FVTX Trigger Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Trigger for Run 8 Rates, Yields, Backgrounds… Debasish Das Pibero Djawotho Manuel Calderon de la Barca Analysis Meeting BNL October 16, 2007.
Advertisements

PHENIX local RUN9 RHIC meeting Manabu Togawa for the PHENIX 1.
1 Run 9 PHENIX Goals and Performance John Haggerty Brookhaven National Laboratory June 4, 2009.
MuTRG for Run12 RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1. Run12 Schedule 14 Cryoweeks -> Mid Jan. ~ End of April GeV pp (2+3 weeks) GeV pp (1+6 weeks)?
Measurements of long-range angular correlation and identified particle v 2 in 200 GeV d+Au collisions from PHENIX Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for.
SPD commissioning Ricci, Míriam, Daniel, Edu, Hugo et al. from 1.
Julia VelkovskaMoriond QCD, March 27, 2015 Geometry and Collective Behavior in Small Systems from PHENIX Julia Velkovska for the PHENIX Collaboration Moriond.
ICPAQGP, Kolkata, February 2-6, 2015 Itzhak Tserruya PHENIX highlights.
Sourav Tarafdar Banaras Hindu University For the PHENIX Collaboration Hard Probes 2012 Measurement of electrons from Heavy Quarks at PHENIX.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.
Time Meeting 3/17/2015 PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
Υ Measurements at PHENIX Shawn Whitaker RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, /20/20111Shawn Whitaker - RHIC/AGS Users Meeting.
Electrical Integration WBS Eric J. Mannel Columbia University Electronics Project Engineer VTX and FVTX.
Jon S Kapustinsky 11/17/2010 Jon S Kapustinsky FVTX Commissioning Plan 1.71 Jon S Kapustinsky 1.
Time Meeting PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
U N C L A S S I F I E D FVTX Detector Readout Concept S. Butsyk For LANL P-25 group.
High Multiplicity FVTX Trigger for Run15 Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group.
Run11 MuTrig-FEE Summary RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
November 18, 2008 John Haggerty 1 PHENIX In Run 9 John Haggerty Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Jet studies in STAR via 2+1 correlations Hua Pei For the STAR Collaboration.
13/Aug/2013, Fluc. & Corr. Workshop, Chengdu, China ShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Flow and Jet-correlation ShinIchi Esumi Univ. of Tsukuba Flow originated.
FVTX Trigger Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group 1.
Run15 pp Achievement and pAu status Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
Time Meeting 3/17/2015 PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
Introduction to High Momentum Trigger in PHENIX Muon Arms RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 中川格 1.
Higher harmonics flow measurement of charged hadrons and electrons in wide kinematic range with PHENIX VTX tracker Maki KUROSAWA for PHENIX collaboration.
Hadron Collider Physics 2012, 12/Nov/2012, KyotoShinIchi Esumi, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Heavy Ion results from RHIC-BNL ShinIchi Esumi Univ. of Tsukuba Contents.
Time Meeting 3/10/2015 PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
Forward-backward multiplicity correlations in PbPb, pPb and pp collisions from ATLAS Jiangyong Jia for the ATLAS collaboration 9/27-10/3, 2015
A. Meneguzzo Padova University & INFN Validation and Performance of the CMS Barrel Muon Drift Chambers with Cosmic Rays A. Meneguzzo Padova University.
1 EMC Trigger Summery from RunII and discussion for RunIII H.Torii, Kyoto Univ. ERT Lvl-1 meeting.
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
1 Nuclear modification and elliptic flow measurements for  mesons at  s NN = 200 GeV d+Au and Au+Au collisions by PHENIX Dipali Pal for the PHENIX collaboration.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger.
High Multiplicity Trigger Operation Status RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa On behalf of Toru Nagashima, Aaron Key, SeYoung Han, Shoichi Hasegawa 1.
STAR J/  Trigger in dA Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Trigger Workshop at BNL October 21, 2002.
PM Meeting PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
1/27/2016 R.Seidl: status of simulation1 W muon analysis in PHENIX Status of the background understanding, signal, smearing and asymmetries R.Seidl (RBRC)
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
1 More on the omega – some better rates/trigger counts Richard Seto UCR Light/Heavy PWG Aug 28, 2003.
Study of J/  ->e + e - in d-Au Collision with Electron Triggers in PHENIX W. Xie (UC. Riverside) PHENIX Collaboration April APS in 2003.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger.
Bill Christie For the STAR Collaboration January 5, Outline Detector configuration for Run 16 Data set Goals Desired luminosity profile for Run.
PHENIX results on centrality dependence of yields and correlations in d+Au collisions at √s NN =200GeV Takao Sakaguchi Brookhaven National Laboratory for.
HBD Report Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting January 7, 2009.
PHENIX results on collectivity tests in high-multiplicity p+p and p+Au collisions at √s NN =200 GeV RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa Quark Matter 2015, Kobe,
High p T results from PHENIX Carla M Vale Brookhaven National Laboratory for the PHENIX Collaboration June
Low Mass Vector Mesons Nuclear Modification Factors in d+Au 200GeV Lei Guo Los Alamos National Laboratory PHENIX Collaboration.
Jamaica 11 Jan.8, 2009 Muon Trigger Upgrade at PHENIX RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Upgrade with Silicon Vertex Tracker Rachid Nouicer Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) For the PHENIX Collaboration Stripixel VTX Review October 1, 2008.
Possible Improvement of MUID Performance Itaru Nakagawa, Seyoung Han (RIKEN, Ewha/RIKEN)
MuTrg/Mutr Optimization Yoshi-mitsu Imazu. ● Mutr Lv1 timing scan Adjustment of Lv1 timing Online/Offline shape cut values ● Mutrg threshold scan → Better.
PHENIX Plan for Run13 Kieran Boyle RSC 01/11/20131.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Analysis Meeting, November 9-11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Heavy Flavor Working Group Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ . Heavy.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Muon Trigger Performance Run12 PP510GeV Sanghwa Park (SNU/RIKEN)
High Multiplicity FVTX Trigger Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group 1.
Time Meeting 2/10/2015 PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
FVTX High Multiplicity Trigger for Run15
RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa
RadLab PHENIX Meeting Feb
Maki KUROSAWA VTX Group 2014 Feb 20
p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

FVTX Trigger Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group 1

Outline 1.Statistical Goal (of high multiplicity events for pp) 2.Trigger Performance 3.Hardware status 2

Slide from Wei Lei, Rice University 3 pA vs. pp Signal is expected to be smaller in pp. Requires more statistics than pA. Requires more statistics than pA

ExperimentpA, dApp CMS ✔✔ ALICE ✔✔ ATLAS ✔ PHENIX ✔ STAR? 4

PPG161 PPG Chair: Shengli Huang (Vanderbilt) PPG Members: PPG Members: John Chin-Hao Chen(RBRC), ShinIchi Esumi(Tsukuba), Jiangyong Jia(Stony), Anne Sickles(BNL), Julia Velkovska(Vanderbilt), Paul Stankus (ORNL) In preparation for PRL 5 Dec.18 (Thusday) I will present the FVTX trigger in PLHF PWG meeting.

Observed v2 in PHENIX Minimum bias : pp 6 Elementary process (not flow) Minimum bias : dAu v2 component (red curve)

Track Multiplicity vs. rapidity 7 PHOBOS Phys. Rev. C72, d-going Au-going v2v2 smaller Larger 0 ~ 20% 0 ~ 5% ~60 ~20 For 0 ~ 5% centrality, track multiplicity is 20 in d-going and 60 in Au- going side in FVTX rapidity region. For pp ~ 40 ? We set trig threshold to be 30.

Required Rejection Power # of Tracks / arm > 0> 10 > 20> 30> 40 Fraction in MB 100%10%0.7%0.04%0.008% Rates in MB 1MHz100kHz7kHz400Hz80Hz Required Rejection Power ,50012,500 8 # of Tracks in FVTX / 510GeV pp Run13 Data Assuming BBC rate of 1MHz, rates for # of tracks > 30 in FVTX is about 400Hz at 500GeV.

Key Features to observe Ridge 0 ~ 5% centrality => 20 ~ 60 tracks / rapidity unit pp is symmetric collision, so take average 40 as the signal region. The higher the multiplicity, collective motion effect expected to be larger. 80 Mevents Cental dA Events in Run8 9

Key Features to observe Ridge 0 ~ 5% centrality => 20 ~ 60 tracks / rapidity unit 80 Mevents Cental dA Events in Run8 10 FVTX North and South separate trigger bits Assuming 100Hz per arm (Total 200Hz) 200Hz x 3600s x 24h x 7days x 9 weeks x 30% DAQ time ~ 300M high multiplicity events Goal of Run 15 - > Purity of the trigger is the issue

Note Trigger efficiency, rejection power and prescale factor do not affect on this total triggered event estimation, because constant 100Hz is assumed. 11 FVTX North and South separate trigger bits Assuming 100Hz per arm (Total 200Hz) 200Hz x 3600s x 24h x 7days x 9 weeks x 30% DAQ time ~ 300M high multiplicity events Goal of Run 15

FVTX TRIGGER TERMINOLOGY 12

13 At least one hit in 3 out of 4 stations is required within a half sector ((  =7.5 o ). -> TrackFlag. If there are more than two tracks within a given sector (  =15 o ), the second one won’t be counted. We Request Two Trigger bits (one per arm) for FVTX trigger. AND Limited to 1bit

Trigger Concept Multi Track Multi Hit How well we can trigger multi track events by multi hit algorithm? 14 Trigger used in CMS

FVTX Trigger Parameters 15 Station-0 Station-1 Station-2 Station-3 Wedge Sector Wedge FEM Cage # of hits/wedge # of active wedges out of 4 stations Active Sector (AND/OR) # of active FEMs Arm Active Cage (AND/OR)

FEM Trigger FEM-IB Discri. TTL->ECL ECL-> TTL RBIB GL1 BCLK ~18 collision 1 BLKC process + delay window 4 Beam Clocks?) 1 BCLK process + 1 BCLK Mulit FEM window + 1 BCLK latch + delay 20 2BCLK FVTX Trigger Timing Chart In theory, we can assign 4 beam clock window for hits to arrive. We can set threshold for 4 hits/wedge. 1 hit/wedge/BCLK

TRIGGER PERFORMANCE Run13 pp data was used. #of tracks could be lower in 200GeV. 17

18 -> 14 total tracks/arm Number of Track Distribution Number of Hit Distribution Turn on around 25

19 Issues 1.Poor statistical accuracy on efficiency 2.Trigger turn on gets too high? -> 18 total tracks/arm

Performance 20 6 ~ 9 Need more statistics to observe the efficiency drop The purity won’t go beyond 0.25 Blue : North Red : South

Multi-Track vs. Multi-Hit Algorithm MultiTrack MultiHit Low track events are more suppressed in Multi-Track than Multi-Hit Mode

Figure of Merit There is some correlation between purity and rejection power. The higher the rejection power, the higher the purity. The present purity 0.25 scales down expected total events from 300M to 80M. So far, the best performance is provided by tighter condition with higher rejection power with smaller prescale. Need to explore even tighter condition with high statistics data sample. (x10 stat data production is completed). Combination trigger with multi-track and multi-hit algorithm will be explored. 22

HARDWARE STATUS 23

FEM-IB Cable 24 4 FEM-IB cables were made and they are ready to be installed. Better wait until January when Eric comes back? FEM end FEM-IB end

Trigger FEM Board 25 Test Pin OUT Serial Wire To FEM-IB Test-Pin

26

FEM -> FEM-IB Installation 27 November 5 th, 2014

20 FEM-IB -> GL1 FEM Trigger FEM-IB Discri. TTL->ECL ECL-> TTL RBIB GL1 BCLK ~18 collision 2BCLK 1 hit/wedge/BCLK

Works to be done Optimization of trigger parameters. Trigger parameters control via slow control (Aaron). Trigger efficiency measurement at test bench (Toru) Chain test with multiple FEMs at Trigger Timing measurement with cosmic.

BACKUPS 30

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ONLINE AND OFFLINE TRACK 31

Difference in Track Criteria This track will be recognized as track in both online and offline. A FEM track frag Offline track FEM i B C B This category won’t be picked up by the trigger -> cause of survival tracks

Difference in Track Criteria This track leaves only 2 hits in FVTX and won’t satisfy ¾ station criteria in the trigger A FEM track frag Offline track FEM i B C C

Difference in Track Criteria This differences can cause small fraction survives FEM track frag> x trigger condition A FEM track frag Offline track FEM i FEM i+1 B C A C C -> B This category won’t be picked up by the trigger -> cause of survival tracks Possibly remove the border within FEM FPGA

FVTX Alignment y-axis x-axis FVTX Event Display track

St-0 St-1 St-2St-3 Wedges are slightly staggered in phi direction to gain phi resolution on purpose This mismatch of phi angle between stations enhances “category C”

Low # Track Leak Cause Summary 1.Online trigger won’t recognize track which crosses boarder between sectors 2.Online trigger won’t have VTX hit information. 3.FVTX stations are staggered by a little bit in phi direction 37 No trivial solutions without significant revise in hardware configuration

Figure of Merit Assuming “trigger” rate is fixed to be 100 ~ 200Hz/arm, then the number of signal is defined as multiplicative function of the efficiency, purity, and RP. Signal = number of high multi-track events