Session 3 The meaning of avoidance and aggressive tax planning in the EU Pasquale Pistone, IBFD Academic Chairman EATLP 2016 – Munich (Germany), 3 June.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Dónal Godfrey, Global Forum Secretariat Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Global Forum web site:
Advertisements

THE POSITION OF JOBSEEKERS Paul Minderhoud Centre for Migration Law Coordinator Network on Free Movement of Workers.
EMU and the euro... (for dummies?) Presentation by Nigel Nagarajan Faculty Orientation for the 2009 Euro Challenge New York, November 25 th 2008 The 2009.
Hybrids – the Netherlands
The European Union (EU)
1 Alternatives to detention: An overview of practices in 27 EU Member States Adriano Silvestri.
2015 Pre-export to Zimbabwe procedures. What is the European Union? The EU is an unique economic and political union between 28 democratic European Countries.
Access to LifeLong Learning in Higher Education (ALLinHE) Work Package 3 Deliverable 8 National Reports.
Introduction to Europe & European Law
Area Definition III KAM,Bratislava. The European Law Students’ Association Albania ˙ Austria ˙ Azerbaijan ˙ Belgium ˙ Bosnia and Herzegovina ˙ Bulgaria.
Standard SS6G5b: Describe the purpose of the European Union and the relationship between member nations.
The European Union “United in Diversity”
THE EUROPEAN UNION. Member States The European Union is composed of 27 independent sovereign states which are know as member states: Austria, Belgium,
THE EUROPEAN UNION. HISTORY 28 European states after the second world war in 1951 head office: Brussels 24 different languages Austria joined 1995.
1945  Second World War ended  Europe united as the European Coal and Steel Community, the founding members of this organisation were Belgium, France,
THE EUROPEAN UNION. EU  1993 European Union  Main Aims  All states in the EU = a single market  One currency throughout the EU = the Euro  To have.
Strength in Numbers Mar The Delian League  Countries do not want to be dominated by other countries.  But there are many advantages to be gained.
Presentation by Kirsten Tesh World Traveler ? European Union.
ELSA as the Franchise? LXV International Council Meeting Qawra, Malta 16 th - 23 rd of March 2014.
Accession to the European Union Criteria acquis rationale.
Standard SS6G5b: Describe the purpose of the European Union and the relationship between member nations.
SPORTS MEDICINE SPECIALIZATION – 24 countries 1)Belarus 13)Romania 2) Bosnia & Herzegovina 14)Serbia 3) Bulgaria 15)Slovenia 4) Czech Republic 16)Spain.
Natural gas, and oil sectors in Europe Vaidotas Levickis Fort Worth, Texas 2015.
Model European Union. What is Model EU? Simulation of the EU.
EXTREME MAKEOVER Members’ Magazine LXIV International Council Meeting Opatija, Croatia October 28 th - November 3 rd 2013.
The European Union 1 THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 2 Where in the world is the European Union?
I will: Know how and why the EU was created. Understand the benefits of being part of the EU.
State of play of OP negotiations and OP implementation ESF Technical Working Group Luxembourg, 2 December
Time line By: Shirley Lin. The story of European Union
Information Security Systems Cost Effective Authenticity & Integrity in CEN/FISCALIS eInvoicing Good Practice Guidelines Nick Pope – Principal Consultant,
The United States of Europe
Purpose of the European Union For its members to work together for advantages that would be out of their reach if each were working alone Believe that.
The European Union. Important Events in EU History May 9, 1950 – French Leader Robert Schuman proposes the idea of working together in coal and steel.
The European Law Students’ Association Albania ˙ Austria ˙ Azerbaijan ˙ Belgium ˙ Bosnia and Herzegovina ˙ Bulgaria ˙ Croatia ˙ Cyprus ˙ Czech Republic.
EU’s Lifelong Learning Programme Erasmus Higher Education Mobility Charter and bilaterals So where can you go?
The European Union Nikola Skalová, C4A
Form and substance in tax law: the reaction to tax avoidance from an EU perspective Pasquale Pistone, IBFD Academic Chairman IFA Asia-Pacific - Seoul,
Someone needed here to point out where Europe is….
THE EUROPEAN UNION Background 11 June Image by Rock Cohen. Used with permission europa.eu – official website of the EU.
Maps of Topic 2B Multilingualism in Europe Europe A Story of Empire (a united Europe) & Language.
Zápatí prezentace Notion and system of European Labour Law.
European Innovation Scoreboard European Commission Enterprise and Industry DG EPG DGs meeting, May 2008.
Table 1. Number and rate of Legionnaires’ disease cases per population by country and year, EU/EEA, 2010–2014 ASR: age-standardised rate, C: case-based.
CONFIDENTIAL 1 EPC, European Union and unitary patent/UPC EPC: yes EEA: no EU: no (*) (*) Also means no unitary patent Albania, Macedonia, Monaco, San.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS Unit 2 Business Development GCSE Business Studies.
Michel Aujean Former Director of Tax Policy EU Commission, Associé Taj, France Coordination of tax policies in the EU: the case of anti-abuse measures.
Revisiting Tax Avoidance EATLP 2016 Ana Paula Dourado SESSION 1 THE MEANING OF AVOIDANCE AND AGGRESSIVE TAX PLANNING IN THE BEPS CONTEXT.
SAP Digital Business Services June 2016
The European Union (EU)
EUROPEAN UNION – MAKING OFF European Economic Community
Revisiting Tax Avoidance: Session 2 The role of GAARs
Notion and system of European Labour Law
European Union Duy Trinh.
What is the EU? A group of 25 European countries whose governments work together. Aims to change and improve the way people live and do business in Europe.
Anti – Avoidance Measures EU Law
DISTRIBUTION AUTOMATIC - GENERATION
Figure 1. Number of reported hantavirus infection cases, EU/EEA, 2014
European Union.
The European Union.
European Union.
POST-REFERENDUM INFORMATION FOR EUROPEAN COLLEAGUES
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Union United in Diversity.
EU: First- & Second-Generation Immigrants
European Union Membership
Chapter 8: International Groupings History of the EU: Timeline
Where in the world is the European Union?
Beneficial Ownership and Abuse Conditions
Prodcom Statistics in Focus
Presentation transcript:

Session 3 The meaning of avoidance and aggressive tax planning in the EU Pasquale Pistone, IBFD Academic Chairman EATLP 2016 – Munich (Germany), 3 June 2016

Outline 1. Tax avoidance in EU tax law (CJEU; relations with EU Charter and directives) and relations with abusive practices 2. Possible different boundaries of tax avoidance in national tax law as consequence of different anti-avoidance rules 3. Repercussions of such differences in the Internal Market and expected developments of COM (2016) Tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning: two structurally different phenomena from the perspective of EU law © 2016 IBFD2

 Emsland-Stärke, 51: protection of EU law may not be invoked in the framework of abusive or fraudulent practices (principle of EU law)  Halifax, 69: definition of abuse in EU tax law “transactions carried out not in the context of normal commercial operations, but solely (Part Service, 42: “essential aim”) for the purpose of wrongfully obtaining advantages provided for by Community law”  Halifax, 74 y 75: core elements to a definition of abuse “notwithstanding formal application of the conditions laid down by the relevant provisions…accrual of a tax advantage…contrary to the purpose of those provisions“,…“apparent from…objective factors”  Cadbury Schweppes, 51: wholly artificial transactions aimed at circumventing the legislation; 67: objective factors (for CFC: staff, premises and equipment)  SGI, 71: right to prove evidence of commercial justification for non ALP Relevant CJEU tax case law on tax avoidance © 2016 IBFD3

Article 54 EU Charter of Fundamental Rights - Nothing in this Charter shall be interpreted as implying any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognised in this Charter or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for herein.  Various measures refer to obligation to counter avoidance, evasion and fraud in EU VAT Recast Directive and, in most directives (direct tax), to the right of countering such phenomena  EU Parent-Subsidiary as of contains definition and obligation to counter abusive practices EU Recommendation 8806 of (aggressive tax planning): taking advantage of the technicalities of a tax system or of mismatches between two or more tax systems for the purpose of reducing tax liability through double deductions or double non-taxation Further relevant source of EU law © 2016 IBFD4

 ‘2. Member States shall not grant the benefits of this Directive to an arrangement or a series of arrangements which, having been put into place for the main purpose or one of the main purposes of obtaining a tax advantage that defeats the object or purpose of this Directive, are not genuine having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances. An arrangement may comprise more than one step or part.  3. For the purposes of paragraph 2, an arrangement or a series of arrangements shall be regarded as not genuine to the extent that they are not put into place for valid commercial reasons which reflect economic reality.  4. This Directive shall not preclude the application of domestic or agreement-based provisions required for the prevention of tax evasion, tax fraud or abuse.’ Article 1 Parent-Subsidiary Directive © 2016 IBFD5

 Substance over form and factual recharacterisation: Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Hungary, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia  Abuse of law GAAR: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Spain, UK  Fraus legis GAAR: Croatia, Netherlands (judicial + richtige heffing)  TAAR: Sweden  No GAAR, but application of civil law: Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia  Judicial approach prevailing: France, Netherlands Last GAARs introduced in: 2013 Greece and UK, 2015 Denmark and Italy EU Approaches to tax avoidance: an overview © 2016 IBFD6

The EU measures announced on COM 23 – the Anti-BEPS tax package and its underlying policy COM 24 – the EU external tax strategy (endorsed on ) Recommendation 271 – PPT GAAR in tax treaties and PE definition COM 25 – broadening the scope of automatic EoI on CbC reporting (approved on ) COM 26 – EU Anti-BEPS Tax Directive (still in agenda) 1. Interest limitation (Article 4) 2. Exit taxes (Article 5) 3. Switchover (Article 6) 4. EU GAAR (Article 7) 5. CFC (Articles 8-9) 6. Anti-Hybrid rule (Article 10) Pure soft lawDraft legislation

Tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning  Three elements: 1. Friction between form and substance to obtain tax advantage (causal link with internal inconsistency) 2. Purely artificial transactions lacking valid economic reasons 3. Intention to avoid tax duly reflected in objective elements Generally reflecting existence of abusive practices  Three elements: 1. Exploitation of cross-border tax disparities to obtain bilateral tax advantages (causal link with external inconsistency) 2. Misalignment between taxing powers and value creation 3. Unintended tax advantages from double non-taxation No abusive practice in one tax system Tax avoidanceAggressive tax planning

 Implementation of BEPS through EU law in principle desirable in order to enhance level-playing field within the EU Internal Market (questionable protectionist impact on relations with third countries)  Coordination of concepts and reactions to aggressive tax planning and tax avoidance removes biases connected with actual differences  Reaction to aggressive tax planning reflects the need to preserve balanced allocation of taxing powers between States (justification) without evidence to prove actual existence of abusive practices  Reaction to tax avoidance under European Union law:  Requires evidence of actual existence of abusive practice  Justifies measures suitable to achieve their goals and in line with the principle of proportionality  Protects all persons acting in good faith  Implementation of EU Anti-BEPS Directive likely to have a strong impact on existing national GAARs, TAARs and SAARs In short © 2016 IBFD9

Thank you! © 2016 IBFD10