Henrik Winterhager Econometrics III Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators 1 Overview of non- experimental approaches: Before After and Difference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact analysis and counterfactuals in practise: the case of Structural Funds support for enterprise Gerhard Untiedt GEFRA-Münster,Germany Conference:
Advertisements

Different Methods of Impact Evaluation
REGRESSION, IV, MATCHING Treatment effect Boualem RABTA Center for World Food Studies (SOW-VU) Vrije Universiteit - Amsterdam.
Advantages and limitations of non- and quasi-experimental methods Module 2.2.
#ieGovern Impact Evaluation Workshop Istanbul, Turkey January 27-30, 2015 Measuring Impact 1 Non-experimental methods 2 Experiments Vincenzo Di Maro Development.
Differences-in-Differences
The World Bank Human Development Network Spanish Impact Evaluation Fund.
Econ Prof. Buckles1 Welcome to Econometrics What is Econometrics?
Impact Evaluation Methods. Randomized Trials Regression Discontinuity Matching Difference in Differences.
Economics 20 - Prof. Anderson
Pooled Cross Sections and Panel Data II
Questions What is the best way to avoid order effects while doing within subjects design? We talked about people becoming more depressed during a treatment.
Prof. Dr. Rainer Stachuletz 1 Welcome to the Workshop What is Econometrics?
1 Difference in Difference Models Bill Evans Spring 2008.
1 Evaluation of the adoption and impact of new varieties of sesame and groundnuts in Tanzania Deogratias Lwezaura.
Health Programme Evaluation by Propensity Score Matching: Accounting for Treatment Intensity and Health Externalities with an Application to Brazil (HEDG.
EE325 Introductory Econometrics1 Welcome to EE325 Introductory Econometrics Introduction Why study Econometrics? What is Econometrics? Methodology of Econometrics.
Evaluating Job Training Programs: What have we learned? Haeil Jung and Maureen Pirog School of Public and Environmental Affairs Indiana University Bloomington.
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Page 1 Discussion on: Estimating the impact of a policy reform on welfare participation:
Matching Estimators Methods of Economic Investigation Lecture 11.
Beyond surveys: the research frontier moves to the use of administrative data to evaluate R&D grants Oliver Herrmann Ministry of Business, Innovation.
Public Policy Analysis ECON 3386 Anant Nyshadham.
AFRICA IMPACT EVALUATION INITIATIVE, AFTRL Africa Program for Education Impact Evaluation David Evans Impact Evaluation Cluster, AFTRL Slides by Paul J.
Difference in Difference 1. Preliminaries Office Hours: Fridays 4-5pm 32Lif, 3.01 I will post slides from class on my website
Non-experimental methods Markus Goldstein The World Bank DECRG & AFTPM.
Chapter 10 Finding Relationships Among Variables: Non-Experimental Research.
Evaluation Designs Adrienne DiTommaso, MPA, CNCS Office of Research and Evaluation.
Randomized controlled trials and the evaluation of development programs Chris Elbers VU University and AIID 11 November 2015.
Selection Models Evaluation Research (8521) Prof. Jesse Lecy 1.
Randomized Assignment Difference-in-Differences
REBECCA M. RYAN, PH.D. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ANNA D. JOHNSON, M.P.A. TEACHERS COLLEGE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY ANNUAL MEETING OF THE CHILD CARE POLICY RESEARCH.
Bilal Siddiqi Istanbul, May 12, 2015 Measuring Impact: Non-Experimental Methods.
Effects of migration and remittances on poverty and inequality A comparison between Burkina Faso, Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, and Uganda Y.
MATCHING Eva Hromádková, Applied Econometrics JEM007, IES Lecture 4.
The Evaluation Problem Alexander Spermann, University of Freiburg 1 The Fundamental Evaluation Problem and its Solution SS 2009.
Alexander Spermann University of Freiburg, SS 2008 Matching and DiD 1 Overview of non- experimental approaches: Matching and Difference in Difference Estimators.
Experimental Evaluations Methods of Economic Investigation Lecture 4.
ENDOGENEITY - SIMULTANEITY Development Workshop. What is endogeneity and why we do not like it? [REPETITION] Three causes: – X influences Y, but Y reinforces.
The Evaluation Problem Alexander Spermann, University of Freiburg, 2007/ The Fundamental Evaluation Problem and its Solution.
Differences-in-Differences
Chapter 11: Quasi-Experimental and Single Case Experimental Designs
Chapter 1: Introduction to Econometrics
Measuring Results and Impact Evaluation: From Promises into Evidence
The Nature of Econometrics and Economic Data
The Nature of Econometrics and Economic Data
Pooling Cross Sections across Time: Simple Panel Data Methods
The Nature of Econometrics and Economic Data
Quasi-Experimental Methods
Quasi-Experimental Methods
Introduction to Microeconometrics
Introduction to Design
Introductory Econometrics
Pooling Cross Sections across Time: Simple Panel Data Methods
Deregulating Job Placement in Europe:
Introduction to microeconometrics
Impact evaluation: The quantitative methods with applications
Matching Methods & Propensity Scores
Matching Methods & Propensity Scores
Methods of Economic Investigation Lecture 12
Introduction to Microeconometrics
Impact Evaluation Methods
Matching Methods & Propensity Scores
Economics 20 - Prof. Anderson
The Nonexperimental and Quasi-Experimental Strategies
Impact Evaluation Methods: Difference in difference & Matching
Evaluating Impacts: An Overview of Quantitative Methods
Construct an idea/concept constructed by the scientist to explain events observed, e.g. self-concept; intelligence; social identity not necessarily clearly.
Counterfactual Impact Analysis applied in the ESF-Evaluation in Austria (period ) Contribution to the Expert-Hearing: Member States Experiences.
Positive analysis in public finance
Financial Econometrics Fin. 505
Presentation transcript:

