TECHNOLOGY IN THE CLASSROOM Presented by Kerrie N. Berry EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor N. Miller.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Advertisements

Learning Supports. Barriers to Learning Learning Supports Successful in School Core Instruction Range of Learners = Motivationally ready & able to learn.
Autism Observation Instrument General Education Classrooms
Simons Valley School Coming Together Areas of Focus 1. Building Community 2. Team Teaching 3. Reading Comprehension across the curriculum 4.
Elementary School Counselor
APS District Technology Plan Team Project July 17, 2012 Jill Roberts, Sam Skeels, Deb Stevenson.
Benchmark assessment data generated from the Edusoft Assessment Management System is a powerful tool for informing classroom instruction, and ensuring.
Zoomerang Slide Presentation. RTI Pre-Survey: Identify your building/level.
Action Research Project Empowering Teachers as Leaders April 2014 By Ashley Dvorak.
Flipping the Grade Six Math Classroom. What is the Flipped Classroom?
On-Site School Review All-Staff Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
Ricki Sabia, JD edCount, LLC Senior Associate and NCSC Technical Assistance and Parent Training Specialist Universal Design for Learning: Working to Create.
Purpose of the Project The purpose of the project was to create an online professional learning network (PLN), to support middle school math/science teachers.
Ashley Consiglio Edu 505. Benjamin Jepson School Founded in 1989 Multi-age Elementary School classroom format Teachers and parents worked together to.
READING FOR COMPREHENSION AND UNDERSTANDING IN THE 21 ST CENTURY. Kerry Pierce Conklin How is this achieved? Who is responsible?
SPECIAL NEEDS PRETEST. 1. Why are there services for children with special needs? A. Some school districts have the money to offer services for children.
Katherine Kingston EDLD May 15, 2011 This presentation will see just how well Galena Park ISD’s technology plan compares with the National.
Objectives 1. ) Describe online learning
NEPALESE TEACHERS’ ICT READINESS SURVEY UNESCO, Kathmandu March 2015.
Disruptive Innovation in K12 Education? Using Moodle to Create a Blending Learning Experience for Students.
Promising Practices in Policy Making Michael Morris Chair, Educational Leadership Team (ELT)
Ivette Veiga Future of Education Instructor: Jennifer Wojcik.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
On-Site School Review Leadership Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
What are the affects of Interactive Student Notebooks on Student Performance? Paige Smith Governor Teacher Network
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Teaching Students in Inclusive Settings. Getting Started Course Overview Discussion Posts and Rubrics Major Assignments Q & A Dr. Phyllis Schiffer-Simon.
PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS (PLES) LACEY GOOCH EVALUATING EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES ITEC 7445 SUMMER 2015.
Company LOGO MCPS District Technology Teaching Plan Department of Instructional Technology Presented by Jennifer Martin July 16, 2012
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY College of Education and Human Services Integrating Technology Into Foundations and Methods Courses.
Writing Workshop with ELLs in mainstream first grade classes An Effective pedagogical practice for Few Good teachers? A Qualitative Study Jayne Sherman.
Benefits of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Classrooms
Connecting Classroom Walkthrough to High Yield Strategies
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
Action Research Purpose and Benefits Technology as a Learning Tool to Improve Student Achievement.
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
RACHELLE VARGAS EDU 671 FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH PROF. WANDA FERNANDOLULLE JANUARY 20, 2016 My Action Research Proposal.
Final Action Research Proposal Presentation Jasmine Crowder EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Tony Valley January 9, 2014.
21 st century Teaching and Learning District Educator Deborah Harris EDU620: Meeting Individual Student Needs With Technology Instructor: Adriane Wheat.
ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL SAMARA DEESE EDU 671: FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR: NEWTON MILLER JANUARY 18, 2016.
Use Formative Data to Drive Instructional Strategy Decisions (Advanced) One School’s Road Map to Success Robby Goodman, Ph.D.
Technology Help or Hinderance? DOMINIQUE JOHNSON EDU671: FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR: FREDERICK ANSOFF 2 JUNE 2014.
Reading Literacy. The purpose of my study will be to describe why young children need to focus on reading in kindergarten and how to improve reaching.
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research ( MRD1423A ) Instructor: Frederick Ansoff Andrea Chisholm.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Kimberly Jose EDU 671 Instructor Tony Valley.
Students Learning Effectively through Creative Resource Classes and Creativity in the Classroom Ashanti Banks Ashford University Professor Miller EDU.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Sharelius Holmes Dr. Miller EDU 671: Fundamental of Educational Research March 3, 2016.
Miclyn Carstarphen Ashford University EDU650: Teaching Learning and Leading in the 21st Century Instructor: Dr.: Kimberly Doerflein.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Claudia S. Herrera EDU671: Fundamentals of Education Research Dr. Newton Miller May 8, 2014.
JUDY CALLOWAY EDU 671 MOCK ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT PRESENTATION MARCH 27, 2014 NEWTON, MILLER.
Mirrinda Huddlestun EDU 650: Teaching, Learning &Leading in the 21 st Century Professor Wendell LaTouche December 05, 2015 The Big Interview.
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (MRD1414A) Ashford University Instructor: Dr. Kathleen Lunsford May 11th, 2014.
ACTION RESEARCH PLAN PROPOSAL PRESENTATION Tracie Shehan EDU671 Instructor: Holley Prescott May 28, 2015.
Dena D. Johnson Ashford University EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Kathy Hoover September 3, 2015.
Action Research Proposal By: B’Nekia Curtis EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Newton Miller.
TEACHING INFANTS PRIMARY COLORS BY: ASHLEY S. HUSER EDU 671:FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR NEWTON MILLER JANUARY 20, 2016.
 The purpose of this study is to determine the best way to deliver instruction to students. I want to find out if whole group instruction or small group.
Research 1 Mathematical Terminology Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Brandy Williams EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor:
Justin Allegra EDU 671 – Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Newton Miller Ashford University March 12, 2016 Action Research Proposal Final Project.
 The Big Interview Stephanie Hinz December 16, 2014 EDU 650 Dr. Jackie Kyger.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
Heather Jones Our Lady of Perpetual Help 5th Grade History
Digital Learning Initiative (DLI)
EDU 675 STUDY Lessons in Excellence-- edu675study.com.
What It Is and How to Design an Action Research Project
Action Research Designs
Presentation transcript:

TECHNOLOGY IN THE CLASSROOM Presented by Kerrie N. Berry EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor N. Miller

AREA OF FOCUS  The purpose of this study is to describe the impacts of exposure to technology in the classroom versus a traditional learning environment. Additionally, to address if a technology driven environment more engaging than a traditional classroom.

LITERATURE REVIEW  Huneycutt, T. (2013, 10 08). Blog:Technology in the Classroom: The Benefits of Blended Learning. Retrieved from National Math+Science Initiative Blog: classroom-the-benefits-of-blended-learning.aspx  Blog  Armstrong, A. (2014). Technology in the Classroom, It’s not a matter of if but how and when.. Education Digest,  Journal article

VARIABLES  The population (age/grade, quantity of participants, students/or adults) is school- aged learners from Pre-K to 5 th grade in Elementary school. I want to find out how technology impacts students early in their school years and the effects it has later.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS  1. What is the students’ prior knowledge of technology?  2. How will the students respond to the technology?  3. ha was the impact of using technology in the classroom ?

DATA COLLECTION  Student survey  Pre/Post Test  Parent/Student survey

CONSIDERATIONS/ETHICS  Considering the technological driven society, I think we are stuck with it. Technology and its advances improve daily and as educators we have to change and begin to utilize it as a resource. I wonder what technology impacts these students the most? I hope to answer that technology has and is a great tool if uses appropriately and consistently as a teaching tool and resource.  Ethics are important when students are exposed to technology. Policies must be addressed and consent forms must be signed.

DATA ANALYSIS/INTERPRETATIO N  The data will be reviewed and compiled to see if the technology implementation has been effective.  Additionally, the team and administrators will analyze the data to address if the technology implementation will continue school-wide.

ACTION PLAN  Meet with the grade level team along with administration to decide what technology tools are available for purchase and already at the school.  Professional development on use of devices and how to incorporate the resources in lesson plans and classroom. Additional professional development to use devices as assistive technology for students with disabilities.  Student survey of technology they are familiar with and their use.  Consent and ethical policy sent home for student and parent signatures.  Pretest on the technology used and lessons.

ACTION PLAN CONTINUED  Grade level meeting to discuss pretest results and data. The team will determine what technology is working and what teachers need assistance with planning and use of technology.  Continued use of technology, software, and devices to assist student learning.  Post- test and data analysis.  Parent survey to gage their student learning and success in the classroom.  End of the school year review with staff and administration to see data of learning and technology

REFERENCE  Huneycutt, T. (2013, 10 08). Blog:Technology in the Classroom: The Benefits of Blended Learning. Retrieved from National Math+Science Initiative Blog: classroom-the-benefits-of-blended-learning.aspx classroom-the-benefits-of-blended-learning.aspx  Armstrong, A. (2014). Technology in the Classroom, It’s not a matter of if but how and when.. Education Digest,