Optimizing SiD for the LOI: Simulation and Reconstruction Norman Graf (for the ALCPG Simulation & Reconstruction Team) October 9, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intelligent Norman Graf (SLAC) (for the ALCPG Simulation & Reconstruction WG) CHEP 07 September 3, 2007 DesignDetector.
Advertisements

LCFI physics studies meeting, 28 th June 05 Sonja Hillertp. 1 Report from ILC simulation workshop, DESY June Aim of workshop: preparation for Snowmass;
Snowmass 25 AugustMark Thomson 1 PFA Progress and Priorities Mark Thomson (for Steve Magill, Felix Sefkow, Mark Thomson and Graham Wilson)  Progress at.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Simulation and Particle Flow Calorimetry for Future Linear Collider Detectors Norman Graf (for the Simulation.
Org.lcsim ILC Reconstruction and Analysis Tony Johnson SLAC March 2005.
Individual Particle Reconstruction Norman Graf SLAC April 28, 2005.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
Simulating SiD for the LOI Norman Graf (SLAC) SiD Phone Meeting July 30, 2008.
1 SLAC LCD Simulations Group Jeremy McCormick ILC Detector Simulation using SLIC LDC: ttbar SiD May05: 100 muonsSiD Aug05: ttbarCDC Aug05: ttbar 6 jets.
Slic A Geant4-based detector simulation package Norman Graf, Jeremy McCormick SLAC October 15, 2009.
Lcsim A Java-based Reconstruction package for Particle Physics Tony Johnson on behalf of Norman Graf SLAC Scientific Computing Workshop June
Silicon Detector: Simulation & Reconstruction Norman Graf SiD Advisory Meeting September 14, 2009.
SiD Software Status. Framework Overview Pythia, WHIZARD, etc. Pythia, WHIZARD, etc. SLIC Tracking, PFA, etc. LCSim StdHep LCIO Events JAS3 (or any AIDA.
Simulating the Silicon Detector August 16, 2005 Norman Graf SLAC.
ALCPG Software Status: Simulation & Reconstruction Norman Graf (for the sim/reco team) LCWS 2010, Beijing March 27, 2010.
HCAL and PFA Studies Ray Cowan Peter Fisher ALCPG 2009 University of New Mexico October 2, 2009.
LCD Simulation News Norman Graf ECFA Workshop ECFA Workshop Montpellier, Nov. 14, 2003.
ALCPG Simulation Status and Plans ECFA LC Workshop, Durham Sep. 2, 2004 Norman Graf (SLAC)
ALCPG Simulation Status and Plans ACFA LC Workshop, Taipei Nov. 10, 2004 Norman Graf (SLAC)
ALCPG Software Tools Jeremy McCormick, SLAC LCWS 2012, UT Arlington October 23, 2012.
Org.lcsim Reconstruction and Analysis framework for ILC Detectors Tony Johnson SLAC July 2006.
Studies of PFA Fundamentals Ron Cassell – SLAC SiD Workshop Jan. 28, 2008.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
Simulation and Reconstruction: ALCPG Framework & Toolkit Norman Graf (for the ALCPG Simulation & Reconstruction Team) ILC-ECFA Meeting November 8, 2006.
SiD Tracking Simulation: Status and Plans Richard Partridge for the SiD Tracking Group Vancouver Linear Collider Workshop July 19-22, 2006.
Detector Simulation Software Norman Graf (SLAC) CLIC08 Workshop CERN October 15, 2008.
Simulation and Reconstruction: ALCPG Framework & Toolkit Norman Graf (for the ALCPG Simulation & Reconstruction Team) ILC Software and Tools Workshop May.
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
Summary of Simulation and Reconstruction Shaomin CHEN (Tsinghua University)  Framework and toolkit  Application in ILC detector design Jupiter/Satellites,
ALCPG Software Framework Overview & Updates Jeremy McCormick, SLAC SiD Group ALCPG 2009.
Sim/Recon DBD Editors Report Norman Graf (SLAC) Jan Strube (CERN) SiD Workshop SLAC, August 22, 2012.
SiD performance for the DBD Jan Strube CERN. Overview Software Preparation (CERN, SLAC) Machine Environment (CERN, SLAC) Tracking Performance (C. Grefe)
SiD Simulation & Reconstruction Norman Graf (for the sim/reco team) LCWS 2010, Beijing March 28, 2010.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
Tracking Toolkit for SiD ALCPG 2007 Fermilab. October 22 – 26, Dmitry Onoprienko Kansas State University.
SiD PFA and Simulations S. R. Magill ANL N. Graf SLAC SiD/ALCPG 10/24/07 Where we Stand Simulation Status PFA Performance Recent R&D Efforts Standard Software.
Lcsim software: status and future plans ECFA-LC DESY May 28, 2013 Norman Graf (for the sim/reco group)
Calorimeter Assisted Track Finder Tracking Infrastructure Dmitry Onoprienko Kansas State University Linear Collider Workshop 2007 May 30 – June 3, 2007.
25 Oct 2007Jeremy McCormick, ALCPG MC1 ALCPG Monte Carlo Framework.
SiD PFA Meeting 27 August Status report on SiD global parameters study and PFA activities at MIT Ray Cowan Peter Fisher 27 August 2009.
Plans to study the Readout design in the forward region June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel  Currently: one big sensitive silicon disks: we record the Geant 4.
Software Status for GLD Concepts Akiya Miyamoto 31-October-2007 ILD Optimization Meeting References: - Y.Sugimoto, “GLD and GLDc”, talk at ALCPG07, ILD.
How to Get Involved in SiD Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC LCWS 07.
1 Software tools in Asia Akiya Miyamoto KEK 18-March-2005 Simulation and Reconstruction Session LCWS2005 Representing acfa-sim-j activity M.C.Chang 1,K.Fujii.
SiD LOI Benchmark Simulation and Reconstruction Norman Graf (SLAC) LCWA09, Albuquerque September 30, 2009.
ILC Jet Energy Working Group: introduction and discussion Norman Graf (SLAC) LCWS07, Hamburg June 2, 2007.
SiD Simulation Status Report Norman Graf (SLAC) SiD Workshop, Boulder April 14,2008.
Slic A Geant4-based detector simulation package Jeremy McCormick, Norman Graf, Ron Cassell, Tony Johnson SLAC June 8, 2006.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
Lcsim Status for Muon Collider Physics and Detector Studies Norman Graf (SLAC) MAP 2012 Winter Meeting SLAC, March 8, 2012.
Lcsim software: status and future plans ECFA-LC DESY May 30, 2013 Norman Graf (for the sim/reco group)
LCSim Tutorial for Muon Collider Detector Studies Jeremy McCormick, Norman Graf SLAC Hans Wenzel FNAL.
Intelligent Norman Graf (SLAC) SuperB computing mini-Workshop Pearl Harbor Day, 2007 DesignDetector.
Intelligent Norman Graf (SLAC) (for the ALCPG Simulation & Reconstruction WG) Muon Collider Simulation Technical Meeting October 5, 2010 DesignDetector.
Status of the ALCPG simulation & reconstruction Norman Graf (SLAC) TILC09, Tsukuba April 19, 2009.
Data Model: LCIO to LCIO2.0 Norman Graf (SLAC) ILC-CLIC Software, CERN May 28, 2009.
Simulation and Reconstruction: ALCPG Framework & Toolkit Norman Graf (for the ALCPG Simulation & Reconstruction Team) LCWS07 May 31, 2007.
Org.lcsim: Event Reconstruction in Java Norman Graf (SLAC) For the ALCPG Physics & Detector Simulation & Reconstruction Group CHEP 2010 Taipei, Oct. 21,
ALCPG Simulation/Reconstruction
SiD: Simulation and Reconstruction
Global ILC Simulation Status Report (Personal summary from TILC08)
slicPandora: slic + pandoraPFANew
Markus Frank CERN/LHCb CHEP2013, Amsterdam, October 14th–18th 2013
HEP detector description supporting the full experiment life cycle
Simulation Framework Norman Graf SLAC June 10, 2005.
General Software Issues at SiD
ALCPG Detector Software Development
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Simulating the Silicon Detector
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Presentation transcript:

