Muon Campus Mary Convery Fermilab Science and Technology Review November 5, 2013

Outline  Introduction  Introduction to Mu2e  Introduction to g-2  Common Accelerator Needs  Muon Campus Program  Recycler RF AIP  Beam Transport AIP  Delivery Ring AIP  Cryo AIP  MC-1 Building GPP  Beamline Enclosure GPP  MC Infrastructure GPP  Conclusions Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Introduction  The Mu2e experiment will look for muon to electron conversion  The g-2 experiment will measure the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon  Both require muons of a momentum which can be produced using an 8-GeV primary proton beam with similar requirements on bunch structure  Both require cryogenics for superconducting magnets  Both planned to re-use infrastructure from the former Antiproton Source (“Pbar”)  The needs of both experiments are suited to a common solution: the Muon Campus Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Introduction to the Muon Campus  The Muon Campus Program provides infrastructure and improvements needed to support both Mu2e and g-2  Based on reusing former Antiproton Source infrastructure  Made up of 4 Accelerator Improvement Projects (AIPs) and 3 General Plant Projects (GPPs), each with a limit of $10M  Recycler RF AIP provides rebunching of proton beam for both expts  Beam Transport AIP provides extraction from Recycler to Muon Campus beamlines and beamline improvements for 8-GeV beam  Delivery Ring AIP provides infrastructure improvements, new injection and abort components to former antiproton Debuncher ring  Cryo AIP provides cryogenics for Mu2e solenoids and g-2 storage ring  MC-1 Building GPP provides building to house experiment, cryo refrigerators, beamline power supplies  Beamline Enclosure GPP provides tunnel enclosure for new beamlines  MC Infrastructure GPP provides cooling for cryo compressors and extension of MI-52 building needed for new Recycler extraction Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Muon Campus Layout Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

View from Wilson Hall Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Mu2e Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Mu2e  Muons regularly decay to electrons and neutrinos    e  e   Mu2e will search for charged lepton flavor violation (  N  eN)  Neutrino flavor oscillations already observed  Conversion rate distinguishes between different theories Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November   e e n n p p n n p p p p n n n n ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Sleptons Squarks  Gauginos Not Yet Thought Of Extra Dimensions Super Strings Super Symmetry _

Mu2e  Generate beam of low-momentum    Stop the muons in a target  Aim to improve sensitivity by 10 4 over previous experiments  Requires ~10 18 stopped muons  Stopped muons are trapped in orbit around the nucleus  Using Aluminum target (nucleus): lifetime in capture   Al =864 ns conversion-electron energy MeV (maximum decay-e energy 52.8 MeV )  Extinction system (AC dipole) to prevent prompt background from out-of-time protons hitting production target Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Mu2e Apparatus Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November Production Solenoid Detector Solenoid Transport Solenoid Production Target Tracker Calorimeter Proton Beam 4.5 T 2.5 T 2 T 1 T Cosmic Ray Veto not shown Proton Beam delivered to the production target via the former Antiproton Source beamlines followed by a new external beamline

Mu2e Apparatus Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November Production Solenoid Detector Solenoid Transport Solenoid Production Target Tracker Calorimeter Proton Beam 4.5 T 2.5 T 2 T 1 T Cosmic Ray Veto not shown  -,  -

Mu2e Apparatus Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November Production Solenoid Detector Solenoid Transport Solenoid Production Target Tracker Calorimeter Proton Beam 4.5 T 2.5 T 2 T 1 T Cosmic Ray Veto not shown ee

Mu2e Schedule Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 CD-1 CD-3a CD-2/3 CD-4 Detector Hall Design Superconductor R&D Detector Construction Accelerator and Beamline Solenoid Infrastructure Solenoid Installation KPPs Satisfied Fabricate and QA Superconductor Solenoid Design Solenoid Fabrication and QA Detector Hall Construction Site work

g-2 Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

The Anomolous Magnetic Moment and g-2 Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November  g  2 but higher-order corrections  QED, EW, hadronic, new physics?  Currently ~3  discrepancy between theory and experiment  New muon g- 2 experiment at Fermilab expected precision could yield ~5  proposed exp. precision

