Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 1 Premarketing Risk Assessment Robert J. Meyer, MD Director, ODE II / OND / CDER Chair of RA Working Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
Advertisements

Susan Boynton, VP, Global Regulatory Affairs, Shire
Safety and Extrapolation Steven Hirschfeld, MD PhD Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapy Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research FDA.
Synopsis of FDA Colorectal Cancer Endpoints Workshop Michael J. O’Connell, MD Director, Allegheny Cancer Center Associate Chairman, NSABP Pittsburgh, PA.
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the main consumer watchdog for numerous products: Drugs and biologics (prescription.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
The ICH E5 Question and Answer Document Status and Content Robert T. O’Neill, Ph.D. Director, Office of Biostatistics, CDER, FDA Presented at the 4th Kitasato-Harvard.
Special Topics in IND Regulation
Meeting Agenda Presentations on endpoints –Regulatory issues –Scientific issues Pros and cons of end points –Classical end points –Non-classical end points.
Career Opportunities for PharmDs in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Research & Development.
Postmarketing Risk Assessment of Drug Products Division of Drug Risk Evaluation Office of Drug Safety Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Oncology Pediatric Initiatives Richard Pazdur, MD Director, Division of Oncology Drug Products.
1 The Chemoprevention of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer Issues Surrounding a Benefit/Risk Analysis in Clinical Trials Mark Avigan MD CM Medical Officer Division.
Stages of drug development
1 Lotronex ® (alosetron HCl) Tablets Risk-Benefit Issues Victor F. C. Raczkowski, M.D. Director, Division of Gastrointestinal and Coagulation Drug Products.
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the main consumer watchdog for numerous products: Drugs and biologics (prescription.
Presented by Lee S. Simon, MD Division Director Analgesic, Anti-inflammatory and Ophthalmology Drug Products ODEV, CDER, FDA at the Arthritis Advisory.
Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer A Regulatory Perspective of End Points to Measure Safety and Efficacy of Drugs Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer Bhupinder.
DSaRM Advisory Committee May 19, 2005 Postmarketing Studies: OND Perspective Julie Beitz MD, Deputy Director, Office of Drug Evaluation III, Office of.
First In Human Pediatric Trials and Safety Assessment for Rare and Orphan Diseases Andrew E. Mulberg, MD, FAAP Division Deputy Director OND/ODE3/DGIEP.
Postmarketing Safety Assessment of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Pamidronate & Zoledronic Acid Division of Drug Risk Evaluation Office of Drug Safety FDA Carol.
Reproductive Health Drugs, Pregnancy Labeling Subcommittee Meeting March 28-29, 2000 Holli A. Hamilton, M.D., M.P.H. Pregnancy Labeling Team Office of.
Drug Submissions: Review Process Agnes V. Klein, MD Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate February, 2003 www/hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
CLAIMS STRUCTURE FOR SLE Jeffrey Siegel, M.D. Arthritis Advisory Committee September 29, 2003.
CTD, Safety Tanja Braakman Genzyme Europe BV Pharmacovigilance Department.
Joint Meeting of Anti-Infective Drugs & Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committees December 14-15, 2006 Ketek  (telithromycin) Regulatory History.
Risk Management in premarketing phase Anshu Vashishtha MD PhD (in individual capacity employer : Watson Pharmaceuticals)
DEVELOPING EVIDENCE ON VACCINE SAFETY Susan S. Ellenberg, Ph.D. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics U Penn School of Medicine Global Vaccines.
FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003.
Proposal for End-of-Phase 2A (EOP2A) Meetings Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee November 17-18, 2003 Lawrence.
Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee May 1, 2007 FDA Presentation Advair Diskus 500/50 Carol Bosken, MD, ScM, MPH Medical Officer Division of Pulmonary.
Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee May 18-19, Overview of Drug Safety Challenges Gerald J. Dal Pan, MD, MHS Director Division of.
DIVISION OF REPRODUCTIVE AND UROLOGIC PRODUCTS Physician Labeling Rule Lisa Soule, M.D.
DHHS / FDA / CDRH 1 FDA Summary CardioSEAL® STARFlex™ Septal Occlusion System with Qwik Load NMT Medical P000049/S3.
Welcome to Workshop #5: Accelerated Approval (AA) in Rare Diseases: Review of a White Paper Proposal Emil D. Kakkis, M.D., Ph.D. President and Founder.
Welcome and Introduction Lee S. Simon, MD Division Director Analgesic, Anti-inflammatory and Ophthalmologic Drug Products ODEV/CDER.
Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Meeting April Quantitative risk analysis using exposure-response.
The FDA: Basic Facts It takes 12 to 15 years to develop a single drug Only 1 in 10,000 potential medications makes it completely through the process Only.
06/02/04DRAFT1. 06/02/04DRAFT2 QUESTIONS FOR PANEL Trial Design 1.The sponsor makes outcome comparisons between the selected subgroups of LVAS and control.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
Good Pharmacovigilance Practices
Cardiovascular Health Research Unit, Seattle, WA IOM recommendations on drug safety: relevance for vaccines? Bruce M Psaty, MD, PhD.
1 International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology FDA Advisory Committee Meeting Proposed Requirement for Long-Term Data to Support Initial.
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
1 Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Questions June 24, 2008 Ira Krefting, MD.
Signal identification and development I.Ralph Edwards.
Ameeta Parekh, Ph.D. CDER/OCPB CPSC Meeting November 17/18
Introduction to the Meeting Introduction to the Meeting Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee November 17-18,
A POST-MARKETING EVALUATION OF SAFETY CAMPTOSAR + 5-FU/LV FOR FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER A POST-MARKETING EVALUATION OF SAFETY.
Advisory Committee for Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs March 7, 2006 Question 1: 1.Has Biogen demonstrated natalizumab’s efficacy on reduced.
Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) Risk Management Public Workshop Day 1 - April 9, 2003 Risk Assessment in Drug and Biological Development Joanna.
Applying New Science to Drug Safety Janet Woodcock, M.D. Acting Deputy Commissioner for Operations April 15, 2005.
Questions to Committee about Potential Cancer Risk with Use of Topical Immunosuppressants (Calcineurin Inhibitors) Question 1: Messages about Risk A. Based.
Regulatory Considerations for Endpoints Ann T. Farrell, M.D. FDA/CDER/DODP.
1 Clinical Overview Omeprazole Magnesium (Prilosec 1 TM ) June 21, 2002 Mark Avigan, MD CM Division of Gastrointestinal and Coagulation Drug Products CDER,
Comments on FDA Concept Paper Sidney N. Kahn, MD, PhD President Pharmacovigilance & Risk Management, Inc. Risk Assessment of Observational.
Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 1 Premarketing Risk Assessment Special Conditions Robert J. Temple, M.D. Associate Director for Medical Policy.
Clinical Trials - PHASE II. Introduction  Important part of drug discovery process  Why important??  Therapeutic exploratory trial  First time in.
Recent FDA Activities in Safe Use of Opioids Bob Rappaport, M.D. Director, Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia, and Addiction Products Center for Drug Evaluation.
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look
Expedited Drug Approval Programs
Balancing Pre and Postmarket Requirements Different Scenarios
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Bozeman Health Clinical Research
FDA-CDRH in the Next Decade A Vision for Change
Issues in TB Drug Development: A Regulatory Perspective
Overview of FDA’s 2005 Risk Management Guidance
How Should We Select and Define Trial Estimands
Presentation transcript:

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 1 Premarketing Risk Assessment Robert J. Meyer, MD Director, ODE II / OND / CDER Chair of RA Working Group

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 2 Group 1 - Premarketing Risk Assessment WG: Bob Meyer*Barbara Gould – PM Mary Willy*Ellis Unger * George Rochester Mark Avigan David GrahamJerry Phillips Donna Griebel Robert Temple Zili Li Judy Racoosin Peter Lee David Cho Trish Rohan Janice Newcomb, Aileen Ciampa, Lois Chester

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 3 Premarketing Risk Assessment Presentations:Presentations: –Generating Risk Information General Considerations - Bob MeyerGeneral Considerations - Bob Meyer Special Considerations - Bob TempleSpecial Considerations - Bob Temple –Reporting Risk Information Analyzing and Presenting Risk Information - Ellis UngerAnalyzing and Presenting Risk Information - Ellis Unger

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 4 Premarketing Risk Assessment For Each Topic:For Each Topic: –FDA presentation –Public Comment Period –Panel Discussion (with questions from the attendees)

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 5 Premarketing Risk Assessment What is Risk Assessment?What is Risk Assessment? –Risk assessment is the process of identifying, estimating and evaluating the nature and severity of risk from a product –Good risk assessment underlies good risk management and pharmacovigilance

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 6 Premarketing Risk Assessment Concept Paper and Talk Does NOT cover:Concept Paper and Talk Does NOT cover: –Pre-clinical and clinical pharmacology aspects of development –Efficacy considerations –Post-marketing risk assessment

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 7 Premarketing Risk Assessment Appropriate size of safety database Ideal Size depends on:Ideal Size depends on: –Novelty of the product –Proposed Indication life-sustaining vs. symptom relieflife-sustaining vs. symptom relief –Intended duration of use –Safety concern from pre-clinical, early clinical findings

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 8 Premarketing Risk Assessment ICH E-1 has guidance on long-term treatments (chronic or intermittent, recurrent) for non-life threatening conditionsICH E-1 has guidance on long-term treatments (chronic or intermittent, recurrent) for non-life threatening conditions –1500 patients total, with – for 6-months, 100 for one year