Optimizing SiD for the LOI: Simulation and Reconstruction Norman Graf (for the ALCPG Simulation & Reconstruction Team) October 9, 2007

2 Goals The goal is not to make the physics case for the ILC, for this has already been done. The goal for this study is to improve the silicon detector concept sufficiently to demonstrate that an affordable, buildable detector can be designed which is able to extract the desired physics from the machine facility. In the long run we need to:  Use realistic detector geometries.  Employ full detector response simulation.  Utilize full event reconstruction.  Use the full power of sophisticated analyses.

3 Goals: Short Term To-date, almost all of the physics performance analyses have relied on fast MC results within custom analysis environments. Will be some need for continued studies using the fast MC as we investigate broader regions of detector phase space and as the full reconstruction matures. Full reconstruction not yet at the level of just running a job.  Much development still to be done.  Analysis results will get worse before they get better if you try to use the full reconstruction. However, benchmarking analyses can proceed in parallel with the reconstruction development. Would like to strongly encourage physics benchmarking groups to target LCIO ReconstructedParticle objects.  Use fast MC now, transition to full reconstruction when it becomes available

4 Overview: ALCPG Framework StdHep Events SLIC LCDD XML LCIO Events Geom Converter Compact XML org.lcsim JAS3 WIRED4 AIDA HepRep XML Conditions Software Package Data Format User Analysis Drivers

5 GeomConverter Compact Description GeomConverter LCDD GODL org.lcsim Analysis & Reconstruction HEPREP slic lelaps wired lcio Small Java program for converting from compact description to a variety of other formats

6 Geometry updates in org.lcsim  hierarchical detector model & geometry model  parameters & identifiers  solids & materials  navigation, point location  logical and physical volumes  readout  coordinate transformation local to global global to local parent to local

7 Silicon Tracking Detectors For the purposes of quickly scanning the parameter space of number of tracking layers and their radial and z positioning, etc. have been simulating the trackers as cylindrical shells or planar disks. Are now moving beyond this to be able to realistically simulate buildable subdetectors. Have always been able to simulate arbitrarily complex shapes in slic using lcdd, but this is a very verbose format. Introduced Geometry and Detector Element trees to handle arbitrary hierarchies of detector elements. Have now introduced tilings of planar detectors (simulating silicon wafers) into the compact xml description.