Measuring g-2  Polarized muons in magnetic field precess with Larmor spin precession frequency  Measure g-2 using cyclotron  Requires precise measurements of and of the magnetic field Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November g = 2 g > 2

 One more trick:  Polarized muons in storage ring with vertical focusing by electrical quadrupole field  At magic momentum p  = GeV/c (  = 29.3), g-2 precession frequency  a independent of electric field  Distribution of decay electrons as function of time Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November Intensity at a single detector station shortly after injection Phys. Rev. D73 (2006)

g-2 Apparatus  Reusing storage ring from BNL g-2 experiment  New calorimeters and straw-tube tracking Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Planned Improvements  Rebunch high-intensity beam into multiple bunches to lower the instantaneous rate  Increase the detector segmentation to reduce the instantaneous rate in a given cell  Modify secondary beamlines to store as many muons from pion decays as possible  Remove pions and protons from muon beam to prevent hadronic flash in calorimeters  Allows analysis of more (earlier) decay e+  Longer beamline for pion decay  Let heavier protons separate in time from pions/muons and kick them out  Improve beam dynamics in storage ring  Improve storage ring field uniformity and the measurement and calibration system Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

g-2 Schedule Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November Field Shimming CD-0 Forecast KPPs Satisfied CD-1 CD-2/3a CD-3 CD-4 Conceptual Design Final Design Accel CD-3a work Accelerator construction / modification / installation Prelim Design MC-1 cryo room controls available Beamline enclosure BOD30 straight ready for new installation End of circulating beam studies Beam Transport complete Recycler RF complete Delivery Ring complete Ring Reassembly Construction of NSF/Early Career funded detector components Cooldown Install vacuum chambers Install remaining ring & detector subsystems MC-1 building BO Cryo ready to cool g-2 Close- out

Beam to Mu2e Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November  Primary (8 GeV) proton beam resonantly-extracted from former Antiproton Debuncher  Extinction of out-of-time beam  Rebunch primary (8 GeV) protons so that rate in detectors is not too high, bunch length < ring revolution time of 147ns  Create 3.1 GeV secondary pions off a target  Beamline long enough for ~all pions to decay  Capture GeV (“magic momentum” muons)  Aim for 40  acceptance  Limit secondary pions and protons making it into g-2 storage ring (cause “hadronic flash” in calorimeters) 31 Mp/pulse  50% Extinction (0.59 MHz) Mu2e pulse shape requirements Beam to g-2

Muon Campus Program Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Muon Campus Beamline Plan for Mu2e and g-2  Inventive plan for combining Mu2e and g-2 allows for expanded capabilities such as g- 2 proton removal using abort needed by Mu2e Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November (where M2 line joins M3 line not yet finalized) 3 GeV p,  +,  + to Delivery Ring for g-2 8 GeV protons to Delivery Ring for Mu2e (target station bypass) 3 GeV p,  +,  + to M3 line for g-2 (“  decay line”) 8 GeV protons to target for g-2 8 GeV protons to M3 line for Mu2e M3 line connects to Delivery Ring (Debuncher) After ~5 turns, p separated in time from  +, kick into abort Primary abort for Mu2e 3 GeV p,  +,  + After ~5 turns essentially all  + decayed  + to g-2 ring Extract  + for g-2 Resonant extraction for Mu2e p to Mu2e target M5

