Public/Private Partnerships for Housing Oregon University Systems, 2001 Bob Simonton February 15, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Business and Legal Issues in Developing Vacant Land and Underutilized Existing Buildings Jeffrey G. Wright Nixon Peabody LLP June 28, 2007.
Advertisements

Virginia Housing Coalition 2013 Housing Credit Conference Deal Structuring, Fundamentals, and Financing and Legal Issues.
Financial Management in Not-for-Profit Businesses
University of Louisville
University of Louisville and Allen & O’Hara Education Services: A Partnership in Excellence Awarded: Spring 2010.
AN OVERVIEW OF PROJECT FINANCE IN PRIVATE-PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS FINANCE 101 T ERRI S MALINSKY Managing Director B.C.
HB1438 Update & Statewide Capital Planning Initiative Office of State Finance Department of Central Services November 8, 2011.
Public-Private Partnerships: Basic Considerations, Accounting and Reporting Issues Presentation by Max Alier Resident Representative in Brazil International.
Presentation to Iron Range Economic Alliance May 28, 2014 Paul Steinman Tony Schertler.
Your Farm, Your Business Crystal Middleton, Esq. Presentation by: Crystal Middleton, Esq. Land Loss Prevention Project, SmartGrowth Business Center.
Report to the State Board of Higher Education Prepared by Office of the Chancellor Finance and Administration December 21, 2001 Part II: Capital Renewal.
Some aspects of alternative and affordable housing in Poland Jarosław BYDŁOSZ, Piotr PARZYCH, Poland Department of Geomatics Faculty of Mining Surveying.
Massachusetts Community & Banking Council Economic Development Committee June 10, 2010.
Design/Build/Financing of Privately Operated Detention Facilities Allison, Bass & Associates, LLP A.O. Watson House 402 West 12 th Street, Austin, Texas.
Auxiliary Services CWU Board of Trustees February 4, 2010.
Business Organizations
PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
CHAPTER SEVEN SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING: PRICING, INVESTMENTS, AND TAX INVESTMENTS.
How to make 4% LIHTC deal work: Case Study from Fairfax County Presented by: Aseem Nigam, Director, Real Estate Finance & Grants Management Division, Fairfax.
Chapter 17 Sources of Funds for Commercial Real Estate Properties © OnCourse Learning.
Business Plans for Agricultural Producers. General Information  A business plan is a road map for a business.  It describes the key functions of the.
Chapter 6 Setting up the company. Objectives Best form of ownership Sole proprietorship and partnership Incorporating a business S corporation and limited.
Comparison of International P3 Model, Corp and Hybrid Lease The Great Debate:
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
 Paul Carman  Chapman and Cutler LLP  September, 2010 Issues for HFAs in Low Income Housing Partnerships 1.
Financial Management in Not-for-Profit Businesses
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
Forms of Business Organization in the USA
Sustainability and Total Cost of Ownership Strategies for Higher Education.
Presented to Global Real Estate Services January 29, 2002 Indiana University Professional Opportunities Orientation Program.
De-Mystifying Public-Private Partnerships Sarah Samuels Jason Taylor The Scion Group LLC Shannon Staten University of Louisville.
Leased Facilities Review and Assessment Energy Efficiency Review and Assessment Presented by: Dennis Dunston & Solveig Monson.
© AECOM Consult, Inc. – October 2003 Daniel L. Dornan, P.E. Managing Infrastructure Assets: Implications for New Accounting Guidelines Presentation to.
Impact Fee Programs and Land Secured Financing Districts 2007 National Impact Fee Roundtable Portland, OR Presented by EPS, Sacramento County, & River.
Chapter 9 Resort Operations: The Importance of Recreational Amenities
Information Seminar on the Framework for Public Private Partnerships in Ireland Alexander Hotel, Dublin 3 rd June 2003.
Chapter 31 Financial Management in Not-for-Profit Businesses.
American Model. Public-Private Partnerships Public Development Private Development Public-Private Partnerships PrivatizationSubsidization.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners March 20, 2007 Discussion Agenda Conduit Finance and the Orange County Health Facilities Authority Orlando.
Citizens Budget Commission: Trustee Breakfast September 18, 2015.
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. BZUPAGES.COM 1-1 Overview of Corporate Finance Hashim Ali Shah
© Mark T. Schenkel 1 Foundations of Entrepreneurship Mark T. Schenkel, PhD Belmont University.
Business Organizations
IGCSE Business Studies Types of Business Organisation.
California Integrated Waste Management Board November 10, 2008 Item #2 Discussion And Request For Direction Regarding The Board's Fulfillment Of The Requirements.
INSTRUCTOR'S MANUAL Chapter 3 ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS.
1 WMECo Solar Program Utility Ownership: One Part of a Portfolio of Options January 19, 2010.
What You Need to Know About Facilities Development Thursday, December 1, 2011.
Community Power Projects An introduction to the process of developing community power projects UBCM 2006 Tuesday, October 24.
Transitional Benefit Corporation A New Model for State and Local Governments with Reduced Tax Revenue Steve Sorett, Esq., McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP To.
CBP3 Sustainable Financing Solutions December 7, 2015.
Introduction to Business Chapter 6 Business Ownership.
Personal Finance Chapter 13
Affordable Housing Delivery by the Private Sector Lessons from elsewhere Integrated Housing Delivery CfHE 2015 Symon Sentain Symon Sentain Associates.
Private Placements and Venture Capital Chapter 28 Tools & Techniques of Investment Planning Copyright 2007, The National Underwriter Company1 What is it?
 There are four forms of business organization, they are: ◦ Sole Proprietorship ◦ Partnership ◦ Corporation ◦ (Cooperative-not covered)  We will look.
Chapter 4 Finance and Budgeting. Chapter Objectives 1.Define capital projects and explain why both for-profit and nonprofit organizations undertake them.
ROLE OF DIFFERENT STAKEHOLDERS AND FINANCIAL MECHANISM OF MHI Financial sources and mechanism of creation of multilateral investment fund to develop the.
Pbwt.com Overview of Tax-Exempt Organizations and Charitable Giving in the U.S. Robin Krause Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP May 11, v1.
2 - 1 CHAPTER 2 Healthcare Business Basics Concept of a business Legal forms of business FP versus NFP ownership Organizational goals Financial goals Taxes.
Agriculture Business Organizations
Finding the Revenue Stream to Make P3s Work
©2008 Prentice Hall, Inc..
A Crash Course in P3 Housing (Public Private Partnerships)
Using LIHTCs to Preserve Rural Affordable Housing
Project Goals Leverage one of our unique CSU Dominguez Hills assets—our underutilized land—to advance the university mission and increase student success.
The Development Team Texas Rural Rental Housing Preservation Academy Session #4 June 6 – Start w/ brief overview of Greystone – who we are and what.
Introduction to Business
Putting It All Together
HFC Public-Private Partnership Basics
Presentation transcript:

