. Pool construction Others and Leak check (water, light) Filling and debug Run T6 Dry run and debug Installation of: PMT (15/day), electronics, calibration, Slow control, DAQ First Lights Water recycling group: water recycling system Slow control group: slow control system Detector installation group: detector installation Operation group T4 T1 Land Lease Light & Water-proof

Summary  A Large Area Water Cherenkov Array is proposed to be built at YBJ in 2 years.  Through hybrid observation with ARGO-YBJ, it will survey the northern hemisphere for new source, filling the time gap before LHAASO and CTA, being at the same time a good complimentary to HAWC  The detector has been designed and partially tested with the prototype and the engineering array.  LAWCA is ongoing as scheduled.

Trigger rate  Trigger rate at different multiplicity can be roughly re- produced by simulations;  The simulation rate is 35-50% lower than data: Only proton, Helium are simulated