Interfacing Model Components CRTI-02-0093RD Project Review Meeting Canadian Meteorological Centre August 22-23, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parameterization of orographic related momentum
Advertisements

Turbulent flow over groups of urban-like obstacles
LARGE EDDY SIMULATION Chin-Hoh Moeng NCAR.
Section 2: The Planetary Boundary Layer
Training course: boundary layer IV Parametrization above the surface layer (layout) Overview of models Slab (integral) models K-closure model K-profile.
Lecture Objectives: Simple algorithm Boundary conditions.
2003 International Congress of Refrigeration, Washington, D.C., August 17-22, 2003 CFD Modeling of Heat and Moisture Transfer on a 2-D Model of a Beef.
OpenFOAM for Air Quality Ernst Meijer and Ivo Kalkman First Dutch OpenFOAM Seminar Delft, 4 november 2010.
Hurricanes Innovative Grid-Enable Multiple-scale Hurricane modeling system Konstantinos Menelaou International Hurricane Research Center Department of.
Session 2, Unit 3 Atmospheric Thermodynamics
UNCLASSIFIED 3.5: Eddy Seeding for Improved WRF- LES Simulations Using Realistic Lateral Boundary Conditions Brian Gaudet, Aijun Deng, David Stauffer,
Reading: Text, (p40-42, p49-60) Foken 2006 Key questions:
Atmospheric Motion ENVI 1400: Lecture 3.
0.1m 10 m 1 km Roughness Layer Surface Layer Planetary Boundary Layer Troposphere Stratosphere height The Atmospheric (or Planetary) Boundary Layer is.
Wolfgang Kinzelbach with Marc Wolf and Cornel Beffa
Boundary Layer Meteorology Lecture 4 Turbulent Fluxes Energy Cascades Turbulence closures TKE Budgets.
Estimation of Prandtls Mixing Length
FUNDAMENTAL EQUATIONS, CONCEPTS AND IMPLEMENTATION
Wind Driven Circulation I: Planetary boundary Layer near the sea surface.
The Air-Sea Momentum Exchange R.W. Stewart; 1973 Dahai Jeong - AMP.
Monin-Obukhoff Similarity Theory
How to use CFD (RANS or LES) models for urban parameterizations – and the problem of averages Alberto Martilli CIEMAT Madrid, Spain Martilli, Exeter, 3-4.
Yamada Science & Art Corporation PROPRIETARY A Numerical Simulation of Building and Topographic Influence on Air Flows Ted Yamada ( YSA.
Mechanistic Modeling and CFD Simulations of Oil-Water Dispersions in Separation Components Mechanistic Modeling and CFD Simulations of Oil-Water Dispersions.
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
A control algorithm for attaining stationary statistics in LES of thermally stratified wind-turbine array boundary layers Adrian Sescu * and Charles Meneveau.
Observation and simulation of flow in vegetation canopies Roger H. Shaw University of California, Davis.
Regional GEM 15 km OPERATIONAL 48-h RUN (00 or 12 UTC) EVENT GEM-LAM 2.5 km GEM-LAM 1 km MC2-LAM 250 m T+5 T+12 T-1 T-3 36-h run 15-h run 6-h run Microscale.
Xin Xi. 1946: Obukhov Length, as a universal length scale for exchange processes in surface layer. 1954: Monin-Obukhov Similarity Theory, as a starting.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar Abhilash Vijayan Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj University of Toledo.
MISKAM simulation of the Oklahoma City case Márton Balczó COST 732 MC /WG meeting Madrid, December 4, 2008 Budapest University of Technology and Economics.
Comparison of convective boundary layer velocity spectra calculated from large eddy simulation and WRF model data Jeremy A. Gibbs and Evgeni Fedorovich.
Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations -- RANS
1/26 APPLICATION OF THE URBAN VERSION OF MM5 FOR HOUSTON University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Sylvain Dupont Collaborators: Steve Burian, Jason.
Turbulent properties: - vary chaotically in time around a mean value - exhibit a wide, continuous range of scale variations - cascade energy from large.
Mass Transfer Coefficient
Modeling the Atmospheric Boundary Layer (2). Review of last lecture Reynolds averaging: Separation of mean and turbulent components u = U + u’, = 0 Intensity.
Review of Urban Modeling Program at LLNL CRTI RD Project Review Meeting Canadian Meteorological Centre August 22-23, 2006.
A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas O. COCEAL and S. E. BELCHER University of Reading, UK.
Estimating the Optimal Location of a New Wind Farm based on Geospatial Information System Data Dec Chungwook Sim.
Session 3, Unit 5 Dispersion Modeling. The Box Model Description and assumption Box model For line source with line strength of Q L Example.
CITES 2005, Novosibirsk Modeling and Simulation of Global Structure of Urban Boundary Layer Kurbatskiy A. F. Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics.
Further steps towards a scale separated turbulence scheme: Matthias Raschendorfer DWD Aim: General valid (consistent) description of sub grid scale (SGS)
Matthias Raschendorfer DWD Recent extensions of the COSMO TKE scheme related to the interaction with non turbulent scales COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
The simplifed momentum equations Height coordinatesPressure coordinates.
Modeling and Evaluation of Antarctic Boundary Layer
CHANGSHENG CHEN, HEDONG LIU, And ROBERT C. BEARDSLEY
1 Zonal Boundary Conditions. 2 Some Basics The flow domain is divided into zones and grids are generated within each zone. The flow equations are solved.
Validation of urbanSTREAM Using JU2003 CRTI RD Project Review Meeting Canadian Meteorological Centre August 22-23, 2006.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Component testing of the COSMO model’s turbulent diffusion.
Mattias Mohr, Johan Arnqvist, Hans Bergström Uppsala University (Sweden) Simulating wind and turbulence profiles in and above a forest canopy using the.
Mesoscale Modeling with a 3D Turbulence Scheme Jocelyn Mailhot and Yufei Zhu (Claude Pelletier) Environment Canada MSC / MRB 3 rd Annual Meeting on CRTI.
Boundary Layer on a Flat Plate: Blasius Solution H z from Kundu’s book Assuming displacement of streamlines is negligible →u = U = constant everywhere,
Computational Modeling of 3D Turbulent Flows With MC2 Claude Pelletier Environment Canada MSC / MRB.
Parameterization of the Planetary Boundary Layer -NWP guidance Thor Erik Nordeng and Morten Køltzow NOMEK 2010 Oslo 19. – 23. April 2010.
Status of component 4, “urbanLS”… testing the four optional configurations (forward/backward, 0 th /1 st order) John Wilson, 22 August/06 Context Random.
HYBRID LARGE EDDY SIMULATION/REYNOLDS AVERAGED NAVIER-STOKES FORMULATION FOR NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICITON H. A. Hassan North Carolina State University,
A revised formulation of the COSMO surface-to-atmosphere transfer scheme Matthias Raschendorfer COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias Raschendorfer.
Wind Driven Circulation I: Ekman Layer. Scaling of the horizontal components  (accuracy, 1% ~ 1‰) Rossby Number Vertical Ekman Number R o and E v are.
Introduction to the Turbulence Models
Overview of urbanGRID CRTI RD Project Review Meeting
Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation
A Simple, Fast Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm for Risk Models
Monin-Obukhoff Similarity Theory
The β-spiral Determining absolute velocity from density field
“Consolidation of the Surface-to-Atmosphere Transfer-scheme: ConSAT
Models of atmospheric chemistry
9th Lecture : Turbulence (II)
Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE)
Presentation transcript:

Interfacing Model Components CRTI RD Project Review Meeting Canadian Meteorological Centre August 22-23, 2006

Component 3 : Interfacing of Model Components urbanSTREAM urbanGEM/LAM Component 2 Component 1 2-way interaction ? urbanLS urbanEU Component 4 Component 5 (whole system validation) Component 3 CRTI

Coupling GEM/LAM with urbanSTREAM urbanSTREAM urbanGEM/LAM Component 2 Component 1 2-way interaction ? Component 3 1.urbanGEM/LAM is a mesoscale code from Environment Canada 2.urbanSTREAM is a microscale CFD model Flow models

Regional GEM 15 km OPERATIONAL 48-h RUN (00 or 12 UTC) EVENT GEM-LAM 2.5 km GEM-LAM 1 km MC2-LAM 250 m T+12 T-3 T-6 T-9 21-h run 18-h run 15-h run Microscale flow models IC + LBC Global Variable resolution 576 x 641 Timestep = 7.5 min 58 levels (for NWP) 1D turbulence No TEB LAM 201 x 201 Timestep = 60 s 53 levels (two levels of packing near surface) 1D turbulence TEB LAM 201 x 201 Timestep = 30 s 53 levels (two levels of packing near surface) 1D turbulence TEB LAM 201 x 401 (long axis oriented along the low- level wind direction) Timestep = 10 s 53 levels (two levels of packing near surface) 3D turbulence TEB From Mesoscale to Microscale

Interfacing Mesoscale Model with CFD Model Two major challenges involved in this activity –Synchronization: Running flow solvers simultaneously and maintaining real-time communication between two codes (information exchange) –Exchange: Specify meaningful boundary conditions on basis of exchanged data Mesoscale model (GEM/LAM) functions as URANS Two possible exchange modes between mesoscale model and CFD model requiring two different methodologies –Mesoscale (URANS) to CFD (URANS) Simpler option –Mesoscale (URANS) to CFD (LES) More difficult option –Artificial buffer layer at interface

