HR-6-11 Head Restraint Static Height Requirements 6 th GTR Head Restraint Informal Working Group Bob Moran 19-21 April 2006 6 th GTR Head Restraint Informal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Methods of analysing change over time and space Ian Gregory (University of Portsmouth) & Paul Ell (Queens University, Belfast)
Advertisements

Slide 1 Graham Greene Chairman JAA Occupant Survivability Project Advisory Group.
Patterns and trends in adult obesity A presentation of the latest data on adult obesity.
Development and Application of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios to Account for PM2.5 Secondary Formation in Georgia James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia.
Mammography Industry: Review of Proposed Accessibility Standards U.S. Access Board May 8, 2012 Atlanta, Georgia.
Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker How do health expenditures vary across the population?
Child safety with respect to vehicle protection and booster seats - a proposal for a CRF for children > 4yo 1 Informal document GRSP (55 th GRSP,
Anthropometric Measurements By Majed Awad. Introduction With the increased objective of creating more efficient man-machine systems, the need to collect.
Actual needed height of head restraints Follow up of discussions during IWG on gtr No.7 in London, March 2012 Hans Ammerlaan - Netherlands Update GRSP.
Young people's exposure to television alcohol advertising in the UK, the Netherlands and Germany Sunil Patil, Eleanor Winpenny, Marc Elliott, Charlene.
Informal document No. GRSG-95-27
Statistics on Obesity, PA & Diet: England, Jan 08 i Compiled by Sally Cornfield on behalf of PAN-WM Headline Findings.
Regional Differences in the Graduate Earnings Premium James Carey, Swansea University Introduction Despite large rises in student numbers, the graduate.
AIKing  2012 HUMAN ANTHROPOMETRY Albert I. King Wayne State University Tsinghua University April 17, 2013 Beijing, China.
47th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (47th session, May 2010, agenda.
HUMAN FACTORS IN DESIGN. ANTHROPOMETRIC DATA Vast amount of information is available on-line.
Christopher J. Bonanti United States HOD to WP.29 Associate Administrator for Rulemaking, NHTSA World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations.
Slide 1 Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc.  Continuous random variable  Normal distribution Overview Figure 5-1 Formula 5-1 LAPTOP3: f(x) = 
Definitions Uniform Distribution is a probability distribution in which the continuous random variable values are spread evenly over the range of possibilities;
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia King Saud University College of Engineering Industrial Engineering department ERGONOMICALLY DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND IMPLEMENTATION.
Anthropometry Anthropos (human) + metrein (to measure) The study of how people vary in Visual acuity Determination Upper back strength Age Leg length Initiative.
Head Restraint GTR Status to AC th Session of WP.29 March 2007 Informal document No. WP , March 2007, agenda item II
Speaker Tips are listed in italics throughout the speaker notes pages.
December 2008 Geneva Proposed amendments to the UNECE Regulation No. 29 on truck cab safety Russian Federation Transmitted by the expert from the Russian.
GRSP December 2004 The Safety of Wheelchair Occupants in Road Transport Vehicles Donald Macdonald Head of Engineering and Research Mobility & Inclusion.
Teachers’ Pensions: A changing environment
Brent Diversity Profile Labour Market Work patterns in Brent May 2015.
How Data from USDA’s Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) Can be Used in Individual and Group Extension Settings Mitch Morehart Economic Research.
WORK-SPACE DESIGN 1. We will cover: - - Introduction - - Anthropometry - - Static Dimensions - - Dynamic (Functional) Dimensions - - General Discussion.
Title: Australia’s Proposal for the Development of Pole Side Impact GTR Presenter’s Name: Allan Jonas Economy: Australia 33rd APEC Transportation Working.
Copyright ©2006 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Turning Data Into Information Chapter 2.
Statistics Division Beijing, China 25 October, 2007 EC-FAO Food Security Information for Action Programme Side Event Food Security Statistics and Information.
© NOO 2012 noo National Obesity Observatory Examining available data for the adult population.
Proposal on actual needed height of head restraints Netherlands MOT RDW Proposal on actual needed HR height - Geneva, May Informal document GRSP
EEVC WG20 European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee 12 th December, 2006 Slide 1 EEVC WG20 and WG12 Rear Impact Test Procedure Development Programme Presented.
International conference – Women’s health and work March , Brussels Physical Strength: Results and Differences in Age and Gender Patrick Serafin,
DEVELOPING FIRE TESTS FOR FCV AND HYDROGEN VEHICLES Glenn Scheffler Consultant for the US Department of Energy August 2010 DEVELOPING FIRE TESTS FOR FCV.
© Nuffield Foundation 2012 © Rudolf Stricker Nuffield Free-Standing Mathematics Activity Gender differences.
Evolution of UNECE R29 OICA proposal
Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in the Irish Population, 2007.
Equality and Human Rights Commission Presentation to UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, 6-8 October 2008.
RDW The Netherlands Head restraint gtr7 meeting 2-3 Feb RDW / Vehicle Standards Development dept. 1 Head Restraints Static Height and Backset Measurement.
Anthropometry Initiative Initiative Imagination Imagination Needs Needs Dexterity Dexterity Intelligence Intelligence And so forth And so forth Visual.
Introduction to Revision of GTR 7
Hardianto Iridiastadi, Ph.D.
WorldSID 50 th Update Klaus Bortenschlager PDB - Partnership for Dummy Technology and Biomechanics on behalf of the WorldSID Task Group 44 th GRSP Session.
Head Restraints Working Group Meeting Paris, France February 1-2, 2005 U.S. FMVSS No. 202 Final Rule Head Restraint IWG Document:HR-1-8.
Transmitted by the expert from GTB Informal Document No. GRE (64th GRE, 4-7 October 2010, agenda item 5(f)) Proposal for Amendments to Regulations.
GLOBAL TRENDS & OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUSINESS VENTURES Entrepreneurship I 2.03 A.
Proposal of the Informal Working Group on Head Restraints GTR Phase 2 JAPAN Informal document No. GRSP (43rd GRSP, May 2008, agenda item.
Chapter 131 Normal Distributions. Chapter 132 Thought Question 2 What does it mean if a person’s SAT score falls at the 20th percentile for all people.
Vehicle Passenger Safety: Exploring Whiplash Protection Systems
Slide 1 Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 Normal Probability Distributions 6-1 Overview 6-2 The Standard Normal Distribution 6-3 Applications.
Smoking in England Robert West Jamie Brown University College London 1.
Gtr7 measuring method for effective head restraint height short explanation with Annex 1 Hans Ammerlaan MOT RDW Short explanation on measuring method -
Fatalities and Injuries among Children in Motor Vehicle Crashes in Japan 18 June, 2008 JASIC Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center CRS
Hand and ergonomics Dana Rubínová Institute of machine and industrial design Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Brno University of Technology Seminar 5th.
The Impact of School Opening on Hospital Admissions for Asthma in New York State Shao Lin, PhD; Xiu Liu, MS; Rena Jones, MS; and Syni-An Hwang, PhD Bureau.
Maggie Mphande (Mphil)
Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-57-25
Gtr7 measuring method for effective head restraint height
Prepared by Mohammad Tomize. Malak Awad. Areej Shawahneh.
Lecture 4: Meta-analysis
GLOBAL DIETARY CALCIUM INTAKE AMONG ADULTS:
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Introduction of Booster Cushions in R129
Introduction of Booster Cushions in R129
Introduction to Revision of GTR 7
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Real World Side Impacts Involving Rear Pediatric Occupants
Presentation transcript:

HR-6-11 Head Restraint Static Height Requirements 6 th GTR Head Restraint Informal Working Group Bob Moran April th GTR Head Restraint Informal Working Group Bob Moran April 2006

HR-6-11 Contents UK population stature ; UK anthropometric data; UK calculations of required head restraint height; and Conclusions UK population stature ; UK anthropometric data; UK calculations of required head restraint height; and Conclusions

HR-6-11 UK population stature

HR-6-11 Stature of UK population - 1 Data from the “Health Survey for England 2003”, published on 17 th Dec 2004 by Department of Health; Key trends … There was a significant increase in men's mean height between the year 2000 and 2002, but no systematic change in mean height over the whole period. There was no systematic variation in mean height among women between 1993 and There was no marked pattern of height variation for men and women in any age band. Data from the “Health Survey for England 2003”, published on 17 th Dec 2004 by Department of Health; Key trends … There was a significant increase in men's mean height between the year 2000 and 2002, but no systematic change in mean height over the whole period. There was no systematic variation in mean height among women between 1993 and There was no marked pattern of height variation for men and women in any age band.

HR-6-11 Stature of UK population - 2 MENAGE YearMeanSE

HR-6-11 Stature of UK population - 3 WOMENAGE YearMean SE

HR-6-11 Stature of UK population - 4

HR-6-11 Stature of UK population - 5

HR-6-11 Stature of UK population - 6

HR-6-11 Summary The UK population has seen no systematic change in mean height over the period 1993 to The UK population has no pattern of varying mean height and age. UK population mean height continues to be very much above average for Europe, as it has been for +15 years. The UK population has seen no systematic change in mean height over the period 1993 to The UK population has no pattern of varying mean height and age. UK population mean height continues to be very much above average for Europe, as it has been for +15 years.