Reusing the Antiproton Source (“Pbar”)  1km of tunnel complete with electrical infrastructure, cable trays, cooling water distribution system and safety interlocks  g-2 reusing Pbar Target Station including target, lithium lens, pulsed momentum-selection magnet, collimation system, target vault, cooling systems, hot work cell, and tunnel access points with overhead crane coverage  Service buildings with HVAC, cooling water, controls communication infrastructure, extensive electrical infrastructure, electronics racks, access roads and parking lots, etc  Repurposing >250 Pbar magnets, g-2 using ~30 BNL magnets, plus 505m Pbar Debuncher used in-place as Delivery Ring  Power supplies will also be repurposed where practical  Reusing instrumentation from Antiproton Source Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Shared Infrastructure  Any shared infrastructure needs to be ready for g-2  No common infrastructure on Mu2e project  Make use of Accelerator Improvement Projects (AIPs) and General Plant Projects (GPPs)  $10M limit, funding comes from lab operations  No Critical Decision process like DOE Projects, implementation of one piece can proceed while other pieces still in design phase Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Muon Campus Program “Geographic” Scope Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November Recycler RF AIP g-2 Delivery Ring AIP Mu2e Beam Transport AIP M5 Cryo AIP Beamline Enclosure GPP MC-1 Bldg GPP MC Infrastructure GPP

Muon Campus Program Organization  Same team working on g-2 accelerators and AIP beamlines (Muon Dept)  Common installation coordinator and beamline mechanical engineer Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November MC-1 Building GPP Project Director E. Gottschalk (PPD) Project Manager R. Alber (FESS) MC-1 Building GPP Project Director E. Gottschalk (PPD) Project Manager R. Alber (FESS) MC Infrastructure Upgrade GPP Project Director R. Ortgiesen (FESS) Project Manager T. Lackowski (FESS) MC Infrastructure Upgrade GPP Project Director R. Ortgiesen (FESS) Project Manager T. Lackowski (FESS) MC Delivery Ring AIP Project Director G. Annala (AD) Project Manager G. Annala (AD) L2 Beamlines: J. Morgan L2 Ctrls Instrum: B. Drendel MC Delivery Ring AIP Project Director G. Annala (AD) Project Manager G. Annala (AD) L2 Beamlines: J. Morgan L2 Ctrls Instrum: B. Drendel MC Beamline Enclosure GPP Project Director G. Annala (AD) Project Manager T. Lackowski (FESS) MC Beamline Enclosure GPP Project Director G. Annala (AD) Project Manager T. Lackowski (FESS) MC Cryo Plant AIP Project Director G. Annala (AD) Project Manager A. Klebaner (AD) MC Cryo Plant AIP Project Director G. Annala (AD) Project Manager A. Klebaner (AD) MC Recycler RF AIP Project Director I. Kourbanis (AD) Project Manager I. Kourbanis (AD) MC Recycler RF AIP Project Director I. Kourbanis (AD) Project Manager I. Kourbanis (AD) Associate Laboratory Director Accelerator Sector S. Henderson Associate Laboratory Director Accelerator Sector S. Henderson MC Beam Transport AIP Project Director G. Annala (AD) Project Manager I Kourbanis (AD) L2 Beamlines: J. Morgan L2 Ctrls Instrum: B. Drendel MC Beam Transport AIP Project Director G. Annala (AD) Project Manager I Kourbanis (AD) L2 Beamlines: J. Morgan L2 Ctrls Instrum: B. Drendel Muon Campus Program Coordinator M. Convery (AD) Muon Campus Program Coordinator M. Convery (AD) Accelerator Division Head R. Dixon Accelerator Division Head R. Dixon Associate Laboratory Director Particle Physics Sector G. Bock Associate Laboratory Director Particle Physics Sector G. Bock Particle Physics Division Head M. Lindgren Particle Physics Division Head M. Lindgren Mu2e R. Ray (PPD) L2 Accelerators S. Werkema (AD) L3 Ext Beamline: C. Johnstone L3 Ctrls Instrum: B. Drendel Install Coord: C. Gattuso Beamline Mech E: C. Ader L2 Conv Constr: T. Lackowski Mu2e R. Ray (PPD) L2 Accelerators S. Werkema (AD) L3 Ext Beamline: C. Johnstone L3 Ctrls Instrum: B. Drendel Install Coord: C. Gattuso Beamline Mech E: C. Ader L2 Conv Constr: T. Lackowski g-2 C. Polly (PPD) L2 Accelerators M. Convery (AD) L3 Beamlines: J. Morgan L3 Ctrls Instrum: B. Drendel Install Coord: C. Gattuso Beamline Mech E: C. Ader g-2 C. Polly (PPD) L2 Accelerators M. Convery (AD) L3 Beamlines: J. Morgan L3 Ctrls Instrum: B. Drendel Install Coord: C. Gattuso Beamline Mech E: C. Ader AIP Installation Coordinator C. Gattuso (AD) AIP Beamline Mechanical Engineer C. Ader (AD) AIP Installation Coordinator C. Gattuso (AD) AIP Beamline Mechanical Engineer C. Ader (AD)

