ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct 2008 1 Visualization of embedding Matevz Tadel, CERN Adam Kisiel, Ohio State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALICE TOF FESTIVAL Offline tools and GRID scenario for the ALICE TOF detector A. De Caro (University of Salerno and INFN) CERN – Bdg.29, October 20 th.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
Outline  motivations  methods: ITS: TPC+ITS(-1 layer) tracks SPD: SPD standalone  tracklets  strategy with data  conclusions Studi di Efficienza dell’ITS.
1 Working Group 5: Particle Identified Studies in Jets - Status / Plans (July 23 rd, 2008) - Group Coordinator: Rene Bellwied (WSU) Group Contributors:
> IRTG – Heidelberg 2007 < Jochen Thäder – University of Heidelberg 1/18 ALICE HLT in the TPC Commissioning IRTG Seminar Heidelberg – January 2008 Jochen.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Large scale data flow in local and GRID environment V.Kolosov, I.Korolko, S.Makarychev ITEP Moscow.
Quality Control B. von Haller 8th June 2015 CERN.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
The High-Level Trigger of the ALICE Experiment Heinz Tilsner Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik Universität Heidelberg International Europhysics Conference.
Framework for Raw Data Thomas Kuhr Offline Week 29/06/2004.
Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.
ALICE Simulation Framework Ivana Hrivnacova 1 and Andreas Morsch 2 1 NPI ASCR, Rez, Czech Republic 2 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland For the ALICE Collaboration.
The ALICE short-term use case DataGrid WP6 Meeting Milano, 11 Dec 2000Piergiorgio Cerello 1 Physics Performance Report (PPR) production starting in Feb2001.
Andreas Morsch, CERN EP/AIP CHEP 2003 Simulation in ALICE Andreas Morsch For the ALICE Offline Project 2003 Conference for Computing in High Energy and.
The ALICE Simulation Strategy Andreas Morsch For the ALICE Offline Group Joint STAR/ALICE Offline Meeting Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY April.
W + /W - and l + /l - A Means to investigate PDFs T. Schörner-Sadenius, G. Steinbrück Hamburg University HERA-LHC Workshop, CERN, October 2004.
TOF, Status of the Code F. Pierella, Bologna University and INFN TOF Offline Group ALICE Offline Week, June 2002.
PWG3 Analysis: status, experience, requests Andrea Dainese on behalf of PWG3 ALICE Offline Week, CERN, Andrea Dainese 1.
Analysis trains – Status & experience from operation Mihaela Gheata.
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
ALICE Offline Week, CERN, Andrea Dainese 1 Primary vertex with TPC-only tracks Andrea Dainese INFN Legnaro Motivation: TPC stand-alone analyses.
David Adams ATLAS DIAL: Distributed Interactive Analysis of Large datasets David Adams BNL August 5, 2002 BNL OMEGA talk.
PROOF and ALICE Analysis Facilities Arsen Hayrapetyan Yerevan Physics Institute, CERN.
3/12/2003 ACAT03 - Giuseppe Lo Re Study of the K*(892) 0 signal in pp ALICE events Giuseppe Lo Re INFN-CNAF, Bologna (Italy) ACAT03, 12/3/2003.
NEC' /09P.Hristov1 Alice off-line computing Alice Collaboration, presented by P.Hristov, CERN NEC'2001 September 12-18, Varna.
Features needed in the “final” AliRoot release P.Hristov 26/10/2006.
HLT Kalman Filter Implementation of a Kalman Filter in the ALICE High Level Trigger. Thomas Vik, UiO.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
STAR Collaboration meeting, Nantes Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC analysis update Just to remember … What we have done.
Tomasz Malkiewicz T0 trigger and luminosity monitoring luminosity monitoring ALICE meeting at JYFL.
Javier Castillo 1 Muon Embedding Status & Open Issues PWG3 - CERN - 15/02/2011.
Predrag Buncic CERN ALICE Status Report LHCC Referee Meeting 01/12/2015.
Experience from analyzing pp collisions in ALICE Konstantin Mikhaylov ITEP, Moscow K.Mikhaylov, ITEP Alice Week, CERN October
Alignment in real-time in current detector and upgrade 6th LHCb Computing Workshop 18 November 2015 Beat Jost / Cern.
PWG3 Analysis: status, experience, requests Andrea Dainese on behalf of PWG3 ALICE Offline Week, CERN, Andrea Dainese 1.
SIlicon VErtex TrAcker Rather than fixed common geometry the common analysis and simulation tools are needed. Such software package should provide : 
January 13, 2004A. Cherlin1 Preliminary results from the 2000 run of CERES on low-mass e + e - pair production in Pb-Au collisions at 158 A GeV A. Cherlin.
I. BelikovALICE Offline Week, CERN, 12 June ESD Classes and the Combined Reconstruction What is the ESD ? Two new classes AliESD and AliESDtrack.
Report from TRD on Raw Data Christoph Blume ALICE Offline Week, October, 2006.
Jet reconstruction with Deterministic Annealing Davide Perrino Dipartimento di Fisica – INFN di Bari Terzo Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di Alice – 13/11/2007.
Jet Production in Au+Au Collisions at STAR Alexander Schmah for the STAR Collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Hard Probes 2015 in Montreal/Canada.
AliRoot survey: Reconstruction P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
R. Croft, Exclusive Diffractive Higgs Signal at L1, Jan 2005 Diffractive Higgs Events in the L1 Trigger ( Work in progress ) Richard Croft, University.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)ALICE Offline week / CERN Update on the SPD Offline Domenico Elia in collaboration with H. Tydesjo, A. Mastroserio Overview:
Barthélémy von Haller CERN PH/AID For the ALICE Collaboration The ALICE data quality monitoring system.
1 GlueX Software Oct. 21, 2004 D. Lawrence, JLab.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
Predrag Buncic CERN ALICE Status Report LHCC Referee Meeting 24/05/2015.
January 2009 offline detector review - 2 nd go 1 ● Offline – Geometry – Material budget – Simulation – Raw data – OCDB parameters – Reconstruction ● Calibration.
Analysis Frame for MC data
Analysis trains – Status & experience from operation
PWG2 Analysis status Adam Kisiel, CERN for the PWG2 group.
Visualization of embedding
Production status – christmas processing
Offline meeting Azimuthally sensitive Hanbury-Brown-Twiss (HBT) Interferometry Lukasz Graczykowski Warsaw University of Technology Johanna.
fields of possible improvement
ALICE – First paper.
AliRoot status and PDC’04
EMCal Offline Code Status: Introduction and tasks
Analysis framework - status
TPC status - Offline Q&A
QA tools – introduction and summary of activities
Use of Geant4 in experiment interactive frameworks AliRoot
Jet Measurements with the EMCal of ALICE
BES III Software: Short-term Plan ( )
Presentation transcript:

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Visualization of embedding Matevz Tadel, CERN Adam Kisiel, Ohio State University

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Outline Embedding process description Requirements Proposition of features Plans for implementation Presentation of implemented features

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Embedding goals The final goal is to study and quantify the effects of resolution and efficiency by performing embedding in the real data We need to make sure that the software tools to do that are available and ready. We must test whether our software tools can do that without compromising quality and introducing artificial distortions in the studied quantities Visualization is an important step to fulfill the goals

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Embedding procedure Raw data background Monte-Carlo simulationRaw data signal “Fake” SDigits Simulated SDigits AliESD Summed SDigits Efficiency correction Kinematics information ConvertRaw2SDigitsConvertRaw2SDigitsSimulation Merge Merge OR Merge Reconstruction Analysis results Effiency&CorrectionFramework High-level analysis code

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Embedding status Embedding has been tried and confirmed to work last year. Since then it has been a continuous effort to ensure it is kept in that state. Most recent tests: last week, AliRoot v4-15-Rev-06 for central barrel detectors (ITS TPC TRD TOF). Tested “real-life” scenario of embedding Pythia pp events into heavy-ion event background (Therminator PbPb midcentral events) as well as merging two pp events

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Embedding visualization For embedding visualization is an important tool; it helps in understanding the effects of merging two signals and should be helpful in debugging Requirements for the visualization software are different from normal ones – the objective is to analyze the behavior of a rather small “signal” against an overall background It is important to compare the “bare” and “embedded” signal reconstruction

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Software requirements The following “use cases” were considered when identifying tasks for embedding visualization  Looking for a low multiplicity signal in a high multiplicity background – visual highlighting should reflect the origin of the signal  Studying detector response – need to visually distinguish hits/digits/clusters from various sources as well as “merged” ones  Comparing “bare” and “embedded” signals requires simultaneous inspection of two or more events

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Software tasks The following software tasks for alieve were identified:  Possibility to load more than one event into alieve in such a way that each event is a separate object  Provide a way to show two events simultaneously “side-by-side” in a synchronized way  Visually differentiate hits/digits/clusters/tracks based on the event they come from  Visually differentiate hits/digits/clusters/tracks within a single event, based on the stream they come from  Highlight “merged” hits/digits/clusters/tracks

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Two-event display two events as separate objects requires patching ROOT and alieve

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Ideas for two-event display Visually differentiate clusters/tracks from events Test the display for large-multiplicity Pb-Pb event, to make sure that the “signal” is still visible – reduce the displayed information for the background only to the necessary Provide a way to cut on the displayed data, to further reduce the amount of information: physics cuts and geometrical (acceptance) cuts Show Kinematics/full information only for signal

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Finding a needle in a haystack embedded signal full PbPb event only clusters small marker

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct “Side-by-side” view mock-up

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Ideas for the side-by-side view Synchronize data highlighting and selection on both views Lock the camera (zoom, rotation, shift) for both views so that actions in one view are automatically mirrored in the second Second view may show either detector response from a specific stream or the input kinematic information for the “real” case of embedding model signal in real data event

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Summary Embedding visualization is under way  Main software requirements identified  Specific software tasks for alieve defined  Implementation in alieve started  Example embedding events provided both for simple testing (pp) and full-scale testing (PbPb)‏

ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct The End