Korea-EU FTA - Implications for Global Businesses - - Implications for Global Businesses -2011.11 Korea-EU FTA - Implications for Global Businesses - -

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Value Chain in East Asia Michitaka Nakatomi President Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO) 1.
Advertisements

Creation of WTO investment rules in the new round We strongly urge that investment rule negotiations be launched at the Fifth Ministerial in September.
The treatment of Government Procurement in international trade agreements: the EU experience Taipei, 11 June 2008 Christian Levon European Commission DG.
EU-Canada Trade and Economic Relations – towards a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) 5 May 2014.
EU’s FTAs and TURKEY Murat YAPICI DG for EU Affairs Ministry of Economy Istanbul, 26 November 2012.
1 Chutima Bunyapraphasara Deputy Director-General Department of Trade Negotiations Free Trade Successes & Thailand Automotive Industry.
1. The DCFTA structure Association agreement (486 articles) PREAMBLE
CEFTA 2006 Improving Regional Trade in South Eastern Europe USAID: RCI Annual Forum Bucharest 1 November.
Short courses on key international economic issues for delegates from permanent missions in Geneva Trade agreements between developed and developing countries.
Economic Integration.
Global Marketing Chapter 3
Regional Economic Integration in East Asia and Japan’s FTA Policy March, 2010 Shujiro URATA Waseda University.
1 The EU Trade Policy. 2 Contents 1.General background of the EU’s trade policy: how is the EU trading bloc structured?  The institutional setting 
Trade and Investment Regime - Japan’s Perspective -
« The voice of the European Service Industries for International Trade Negotiations in Services » MULTILATERAL versus NEW EU BILATERAL TRADE POLICY WTO.
The Partnership Instrument (PI) CONNECTING EUROPEAN CHAMBERS Sharing lessons learnt and new challenges from EU Programmes 27 March 2015.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hajime Matsumura Deputy Director, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan Paris, 15 December 2010.
AEC and Regional Economic Integration in East Asia
The European Union Trade Policy 2014
ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) 45 th ASEAN economic Ministers’ Meeting on August 2013, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam.
How can trade contribute to growth and jobs? The role of EU trade policy Signe Ratso Director Directorate General of Trade European Commission.
Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation By Shelby and LOLA THE DESTROYER.
Free Trade Agreements: Helping U.S. Businesses Export.
Asia’s RTA: Two Alternative Models Jang-Hee Yoo Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of International Studies Ewha Womans University Seoul, Korea.
1 Korea’s FTA strategies & Effects of Korea-EU FTA.
General orientation of international economic integration
Australia. Angus M Robinson Chief Executive, AEEMA WEF Panel on Trade 10 th World Electronics Forum, Washington DC 22 September 2004.
Services Negotiation in JTEPA and RCEP
September 28, 2012 Expanding Market Opportunities Through Trade Policy: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative Sushan Demirjian Deputy Assistant U.S.
ECIPE PRESENTATION » Natalia Macyra Trade Policy Analyst, European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE) Implications of the Transatlantic.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 8 GLOBAL2  PENG © iStockphoto.com/Baris Onal.
1 U.S. and the WTO: overview Washington, DC, February 13,
Japan’s FTAs/EPAs with APEC Economies Nobuhiko Sasaki Deputy Director-General APEC Senior Official METI Japan March 2006.
0 0 Korea ’ s FTA Policy and its Perspectives 27 September 2006 Heungchong Kim Head, European Studies Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
Rationale and Main Features of Trade Policy of
PASC’s role in supporting Free Trade in the region.
Ministry for Foreign Affairs Sweden The EU-India FTA negotiations – a European perspective Anders Ahnlid Director-General for Trade Ministry for Foreign.
Brazil-Japan: Roadmap for an Economic Partnership Agreement Keidanren
Japan-EU EPA Negotiation: Lessons from EU-South Korea FTA EU Institute in Japan, Kansai Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University Dr. Prof. YOSHII.
Securing Advantage from NZ’s FTAs Martin Harvey, Manager Trade Negotiations MFAT.
1 The European Union Trade Policy The European Union Trade Policy May 2009.
ICTSD/IDRC Symposium ‘Rationalising Regional Arrangements In The South – Before and After Hong Kong’ Towards A Framework For Amalgamation Of East Asia.
1 Trade Policy Dialogue on the Multiple Dimensions of Market Access and Development Session IV Regional Trade Liberalizations as a Complement of Multilateral.
1 EXPERIENCES OF LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES WITHIN THE APEC REGION: THE CASE OF CHILE HERNAN GUTIERREZ B. Director Economic and Trade Department Embassy.
Future Development of Asian Electronics Industry May 17, 2004 Japan Electronics & Information Technology Industries Association.
« The voice of the European Service Industries for International Trade Negotiations in Services » Trends in World Trade in Services.
Mega FTA in East Asia for Regional Economic Integration: RCEP and TPP
The Effect of FTAs on Korean Trade Remedy System and Its Future Direction The Effect of FTAs on Korean Trade Remedy System and Its Future Direction
The Changing Landscape of Trade Negotiations Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan For presentation at 2015 Seoul Conference.
1 Lecture 4 Multilateralism and Regionalism Hyun-Hoon Lee Professor Kangwon National University.
THE ROLE OF TRADE: SOUTH-SOUTH AND GLOBAL Ing. MARCELO REGUNAGA New Delhi, November 2003.
February 9, 2016 The Pike Law Firm, P.C..  The Trans-Pacific Partnership (“TPP”) is a trade agreement among 12 Pacific Rim countries  The TPP agreement.
European business in a global context – the developed world.
EU-Indonesia Trade Cooperation Facility Module 2: EU as a negotiating partner Trends of EC trade negotiations 29 September
Dr., Rodica CRUDU Assoc. Prof., Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova.
Plenary Session III: RCEP Impact on East Asia Investment Presented by Mr. Phairush Burapachaisri, Vice Chairman, the Board of Trade of Thailand Chairman,
THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP: OVERVIEW March 17, 2016Cielito F. Habito.
1. First Secretary, Park Jong hark Embassy of the Republic of Korea.
Philippines-European Free Trade Association FTA UNDERSECRETARY NORA K. TERRADO Department of Trade and Industry 26 April 2016 Zurich, Switzerland.
“…global multinationals have … viewed developing Asia [countries]…as an offshore-production platform. The offshore- efficiency solution is still an attractive.
Two Ways forward – a crossroad in the global economy -
U.S. Trade Agenda Juliet Bender, Director Office of the Pacific Basin September 2007 ~ Bangkok, Thailand.
2016 ILS Retreat September 30- October 2, 2016 Boca Raton Resort & Club “Thoughts on the Trans Pacific Partnership, The Election, and the Future of Trade”
ALMA Business Plan Overview
EU’s response and preparation for the EU-Korea FTA
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): - state of play Marino Radačič Americas Unit Czech Ministry of Industry and Trade.
Anastasia Makarenko PhD researcher, ESI-MGIMO
Association of Southeast Asian Nations
Will membership in TPP really help Japan?
Presentation transcript:

Korea-EU FTA - Implications for Global Businesses - - Implications for Global Businesses Korea-EU FTA - Implications for Global Businesses - - Implications for Global Businesses Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade The Republic of Korea United Kingdom

I. Korean Economy and Trade  Past and Present of the Korean Economy  Importance of Trade in the Korean Economy  88% of Korea’s GDP comes from trade (2010) GDP Per Capita Income 500 times 240 times

II. Korea’s FTA Policy (1)  Consistent Trade Liberalization policy - based on WTO multilateral system  Policy Environment in 2000’s  Stalemate in the WTO DDA negotiations  Surge of RTAs after the establishment of WTO in 1995  International trade volume under RTAs : more than 50% of the global trade  FTA Roadmap in 2003

II. Korea’s FTA Policy (2)  Korea aims to put trade under FTAs to take up more than 80% of the total trade volume. In ForceConcludedNegotiatingPreparing Chile, Singapore, EFTA, ASEAN, India, EU, Peru USA Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Mexico, Turkey, Colombia, GCC China, Japan, Russia, MERCOSUR

II. Korea’s FTA Policy (3)  Establishment of Global FTA Networks  Securing External Markets  Advancing Domestic Economic System ASEAN MERCOSUR EFTA China Canada Mexico Chile In effect or ConcludedUnder Negotiation Under Preparation USA Mongolia India Japan Colombia New Zealand Peru EU GCC Israel Turkey * The size of the circle proportionate to the size of the market Malaysia Australia Indonesia Singapore Viet Nam Central America

III. the Korea-EU FTA: Background  Strengthening the Strategic Partnership  Korea’s Economic Network with the World’s Largest Market  EU’s Springboard into the Asian Market Progress Launched Concluded Initialed Officially Signed Provisional Application Background  Formal Entry into Force (in 2~3 yrs)  When all 27 Member States of the EU Completes Domestic Ratification Procedures

Main trade partners for Korea and EU (2010)

 “High-Level” Trade Deal  Elimination of Industrial Tariffs IV. Korea-EU FTA: Main Features(1) Staging Category KOREAEU Number of tariff lines (%) Items Number of tariff lines (%) Items Entry into force 90.7 auto parts, TV, refrigerator 97.3 auto parts, air- conditioner 3 years5.1 medium & large- sized cars, 2.1 medium & large-sized cars 5 years3.7 small-sized cars, cosmetics 0.6 small-sized cars, TV 7 years0.5 woolen fabric, plywood - Total100.0

High-Level Trade Deal Korea K-Chile Chile (%) % 41.8% Korea K-ASEAN Asian (%) % Korea K-INDIA India (%) % 3.9% Korea KOREU EU (%) % 94% Korea KORUS US (%) % 81.2%  Tariff Elimination of Goods at the Entry into Force

IV. Korea-EU FTA: Main features(2) Goods Protocols 2. Nat’l Treatment and Market Access for Goods 1. Objectives and General Definition 3. Trade Remedies 4. Technical Barriers for Trade 5. Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures 6. Customs and Trade Facilitation Protocol Concerning the Definition of ‘Originating Products’ and Methods of Administrative Co-operation Protocol on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Custom Matters Protocol on Cultural Co-operation Rules & Others Services 7. Trade in Services, Establishment and Electronic Commerce 8. Payments and Capital Movements Rules & Others 9. Government Procurement 10. Intellectual Property 11. Competition 12. Transparency 13. Trade and Sustainable Development 14. Dispute Settlement 15. Institutional, General and Final Provisions  “Comprehensive” Trade Deal

V. Korea-EU FTA: Its Implications Tariff Elimination Harmonizing Regulatory Rules Enhancing IPR Rules Substantial Export & Investment Opportunities

 Increase in Korea’s GDP and Welfare  Increase in Employment Implications for the Korean Economy Increase in Real GDP Increase in Welfare For Real GDP Short-term effect Long-term effect SectorShort-term IncreaseLong-term Increase Agriculture-1, Manufacturing4,00033,200 Services27,600219,000 Total29,900253,100

Implications for the EU Economy Report for the European Commission, May 2010 CEPII, Paris; GEP, University of Nottingham; LEAD, Unversité du Sud Toulon-Var  Economic Impacts of the Korea-EU FTA (% change)

Implications for the Korea-EU Trade (2010)

Implications for the Korea-EU Investment 15 (Inbound: EU  Korea, Outbound: Korea  EU)

Implications for the Korea-UK Trade

(2010)

Implications for the Korea-UK Investment (Inbound: UK  Korea, Outbound: Korea  UK)

 Score for the first 100 days  Bilateral trade volume: 25.4 billion US$ = 11.8% increase  The 1 st Trade Committee Meeting: 12 October 2011, Seoul  FTA is not ending point, but starting point  Active participation of Business Community in both Trade and Investment is essential  Cooperation between Government and Business Community is also important VI. Korea-EU FTA: How to make it REAL