Muon Campus Program Roles  The MC Program Coordinator oversees the performance of the individual projects to ensure all the necessary technical and administrative planning; organizing; coordinating; and tracking (e.g., cost, schedule, deliverables), performance management, risk management, component procurement management, resource management, data management, and subcontract management required to perform all the activities successfully. The program coordinator shall keep directorate informed of any potential problems and make recommendations for solutions.  The GPP and AIP Projects will be executed by a Fermilab project team that is headed by the Project Director. The Fermilab Project Director is a key stakeholder that has accepted the scope of work as described within the project plan as being appropriate and complete.  The GPP and AIP Project Manager is responsible for project implementation and evaluating and mitigating project risks. Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Muon Campus Program Plans  Muon Campus Program Plan Muon Campus Program Plan  Includes discussion of requirements documents and interface milestones between projects  MC-1 Building Project Plan MC-1 Building Project Plan  MC Beamline Enclosure Project Plan MC Beamline Enclosure Project Plan  MC Infrastructure Project Plan MC Infrastructure Project Plan  Cryo AIP Project Plan Cryo AIP Project Plan  Recycler RF Project Plan Recycler RF Project Plan  Beam Transport Project Plan Beam Transport Project Plan  Delivery Ring Project Plan Delivery Ring Project Plan  Include scope, change control, etc Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Integration  Interfaces and dependencies between Muon g-2 and the non-project Muon Campus program is ensured through actively managed Interface Milestones  The establishment of requirements and specifications of the common elements involves all stakeholders  Configuration Management and Change Control processes in place and incorporate relevant stakeholders  We recognize the need to manage the interfaces and dependencies and have the necessary processes in place to do so Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Interface Relationships Mu2eg-2MC-1Beaml Encl InfrastCryoRRFBeam Transp Deliv Ring Mu2e g-2 MC-1 Beaml encl Infrast Cryo RRF Beam Transp Deliv Ring Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November delivers sets requirements

Interface Milestones  Interface milestones are the basis for communicating schedule impacts between the AIP’s, GPP’s, g-2 and Mu2e  The integration of these into the g-2 and Mu2e schedules shows the impact of any change Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November Milestone NameResponsibilityImpacts Forecast MC-1 Bldg Beneficial Occupancy for CryoMC-1 Building GPPCryo AIP 1/8/14 MC-1 Bldg Beneficial Occupancy for g-2 RingMC-1 Building GPPg-2 2/18/14 Beamline Enclosure Beneficial OccupancyBeamline Enclosure GPPg-2 6/9/15 Cryo Compressor Cooling EstablishedMC Infrastructure GPPCryo AIP 9/30/14 MI-52 Bldg Extension Beneficial OccupancyMC Infrastructure GPPBeam Transport AIP 9/30/15 Cryo Ready to Cool g-2Cryo AIPg-2 1/2/15 Cryo Ready to Cool Mu2eCryo AIPMu2e 10/1/17 Recycler RF CompleteRecycler RF AIPbeam to g-2, Mu2e 9/30/16 Beam Transport CompleteBeam Transport AIPbeam to g-2, Mu2e 1/4/16 End of Circulating Beam Studiesg-2, Mu2eg-2, Mu2e, Delivery Ring AIP 4/1/14 Delivery Ring CompleteDelivery Ring AIPbeam to g-2, Mu2e 3/30/17 MC-1 Cryo Room Controls Availableg-2Cryo AIP 9/22/14 D30 Straight Section Ready for New Installationg-2Delivery Ring AIP 2/3/16