Henrik Winterhager Econometrics III Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators 1 Overview of non- experimental approaches: Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators

Henrik Winterhager Econometrics III Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators 2 1.Non-experimental approaches with panel data 2.Before After Estimators 3.Difference in Difference Estimators Hagen, Tobias und Bernd Fitzenberger (2004), Mikroökonometrische Methoden zur Ex-post-Evaluation, in: Hagen, Tobias und Alexander Spermann, Hartz-Gesetze – Methodische Ansätze zu einer Evaluierung, ZEW-Wirtschaftsanalysen, 74, S.45-72

Henrik Winterhager Econometrics III Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators 3 Evaluation with non-experimental approaches Cross Section DataPanel Data „Regression Discontinuity Design“ „Propensity Score Matching“ Instrumental Variables Approach (IV) Before After Estimators Difference in Difference Estimators (DiD) „ Propensity Score Matching“ + DiD Multivariate Separation Rate Models („Timing of Events“)

Henrik Winterhager Econometrics III Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators 4 Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators use Panel Data: Data for certain observation units (individuals / households / enterprises) for several points in time  Cross Section and Time Series elements (See later slides)

Henrik Winterhager Econometrics III Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators 5 Model: α i : individual effect, taken to be constant over time t and specific to the individual cross section unit i θ t : macroeconomic effect constant over the individual cross section ε it : „white-noise“-disturbance

Henrik Winterhager Econometrics III Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators 6 Assumption: Participants of treatment group and control group differ in unobserved time-constant characteristics: For instance: Motivation, Management Skills, Intelligence Question: What treatment effect is caused on an outcome variable y of the treated?

Henrik Winterhager Econometrics III Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators 7 Before After Estimators Concept: Comparison of an individual‘s outcome before and after a treatment ATT is estimated by: t: Point in time after treatment t‘: Point in time before treatment

Henrik Winterhager Econometrics III Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators 8 Calculation of the difference in average outcome variable before and after the treatment Elimination of time constant individual effects Difference is equivalent to the treatment‘s causal effect Assumption: E[y 0t |C=1] = E[y 0t‘ |C=1]

Henrik Winterhager Econometrics III Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators 9 Problem: Assumption is violated in case of: macroeconomic shocks (θ t ≠0) Lifecycle effects (e.g.: Outcome variable „income“ changes with age) Anticipation effects (e.g.: Job search intensity diminishes before participation in a job creation scheme)

Henrik Winterhager Econometrics III Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators 10 Solution: Difference in Difference Estimators ATT is estimated by: Idea: Outcome variable change in treatment group over time in excess of outcome variable change in non tr. group over time

Henrik Winterhager Econometrics III Before After and Difference in Difference Estimators 11 By calculating the differences twice, time constant individual effect as well as time varying effects identical over individuals are eliminated. Assumption: E[y 0t -y 0t‘ |C=1] = E[y 0t -y 0t‘ |C=0], i.e. Lifecycle effects on participants and non participants are identical