FMRP 2014 | 1 Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert A.Z. Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden Patrick Peeters Jürgen Verbist OLV Hospital,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Single Center Experience with Drug Eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Occlusive Disease in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia: Mid-term follow up Robert.
Advertisements

DEFINITIVE AR - Acute Outcomes -
2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Viabahn Covered Stents for Cephalic Arch Stenosis Can Improve Patency and Longevity of Upper Arm AV Fistulas Toufic Safa, MD, FACS Vascular & Endovascular.
Zilver PTX Trial Bhagat K. Reddy, MD, FACC
Treatment Strategies for Peripheral In-Stent Restenosis
1 Michael Dake, MD Research/Research Grants, Clinical Trial Support –W. L. Gore –Cook Medical Consulting Fees/Honoraria –W. L. Gore –Abbott Vascular Equity.
Superficial Femoral Artery Stents - Bare, Covered, or Drug-Coated – “The Data and The HYPE” Dennis F. Bandyk, MD Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery.
FAST (Femoral Artery Stenting Trial) Final Results Hans Krankenberg (on behalf of the FAST Investigators) Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center Prof.
DIABETES trial P Jiménez-Quevedo, M Sabaté, DJ Angiolillo, JA Gómez-Hospital, R Hernández-Antolín, J Goicolea, F Alfonso, C Bañuelos, J Escaned, R Moreno,
Chaim Lotan MD, Yaron Almagor MD, Karel Kuiper MD, M.J. Suttorp MD, William Wijns MD The SICTO Study CYPHER TM Sirolimus-eluting stent in Chronic Total.
Wires, balloons, drug-eluting devices, ect.
As presented by Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD, FACC Principal Investigator Thoraxcentre - Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands PISCES Paclitaxel.
Klinikum Rosenheim Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology LINC 2014 DEFINITIVE AR Severe Ca++ Arm 30-Day Results Gunnar Tepe, MD On behalf.
TITAX AMI Trial Y. Giraud-Sauveur on behalf of P.Karjalainen, MD, PhD : Principal Investigator BCIS 2009 London, UK A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing.
DES-BTK: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Trial of Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared to Bare Metal Stents in Patients with Infrapopliteal.
Endeavor Safety: Pooled Analysis of Early and Late Safety of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Laura Mauri, MD, MSc Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Clinical.
Angelo Cioppa, MD  I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report:  Research contracts  Consulting  Employment in industry  Stockholder.
12-Month Analysis Barry T. Katzen MD, FACR, FACC Founder and Medical Director Baptist Cardiac & Vascular Institute.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating a Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon in Patients TReated with Endothelial Progenitor Cell CapTuring Stents for De Novo.
Endovascular Treatment of Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Lesions – Balloon Angioplasty versus primary Stenting: A prospective, multi-centre, randomised.
Prospective, Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent versus Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Coronary Restenosis.
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial Myeong-Ki.
DES-BTK: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Trial of Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stents (SES) Compared to Bare Metal Stents (BMS) in Patients with.
RAVEL 4 YEAR FOLLOW-UP - Cordis Cardiology / Cardialysis – Euro-PCR – Sousa – 24 May 2005 RAVEL A RAndomised, double-blind study with the Sirolimus-eluting.
The 4EVER Trial Final 24 month results:
UpdateDEB Lesions Learned from the Trials and Daily Clinical Practice Ralf Langhoff, MD Center for Vascular Medicine Berlin-Wilmersdorf St. Gertrauden.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Vascular Surgery – Director: prof. Coppi Silingardi R. Veronesi J. Gennai S.
FMRP 2014 | 1 Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert A.Z. Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden Patrick Peeters Jürgen Verbist OLV Hospital,
D.DELEANU, M.CROITORU BUCHAREST, ROMANIA. BTK Interventions ? BTK disease = claudication and CLI BTK interventions = CLI Main goal of CLI therapy = functional.
Peripheral Interventions: Unmet needs!
FMRP 2011 | BEC Popliteal case K. Deloose M. Bosiers.
FMRP 2014 | 1 Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert A.Z. Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden Patrick Peeters Jürgen Verbist OLV Hospital,
Superficial Femoral Artery – Where Does the Data Stand? Director, Endovascular Services Mehdi H. Shishehbor, DO, MPH, PhD Cleveland Clinic.
From: Sustained Safety and Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 2-Year Follow-Up From the Zilver PTX Randomized and Single-Arm.
Global Experience with Peripheral DCBs/Stent Studies: C.R. Bard
4EVER results Koen Deloose, MD Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose
Can Drug-Coated Balloons Work in Synergy with Stent Grafts?
INFRATIBIAL INTERVENTIONS Current Results with DES
Lutonix® Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon to Treat Obstructive Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries Preliminary Six-Month Results from.
The (Potential) Role of Drug Eluting Balloons in BTK Interventions
Heavily calcified SFA lesions do not avoid the use of 4 F systems
Fem-Pop Stenting: Is ZILVER PTX DES The “De Facto” Stent to Deploy?
Stent Graft for the Treatment of ISR:
Angiographic Features of Atherosclerotic Superficial Femoral Artery Disease in Diabetics and Non-diabetics Presenting with Claudication Atif Mohammad,
One-Year Interim Results
Restenosis in Peripheral Arteries
A.Z. Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde
Eric J Dippel, MD FACC Davenport, Iowa, USA February 19, 2017
Drug Eluting Balloons Bodo Cremers, MD
Modern treatment of SFA
The Role of Interventional Treatment for The Failing Grafts
Medical Director of the Vascular Center
Instent Restenosis and Occlusion: Time for Surgical Revision?
Insights from the IMPERIAL and MAJESTIC SFA Studies
Case Presentation: SFA or BTK DES
Are we using fewer Covered Stents for SFA Occlusive Disease?
Results from the Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) study demonstrate the benefits of minimal metal implants for dissection repair after angioplasty 
FAIR Trial design: Patients with SFA in-stent restenosis (ISR) were randomized to either a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB) (dose 3.5 μg/mm2) or routine.
EXCITE ISR Trial design: Participants with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis were randomized to excimer laser atherectomy + adjunctive angioplasty (n.
ILLUMENATE Trial design: Patients with superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or popliteal arterial stenoses were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to either balloon.
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in patients with critical limb ischemia and infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease 
Division of Endovascular Interventions
ORAL CILOSTAZOL TREATMENT PREVENTS RESTENOSIS AND MAJOR ADVERSE CLINICAL EVENTS AFTER DRUG-ELUTING STENT IMPLANTATION: EVIDENCE FROM A META-ANALYSIS G.
Updated 3-Year Meta-Analysis of the TAXUS Clinical Trials Safety and Efficacy Demonstrated in 3,445 Randomized Patients Time allocation for this talk.
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
The United States StuDy for EvalUating EndovasculaR TreAtments of Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal By usIng the Protégé.
Three-year results of the VIBRANT trial of VIABAHN endoprosthesis versus bare nitinol stent implantation for complex superficial femoral artery occlusive.
Results of a randomized clinical trial of external beam radiation to prevent restenosis after superficial femoral artery stenting  Eric Therasse, MD,
Presentation transcript:

FMRP 2014 | 1 Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert A.Z. Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden Patrick Peeters Jürgen Verbist OLV Hospital, Aalst Lieven Maene R.Z. Heilig Hart, Tienen Koen Keirse Bart Joos BEC 2014, София RELINE Study: RELINE Study: preliminary 24-month results Koen Deloose, MD

FMRP 2014 | Results with modern angioplasty/stent technology in the SFA 2 THUNDER FEMPAC 12-month Primary Patency (%) FAST – FACT RESILIENT DURABILITY ASTRON VIENNA DURABILITY-200 ZILVER PTX ZILVER PTX long lesions 35%

FMRP 2014 | Mid term failure in the SFA Lesion factors Lesion length Vessel diameter Lesion location Occlusion vs stenosis Patient factors ESRD Diabetics sex 3 Vessel treatment Endoluminal trauma Inflammatory response Neo-intimal proliferation Tissue ingrowth ISR

FMRP 2014 | Mid term failure in the SFA Chemical block Inhibiting smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation DEB DES 4 Mechanical block Creating physical barrier & Remove the stimulus for ISR from the equation Covered stents Shorter TOSAKA I & II (< 15cm) longer TOSAKA II – short TOSAKA III

FMRP 2014 | What does the literature say about stent-grafts for ISR? 5

FMRP 2014 | Endoprosthesis for ISR Literature results 6 N° of patients Average lesion length Primary patency Kazemi TCT Ansel Monahan JVS 2011 Shamerri Ann Saudi Med cm -> non-randomized, single center data

FMRP 2014 | 7 The RELINE Trial Physician initiated, randomized, controled, multi-center trial comparing the new generation Viabahn endoprothesis (Gore & Associates, Flagstaff,AZ) and POBA in the treatment of femoral in-stent restenosis

FMRP 2014 | RELINE study : Participating centers BELGIUM –M. Bosiers, K. Deloose - AZ Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde –P. Peeters, K. Keirse - Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden –J. Hendriks, P. Lauwers, O. D’Archambeau - UZA, Edegem –W. Lansink, G. Lauwers, H. Schroë - ZOL, Genk GERMANY –D. Scheinert, A. Schmidt - Herzzentrum Leipzig –T. Zeller - Herz-zentrum Bad Krozingen –G. Torsello - St Franziskus Hospital, Münster 8