Public/Private Partnerships for Housing Oregon University Systems, 2001 Bob Simonton February 15, 2001

Introduction The Anderson Strickler report provides: Internal Benchmark of existing housing Defines forms of partnerships Highlights relevant case studies Strategies for future housing projects

Overview of Student Housing OccupancyOccupancy Deferred MaintenanceDeferred Maintenance Existing Debt ServiceExisting Debt Service

Overview of Student Housing Occupancy & Housing Types

Overview of Student Housing Deferred Maintenance

Overview of Student Housing Current Annual Debt Service

Overview of Student Housing General ConclusionsGeneral Conclusions –Current operating performance does not justify or support the addition of new housing –However, enrollment projections suggest a need for a mechanism to develop new student housing on all campuses –Additionally, campuses are facing increasing deferred maintenance backlogs for facilities that are not configured to meet student demands –Renovations and conversions will require additional, substantial debt capacity –A partnership solution for new construction should also address the needs of existing facilities (i.e., comprehensive solution needed)

Partnerships Why Consider PartnershipsWhy Consider Partnerships Elements of a PartnershipElements of a Partnership Risk Return & ControlRisk Return & Control Partnership ModelsPartnership Models –Traditional University Sponsored –University Affiliated Foundation –Unaffiliated Nonprofit Corporation –Fully Privatized

Fundamentals of Partnerships Partnering for a PurposePartnering for a Purpose –Shift risk –Speed up development process –Gain necessary expertise –Obtain financing –Improve value of project Partnership Structure Depends on Objectives for OutsourcingPartnership Structure Depends on Objectives for Outsourcing

Elements of a PartnershipElements of a Partnership –Outsourcing of tasks defines structure Ownership University Affiliated Foundation Unaffiliated Nonprofit Private Developer Ownership University Affiliated Foundation Unaffiliated Nonprofit Private Developer Development University Private Developer Development University Private Developer Financing University Conduit Authority Corporation Banker Financing University Conduit Authority Corporation Banker Architect Engineer Contractor Management University Private Developer Third-party Management University Private Developer Third-party Design/Build Turnkey Fundamentals of Partnerships

