State of Louisiana Division of Administration Facility Planning and Control “Project Outlook” American Council of Engineering Companies of Louisiana Mark A. Moses Director November 13, 2014

MISSION STATEMENT: To assist in management of the state's finances and fixed assets by administration of the comprehensive capital outlay budget process and implementation of a comprehensive centralized facility management program. To provide appropriate owned or leased facilities to house the operations of state government and meet the space and functional needs of each user agency. This recognizes the need to serve two primary customers: the state agencies which occupy the owned or leased space, and the taxpayers who expect the housing of state agencies to be accomplished in a cost-effective manner.

MISSION STATEMENT: To assist in management of the state's finances and fixed assets by administration of the comprehensive capital outlay budget process and implementation of a comprehensive centralized facility management program. To provide appropriate owned or leased facilities to house the operations of state government and meet the space and functional needs of each user agency. This recognizes the need to serve two primary customers: the state agencies which occupy the owned or leased space, and the taxpayers who expect the housing of state agencies to be accomplished in a cost-effective manner.

MISSION STATEMENT: To assist in management of the state's finances and fixed assets by administration of the comprehensive capital outlay budget process and implementation of a comprehensive centralized facility management program. To provide appropriate owned or leased facilities to house the operations of state government and meet the space and functional needs of each user agency. This recognizes the need to serve two primary customers: the state agencies which occupy the owned or leased space, and the taxpayers who expect the housing of state agencies to be accomplished in a cost-effective manner.

MISSION STATEMENT: To assist in management of the state's finances and fixed assets by administration of the comprehensive capital outlay budget process and implementation of a comprehensive centralized facility management program. To provide appropriate owned or leased facilities to house the operations of state government and meet the space and functional needs of each user agency. This recognizes the need to serve two primary customers: the state agencies which occupy the owned or leased space, and the taxpayers who expect the housing of state agencies to be accomplished in a cost-effective manner.

Capital Outlay Act House Bill 2 Act 25 of 2014

Means of Financing State General Fund Fees and Self Generated Funds Interagency Transfers Revenue Bonds General Obligation Bonds Federal Funds Statutory Dedications Transportation Trust Fund

Priority 1 General Obligation Bonds Projects and amounts which were previously authorized by Act 24 of the 2013 Regular Session of the Legislature; and which were granted cash lines of credit by the State Bond Commission. The bonds to fund these projects were not sold in Fiscal Year The reauthorization of the portion of the outstanding Fiscal Year Priority 5 Non-Cash Lines of Credit for projects which will require cash expenditures in Fiscal Year and therefore must be converted to Cash Lines of Credit in Fiscal Year

Priority 2 General obligation bond projects are for the completion of plans and specifications, land acquisition, site preparation, or for construction which will begin during the fiscal year. It is presently anticipated that the listed projects will require the sale of bonds or extension of lines of credit during the fiscal year. This is considered “new” money.

Priority 3 General obligation bond projects are for the preparation of plans and specifications, land acquisition, site preparation, or for construction and shall be limited to funding for the portion of construction contracts which will not require cash expenditures during the fiscal year. The projects in this category shall be considered future year projects in the State's five year capital outlay plan. It is presently anticipated that the listed projects will not require the sale of bonds or extension of lines of credit during the fiscal year.

Priority 4 General obligation bond projects are for the preparation of plans and specifications, land acquisition, site preparation, or for construction and shall be limited to funding for the portion of construction contracts which will not require cash expenditures during the fiscal year. The projects in this category shall be considered future year projects in the State's five year capital outlay plan. It is presently anticipated that the listed projects will not require the sale of bonds or extension of lines of credit during the fiscal year.

Priority 5 General obligation bond funding shall be limited to funding for the portion of construction contracts which will not require cash expenditures during the fiscal year. These funds, when combined with previously sold bonds or with higher priority bonds on lines of credit, or with funds appropriated from other sources, will provide sufficient appropriated funds to award contracts. Non-cash lines of credit shall be required prior to the award of these contracts.

