Marsh bird research on Imperial NWR and the Lower Colorado River: adaptive management in practice Christopher P. Nadeau, University of Arizona Courtney.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monitoring Birds in Wisconsin An update on new surveys and how to get involved Ryan Brady and Andy Paulios (WI-DNR) October 25, 2008.
Advertisements

Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
Birds of the Coastal Wetlands of Southern Sonora: Status and Conservation Osvel Hinojosa Huerta.
Habitat Suitability of the Yellow Rail in South-Central Manitoba: An analysis at multiple spatial scales Kristen A. Martin 1, Dr. Nicola Koper 1, Dr. Micheline.
Spoil to Splendor: A Story of Chesapeake Bay Island Restoration Presented by Christopher P. Guy, Peter C. McGowan And Robbie Callahan U.S Fish and Wildlife.
To broadcast or not to broadcast?. How structure call-broadcast? all surveys broadcast same suite of species all surveys broadcast same suite of species.
ATLSS Fish Functional Group Dynamics Model ALFISH Holly Gaff, Rene’ Salinas, Louis Gross, Don DeAngelis, Joel Trexler, Bill Loftus and John Chick.
What is a Chapter Network Manager? 1. Audubon California’s vision is that bird populations will thrive in the future, together with all Californians.
The ATLSS High Resolution Topography/Hydrology Model Scott M. Duke-Sylvester ATLSS Project : University of Tennessee Project web-site : .
Suzanne Macey.  DEC looks at known occurrences with 1 mile  FWS looks at known occurrences plus the potential for suitable habitat  Contact DEC and/or.
Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge Complex. Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge.
Chris Lowie Refuge Manager Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge
Bird Conservation and Research in the Colorado River Delta.
Nathan 06 May 2008 Tyrannid Flycatchers As Indicators Of Habitat Quality Vermilion Flycatcher (Pyrocephalus.
Example of Research Looking at Marsh Bird Density And Relationship to Vegetative Characteristics Upland Habitat Water Marsh.
Restoring Colorado River Delta Wetlands
Contaminants in fish and invertebrates from the Lower Colorado River: AZ, CA, Sonora and Baja California Jaqueline Garcia 1 and Kirke King 2 1 University.
PRRP Songbird Monitoring Proposal Travis Crane, Chandler Mundy, Travis Mote, and Morgan Mendenhall.
Methods for Estimating Distributions Static Distributions –Polygon –Grid –Habitat Mapping.
Monitoring a changing climate: An overview for State Wildlife Planners Jonathan Mawdsley The Heinz Center.
Evaluating survey methods for the Yellow Rail: comparison of human surveys and autonomous recording units Kiel Drake and Danica Hogan.
What are our goal(s) for green infrastructure?.
Birds and the Salton Sea An exploration of the importance of the Salton Sea and associated ecosystems to birds: a global and regional perspective Presented.
Targeting Augmentation Basin States Augmentation Work Group Colorado River Water Users Association Thomas Buschatzke Assistant Director of Water Planning.
UTCFWRU Landscape dynamics of bird and small mammal communities in sagebrush-dominated mountain meadows: A hierarchical, multi- scale study Elizabeth J.
Hawks Aloft, Inc. Thinning Avian Monitoring for Jemez Collaborative Landscape Forest Restoration Project
 Secretarial Order No establishes Landscape Conservation Cooperatives, which focus on on-the-ground strategic conservation efforts at the landscape.
SFCC Walkover Habitat Survey Training Course July 2015.
Low Flow Analysis & Water Use Plan Science & Community Environmental Knowledge Fund Forum June 10, 2004 Barry Ortman Diversified Technical Services Dawson.
OPTIMAL STRATEGIES FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE Koel Ghosh, James S. Shortle, and Carl Hershner * Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology,
Moose(Alces alces gigas) browse and habitat resources and resource use in response to post-fire succession on Kanuti National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska ____________________________________________________.
Suggested Guidelines for Geomorphic aspects of Anadromous Salmonid Habitat Restoration proposals G. Mathias Kondolf.
Ponds 6, 7 & 8 Permitting Update Napa Sonoma Marsh Restoration Group Meeting USGS San Pablo Field Station Office Mare Island November 17, 2010 April 17,
Effects of food and ectoparasites on dispersal age Victoria Garcia & Courtney J. Conway, Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of.
The MWS Program educates and trains citizens across the state of Arizona to serve as volunteers in the protection, restoration, monitoring, and conservation.
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Fish and Wildlife Department.
WRU Workshop: Modeling Flow, Sediment Transport and Bed Evolution in Vietnamese Rivers October 29-30, 2008 Jonathan Nelson USGS Geomorphology and Sediment.
Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) abundance and diversity in the tidal Potomac River and estuary By Nancy Rybicki, Jurate Landwehr, Edward Schenk, and.
What Species? We assume this workshop is primarily focused on secretive marshbirds, as defined in the 1998 workshop. But in some (many?) areas, implementation.
Walker River Basin Project Agriculture, Restoration, and Plant/Soil/Water Interactions Tasks 4 & 5 Summary2008.
Sampling Plan for the Marshbird Monitoring Program.
Napa Salt Marsh Restoration Project 2010 Status Update.
Marsh Bird Monitoring Technical Workshop March 6-8, 2006 Patuxent National Wildlife Research Center.
Research and Monitoring Related to Sea Level Rise at the Grand Bay NERR Will Underwood Stewardship Coordinator.
Seabird Monitoring in the California Current System U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Geological Survey.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Normalized Difference Vegetation Index for Restoration Monitoring Bruce K. Wylie 1, Steve Boyte.
Stakeholders Meeting November 15,  Review the development and identification of State’s preferred alternative  Provide updates on SCH Project.
Program Implementation Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.
1 South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project Stakeholder Forum Meeting December 4, 2003.
Long term monitoring of nearshore habitats in the Gulf of Alaska: Why and How? James L. Bodkin USGS, Alaska Science Center USGS, Alaska Science Center.
Establishing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management On the Upper Mississippi River Dr. Ken Lubinski, USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center.
Small Mammals Mark Peyton, Ruth Passernig, Robert Parmenter.
The Past, Present, and Future
Alachua County Forever Timber Harvesting Business Plan June 28, 2011.
Response of Birds to Vegetation, Habitat Characteristics, and Landscape Features in Restored Marshes Mark Herzog 1, Diana Stralberg 1, Nadav Nur 1, Karin.
The Great Lakes Binational Marsh Monitoring Program: The Role of Volunteer Participants Steve Timmermans Joel Ingram.
This is slide one Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Habitats of the Pacific Northwest: Application of a Model A Presentation for the 2009 Puget Sound Georgia.
Introduction Limited knowledge of these species: – Yellow Rail – Nelson’s Sparrow – Le Conte’s Sparrow.
Hydrographic Services Review Panel October 2010 David Fox Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Marine Resources Program Use of seafloor mapping data in.
National Marsh Bird Monitoring: Methods, Pilot Study, and Where We Go From Here 16 January 2013 Mark Seamans U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Lakewood, CO.
Phil Gruenberg, Executive Officer California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin Proposed IID/SDCWA Transfer CRWQCB-R7 Staff Concerns.
Habitat suitability and availability for rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss in the Canyon Reservoir tailrace Greg Cummings.
Use & Availability of Habitats & Foods Resource selection Measurements of use & availability –Food –Habitat Design & analysis Modeling Sampling.
Modeling to Improve Wetlands Management
Irvine Ranch Conservancy Monitoring on the IRNL
Identification of Restoration Sites for  a Fire-dependent Bird in an Urbanizing Environment Bradley A. Pickens North Carolina Cooperative Fish and Wildlife.
Developing a Prescribed Burn Program
Shannon Clemens GIS for Water Resources December 2, 2008
The Gila River Restoration at Apache Grove
FIRES IN RIPARIAN AREAS AND WETLANDS
Presentation transcript:

Marsh bird research on Imperial NWR and the Lower Colorado River: adaptive management in practice Christopher P. Nadeau, University of Arizona Courtney J. Conway, USGS AZ Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit

A glimpse at our studies Restoring managed marsh units to benefit California black rails 1. Managing rail habitat with fire 2. Estimating the detection probability of Yuma clapper rails 3. Determining the patch size requirements of Yuma clapper rails 4.

Restoring managed marsh units for California black rails Determine the habitat requirements of California black rails (and other marsh birds). Provide detailed recommendations on the hydrologic and vegetative requirements of black rails to inform management and restoration.

Study Sites on Imperial NWR 18 16

Water and Vegetation Monitoring

Learning from the BLRA detections in field 16 6 total BLRA detections 0 detections on 66% of our surveys

Where Have All the Black Rails Gone???

What do we know about Black Rail habitat???

-2 – 2 inches 2 – 4 inches 4 inches Water Depth Building Spatial Models to Determine Optimal Water Depth

high moderate low Fine-stem Bulrush Stem Density

= Building Spatial Models to Determine Optimal Water Depth high moderate low Habitat Suitability water depth stem density

4 inches Field 16: 20 Apr 09 BLRA Detections

2 inches Field 16: 24 Apr 09 BLRA Detections

0.1 inches Field 16: 6 Jul 09 BLRA Detections

water depth (in)percent suitable habitat staff gaugeminmaxavgmoderatehigh moderate + high %0%3% %3%32% %11%62% %31%78% %65%82% %59%72% %39%46% %2% Field 16: Optimal Water Depth Optimal Staff Gauge Depth = 2 – 5 in

water depth (in)percent suitable habitat staff gaugeminmaxavgmoderatehigh moderate + high %11%31% %18%41% %27%47% %26%44% %23%37% %19%28% %15%22% %12%16% Field 18: Optimal Water Depth Optimal Staff Gauge Depth = 4 – 7 in

Upcoming Work Work with Imperial NWR to maintain optimal water depths Modify models as vegetation changes in Field 18 and to model water depth variation Build more statistically based models as BLRA detections increase in field 16

* * * * * * LCR and Gila River Salton Sea NWR 900 Survey Points

Managing Rails With Prescribed Fire

clapper rail black rail Virginia rail sora least bittern CLRA numbers increased post fire All other species not affected by fire Detection probability did not differ between pre- and post-burn surveys

Estimating the Detection Probability of Yuma Clapper Rails tracked 14 clapper rails: 3 at Imperial NWR 11 at Salton Sea NWR conducted 84 detection trials detected focal bird on only 27% (23) of the trials

Determining the Patch Size Requirements of Yuma Clapper Rails Mapping emergent marsh patches throughout the LCR basin What is the minimum patch size a CLRA will use?

Marsh Bird Training Workshop 16 – 18 March 2010 Yuma, AZ to register

Jun 2008 Field 18: a restoration comes to life Sep 2009

What do we know about Black Rail habitat??? fine-stemmed bulrush (e.g. Olney threesquare) high stem density to provide overhead cover

5 inches 2 inches

Field 18 Water Fluctuations and Black Rail Detections

Field 18 Vegetation Composition

Field 16 Vegetation Composition

7 inches

Field 16 Water Fluctuations and Black Rail Detections