Two Modes of Exchange From Mesoscale Model to CFD Mesoscale (URANS)CFD (LES) Provide statistically-averaged data Create turbulent fluctuations coarse resolution statistical averages of momentum and turbulence quantities turbulence approximated with model fine resolution generation of quality turbulent eddies according to statistical data supplied by RANS flow solver to dispatch into LES region (“eddy seeding”) Interface Mesoscale (URANS)CFD (URANS) Provide statistically-averaged data coarse resolution prolongation of solution from mesoscale region to CFD region fine resolution restriction of solution from CFD region to mesoscale region Interface Mode 1 (two-way coupling) Mode 2 (two-way coupling) Measurement (Experiment)

Inner region: buildings explicitly resolved Outer region: modelled by drag force B.C. from urbanGEM/LAM One-way coupling (downscaling) (URANS  URANS) urbanSTREAM

Coupling GEM/LAM with urbanSTREAM Multi-resolution decomposition with full overlap One-way coupling algorithm One-way coupling of GEM/LAM (mesoscale model) to urbanSTREAM (CFD model) Solution integrated separately on coarse-level and fine-level domains Coupling enforced by imposing boundary conditions on D f using data coming from coarse grid (mesoscale solution) on D c Coarse resolution field obtained on boundary of D f by simple linear interpolation Prolongation of coarse grid solution at boundary of fine-level domain to various vertical levels obtained from idealized mean velocity and TKE profiles (e.g., three-layer wind model)

Interface Limited Length-Scale k-e Model to Mesoscale Model (GEM/LAM) Inclusion of Coriolis force terms –without Coriolis forces to balance applied pressure gradient at boundary- layer top (where stress divergence vanishes), horizontally homogeneous boundary layer not possible For flow in ABL, need to impose outer scale to limit maximum size of turbulent eddies due to –boundary-layer depth (e.g., ) –stable stratification (e.g., ) Limit turbulent length scale modifying production term in dissipation rate transport equation –Model remains consistent with logarithmic velocity profile for –No new closure constants are introduced into model

Coupling GEM/LAM with urbanSTREAM (One-Way Interaction) GEM/LAM domain urbanSTREAM domain

Inflow Condition from GEM/LAM

Comparison with Experimental Data Location 1 Location 2

Mean wind speed and direction at Location 1 Expt data Drag force

Mean wind speed and direction at Location 2 Expt data Drag force

Coupling GEM/LAM with urbanSTREAM Mean velocity profile: Below canopy height (exponential profile) Above canopy height (surface layer profile with diabatic correction) Above surface layer (constant wind profile) Diabatic corrections: Unstable Stable Blend profiles at canopy top:Below canopy

Coupling GEM/LAM with urbanSTREAM Mean velocity profile: Blend profiles at canopy top:Above canopy need to shift surface-layer profile upwards by d, the displacement height of canopy U s is velocity at top of surface layer Estimate of height to top of surface layer: Input: roughness length of canopy displacement height of canopy boundary-layer height Monin-Obukhov length reference velocity above canopy Determination of U s from reference velocity if reference height Parameterization for d : attenuation coefficient Parameterization for frontal area density

Coupling GEM/LAM with urbanSTREAM Turbulence kinetic energy profile: (Simplified) Below canopy where Above canopy where need to know value of TKE at some reference height above canopy, then

Coupling GEM/LAM with urbanSTREAM Turbulence kinetic energy profile: (Second-order closure model) Above canopy Below canopy where NB: Skin frictioncan be obtained from mean velocity profile, since at canopy top

Coupling GEM/LAM with urbanSTREAM Viscous dissipation profile: Length scale determined as Imposed limiting length scale restricting depth of inertial sublayer above canopy

Interfacing urbanSTREAM With Urban Dispersion Models urbanPOST takes output from urbanSTREAM and writes out flow statistics required by various urban dispersion programs Coordinate system used in urbanSTREAM (meteorological convention): x W-E (index = i ) y (index = j ) S-N z (index = k ) Vertical Numbering convention : (direction l) - grid lines (l = 1, 2, …, NL-1) - cell centers (l = 2, 3, … NL-1) [interior] l = i, j, k … l =123 NL-1NL-2 l =12 3NL-1 NL l

urbanSTREAM to urban(A)EU or urban(B)LS-0 urbanSTREAM urban(A)EU urban(B)LS-0 File: urbanEU_input.dat (dt > 0)

urbanSTREAM to urban(B)LS-1 urbanSTREAM urban(B)LS-1 File: urbanLS_input.dat

grid_generator Summary urbanSTREAM(-P) urbanPOST urban(A)EU urban(B)LS-0 urban(B)LS-1 ArcView Shape file (*.shp,*.dbf) Meteorological data file (urbanGEM / LAM) grid generation flow solver post processor AVERAGE.dat GridInfo.dat urban dispersion  Eulerian  Lagrangian urbanLS_input.dat urbanEU_input.dat input.par boundary_interpolate interpolate BCs urbanGRID gridded output individual receptor locations