Perry Elementary School Perry, IA Kelly Schloss, Principal Jenny Adair, 1 st Grade Amy McCord, 2 nd Grade Janna Bjork, 3 rd Grade Shannon Cline, 5 th Grade.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leadership in A PLC. Leading in a PLC Widely dispersed leadership is essential in building and sustaining PLCs, and it is important that individuals at.
Advertisements

LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Professional Learning Community Secondary Leaders
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Collaborating to Provide Feedback for Learning Lisa Youell and Michelle Samples.
A NEW MODEL OF TIERED INTERVENTION REQUIRED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT AS OF JULY 1, PRESENTED BY JESS GRAYUM Response to Instruction and Intervention.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
Power of Professional Learning Communities
Professional Learning Communities OKGEAR UP Public Schools April 2, 2015.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
The First Step in Building a Professional Learning Community Austin G. Buffum, Ed.D. Senior Deputy Superintendent Capistrano Unified School District.
DRIVING INSTRUCTION THROUGH DATA WITHOUT DATA IT IS JUST AN OPINION.
RTI 2 Murfreesboro City Schools Lessons Learned Linda Gilbert, Director of SchoolsLinda Gilbert, Director of Schools Caresa Brooks, Coordinator, Reading/InterventionCaresa.
MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  DIVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION/EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES JOHNS Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Learning services ~ What’s next? Gulf Islands SD 64 April 25, 2013 G17 to G200.
Welcome New Concepts to Consider in Classroom Assessments 1.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
Professional Learning Communities Changing the Way of Thinking About Teaching and Learning.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Creating SMART Goals Refer to pgs in spiral conference binder.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
How do we ensure that all students are college and career ready?
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Professional Learning Communities A school-wide approach to ensure that all students learn.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Common Core State Standards Common Core State Standards State Board of Education October 22, 2009.
Austin ISD Eastside Numeracy Plan Talking Points: 10/11/10 AISD Department of Mathematics.
Data for Student Success Using State Assessment Data to Identify School Improvement Goals Lani Seikaly Professional Development Coordinator Data for Student.
John Fuller Elementary School Pine Tree Elementary School &
By Brian Patrick Federal Programs Director Whiteriver Unified School District #20 WHITERIVER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 I.ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW.
Bringing About Change Using Professional Learning Communities OSPI Winter Conference 2006 Dave Colombini – Principal, South Kitsap High School Dan Whitford.
Knowledgeable and Skillful Leadership
Professional Learning Community Rolling Green Elementary January, 2012 Rolling Green Elementary January, 2012.
Proposed Areas of Focus & District Priority Board Meeting April 22, 2014 Kevin. L. O’Gorman, Chief Academic Officer Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
Teaching is Contagious
Learning Targets for Today
Olympia High School.  “The question confronting most schools and districts is not, ‘What do we need to know in order to improve?’ but rather, ‘Will we.
REGIONAL TRAINING UNIT Leading and Managing Achievements and Standards in the Special School and the Learning Community.
Professional Learning Communities Supporting Student Achievement Supporting Student Achievement.
Elementary Math Work – Spring 2013 Des Moines Public Schools Mathematics Expectation: All students will demonstrate mastery of the rigorous Common Core.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Redesigning Bearfield for a Whitewater World!! Will Professional Learning Communities be our kayaks? Choose your kayak.....
Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21 st Century Teaching and Learning Institute Pennsylvania Department of Education Upper Dublin School District.
Common Core State Standards- Based Assessment: Toward RTI 2 in K-4.
Sparta High School Continuous School Improvement Plan.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
PLC’s and Professional Development Kick Start Monday, August 11, 2015.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Using Data to Analyze Tier 1 Curriculum and Make Informed Decisions.
Professional Learning Communities
Evergreen Heights Elementary
Professional Learning Communities
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Issue Analyses RtI Yvette Benton Brad Baietto Brad Scarbrough.
Russ Bennett Superintendent Aurora City Schools
PLC/RtI: Tier II Removing the Mystery! Friday, April 7, 2017.
Professional learning communities It’s a Journey, Not a destination
Effective Implementation of Professional Learning Communities
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
The Work of a Team Professional Learning Communities
Professional Learning Communities
Professional Learning Communities
Presentation transcript:

Perry Elementary School Perry, IA Kelly Schloss, Principal Jenny Adair, 1 st Grade Amy McCord, 2 nd Grade Janna Bjork, 3 rd Grade Shannon Cline, 5 th Grade Sarah Ade, Title Reading !

 We will discuss how we started reframing the concept of RtI.  Shedding a little light…

 25 miles NW of Des Moines  7,700 residents  Industry changes

 Pk-5 elementary  808 PK-5 students  68 teachers and about 100 total staff members

 72% Free/Reduced  51% Hispanic, 44% White  277 ELLs (35%)

 “Seven Ways to Kill RtI” by Brandi Noll. ◦ 1. Mandating a core reading [and math] program. ◦ 2. Ignoring the quality Tier I instruction. ◦ 3. Ineffective or lacking professional development. ◦ 4. Quick fixes.

 “Seven Ways to Kill RtI” by Brandi Noll. ◦ 5. Commercial intervention programs vs. knowledgeable educators. ◦ 6. Lack of using assessments that measure impact of instruction and intervention. ◦ 7. Failing to provide teachers with the support they need to analyze data.

Preparation for collaborative conversations about School Improvement.  6 Professional Development Groups  SINA Process, Back to the Beginning  Shared data  Listen, and Ask a lot of Questions

What we “unearthed:”  Mandated curriculum (1)  Focus on intervention vs. core (2)  Needed targeted professional development (3)

What we “unearthed:”  Lots of “things” (4)  Assessment alignment issues. (6)  Data secrets. (7)

 If a school tried to build an intervention program in isolation of its core program, it would be like trying to build a house, but starting with the roof – without a proper foundation, no structure can stand.

 A collection of facts is no more mathematics than a heap of stones is a house. – Polya

 The Core Instruction is the soil. If the soil is lacking nutrients, it has to be fertilized.

 What do we want for our children?  What do our children need?  What do we want students to learn?  How will we know when they have learned it?  How will we respond when they don’t?  How are we going to respond to the students who have already learned it?

 Focus on learning (instead of on teaching)  We expect high levels of learning for all students as the fundamental purpose of our school and therefore are willing to examine all practices in light of their impact on learning.

 “Collaborative cultures, which by definition have close relationships, are indeed powerful, but unless they are focusing on the right things, they may end up being powerfully wrong.” - Fullan

 “We assess our effectiveness on the basis of results rather than intentions. Individuals, teams, schools, and districts seek relevant data and information and use that information to promote continuous improvement.” -DuFour, DuFour, & Eaker

 To guide our intervention program, common assessment information must tell us… 1. Which students did or did not master specific essential standards. 2. Which instructional practices worked or did not work.

 To guide your site interventions, you need timely and frequent information ◦ On your students’ achievement  In meeting agreed-on standards  On a valid assessment  In comparison to others -DuFour

 Formative Assessment: ◦ Write Around:

 Formative Assessment: ◦ Write Around:

 Formative Assessment: ◦ Write Around:

 Formative Assessment: ◦ Write Around:

 Formative Assessment: ◦ Write Around:

 Formative Assessment: ◦ Write Around:

 Formative Assessment: ◦ Write Around:

 Formative Assessment: ◦ Write Around:

 Formative Assessment: ◦ Write Around:

Note Taking Tool

Tier III Tier II Tier 1

Tier III Tier II Tier 1

Tier III Tier II Tier 1

Tier III Tier II Tier 1

Action # 1: Math Core and Standards of Practice Action # 2: Reading Core and College and Career Readiness (CCR) Anchor Standards. Action # 3: Develop a multi-year assessment plan. Action # 4: Develop a robust professional development plan.

Action # 1: Math Core and Standards of Practice Tier III Tier II Tier 1

Action # 2: Reading Core and College and Career Readiness (CCR) Anchor Standards. Tier III Tier II Tier 1

Action # 3: Develop a multi-year assessment plan. Tier III Tier II Tier 1

Action # 4: Develop a robust professional development plan. Tier III Tier II Tier 1

 RTI is a framework, not a specific process.  Our PD Committees, RTI, and SINA Actions are all interrelated.  There are 3 components to a strong system: ◦ Focus on learning. ◦ Collaboration. ◦ Focus on results.

 Don’t waste time watering the rocks.  Find new light.  A little weather strengthens the plant.