Risk, Return, and ControlRisk, Return, and Control –Risk and control go hand-in-hand –Return increases with the amount of risk that is assumed Attribute Traditional Development University- Affiliated Foundation Unaffiliated Nonprofit Corporation Fully Privatized Development RiskModerate LowLow or None ReturnHighModerate to Low Low or None ControlHighModerateLowNone PublicPrivate

Fundamentals of Partnerships Oregon University System Financing Land Owner Oregon University System Financing Land Owner Campus Treasurer Campus Housing Architect Design Contractor Construction Contractor Construction Campus Project Developer Project Manager Campus Project Developer Project Manager Consultant Planning Bond Financing Operations Residence Life All risk, return and control are assumed by the University Public Traditional University-Sponsored ModelTraditional University-Sponsored Model Private

Fundamentals of Partnerships University-Affiliated Foundation ModelUniversity-Affiliated Foundation Model Oregon University System Land Owner Oregon University System Land Owner Banker Financing Banker Financing Property Manager Contractor Construction Contractor Construction 501(c)(3) Foundation Project Developer Project Manager 501(c)(3) Foundation Project Developer Project Manager Consultant Planning Operations Residence Life Campus All risk, return and control are assumed by foundation, but the University is likely to be viewed as owner if boards are overlapping PublicPrivate Architect Design

Fundamentals of Partnerships Unaffiliated Nonprofit Corporation ModelUnaffiliated Nonprofit Corporation Model Oregon University System Land Owner Oregon University System Land Owner Banker Financing Banker Financing Property Manager Architect Design Contractor Construction Contractor Construction 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Special Purpose Corp. Consultant Planning Operations Residence Life Campus Developer Developer Ground Lease Development and operational risk are assumed by contractors to the foundation; operating surpluses can accrue to University. PublicPrivate

Fundamentals of Partnerships Fully Privatized ModelFully Privatized Model Oregon University System Land Owner Oregon University System Land Owner Banker Financing Banker Financing Property Manager Architect Design Contractor Construction Contractor Construction Private Developer Project Developer Project Manager Private Developer Project Developer Project Manager Operations Residence Life Campus All risk, return and control are assumed by the developer; minimal control of operations available to the University PublicPrivate

Fundamentals of Partnerships Factors Favoring Traditional ApproachFactors Favoring Traditional Approach –Site is proximate to campus core –The traditional means of developing and operating housing are successfully established –Tax-exempt financing is available and inexpensive –Housing is integral to the educational mission of the institution –Institution wants control and/or financial return; willing to take the associated risk

Fundamentals of Partnerships Factors Favoring a PartnershipFactors Favoring a Partnership –Housing required faster than institution can deliver it –Debt capacity or financing is unavailable –Cost of developing or operating in the traditional manner is cost prohibitive –Institution lacks expertise in developing and operating residential facilities –Capital projects are predominantly new construction

Partnership Recommendations University-Affiliated FoundationsUniversity-Affiliated Foundations –OUS can modify rules to add an “OUS Foundation” –Use of University-affiliated Foundation not likely because: Primary purpose is to raise money for research, scientific or educational programsPrimary purpose is to raise money for research, scientific or educational programs Foundation boards are probably not comfortable with operating student housingFoundation boards are probably not comfortable with operating student housing

Partnership Recommendations University-Affiliated FoundationsUniversity-Affiliated Foundations –Unresolved Issues Oregon Law prohibits institutional control of a Foundation-voids IRS qualification to issue tax- exempt bonds. Would require qualification as a “Public Charity”Oregon Law prohibits institutional control of a Foundation-voids IRS qualification to issue tax- exempt bonds. Would require qualification as a “Public Charity”

Next Steps Issues for ConsiderationIssues for Consideration –What’s Broken What features of the Traditional Model do not work for your Campus?What features of the Traditional Model do not work for your Campus? What features of the 4 public/private models interests you?What features of the 4 public/private models interests you?

Next Steps HighestModerateLowest Ease of Implementation Lowest Potentially High HighHighest Financial Return Lowest High if managed by Campus Lower if managed by 3 rd party Highest Level of University Control Yes Probably Possible Probably Not Possible Not Possible Off-Balance Sheet Financing Not Available Potentially Available Available Access to Tax-Exempt Financing HighestHigher Slightly Higher Lowest Cost of Capital Fully Privatized Unaffiliated Nonprofit Corporation University- Affiliated Foundation Traditional University Development Issue