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 9 Premarketing Risk Assessment ICH E-1 does NOT specify what patients should be regarded as contributing to this 1500 patient targetICH E-1 does NOT specify what patients should be regarded as contributing to this 1500 patient target –For chronic use drugs, should come from multiple dose studies of reasonable duration (e.g., 4 weeks or more) –Should be exposed to doses at or above lowest proposed dose

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 10 Premarketing Risk Assessment Rule of Three tells us that for a 1,500 patient database, we have a reasonable chance of identifying a particular event that occurs at a rate of 1 / 500!Rule of Three tells us that for a 1,500 patient database, we have a reasonable chance of identifying a particular event that occurs at a rate of 1 / 500! Yet, drugs commonly are used by thousands to millions of patients shortly after releaseYet, drugs commonly are used by thousands to millions of patients shortly after release

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 11 Premarketing Risk Assessment When are ICH targets not enough?When are ICH targets not enough? ICH: –Cause for concern for time related effect on safety –Need to quantify low-frequency events –Limited or unknown efficacy –Where there is concern that a product may add to a background rate of morbidity/mortality

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 12 Premarketing Risk Assessment When are ICH targets not enough?When are ICH targets not enough? FDA: –Preventive treatments –A very safe alternative already exists –There is a potential for a large market and very fast uptake into the marketplace, particularly for a drug for a non-life-threatening, non- serious condition

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 13 Premarketing Risk Assessment For acute use therapies and/or those for life-threatening diseases, no ICH or FDA guidance exitsFor acute use therapies and/or those for life-threatening diseases, no ICH or FDA guidance exits For life-saving products with mortality trials, these data alone may be enough to demonstrate acceptable risk/benefitFor life-saving products with mortality trials, these data alone may be enough to demonstrate acceptable risk/benefit Accelerated approval - definitive efficacy and full safety may come laterAccelerated approval - definitive efficacy and full safety may come later

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 14 Premarketing Risk Assessment What are the Characteristics of an ideal safety database?What are the Characteristics of an ideal safety database? –Controlled trials performed throughout –Diverse population (age, race/ethnicity, concomitant disease, drugs….) –Range of doses explored throughout development

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 15 Premarketing Risk Assessment What are the Characteristics of an ideal safety database? Controlled trials performed throughoutWhat are the Characteristics of an ideal safety database? Controlled trials performed throughout –essential for detecting treatment relation to common outcomes in the population –helps address confounding by indication –With active comparator, opportunity to judge safety vs. accepted (approved) therapy

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 16 Premarketing Risk Assessment What are the Characteristics of an ideal safety database? Diverse PopulationWhat are the Characteristics of an ideal safety database? Diverse Population –Only patients with obvious contraindications excluded in late phase trials –Allows for better generalizability of safety findings –Develop better clinical data on Rx-demographic, Rx - disease and Rx - Rx interactions

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 17 Premarketing Risk Assessment What are the Characteristics of an ideal safety database? Range of doses studied throughout developmentWhat are the Characteristics of an ideal safety database? Range of doses studied throughout development –Better characterize clinical exposure-response relationship (dose finding not complete at EOP-2) –May help provide important E-R data for dose adjustments in subpopulations –(Also may add important information on the assessment of efficacy - maximizing benefit vs. risk)

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 18 Premarketing Risk Assessment To detect potential interactions not previously identified, sponsors should:To detect potential interactions not previously identified, sponsors should: –Be vigilant for drug-drug interactions, particularly for likely concomitant medications (e.g., binding resins and HMG- CoA reductase inhibitors) –Product -demographic interactions (diverse population studied)

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 19 Premarketing Risk Assessment To detect potential interactions not previously identified, sponsors should:To detect potential interactions not previously identified, sponsors should: –Product-disease interactions (study range of disease and concomitant diseased patients) –Product-food interactions –Product-dietary supplement interactions (for popular supplements for the disease in question)

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 20 Premarketing Risk Assessment To help detect potential interactions:To help detect potential interactions: –An important way of providing data to inform about unanticipated interactions is to perform drug level (e.g., population PK) assessments in phase 3 trails –Could help define E-R relationship for S+E (help validate biomarkers) –Could help define drug level relationship to any unusual, rare AE

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 21 Premarketing Risk Assessment When would comparative safety data be useful?When would comparative safety data be useful? –Expected with some classes of products (e.g., preventive vaccines) –Need to characterize background rates –When there is a well established, well- characterized low toxicity product

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 22 Premarketing Risk Assessment When would comparative safety data be useful?When would comparative safety data be useful? –Where there is a well-established, related therapy –Where there is an established therapy with effect on survival or altering irreversible morbidity –When the sponsor wishes to make comparative claims

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 23 Premarketing Risk Assessment ConclusionConclusion –Pre-marketing Risk Assessment relatively mature, but still evolving –Public Health, Industry and FDA would all benefit from optimizing Risk Assessment allowing for approval of safe drugs with fully informative labeling