8 xml: Defining a Module <module_component width="7.6" length="125.0" thickness="0.26" material="CarbonFiber" sensitive="false"> <module_component width="7.6" length="125.0" thickness="0.05" material="Epoxy" sensitive="false"> <module_component width="9.6" length="125.0" thickness="0.1" material="Silicon" sensitive="true">

9 xml: Placing the modules

10 The Barrel Vertex Detector

11 LCIO SimTracker Hits from Vertex CAD Drawing GEANT Volumes LCIO Hits

12 The Barrel Outer Tracker

13 Reconstruction We are able to simulate arbitrarily complex tracking detectors. However, the bottleneck has been to turn the SimTrackerHits into TrackerHits.  SimTrackerHit  channel number & ADC  Associate adjacent channels  Clusters  Clusters  TrackerHit (measurement + uncertainty) Dima Onoprienko has made a lot of progress recently and has release a number of classes to handle this for the simplified detectors.

14 Tracker Digitization Will probably still be a long time before we have designs for realistic silicon wafer tilings and realistic digitization of SimTrackerHits. Dima’s packages provide a virtual segmentation of the cylindrical and planar detectors currently being simulated.  More than sufficient to investigate questions of detector placement, numbers of layers, strip pitch, etc.

15 Tracking reconstruction Dima, Hans Wenzel and Rob Kutschke to talk this afternoon about:  Virtual segmentation and digitization  Producing TrackerHits in sid01  Fitting tracks Aim is to very soon have released code which will provide the full chain of functionality from SimTrackerHit to Track.

16 Calorimeter Improved Simulations Having settled on a concept with the requisite performance, will have to design a detector which can be built. Engineering will have to be done to come up with the plans, but the existing simulation package can already handle arbitrarily complex shapes. Can then study effects of support material, dead regions due to stay-clears, readout, power supplies, etc. However, again, the hard work is in analyzing this, not simulating it.

17 Improved Calorimeter Simulations II Have two types of polygonal barrel geometries defined in the compact description: Overlapping staves: Wedge staves: Can define ~arbitrary layerings within these envelopes to simulate sampling calorimeters.

18 sid01_polyhedra Dodecagonal, overlapping stave EMCal Dodecagonal, wedge HCal Octagonal, wedge Muon Cylindrical Solenoid with substructure

19 Detector Variants Runtime XML format allows variations in detector geometries to be easily set up and studied:  Stainless Steel vs. Tungsten HCal sampling material  RPC vs. GEM vs. Scintillator readout  Layering (radii, number, composition)  Readout segmentation (size, projective vs. nonprojective)  Tracking detector technologies & topologies TPC, Silicon microstrip, SIT, SET “Wedding Cake” Nested Tracker vs. Barrel + Cap  Field strength  Far forward MDI variants (0, 2, 14, 20 mr )

20 Example Geometries MDI-BDS Cal Barrel SiD SiD Jan03 Test Beam Cal Endcap

21 Example of Test Beam Analysis

22 Calorimeter Reconstruction There is not yet a canned analysis which efficiently and precisely reconstructs individual particles in the detector. PFA group has been meeting weekly to discuss status and plan future activities. Three ALCPG meetings devoted to this:  Oct. 4: Steve Magill  Oct. 11: Mat Charles  Oct. 18: Ron Cassell Stay tuned…

23 slic Number of internal optimizations and refactorings.  Should not be noticed by end users. Upgrades to recent version of Geant4 has essentially eliminated problem of event aborts when particle tracking became stuck. slic from scratch: cvs -d co SimDist cd SimDist./configure make Binaries also available for Windows, Mac, Linuxes

24 “Signal” and Diagnostic Samples Have generated canonical data samples and have processed them through full detector simulations. simple single particles: , , e,  +/-, n, … composite single particles:  0, , K 0 S, , , Z, … Z Pole events: comparison to SLD/LEP WW, ZZ, t t, q q, tau pairs, mu pairs, Z , Zh: Web accessible:

25 Standard Model Sample Access to the Standard Model MC dataset has been cumbersome to-date.  required a slac computing account, running slac- specific scripts, and having to completely run over the full set of input files. Have produced a set which represents the anticipated ILC data sample:  500 fb -1 with 80% e - / 30% e + polarization.  events from individual processes are mixed in each file. can run over arbitrary numbers of events and will get a representative sample.

26 Additional Information lcsim.org - ILC Forum - Wiki - org.lcsim - Software Index - Detectors - LCIO - SLIC - LCDD - JAS3 - AIDA - WIRED -