FMRP 2014 | 9 39 VIABAHN Endoprosthesis 44 PTA alone 1:1 randomization 83 patients* Rutherford 2-5 * After Protocol Deviations were excluded RELINE Study

FMRP 2014 | RELINE study : Primary endpoints Primary patency at 12 months –no evidence of restenosis/occlusion within the treated lesion based on CFDU (peak systolic velocity ratio ≤2.5) & without TLR within 12 months serious device‐related adverse events within 30 days post‐procedure 10

FMRP 2014 | RELINE study : Inclusion criteria Rutherford classification 2-5 Ankle‐brachial index ≤0.8 Restenosis/reocclusion in a stent (implanted >30 days) in the superficial femoral artery Total target lesion length between cm (comprising in‐stent restenosis and adjacent stenotic disease) 11

FMRP 2014 | RELINE study: Patient demographics Characteristic VIABAHN ISR N=39 PTA N=44 p-value General Male (%) Female (%) 29 (74.4%) 10 (25.6%) 32 (72.7%) 12 (27.3%) Age (min – max; ±SD) (49 – 86; 9.77) (48 – 86; 9.71) Rutherford categorization Claudication (R 2-3) (%) Critical Limb Ischemia (R 4-5) (%) 34 (87.2%) 5 (12.8%) 36 (81.8%) 8 (18.2%) Rutherford 2 (%) Rutherford 3 (%) Rutherford 4 (%) Rutherford 5 (%) 12 (30.8%) 22 (56.4%) 4 (10.3%) 1 (2.6%) 5 (11.4%) 30 (68.2%) 3 (6.8%) 6 (13.6%)

FMRP 2014 | RELINE study: Patient demographics Characteristic VIABAHN ISR N=39 PTA N=44 p-value Medical history Nicotine abuseNever Current Previous 13 (33.3%) 16 (41.0%) 10 (25.6%) 12 (27.3%) 16 (36.4%) HypertensionNo Yes, medically treated Yes, not medically treated 12 (30.8%) 26 (66.7%) 1 (2.6%) 16 (36.4%) 27 (61.4%) 1 (2.3%) Diabetes MellitusNo Yes, insulin dependent Yes, non-insulin dependent 26 (66.7%) 6 (15.4%) 7 (17.9%) 28 (63.6%) 7 (15.9%) 9 (20.5%) Renal insufficiencyNo Yes 37 (94.9%) 2 (5.1%) 41 (93.2%) 3 (6.8%) HypercholesterolemiaNo Yes 22 (56.4%) 17 (43.6%) 15 (34.1%) 29 (65.9%) ObesityNo Yes 28 (71.8%) 11 (28.2%) 33 (75.0%) 11 (25.0%)

FMRP 2014 | 14 PTA (N=44) Mean Lesion Length 190 (30-270)* stenosis (pre) 75.0 % chronic occlusion 25.0 % acute occlusion 0.0 % Calcified lesion 25.0 %** 8 bail-out procedures after failed PTA Viabahn (N=39) Mean Lesion length 173 (30-330) stenosis (pre)76.9 % chronic occlusion20.5 % acute occlusion 2.6 % Calcified lesion33.3% * Missing data of 3 patients ** Missing data of 1 patient RELINE study

FMRP 2014 | % 95.3 % p=0.383 Number at riskbaseline1MFU6MFU 12MFU PTA Viabahn The Reline Trial: 12 Month Survival:

FMRP 2014 | % 28.0 % p<0.001 The Reline Trial: 12 Month primary patency: Number at risk baseline1MFU6MFU 12MFU PTA Viabahn

FMRP 2014 | % 42.2 % p<0.001 Number at riskbaseline1MFU6MFU 12MFU PTA Viabahn The Reline Trial: 12 Month Freedom from TLR:

FMRP 2014 | 18 The Reline Trial: 24 Month Survival: PRELIMINARY RESULTS 24MFU Number at risk 26 PTA 19Viabahn 88.3 % 92.0 % p=0.531

FMRP 2014 | 19 The Reline Trial: 24 Month primary patency: PRELIMINARY RESULTS 24MFU Number at risk 2 PTA 12Viabahn 61.0 % 10.2 % p<0.001

FMRP 2014 | 20 The Reline Trial: 24 Month Freedom from TLR: PRELIMINARY RESULTS 24MFU Number at risk 5 PTA 12Viabahn 65.2 % 19.8 % p<0.001

FMRP 2014 | Conclusion ISR is the Achilles heel of the current SFA treatment There is some evidence that chemical solutions are valuable in the battle against ISR. The RELINE results proof that a mechanical barrier (like the Viabahn stentgraft) against tissue ingrowth is also a promising tool for treatment of in-stent restenosis, even on the long run… So…. 21

FMRP 2014 | 22 Conclusion …