Actuarial Credibility Task Force Report & The Potential Impact to ASOP 36 Chris Carlson, FCAS, MAAA Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Chair Casualty Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What one person writes and another person reads are often two different things!
Advertisements

1 CHANGES TO SSAP #62 PROPERTY & CASULTY REINSURANCE NAIC Property and Casualty Reinsurance Study Group Chicago, IL May 10, 2005 Michael Moriarty Director,
Course on Professionalism ASOP 43 – Property / Casualty Unpaid Claim Estimates.
Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Breach of a Requirement of the Code Marisa Orbea New York 19 June 2012.
Casualty Actuaries Society Tax Issues Associated with Unpaid Losses September 12, 2006.
ACTUARIAL SERVICES ADVISORY Other Balance Sheet Reserves: SAO & Reinsurer Concerns Las Vegas September 2004.
Materiality and Statements of Actuarial Opinion Presentation to Appointed Actuary Seminar September 20-21, 2004 PD-11 Materiality Joseph A. Herbers, ACAS,
Interaction Between the Appointed Actuary and Auditor Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 12, 2005.
P & C Actuarial Issues Associated With Implementation of NAIC Accounting Practices and Procedures Developed by the Committee on Property and Liability.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Minneapolis, Minnesota September 18 – 19, 2000 NAIC Codification of Statutory Accounting Actuarial Considerations Pat Teufel,
STATUTORY STATEMENTS OF ACTUARIAL OPINION – Changes for Today and Tomorrow Tomorrow’s Model Law 2003 CLRS Chicago, IL.
CASUALTY LOSS RESERVE SEMINAR September 10-11, 2007 Chap Cook, FCAS FCA, MAAA, CPCU Chap Cook, FCAS FCA, MAAA, CPCU Consulting Actuary, MBA Actuaries,
Skit on Reserving Committee on Professionalism Education.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar New perspectives on asbestos Paul Jardine Chief Actuary, Equitas Limited 10 September 2001.
Course on Professionalism ASOP Presentation. 2 Contents Introduction Introduction ASOP Highlights ASOP Highlights ASOP in Asia ASOP in Asia.
PwC CAS Fair Value Project Casualty Actuaries in Europe Spring Meeting 23 April 2004 E. Daniel Thomas (1)
Restoring the Credibility of Casualty Actuaries Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Boston, MA Panelists: Members of the Joint Task Force on Enhancing the Reputation.
Non-Life Loss Reserving Practices and Documentation IAIS – ASSAL Training Seminar April 29, 2009 David Oakden.
1 The Impact of SAS 112 on Governmental Financial Statement Audits GAQC Member Conference Call January 4, 2007 Presented by Chuck Landes, CPA.
1 Actuarial Evaluation of Premium Liabilities By:Claudette Cantin, FCIA, FCAS, MAAA Partner – KPMG LLP CLRS - Minneapolis September 19th, 2000.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Minneapolis, Minnesota September 18 – 19, 2000 Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 36 Discussion of Implementation Considerations.
The Actuarial Standards Board and Actuarial Standards of Practice Actuaries’ Club of Boston Annual Meeting September 16, 2010 Kathleen A. Riley, FSA, MAAA,
Property/Casualty Loss Reserves Chuck Emma, FCAS, MAAA Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Inc. CAS Annual Meeting November 15, 2005.
2 - 1 Copyright  2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc. CHAPTER 2 The Auditor’s Reports.
Are Your Opinions and Actuarial Reports Meeting Expectations of Regulators and Others Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September Moderator: M.
Ratemaking ASOPS By the CAS Committee on Professionalism Education.
Reconciliation and the Opining Actuary Wendy Germani, FCAS MAAA Holmes Gwynn, ACAS MAAA Presented CLRS – Fall 2004.
Actuarial Considerations In Connection with Captive Insurance Companies September, 2007 George Levine KPMG LLP.
Enhancing the Reputation of Casualty Actuaries Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Renaissance Waverly Hotel Atlanta, GA September 12, 2006.
Discussion of Unpaid Claim Estimate Standard  Raji Bhagavatula  Mary Frances Miller  Jason Russ November 13, 2006 CAS Annual Meeting San Francisco,
2003 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar NAIC/AAA Loss Reserve Symposium for Readers and Writers of Loss Reserve Opinions.
Fair Value Accounting Mike Grillaert KPMG LLP September 23, 2002 Mike Grillaert KPMG LLP September 23, 2002 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar.
Loss Reserves from the Actuarial, Accounting and IRS Perspectives Actuary’s Perspective by Alan E. Kaliski, FCAS, MAAA.
US Standard of Practice #43 Unpaid Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Estimates Mary Frances Miller Christopher Carlson Casualty Actuarial Society Quebec,
Regulatory Guidance to the 2004 Changes to the Actuarial Opinion SWAF Fall 2004 Wendy Germani, FCAS, MAAA Nicole Elliott, Aspiring Actuary.
Opinion Writers Symposium Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 10-11, 2007 Moderator: Mary D Miller, Ohio Dept of Insurance Panelists: Nicole Elliott,
Copyright © 2008 by the Actuarial Board for Counseling and Discipline A Presentation by Michael Toothman, June 5, 2008 Actuarial Board for Counseling and.
March 9-10, 2000 The Contest - Part I CAS Seminar on Ratemaking SPE - 47 Thomas L. Ghezzi, FCAS, MAAA Katharine Barnes, FCAS, MAAA.
Ranges of Reasonable Estimates Charles L. McClenahan, FCAS, MAAA Iowa Actuaries Club, February 9, 2004.
MATERIALITY AND THE RISK OF MATERIAL ADVERSE DEVIATION: A REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE CASUALTY LOSS RESERVE SEMINAR September 11-12, 2006 Moderator:Kris DeFrain,
Estimation and Application of Ranges of Reasonable Estimates Charles L. McClenahan, FCAS, MAAA 2003 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar.
Statement of Actuarial Opinion Changes for 2007 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 2007 By: Joseph A. Herbers Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Inc.
Proposed ASB Actuarial Standard of Practice on Statements of Actuarial Opinion Regarding Property/Casualty Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves Status.
# Insurance and Actuarial Advisory Services Statements of Actuarial Opinion Midwest Actuarial Forum March 23, 2004 Robert H. Wainscott, FCAS, MAAA,
2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2009 Bill C-57 and the Actuary – Nicholas Bauer 2009 Seminar for the Appointed.
2002 CLRS - Arlington, VA Reserve/Opinion Issues from a Regulatory Perspective Proposed Revision to the NAIC Annual Statement Instructions Richard Marcks,
Loss Reserve Opinions Mary D. Miller FCAS, MAAA Ohio Department of Insurance CASE 2006 Fall Meeting September 13, 2006.
The Chubb Corporation 2005 Update on Asbestos Reserves Date of release 01/31/2006.
Accounting Implications of Finite Reinsurance Contracts 2003 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Chicago, IL Session 4 – Recent Developments in Finite Reinsurance.
IRS/Actuary Actuary’s Perspective by Alan E. Kaliski, FCAS, MAAA.
STATUTORY STATEMENTS OF ACTUARIAL OPINION – Changes for Today and Tomorrow Changes for CLRS Chicago, IL.
Conflicts of Interest Peter Hughes IESBA June 2012 New York, USA.
© 2004 Towers Perrin September 22, 2004 Thomas L. Ghezzi, FCAS, MAAA CANE Fall 2004 Meeting Statements of Actuarial Opinion – Changes for 2004 and 2005.
Copyright © 2011 by the American Academy of Actuaries Southwest Actuarial Forum June Lisa Slotznick, FCAS, MAAA Member, COPLFR Revised ASOP No.
Charles L. McClenahan 10 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL Dancin’ With the Devil Ranges and Adverse Deviation Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar, September.
2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2009 ASB update on IFRS – Nicholas Bauer 2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary.
Revising ASOP No. 21 Michael G. McCarter, FCAS, MAAA American International Group, Inc. Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Chicago, September 9, 2003.
CAS Loss Reserve Seminar Loss Reserving Issues for Small Insurance Companies Patrick J. Crowe, FCAS, MAAA, ARM Vice President and Actuary Kentucky Farm.
2005 Opinions & 2006 Regulatory Guidance
Reserve/Opinion Issues from a Regulatory Perspective
Regulatory Issues in Health Reserving
RMAD _ RISK OF MATERIAL ADVERSE DEVIATION A Regulator’s Viewpoint
Mary D. Miller FCAS, MAAA Ohio Department of Insurance March 23, 2004
Discussion Draft of Proposed Revision to 1988 Statement of Principles Regarding Property and Casualty Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves May 16,
SAO Changes Then and Now
Bermuda Economic Balance Sheet (EBS) Technical Provisions
ASU Short Duration Contracts – New GAAP Disclosures
Canadian Institute of Actuaries L’Institut canadien des actuaires
Non-Life Loss Reserving Practices and Documentation
Presentation transcript:

Actuarial Credibility Task Force Report & The Potential Impact to ASOP 36 Chris Carlson, FCAS, MAAA Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Chair Casualty Committee of the Actuarial Standards Board Pat Teufel, FCAS, MAAA KPMG, Chair, CAS Board Task Force on Actuarial Credibility

CAS Task Force Report Recommendation Impacting ASOP 36 A. To enhance the transparency of the actuary’s conclusions by clearly identifying differences, if any, that exist between management’s “best estimate” of the loss and loss adjustment expense reserves as of a valuation date and the actuary’s “best estimate” of the reserve need as of that valuation date within the statement of actuarial opinion.

Section 8 of the 2005 Instructions for Actuarial Opinions The Actuarial Opinion Summary should include at least the following: A. The Appointed Actuary’s range of reasonable estimates for loss and loss adjustment expense reserves, both gross and net of reinsurance; and/or B. The Appointed Actuary’s point estimates for loss and loss adjustment expense reserves, net and gross of reinsurance; and C. The Company’s recorded loss and loss adjustment expense reserves, net and gross of reinsurance; and D. The difference between the company’s carried reserves and the Appointed Actuary’s point estimate and/or range of reasonable estimates, net and gross of reinsurance…

Recommended Specific Activity Determine whether the CAS wishes to recommend to the Actuarial Standards Board that a revision to ASOP 36 to incorporate required disclosure of the difference between management’s recorded reserves and the actuary’s best estimate be considered. Target - Fourth Quarter 2005

Disclosure and Scope The Task Force sees its recommendation as a natural extension of the NAIC requirement, moving the required disclosure from a confidential document to the public domain. Further, the Task Force believes that such disclosure would be appropriate for all statements of actuarial opinion; while relevant for NAIC statements of actuarial opinion, our recommendation is not confined to that venue.

Recommended Specific Activity Develop and expose a revision to ASOP 36 to incorporate required disclosure of the difference between management’s recorded reserves and the actuary’s best estimate. Target – Fourth Quarter 2006

Suggested Addition to ASOP 36 Disclosure Section k.The actuary should disclose the amount by which the stated reserve amount differs from the actuary's expected value estimate. In circumstances where the actuary does not derive a single, most likely expected value estimate but instead develops a range of expected value estimates (the actuary's range of reasonable reserve estimates), the actuary should disclose the amount by which the stated reserve amount differs from the midpoint of the range of the actuary's expected value estimates.

Suggested New Addition to ASOP Changes in the Opining Actuary's Estimates of Liability. - The actuary should include within the documentation a reconciliation of the current estimates of liability to the estimates that existed as of the prior evaluation period, if any. Such reconciliation should be performed at a level, by accident year and business segment that the actuary deems to be appropriate. In addition, the actuary should provide an extended discussion of the factors underlying the change in estimates, including the facts and circumstances that have emerged during the period and how these factors have been considered in the evaluation process.

ASB Process on ASOP Changes 1. Recommendation to ASB to initiate review 2. ASB charges Casualty Committee to review 3. Casualty Committee or Subcommittee develops exposure draft for ASB review 4. ASB votes to expose to members for comments

ASB Process on ASOP Changes (continued) 5. Casualty Committee receives and reviews comments – considers and responds to all of the comments 6. Casualty Committee considers and responds to all of the input and revises draft accordingly 7. ASB reviews revision and comments. – If changes are significant, draft ASOP is re-exposed (step 4). – If not significantly changed, ASB can vote to adopt.