Oversight and Decision-Making  Monthly Project Management Group (PMG) meetings of Muon g-2, Mu2e and Muon Campus  Attendees include (at a minimum) the Project, PMs for all three Projects, ALDs, Division Heads, key Dept. Heads  Monthly Project Oversight Group (POG) meetings  Review of performance of all ongoing construction Projects (and the Muon Campus)  Attendees include (at a minimum) Laboratory Director and all Sr. Management, Division/Section/Center Heads, Project Managers  Forum for raising resource needs and conflicts  Integrated budget and planning  Budget decisions and conflicts managed at Sr. Management level Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

History of Assessments  Internal Review of Muon Campus AIPs, Jan 23, 2013  Director’s Review of Project Management, Mar 25-27, 2013  Director’s Independent Conceptual Design Review of the Muon g-2 Project, Jun 5-7, 2013  Independent Project Assessment of the Muon Campus Program, Jul 8-10, 2013  Director’s CD-1 Readiness Review of the Muon g-2 Project, Jul 23-25, 2013  DOE CD-1 Review of the Muon g-2 Project, Sept 17-18, 2013 Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Ensuring Success of the Integrated Muon Program  Success of the Muon Program, including the g-2 and Mu2e Projects, necessarily requires an integrated approach  While challenging compared to a standalone project or program, we appreciate the advantages and risks and are working to ensure the success of the integrated Muon Program  We recognize the complexity and have the necessary organization and processes in place to ensure success  Sr. Lab Management is engaged and actively supporting the integrated Muon Program Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Protons to the Muon Campus Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Protons Available  (Mu2e and g-2 cannot run simultaneously) Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November Main Injector Energy Booster Cycles Protons to NOvA Protons to g-2 Protons to MicroBooNE { Need 2 Booster cycles to manipulate g-2 beam in Recycler Protons to Mu2e

Re-bunching Beam in Recycler  53 MHz bunches (4x10 12 protons) reformed into 4 bunches (1x10 12 protons) at 2.5 MHz  Reduce pile-up in detector  Build new cavities for 2.5MHz system  g-2 needs beam pulses out of Recycler not longer than ~100ns  Muon storage ring revolution time 147ns  Balance efficiency, momentum spread, and longitudinal extent  Achieve pulses with 95% of beam within 120ns  Beam pulses should be separated by ~10ms for the muons to decay in the g-2 storage ring and data to be recorded  Mu2e specs are less stringent than g-2 Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Recycler RF AIP  Divide 4x GeV protons from Booster into four bunches of protons spaced 10ms apart using 2.5-MHz RF  4 batches from Booster every 1.33s NO A cycle  95% of protons contained in 120ns Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November msec 1.33 sec Cycle length Pulse separation Begin cycleEnd cycle 100Hz 800 msec ~~~~ 12 Hz average phase (1° = 31 ns) Very good agreement between simulations and beam data at low intensities

RF Cavity Production  Reuse ferrites from MI coalescing and Pbar cavities (worth $1M today), buy additional  Cavities must have active cooling  7 RF systems (cavities + PA’s) for Recycler  2 cavities for Mu2e to be installed in the Delivery Ring Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November Building fixture to test cooling plate scheme using three ferrites with four cooling plates Former MI coalescing cavities

Beam Transport AIP  Allows re-bunched 8 GeV proton beam to be extracted to the P1 line and transported towards the experimental areas  Extraction kickers and Lambertson  (building extension for kicker power supplies provided under MC Infrastructure GPP)  Beamline connection from Recycler to P1 line  Aperture improvements in P1, P2, M1 lines for 8-GeV beam Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Delivery Ring AIP  Upgrades to the Delivery Ring (former antiproton Debuncher) to support Mu2e and g-2, including injection into the Delivery Ring  Collider equipment removal (e.g. stochastic cooling tanks) to improve aperture and make room for new components Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Delivery Ring AIP (cont.)  Delivery Ring abort  Mu2e: remove beam left after resonant extraction  g-2: proton removal  Repurposing steel shielding already in enclosure from old experiment, retrofitted with new steel central core and surrounded by concrete  Significantly less expensive than building new beam abort dump  Electrical infrastructure  Re-route controls around new external beamline enclosure  Instrumentation for high- intensity protons Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November x cut during tunnel excavation

Cryogenics for the Muon Campus Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Cryogenics Requirements for g-2 and Mu2e Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November Cryogenic loads:  g-2 storage ring  Liquefaction load: 1.4 [g/sec]  Refrigeration load: 300 [W]  LN2 Shield flow rate: 1.6 [g/sec]  Provide for independent operation g-2 and Mu2e, including transient modes, e.g. warm-up, cooldown, etc.  It should be possible to connect and/or isolate Mu2e magnets from the transfer line while under cold conditions  Mu2e solenoids  Liquefaction load: 0.8 [g/sec]  Refrigeration load: 350 [W]  LN2 Shield flow rate: 20 [g/sec]

Muon Campus Cryo System Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November TeV Tank farm Had originally planned to have He storage tanks outside MC-1 bldg but brainstorming led to idea of running piping to Tevatron tank farm which is less expensive Most of cryo equipment refurbished / reengineered Tevatron equipment

Piping Headers from A0 to MC-1 Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November from A0

MC-1 to A0 Pipe Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

General Plant Projects Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

MC-1 Building GPP  MC-1 building designed to house g-2 and future experiments, cryo refrigerator system for g-2 and Mu2e, and power supplies for some beamline components  80’ x 80’ high-bay with 30 T crane, internal loading dock  Floor stable, load-bearing to 700 T  Excellent temperature control Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

MC-1 Building – First Floor Plan Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

MC-1 Building – Second Floor Plan Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

MC-1 Building – Cross Sections Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

MC-1 Building Construction in Progress  Beneficial Occupancy milestones  Cryo Room Only – Jan 8, 2014  Experimental Hall – Feb 18, 2014  Project Complete – Apr 22, 2014 Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

MC-1 Construction Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Beamline Enclosure GPP Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November  Main Injector type enclosure  Painted walls and ceiling, sealed floor. Floor to have cover over rebar to enable stand anchorage.  Channel inserts walls and ceiling  Shielding earth/concrete  Ready to start final design – requisition for A&E in process  Same subcontractor as Mu2e building  Construction start in Q4 FY14, beneficial occupancy FY15, well in time for beamline installation

Plan View from Delivery Ring  Access for magnets is provided directly from Delivery Ring enclosure; lift provided for magnet installation. Shielded hatch provided for magnet installation/replacement. Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Plan View for Downstream M4 and M5 Lines Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Section View – M4, M5 Line to MC-1 Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Section View – M4 Line to Mu2e Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

MC Infrastructure GPP  Water cooling for cryo compressors Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

MC Infrastructure GPP (cont.)  Extension of MI-52 building for new Recycler extraction kicker power supplies Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Block Schedule and Interfaces  Muon Campus Program ready for beam to g-2 Q3 FY17 Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November

Conclusions  Muon Campus Program supports g-2 and Mu2e  Plan provides common infrastructure in a way that not only does not compromise the physics of either experiment, but in fact enhances the capabilities  Current schedule provides Muon Campus ready for beam in time to meet current g-2 and Mu2e schedules Mary Convery, Fermilab S&T Review - November