HR-6-11 UK anthropometric data 1998

HR-6-11 Anthropometric Data - 1 ADULTDATA - The Handbook of Adult Anthropometric and Strength Measurements – Data for Design Safety. Department of Trade and Industry, London. ISBN May Government Consumer Safety Research Utilises ‘PeopleSize’ anthropometry database, which brings together data from Department for Health (UK), National Center for Health Statistics (US) and the Human Measurement and Research Group (HUMAG) at Loughborough University (UK); ADULTDATA - The Handbook of Adult Anthropometric and Strength Measurements – Data for Design Safety. Department of Trade and Industry, London. ISBN May Government Consumer Safety Research Utilises ‘PeopleSize’ anthropometry database, which brings together data from Department for Health (UK), National Center for Health Statistics (US) and the Human Measurement and Research Group (HUMAG) at Loughborough University (UK);

HR-6-11 Anthropometric Data MaleFemale 5th%ile50th%ile95th%ile5th%ile50th%ile95th%ile Stature Erect Sitting Height Head Circumference Face Length ADULTDATA - The handbook of adult anthropometric and strength measurements. Department of Trade and Industry, London. ISBN May 1998.

HR-6-11 UK calculations of required head restraint height

HR-6-11 Anthropometric Data 1 - UK MaleFemale 5th%ile50th%ile95th%ile5th%ile50th%ile95th%ile Stature Erect Sitting Height Head Circumference Face Length ADULTDATA - The handbook of adult anthropometric and strength measurements. Department of Trade and Industry, London. ISBN May 1998.

HR-6-11 UK calculation of required head restraint height - Method NL Based upon HR-03-06e / HR-02-14e; Using UMTRI 1983 data as reference; Height measured as per UN-ECE Regulation 17; height measured in a plane as near to 25° as possible from vertical normal line of the manikin torso ref. line, unless otherwise specified by manufacturer; and NL adds a ‘conservative’ 15mm to account for torso ‘ramping’ and ‘spine straightening’ effect. Based upon HR-03-06e / HR-02-14e; Using UMTRI 1983 data as reference; Height measured as per UN-ECE Regulation 17; height measured in a plane as near to 25° as possible from vertical normal line of the manikin torso ref. line, unless otherwise specified by manufacturer; and NL adds a ‘conservative’ 15mm to account for torso ‘ramping’ and ‘spine straightening’ effect.

HR-6-11 UK calculation of required head restraint height - Method NL UMTRI [UMTR , Dec 1983] Erect sitting height 50th%ile male = 911 mm Distance crown to CoG head = 93 mm Distance H-point to lowest buttocks = 67 mm Face length UMTRI equivalent = 117 mm [HR-02-14] Sitting height UMTRI equivalent = 912 mm [HR-02-14] “SittingEffect” as described in SAE Paper ; Human Head Neck Response During Low-Speed Rear End Impact (1998); Kroonenberg, A van den et al. “SittingEffect” = Ramping + Spine Straightening => Add Height Req mm ► + 34 mm UMTRI [UMTR , Dec 1983] Erect sitting height 50th%ile male = 911 mm Distance crown to CoG head = 93 mm Distance H-point to lowest buttocks = 67 mm Face length UMTRI equivalent = 117 mm [HR-02-14] Sitting height UMTRI equivalent = 912 mm [HR-02-14] “SittingEffect” as described in SAE Paper ; Human Head Neck Response During Low-Speed Rear End Impact (1998); Kroonenberg, A van den et al. “SittingEffect” = Ramping + Spine Straightening => Add Height Req mm ► + 34 mm

HR-6-11 UK calculation of required head restraint height - Method NL 50 th %ile Male UK Head Restraint Height required = 758 mm + 15 = 773 mm Head Restraint Height required = 758 mm + 34 = 792 mm 95 th %ile Male UK Head Restraint Height required = 803 mm + 15 = 818 mm Head Restraint Height required = 803 mm + 34 = 837 mm 50 th %ile Male UK Head Restraint Height required = 758 mm + 15 = 773 mm Head Restraint Height required = 758 mm + 34 = 792 mm 95 th %ile Male UK Head Restraint Height required = 803 mm + 15 = 818 mm Head Restraint Height required = 803 mm + 34 = 837 mm

HR-6-11 Conclusions UK supports the NL proposal for a minimum head restraint height of 850 mm for the proposed GTR [UNECE R17 methods]. It is an appropriate height to offer protection to the population of vehicle occupants in the UK. It is an appropriate height to offer protection to the population of vehicle occupants globally, most of whom who are increasing in stature.  Cost-benefit analysis / regulatory impact assessment. UK supports the NL proposal for a minimum head restraint height of 850 mm for the proposed GTR [UNECE R17 methods]. It is an appropriate height to offer protection to the population of vehicle occupants in the UK. It is an appropriate height to offer protection to the population of vehicle occupants globally, most of whom who are increasing in stature.  Cost-benefit analysis / regulatory impact assessment.

HR-6-11 Head Restraint Static Height Requirements 6 th GTR Head Restraint Informal Working Group Bob Moran April th GTR Head Restraint Informal Working Group Bob Moran April 2006