1 Address: UIC Safety Database (SDB) System and Results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Terje Andersen 06 May 2011 Analysis of past derailments Information from data bases, investigation reports and surveys.
Advertisements


Introduction Level Crossing Risk – Approximately 30% of rail related fatalities occur as a result of motor vehicle collisions 1 – Annual estimated cost.
State of Safety Breakfast 2013/14 24 November 2014 Dr Cornel Malan RSR Head : Research.
IRSC DUBLIN OCTOBER 2006 vue n°1 INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY SAFETY CONFERENCE Dublin 23 – 25 october 2006 CIRCULATION OF TRAM-TRAINS ON THE FRENCH NATIONAL.
Transport Railways Incident Procedures. Aim To give students information about the emergency procedures to be adopted at incidents involving railways.
1 Risk-based Evaluations and Trends of Railway Casualty Accidents on the National Railway of South Korea International Railway Safety Conference 2007.
Smart Sensor Technology For Rail Network health Hawk Measurement Systems.
Performance Metrics Reporting Requirements Including Enhancements Qasim Yunus Tariq Alauddin 1.
TPT-WG34, Brisbane, Australia Thirty Fourth APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting, Brisbane, Australia, June 2011 RAIL SAFETY IN NEW ZEALAND.
Brief Overview of New ALCAM
October 2008 International Rail Safety Conference 2008 Denver, Colorado, USA.
Railway Safety Plan and Its Status in Korea
Vectus Ltd Copyright Page 1 Safety Process in Vectus ’ PRT Project Inge Alme: Safety Manager Jörgen Gustafsson: CTO.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Transport statistics Demarcation of the domain 1.
The European Railway Agency in development
Network security policy: best practices
1 Strategy for risk based health and safety regulation Richard Price IRSC Conference.
Japan’s Efforts to Ensure Safety of Railways October 12th, 2010 Railway Bureau MLIT.
R A I L T R A C K Presentation to Liability Underwriters Group Conference 4 September 2002 Ian Thompson Head of Insurance & Risk Management Railtrack PLC.
Railtrack PLC Safety & Standards Directorate Railway Safety: Analysing Risks and Causes Sally Brearley Railtrack Safety and Standards Directorate 8 December.
Human factor, road-rail safety policies, available technologies at level crossing. Towards a model to evaluate LCs risk. Emilio Cosciotti Massimo Costa.
CHAPTERS 1 and 2 o Advantages of Railroad Concept o Problems Early On o Economics Common Goal o Development of the Country o Common Goal CE 433.
Title: Railway Safety Plan in Korea Name: Sanglog Kwak, Sungbae Yoon, Kwanghag Choi Organisation: MLTM, KRRI Economy: Republic of Korea Thirty Fourth APEC.
Rail Freight Noise Abatement in Europe A consensus building workshop for all relevant stakeholders Conclusions and next steps Luc Aliadière, UIC UIC, Paris.
IRSC – Goa, 30 Sept – 6 October ‹#› The Rail Sector and the European Rail Safety Directive Simon Fletcher Senior Safety and Interoperability Manager,
Frequency analysis and scenario development
TRACECA PROJECT EVALUATION. LEVEL CROSSINGS ON GEORGIAN RAILWAY TRACECA ROUTE AUTOMATION OF 39 LEVEL CROSSINGS ON THE MAIN LINE FROM AZERBADJAN BORDER.
Title: Rail Safety Survey Presenter’s Name: DAISY P. JACOBO Economy: Philippines 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group Tokyo, Japan October
Supporting European Rail Accident Investigation Inter national Rail Safety Conference Sweden 29th September 2009 Dr Jane Rajan Head of sector : safety.
UIC ERTMS World Conference
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.
SAFETY OF TRAFFIC COMPARED TO OTHER HUMAN ACTIVITIES IN FINLAND Otto Kärki and Kirsi Pajunen Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT)
EFRTC General Assembly Brussels, 28 November 2008 Worldwide market for railway infrastructure UNIFE Study Key Findings & Outlook 2016.
INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICAL STUDY OF BUS ACCIDENT ARE THE BUSES SAFE OR NOT? GRSG, 109 th session Sept. – 2. Oct Presented by Dr. MATOLCSY Mátyás.
Designing tools for enhanced monitoring of railway safety performance of the European Union and its Member States Vojtech EKSLER & Cecilia LIND Safety.
1 Review and Assessment of the Korea Rail ’ s Safety Performance using Risk Assessment Models International Railway Safety Conference 2009, Sweden Chan-Woo.
HŽ Passenger Transport – overviewBUCHAREST HŽ PASSENGER TRANSPORT.
INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCE „LET‘S SAVE LIVES“ Tallinn, Estonia, March 15 th, 2011 Martina Pavlíková ŽSR – The Railways of the Slovak Republic.
European Railway Safety Strategy EIM Safety Group (PhGALLEY and J-Å HALLDEN) 29 september 2009.
1Deutsche Bahn AG, TS Remit of the newly introduced Chief Operating Superintendent and Safety Officer at Deutsche Bahn AG International Railway.
What’s Wrong with Integrity Management? How Do We Improve Integrity Management? Terry Boss Senior Vice President Safety Environment and Operations PST.
Pipeline Performance Measures Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
Transport Rail Safety & the Railway Safety Directive Frank Jost Single European Rail Area EU Commission 1.
UIC Safety Unit activities – UNECE Railway Safety Workshop Geneva, 24 November 2015 Peter Gerhardt, Manager of UIC Safety Unit.
1 Federal Office of Transport, Hannes Meuli, Roman Slovák Workshop on Rail Safety: Trends and Challenges, UNECE, Geneva, Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft.
Using functional analysis to determine the requirements for changes to critical systems: Railway level crossing case study Joe Silmon, Clive Roberts Centre.
Human Factors and Signals Passed at Danger Dr Huw Gibson Dr Ann Mills RSSB.
1 Båstad 28th September 2009 Safety and Security together in the railway environment Simon Fletcher Head of Safety Unit and Regional Coordinator, Europe.
A sustainable safety performance for railways Angelo Pira Project Officer at the European Railway Agency (ERA)
DESTination RAIL Decision Support Tool for Rail Infrastructure EU Project No Railway Pro Investment Summit Building the New CEE Railway Economy.
SAFETY OF TRAM TRAFFIC IN THE CITY OF ZAGREB Goran Radosović.
SIAFI, Paris, Infrastructure Activities Databases and Benchmarking  Franco SCHIAVI: Senior Advisor  Aleksandra PERKUSZEWSKA: Database Administrator.
HIGH SPEED RAIL ASSESSMENT NORGE
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
Guide for the application of CSM design targets (CSM DT)
Developing Transport Service Contracts
European Rail Infrastructure Managers
Accident investigations: developments and roles
Track circuit reliability assessment for preventing railway accidents
Meeting of the Working Group on Rail Transport Statistics
Task Force on Passenger Mobility Statistics 11 October 2018
Working Group on Rail Transport Statistics:
Rail transport developments Agenda point 7.2
UNECE Rail Statistics Alex Blackburn
ERA and accident statistics
Ministry of Transport and Road Safety
Life Cycle Costing.
Presentation transcript:

1 Address: UIC Safety Database (SDB) System and Results

2 UIC Safety Database is:  An Internet application based on a server at UIC in Paris  24 European Infrastructure Managers including Norway, Switzerland and Eurotunnel: kilometres of lines level crossings Million km of train movements per year  8500 significant accidents registered since 2003

3 UIC SDB is available for the following:  Learning from accidents - Identification of railways that have low accident rates so that good practice can be investigated  Providing a homogeneous statistical data set that can be used for accident analysis and risk assessments  Using a “ comparison database ” for lobbying purposes,  Producing trend analyses.  Proving a basis for bi- and multi-lateral discussions between individual IM(s). UIC SDB offers 3 levels of analysis

4 Data registered in the SDB for each accident: Type of Accident Associated Events Location Train(s) involved Causes Type of Line Signalling System Traffic Control Consequences Human Financial Environmental Protective Measures

5 19 types of accidental events divided in: 9 types of Accidents 5 types of Critical event An accident may associate from 1 ÷ 18 accidental events

6 9 Types of accidents in 6 families Train Collision Derailment Fire in Rolling Stock To Person caused by Rolling Stock in Motion Electrocution by Traction Power Involving Dangerous Goods with an obstacle with another train individual hit by train individual falling from train without dangerous goods release in which dangerous goods are released

7.. And 5 types of critical events:  TRACK SUBSIDENCE / TRACK DEFORMATION  BROKEN RAIL  (WRONG-SIDE) SIGNALLING FAILURE  BROKEN WHEEL OR BROKEN AXLE  SIGNAL PASSED AT DANGER (SPAD)

8 Significant Accidents Serious Injuries Cost of damage to stock, track, other installations > 150 K€ or disruptions to traffic > 6h Involving at least 24 h hospitalisation Accidents taken in account: + Accident involving dangerous goods when in accordance with RID/ADR section 1.8.5,.

9 Where in compliance with European Regulation N° 1192/2003 amending Regulation N° 91/2003 EUROSTAT: Fatality means any person killed immediately or dying within 30 days as a result of an injury accident, excluding suicides. Serious Injury refers to a person who was hospitalized for more than 24 hours as a result of an accident, excluding attempted suicides. Safety Data Base definitions are given on:

10 Location Open Line Station Other Level Crossing Bridge / Viaduct Tunnel Switches and Crossings Other Location Details

11 Trains Involved Freight Trains Combined Transport Block Train HS Train Other Passenger Trains Regional Long Distance HS Train Other Other or not Identified Locomotive Running Light Infrastructure Works Train Other Train (infra) Train not Identified Shunting Operation

12 3 Levels of Causes It recognises internal or external causes of accidents and the associated subsystems

13 Data on consequences of accidents Number of Fatalities Number of Injuries Cost of Damage Environmental Impact - Passengers - Railway Staff - Other

14 SDB Level 1 of analysis gives:  Number of accidents by type  Causes of accidents  Location of accidents  Daily and monthly distribution of accidents  Types of trains involved  Passengers, workforce and public: fatalities serious injuries  Key findings (in the Annual Report)  Specific reports.

15 Level 1: Breakdown and Rate of types of accidents

16 Level 1- Passengers, workforce and public safety : Rate of the victims of all accidents

17 Level 1- Accident rates in 2006 per million km of train movements from Safety Database 2007 Annual Report

18 SDB Level 2 calculates Common Safety Indicators and draws S curves: - Numbers of accidents per million Km of trains movements - Numbers of fatalities and serious injuries (per passengers staff and other) per million Km of trains movements with their breakdown per types:  Train derailments  Train collisions: collision with an obstacle collisions between trains  Level crossing accidents  Accidents to persons caused by rolling stock in motion persons hit by a train persons boarding/alighting a train  Fires in rolling stocks  Other types of accidents

19 Second level analysis from UIC SDB – Indicator on significant accidents period Collisions of trains, including collisions with obstacle within the clearance gauge relating to combined total number of million km of train movements. Collisions between trains Trains collisions with obstacles within the clearance gauge

20 Second level analysis from UIC SDB – Indicator on significant accidents period Number of level crossing accidents, including acc. involving pedestrians at level crossing relating to combined total number of million km of train movements.

21 2) Evaluate your performance % of Railway community compliance Significant accidents / million km of train movements Level 2 analysis from UIC SDB – Indicator period Number of all significant accidents relating to combined total number of million km of train movements. 1) Enter your indicator

22 SDB Level analysis 3 is for:  Assessing the performance of each company in the context of the distribution of community performance  Finding out specific local areas of accident’s risk to improve the overall safety of the system.  Validating a future threshold for each indicator as a value for the community.

23 Level 3: Assess performances in the context of the distribution of community performance. Normal distribution of the indicators on significant accidents in the period for the network of European UIC members participating in SDB

24 Third level analysis from UIC Safety Data Base Performances of 20 UIC European railway companies in 2006 in relation to the results of the community in the period 2004 – 2006.

25 Any questions? Thank you for your attention.