1 Testing 1, 2, 3: An Analysis of 4Sight in Pennsylvania A Paper Presented at the 2009 North American Summer Meeting of the Econometric Society Robert.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Advertisements

Pennsylvania Department of Education Get R. Pennsylvania Department of Education Presented By: June Tran, IRF Kirkbride School December 6, 2010.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
Under Pressure: Job Security, Resource Allocation, and Productivity in Schools under NCLB Randall Reback Barnard College, Columbia University Jonah E.
1 The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Financial Impact on Manchester Public Schools Fiscal Year
Coal City Unit District #1 Title I Parent Meeting.
Assessment and Accountability at the State Level NAEP NRT (Iowa Tests) Core CRTs DWA UAA UBSCT NCLB U-PASS Alphabet Soup.
Watertown Public Schools Assessment Report 2009 Ann Koufman-Frederick & WPS Administrative Council School Committee Meeting December 7, 2009 Part I MCAS,
> Tom Corbett, Governor Ron Tomalis, Secretary of Education Title of Presentation > Tom Corbett, Governor Ron Tomalis, Secretary of Education Pennsylvania’s.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
Chapter 4 Changes Graduation Requirements Keystone Exams Upper Merion Area School District Presentation by Jane Callaghan 6/21/10.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Keystone Instructional Specialist. Keystone Exams Offered three times each year – winter, spring and summer. Offered in Algebra I, Biology and Literature.
PSSA & Keystone Exams Pa School Performance Profile
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Impact of fine arts on academic success A Comparison study EDRS 5305 Fall 2004 Dr. Teresa Cortez.
Pennsylvania Department of Education Initiatives Updates May 24, 2012.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
TRANSITIONING TO THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS South Middleton School District Education Committee April 10, 2012.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
Can I ask you a question? Do you have a sociological imagination…really?
PSSA: Pennsylvania System of Schools Assessment Robert Valeria.
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Understanding and Using Standardized Tests
Welcome to Media’s PSSA Parent Night. Reading in 2007 March 12-23, 2007 Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 11 Multiple-Choice Open-Ended Item-specific Scoring.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS INITIATIVE March 2011.
Comparison PVAAS Scatter Plots State to IU Region to School District Grades 4-8, Math & Reading PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE Contact your IU PVAAS.
Why We Got Involved… Bellwood-Antis Middle School PSSA Data 2003.
Pennsylvania’s Keystone Exams: A Change to Graduation Requirements.
Diagnostics Mathematics Assessments: Main Ideas  Now typically assess the knowledge and skill on the subsets of the 10 standards specified by the National.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Overview of the Title I Program at [school name] Presenter Date Location.
Growth Model for District “X” Why Use Growth Models? Showing progress over time is a more fair way of evaluating It is not just a “snap shot” in time.
Challenging Curriculum and Organizational Structures Oct. 23, 2013 Jesse White.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
CC A PA Standard English Language Arts Standard Categories:
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Classroom Diagnostic Tools Programs and Services Advisory Council Friday, October 22, 2010.
PROGRESS & & ACHIEVEMENT Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS) The Power of School District School District.
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation May 14, 2012 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team 1.
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.
To make the best use of this supplementary material, set your PowerPoint view to Normal and make sure that you can see the notes window. Please let a facilitator.
CREP Center for Research in Educational Policy SES Student Achievement Methods/Results: Multiple Years and States Steven M. Ross Allison Potter The University.
Teacher’s English Proficiency Test (TEPT) and Process Skills Test (PST) in Science and Mathematics TEPT-PST: Overview 2015.
A presentation of methods and selected results 1.
Assessment: Results & Implications for Instruction Parent meeting – October 13, 2011.
Chapter 3 Culture. Charles Schwab & Co. In 1990, Charles Schwab & Co. began looking for ways to expand. They decided one way to increase profits would.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
PENNSYLVANIA’S TRANSITION TO THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS February 24, 2012.
The purpose of evaluation is not to prove, but to improve.
Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21 st Century Teaching and Learning Institute Pennsylvania Department of Education Upper Dublin School District.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
S TAR Assessment New Teacher Orientation
1 PDE Benchmark Initiative An Introduction to the 4Sight Benchmarks September 9, 2005 PaTTAN Pittsburgh.
1 Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21st Century Teaching and Learning December 8, 2009 HOMEROOM 3 Fair Assessment & Materials and Resources.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Governor Thomas Johnson High School AYP/ HSA Results for the School Year.
Standardized Test Overview
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Create a Strong Start ACT® Aspire ®.
Overview Edward G. Rendell Governor Tom Gluck Secretary of Education.
Start with the Science & Technology Standards (2002, 2008?)
Standards Aligned System Integration Trainer Professional Development
NCLB “No Child Left Behind”.
Pacing Guides, Assessments and Report Cards
What are the CDTs? (Classroom Diagnostic Tools)
Presentation transcript:

1 Testing 1, 2, 3: An Analysis of 4Sight in Pennsylvania A Paper Presented at the 2009 North American Summer Meeting of the Econometric Society Robert P. Strauss and Abby Clay Turner Carnegie Mellon University Saturday, June 6, 2009

2 Outline Overview of Testing in PA Schools Research Questions & Motivation Results: Alignment Analysis & Use of 4Sight Econometric Design & Results: –Program Evaluation –Reporting Category Analysis Conclusions and Policy Implications

3 Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA) 2002 No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Requires state testing to receive federal funds All students must be tested/reported in math/reading States set Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) goals for their schools/districts –100% of students proficient by 2014 –Failing AYP leads to sanctions PSSA becomes high-stakes for schools

4 Overview of 4Sight Example of an intervention schools take to help meet AYP Math and reading tests written by Success for All Foundation of Maryland “Predictive Benchmark Assessment” –Given to students 4-5 times throughout the year –Meant to predict student performance on PSSA –Provides teachers with feedback on student strengths/weaknesses Schools buy in: –$1000 online, about $3/student/subject paper –Teacher/administrator training –4-5 hours of teaching time for tests alone –Teacher time to adapt to feedback : Used by 750 schools/310 districts

5 PSSA Design Multiple choice questions drawn from a set of “eligible content” for each grade/subject. –Aligned to the set of knowledge districts teach within the grade/subject Material within a grade/subject broken down: –Reporting Category Assessment Anchor –Eligible Content Math Reporting Categories: Numbers and Operations, Measurement, Geometry, Algebraic Concepts, Data Analysis and Probability Reading Reporting Categories: Comprehension and Reading Skills, Interpretation and Analysis of Fictional and Nonfictional Text

6 Research Question & Motivation How does 4Sight impact student PSSA performance? –Analyze use and alignment of 4Sight ( ) –Perform program evaluation Policy Motivations: –Measure benefits and compare to costs –Suggest improvements to process Economic Motivations: –Contribute to empirical education production literature

7 Analysis of 4Sight: Alignment 4-5 tests per subject/grade questions per test Same “eligible content” covered on each test –Does not cover all PSSA eligible content –6 th grade test covers only 40% of reading Only 80% of math content Exam not fully aligned to curriculum & PSSA

8 Analysis of 4Sight: Use Formative assessment: “Ongoing assessment designed to make student thinking visible to both teachers and students.” (National Research Council) Training materials provide feedback to teachers Students do not receive direct feedback 4Sight does not conform to NRC’s definition of formative assessment

9 How will using 4Sight affect PSSA? Positive effect if: –4Sight provides effective feedback to teachers Teachers use feedback to tailor their teaching –Students become accustomed to the format of 4Sight/PSSA with practice Negative effect if: –Teaching time is less (equivalent to 8 hours of instruction if using both tests) –Students are frustrated by being tested on material they have not yet learned –Students develop negative attitude toward test

10 Difficulty Identifying the Effect of 4Sight Interested in knowing change in test scores Evaluating “treatment effect” –Never observe treated and non-treated scores from same student –Selection bias: Are non-treated students appropriate controls for treated students? Modeling education production function –Student “ability” is unobserved –Data limitations to what we can control for

11 Data Student-level test score data plus identifying, SES, and academic (DRC) –Raw score, scaled score, “reporting category” –Matched with for 5 th to 6 th grade: 89.0% School-level data (PDE) 4Sight use by school, grade, subject (PDE) Descriptive statistics show students using 4Sight –4Sight users have higher income, higher % white, more experienced teachers –Still more likely to receive other treatments (Tutoring, FRL, Title III) –Begin with lower PSSA scores

12 Individual-Level OLS Equivalent to a 1.7-point increase at the mean Equivalent to a 2.4-point decrease at the mean

13 Individual-Level Quantile Regressions Reject the hypothesis that the coefficient on 4Sight is different at different quantiles for Reading specifications (3) & (4)

14 School-Level OLS

15 Propensity Score Matching Probit specification Matching: –School-level nearest neighbor based on propensity score –Trimmed to common support –Bootstrapped standard errors

16 Individual-Level Reporting Category Tobit Analysis: Math

17 Individual-Level Reporting Category Tobit Analysis: Reading

18 Conclusions/Policy Implications 4Sight not fully aligned with PA standards –Suggest rewriting test to full alignment –Possible within current length of test –Correlation between coverage and performance 4Sight does not conform with NRC’s definition of formative assessment –Provide format for formal feedback to teachers and students to realize full potential as a teaching tool Study of first year suggests small impact –Reading negative and significant in all specifications –Differences between treated and non-treated groups suggest possible endogeneity –Careful empirical analysis to continue for several years to determine the effects of 4Sight