TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU funds’ evaluation plan , Latvia
Advertisements

The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DG “PROGRAMMING OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” EVALUATION.
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance Workshop on strategic programming, monitoring and evaluation Ilse De Mecheleer, DG EMPL Madrid, 22 February 2013.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Civil Service Performance Assessment in Lithuania: Current.
Arrangements regarding ECP 2014–2020 implementation 1.Implementation of the Republic of Slovenia Budget Act Specific section for the period:
Sustainable Energy Systems Overview of contractual obligations, procedures and practical matters KICK-OFF MEETING.
Maris Puurmann Chief specialist Local Government and Regional Administration Department Ministry of the Interior of Estonia Implementation of Estonian.
PUBLIC SECTOR INTERNAL AUDIT IN THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA Mr. Jonas Vaitkevičius Head of Internal Audit and Financial Control Methodology and Monitoring.
Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.
The European Railway Agency in development
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 10 February 2011 How to apply: Legal Framework – Beneficiaries – Application and Selection Procedure.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
0 Kestutis Rekerta Strategic Planning Division, Government Office of Lithuania World Bank Workshop, Bratislava, September 6, 2006 STRATEGIC PLANNING IN.
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds in Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Innovation and the Structural Funds, Antwerp, 16 January 2007 Veronica Gaffey Innovative Actions Unit.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Co-operation Between the Ministry of Finance and the Court.
Manuel Mariño Regional Director International Co-operative Alliance ACI-Américas CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CO-OPERATIVES Global Corporate Governance Forum.
Regulatory requirements in the current programming period Funchal, 18 November 2010.
INSTITUTION BUILDING FOR LEADER FROM LOCAL TO NATIONAL AND FROM NATIONAL TO LOCAL IN SLOVENIA Tihany, november 2006 Slovenian Rural Development Network,
Expert group meeting on draft delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) under cohesion policy
Evaluation of EU Structural Funds information and publicity activities in Lithuania in Implementing recommendations for Dr. Klaudijus.
Managing Authority of EU Funds – Ministry of Finance 1 Methodology of selection of project applications for EU funds including preparation of appraisal.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Improving Aid Coordination in Tajikistan Aid Coordination in Tajikistan Improving and Challenges Aid Coordination in Tajikistan Improving and Challenges.
PARTNERSHIP AND INVOLVMENT Deyan Kolev, observer in MK from the group of Roma NGOs The Roma community and HRD OP
Struktūrfondu vadošā iestāde – Finanšu ministrija 1 1 Communication Strategy of EU Funds Sanda Rieksta Head of Information Division, Deputy Head.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Legal and institutional foundation of economic statistics Overview of international experience Regional Workshop for African Countries on Compilation of.
Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.
SEYCHELLES EXPERIENCE Hon. Nichole Barbe, PAC Member, Seychelles.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
Experience of Accessing EU Financial Support in Lithuania 4th PG Funding Meeting , Paris.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Participation in the Process of Brownfield Regeneration Dagmar Petríková, Matej Jaššo „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
Polish National Rural Network Bureau of Technical Assistance Responsible for: -Technical Assistance in Programs of Rural Development for period.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
The EU Water Initiative and the EU ACP Facility New Instruments to promote sustainable development of water resources and affordable access Antonio Garcia-Fragio.
EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Brian Gray DG BUDGET Workshop.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
Reforms in the Albanian Public Procurement System 7 th Regional Public Procurement Forum Tbilisi, Georgia May 16-19, 2011 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
1 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND BUDGET PRIORITISATION IN CROATIA Francois-Roger Cazala, Rimantas Veckys SIGMA - Lithuanian Ministry of Finance.
Information by the Managing Authority on evaluations of EU funds in 2009 Monitoring Committee meeting 25 March 2009.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
An Integrated Approach to the Future Role of the RCARO in Support of the RCA Programme.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Proposed Organisation of Evaluation of the Romanian NSRF and Operational Programmes, Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project for Programming,
Objectives of the Training
Lithuanian Standards for Evaluation of EU Structural Funds
WORKING PRINCIPLES ECONOMIC COOPERATION ORGANIZATION REGIONAL COORDINATION CENTRE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ECO/FAO REGIONAL PROGRAMME FOR FOOD SECURITY.
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance
ESF and Social Partners
Summary of key findings Inga Pavlovaite
ESF ASSISTANCE TO LITHUANIA’S OBJECTIVE 1 AND EQUAL PROGRAMS
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
State of play of OP negotiations
ESF IMPLEMENTATION IN MALTA
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EUPAN
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners Applied in the Monitoring of the Operational Programme

Contents Legal framework of the partnership principle; Formation of the Monitoring Committee (the issues and their solutions); Work of the Monitoring Committee (formal requirements and good practice); Conclusions and Implications; Challenges for the Future.

Legal framework for Partnership Obligatory provisions for the Application of the Partnership Principle Responsibility and functions Implementation process MonitoringEvaluationCommunicati on Rules on the Distribution of Responsibility and Functions among Institutions in the Implementation of the Operational Programme for the EU Structural Funds’ Investments in 2014–2020 1) Rules on Administration of the Operational Programme; 2) Rules on Project Administration and Funding; 3) Plan of Implementation of Implementing Measures of Technical Assistance Priorities under the Operational Programme Governme nt of the Republic of Lithuania Resolution On Setting-Up of the Monitoring Committee Evaluation Plan of the Use of the EU Structural Funds Assistance Communicati on Strategy for the EU Funds’ Investments in

Steps of Partnership Principle Implementation Selection Involvement and empowerment Feedback and Evaluation

Issues of the Monitoring Committee Formation The main issues of the Monitoring Committee formation:  How to determine an optimal composition of the MC members;  How to select the „right“ partners; Actions, which were taken:  Analysis of the partners‘ involvement in the Monitoring Committee work during (what partners and how actively participated, how efficient involvement was ensured, etc.);  Analysis of the partners involved in the activities of the Commission for the EU Structural Assistance in ;  Proposals for partners to participate in different working groups;  Discussions and meetings with potential partners;  The Standard of Partnership;  Guidelines for the ministries on partnership, particularly on selection procedures.

Partnership Principles The partners are involved into all stages of the OP implementation: planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. Involvement The partners representing national, regional, sectoral or certain public group interests may participate in the implementation of the OP. Openness The partners are provided with all the information required for efficient participation in the OP implementation. Transparency The partners are involved in the OP implementation within their competence, timely, in the forms appropriate for them and regarding essential issues. Efficiency Partnership is based on mutual confidence and obligation to strive for efficient use of the EU Structural assistance, contribution of all partners is recognised and highly valued. Mutual Responsibility

Guidelines for the Application of the Partnership Principle Involvement of partners into institutionalised forms of partnership is carried out in two ways:  By an invitation of authorities;  Upon request of potential partners; Step by step: how to ensure efficient partnership:  How are partners selected;  How to become a partner; When and how to involve the partners in each OP stage (planning, implementation, monitoring, evaluation):  The scope of partnership;  The scale of partnership;  Forms of partnership.

Key Criteria for Selection of Partners Partners should be clearly associated either with the problem, which is to be solved, or with its solution. Relevant partners may differ depending on the stage of the EU Structural Funds management and the issue concerned. Relevance Representation of all relevant partners (territorial, social, economic, NGO) should be ensured. Proportionality Partners representing wider and not narrower individual interests should be involved. Scope of representation

Composition of the Monitoring Committee (1) Monitoring Committee 55 members Member State authorities Intermediate bodies Partners (29 members) Representatives from the European Commission Representatives from the National Audit Office of Lithuania Representatives from the EIB

Composition of the Monitoring Committee (2)

Main Rights and Obligations of Partners in the MC The main obligations of partners : To participate in meetings (consideration and submittion of proposals on the MC meeting agenda); To represent the interests of the majority of umbrella organisations; To express their opinion and make reasoned proposals to the authorities administering the EU Structural Funds on more efficient EU Structural Funds management; To be impartial and responsible; To meet the obligations of confidentiality; To take other necessary actions required for ensuring efficient partnership. The main rights of partners: The right of access to information from the authorities administering the EU Structural Funds, which is necessary for effective participation in the EU Structural Funds management; Decision-making right, (in case of participation in the activities of the Monitoring Committee – voting right); Advisory capacity, which is granted in all stages of the Operational Programme management; Right of initiative, i.e. the right to propose issues of the Operational Programme management relevant to partners for consideration by the authorities responsible for the Operational Programme implementation.

The Work of the Monitoring Committee The formal procedures set in the Work Regulation of the Monitoring Committee:  Functions of the MC;  Organisation of MC meetings;  Time period for sending documents to members of the MC;  Decisions of the MC, approval of Minutes, etc.... And how it work in practice

The Role of Evaluation in Strengthening of Partnership The Evaluation Plan and its amendments are approved by the MC; The progress made in implementation of the Evaluation plan is discussed in the MC systematically; The partners receive all evaluation reports and information on the implementation of recommendations; The partners are involved into the implementation of evaluation actions, in particular, stages of evaluation planning, data collection and consideration of results.

Conclusions and Implications Legal basis is the main precondition for the enhancement of the partnership principle implementation; Umbrella organisations play a crucial role in the partnership development; Proper selection of partners is one of the key factors of the efficient partnership; Methodological documents support the application of the partnership principle in practice; In order to increase the role of the partnership, the fulfilment of formal requirements is not enough.

Future Challenges A number of challenges remain. There is a need for wide discussion on the following issues: Capacities of partners (what type of learning is effective; how to present an information in more simple manner, how to organise more efficient communication, etc.); A negative point of view from administration institutions (partnership as additional administrative burden, lack of knowledge on partnership, etc.); A Partner versus Project Promoter (EU Structural funds as main resources for the financing of the NGO‘s activities).

THANK YOU! Danutė Burakienė, Head of Evaluation Division European Union Structural Assistance Management Department Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania Mutual trust is fundamental to a successful partnership, whether in business or in marriage