General Obligation Bonds Priority 1 Receives Cash Line of Credit generally in July from the State Bond Commission Meeting Treated as “Cash” for the purposes of contracting P1 could be reauthorized P1 CLOC from a prior year P1 could be reauthorized P2 CLOC from a prior year P1 could be reauthorized P5 NLOC from a prior year

General Obligation Bonds Priority 2 Receives Cash Line of Credit generally in September, October or November Treated as “Cash” for the purposes of contracting

General Obligation Bonds Priority 5 Receives Non-Cash Line of Credit Only provides contracting authority – No Cash (Can’t pay the bills)

ACT 25 of 2014 Priority 1:$1,548,346,100 Priority 2: $445,385,800 Priority 3: $0 Priority 4: $0 Priority 5:$1,943,550,000 G. O. Bond Proceeds: $66,740,048 Fees & Self Generated: $112,642,000 Revenue Bonds: $185,875,000 Federal Funds: $106,957,022 Interagency Transfers: $417,841,541 Transportation Trust Fund: $788,249,140 Re-appropriated Cash: $13,622,939 Coastal Protection and Restoration $277,821,418 Statutory Dedications: $53,153,456 Total:$5,960,184,464

Requests for year one funding total approximately $12B. Appropriations competing for cash lines of credit total approximately $750M Line of Credit Capacity for FY is $355M

HOW DO I GET ONE OF THESE PROJECTS IN ACT 25 OF 2014?

Designer Selection For FPC Administered Projects Direct Appointments – Less than $500,000 State Selection Board - $500,000 or greater

Direct Appointments FPC Staff nominates 3 firms Criteria used for Appointment: Hudson Initiative Veteran Owned Disabled Veteran Owned Proximity to site Projects with FPC within the last 4 years Designer Evaluation

Hudson Initiative This is a goal-oriented program which encourages state agencies to contract with certified small entrepreneurships (SE's) as well as encouraging contractors who receive contracts from the state to use good faith efforts to utilize certified SE's in the performance of the contract. The Hudson Initiative is a race and gender-neutral Program. The primary intent of this Program is to provide additional opportunities for Louisiana-based small entrepreneurships (SE's) that are certified by the Louisiana Department of Economic Development to participate in contracting and procurement with the State.

Selection Board (Architect’s, Engineer’s and Landscape Architect’s) Established by Statute (R.S. 38: 2311) Architect’s Selection Board 8 Members including FPC Director and Assistant Director Engineer’s Selection Board 6 Members including FPC Director Landscape Architect’s Selection Board 6 Members including FPC Director

Selection Board (Architect’s, Engineer’s and Landscape Architect’s) Criteria Established by Statute (R.S. 38: 2311) The following guides, among other factors that the boards may deem appropriate, shall be used by the boards in selecting persons for professional services: (1) Professional training and experience, both generally and in relation to the type and magnitude of work required for the particular project; (2) Capacity for timely completion of the work, taking into consideration the person's or firm's current and projected workload and professional and support manpower; (3) Past and current professional accomplishments, for which opinions of clients or former clients and information gathered by inspection of current or recent projects may be considered;

Criteria Established by Statute (R.S. 38: 2311) (4) The nature, quantity, and value of agency work previously performed and presently being performed by the person after the effective date of this Part, it being generally desirable to allocate such work among persons who are desirous and qualified to perform such work. (5) Past performance on public projects, including any problems with time delays, cost overruns, and design inadequacies for which the designer was held to be at fault, involved in prior projects as evidenced by documentation provided by the Facility Planning and Control Department of the office of the governor;

Criteria Established by Statute (R.S. 38: 2311) (6) An analysis provided by the Facility Planning and Control Department of the office of the governor of whether problems as indicated in Paragraph 5 herein resulted in litigation between the public entity and the person performing professional services, particularly if the designer is currently involved in unsettled litigation with a public entity or has been involved in litigation with a public entity where the public entity prevailed. Other Factors Considered by FPC Portfolio of Relevant Work Location

FPC administers hundreds of projects each year. We need designers that are interested in our work We ask that you please continue to consider our projects

THANK YOU! Mark A. Moses Director Facility Planning & Control P.O. Box Baton Rouge, Louisiana Phone: