Nicki Horseman Lead HE analyst Times Higher Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Karl Donert, National Teaching Fellow HERODOT Project coordinator HERODOT: Benchmarking Geography.
Advertisements

THE ADMISSIONS POLICY. WHY AN ADMISSIONS POLICY ? To ensure that the University is compliant with the QAA Code of practice: Admissions to Higher Education.
How do I know that my work is PhD level? Professor Chris Park Director, The Graduate School.
Using data and case studies to inform and change admissions policy and practice Michael Hill Kingston University June 2003.
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance Sarah Butler Assistant Director, Development and Enhancement Group Quality Assurance Agency for.
Reflecting on the results of the 2013 National Student Survey Professor Kelvin Everest PVC for Student Experience November 2013.
Learning & Teaching Conference Embracing Diversity 9 January 2013 Paul White Pro Vice-Chancellor, Learning & Teaching.
Defining ‘Best Practice’ in PGT Dr Janet De Wilde Assistant Director, Head of STEM, HEA
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Planning and Statistics Using the University’s Statistical Digest PLANNING AND STATISTICS V.1 1 The University’s Statistical Digest Information and Training.
The National Student Survey An introduction for course reps.
How is HE differentiated in the UK? Is this changing? David Raffe and Linda Croxford University of Edinburgh Changing Inequalities and Access to a Differentiated.
LEAGUE TABLES AND NEW KPIs VC’s OPEN MEETING Anita Wright Head of Planning November 2013.
Benchmarks and Benchmarking in the UK - Lessons Learned Catherine Connor Quality Enhancement Unit London Metropolitan University.
University Strategy Marcus Williams. Contents 0.1 Strategic goals 0.2 Re-positioning 0.3 Campus infrastructure 0.4 Sussex off campus 0.5 Malaysia Office.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
The REF assessment framework and guidance on submissions Linda Tiller, HEFCW 16 September 2011.
Key features of the University of Manchester Professor Cathy Cassell Deputy Director (Academic) Sarah Featherstone Head of Undergraduate Services Original.
Applying to a competitive university. Aims and objectives To understand what a competitive university is Develop an understanding of what the benefits.
Research Assessment Exercise RAE Dr Gary Beauchamp Director of Research School of Education.
The National Student Survey (NSS) Penny Jones, Strategic Planning Office Tracy Goslar and Miles Willey, Academic Standards & Partnership Wednesday 16 March.
The Retention of Graduate Human Capital: An Analysis of Graduate Migration Flows in and out of Scotland by Alessandra Faggian University of Southampton.
Jason Leman Education Researcher Sheffield Hallam University.
Directors of Student Education October 2013 Vivien Jones.
The Research Excellence Framework: principles and practicalities Stephen Pinfield Thanks to Paul Hubbard and Graeme Rosenberg of HEFCE for providing much.
The REF assessment framework (updated 23 May 2011)
Vice-Chancellor’s All Staff Open Meeting Monday 23 November 2015 Questions?
Attainment and Progression of Students from Underrepresented Groups Annette Hayton, Head of Widening Participation.
The UK’s European university Green Paper Fulfilling our Potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice ADM – 2 December, 2015.
Understanding Newspaper League Tables Nov 2015 Katarina Thomson Planning and Statistics.
Using data across the student life-cycle to inform student success provision Mike Kerrigan, Schools, Colleges & Community Outreach 10 th December 2015.
Introducing Key Information Sets Professor Janet Beer Chair of the Higher Education Public Information Steering Group.
Jenny Lyon Quality Assurance Team
Rosie Drinkwater & Professor Lawrence Young Group Finance Director, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Academic Planning & Resources) League Tables Where are we, why.
FS&N School Staff Meeting October, Agenda 1.Apologies 2.Minutes of Last Meeting. 3.Matters Arising 4.HoS’s Statement including items from Senate.
When education isn’t enough: Labour market outcomes of ethnic minority graduates at elite universities Laurence Lessard-Phillips, Daniel Swain, Maria Pampaka,
Legal Basis of Equality Impact Assessments (EQIAs)  Requirement in Scotland under Equality Act 2010 to:  Assess the impact of applying a new or revised.
Professor Les Ebdon CBE Director of Fair Access to Higher Education.
PMI 2 Employer Event 2 March 2011 The impact of Internationalisation on HE and Graduate Employment Margaret Dane AGCAS Chief Executive.
FS&N School Staff Meeting October, Agenda 1.Apologies 2.Minutes of Last Meeting. 3.Matters Arising 4.Terms of Reference 5.HoS’s Statement including.
Current Developments in Higher Education and at Birmingham City University Professor Fiona Church Pro-Vice-Chancellor Student Learning Experience.
One Methodology, Many Services
Report on Research and Data Analysis on Academic Teaching Qualifications Will Joice 19 December 2016.
Monitoring, Annual Review & Enhancement
Professor Les Ebdon CBE Director of Fair Access to Higher Education
Teaching Excellence Framework Year Two
UCL Annual Student Experience Review
Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) Higher Education White Paper
New developments in the UK Higher Education
What do universities mean by ‘excellent teaching’?
A nationwide US student survey
Reshaping the Landscape? Policy developments in HE
The Teaching Excellence Framework and the wider HE policy landscape
Start of Year meetings 8 September September 2016
Partnership Forum 2017 Quality Assessment
HESA Data Opportunities
Learning Gain: Evaluation, Evidence and Enhancement
HESA Data Opportunities
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance
Engage – Annual Learning and Teaching Conference Anglia Ruskin University Employability of Students’ and Graduates Dr Heike Behle, LEGACY, Warwick.
The Teaching Excellence Framework: what does it mean for UCL communicators? Jess Shepherd, Head of Communications in the office of the Vice-Provost for.
TEACHING EXCELLENCE FRAMEWORK (TEF) GOING FOR GOLD
Student Education at Leeds Vivien Jones Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Student Education) Melissa Owusu Education Officer, LUU 20 January 2016.
Stephen Denyer PVC (Education & Student Experience)
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
Context: Increase in upper degrees UK-wide
Hunting for Evidence in the Data Landscape Naomi Jeffery and Erica Hensens University of Dundee 19 February 2019.
Utilising Module Evaluation data to explore outcomes from the Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework (TEF) Subject Level Pilot. Natalie Holland.
UCL experience of the TEF and the subject pilot
Presentation transcript:

Nicki Horseman Lead HE analyst Times Higher Education

Teaching Excellence Framework and Relative Teaching Performance

TEF recap Data available now What might relative teaching performance look like? What next?

TEF - Technical consultation for Year Two ‘build on existing high standards’ ‘allow for diverse forms of excellence to be identified and recognised’ ‘clear judgments about excellence for students, employers and other stakeholders’

Assessment based on: Context/metrics Data will be averaged over three years; also presented by individual year in total TEF Year Two will use existing NSS / DLHE; will take account of non-respondents in Year Three Additional evidence - 15 pages submitted by institution Student Outcomes Learning Environment Teaching Quality

Institutional Metric presentation to the assessment panel

So what data is available now (with benchmarks) AspectTEF proposalTHE Teaching QualityNSS Q1-4 Teaching on course; NSS Q5-9 Assessment and feedback NSS Q22 Overall Satisfaction Learning EnvironmentNSS Q10-12 Academic support; Non-continuation (T3) Projected Outcomes (T5) Student Outcomes and Learning Gain Employment (DLHE); potential highly-skilled jobs metric Graduate Destinations (DLHE)

Teaching Quality - NSS - Q1 (Staff are good at explaining things) v.s. Q22

Q22 Overall satisfaction Q1 Source: HEFCE NSS 2015 Summary Data Taught

Teaching Quality - NSS - Q1 (Staff are good at explaining things) v.s. Q22 Q22 Overall satisfaction Q1 Guild HE Source: HEFCE NSS 2015 Summary Data Taught

Teaching Quality - NSS - Q1 (Staff are good at explaining things) v.s. Q22 Q22 Overall satisfaction Q1 MillionPlus Guild HE Source: HEFCE NSS 2015 Summary Data Taught

Teaching Quality - NSS - Q1 (Staff are good at explaining things) v.s. Q22 Q22 Overall satisfaction Q1 University Alliance MillionPlus Guild HE Source: HEFCE NSS 2015 Summary Data Taught

Q22 Overall satisfaction Q1 Russell Group University Alliance MillionPlus Guild HE Teaching Quality - NSS - Q1 (Staff are good at explaining things) v.s. Q22 Source: HEFCE NSS 2015 Summary Data Taught

Q22 Overall satisfaction Q1 Russell Group University Alliance MillionPlus Guild HE Loughborough Swansea Teaching Quality - NSS - Q1 (Staff are good at explaining things) v.s. Q22 Source: HEFCE NSS 2015 Summary Data Taught

Learning Environment - T3 (continuation after first year) v.s. T5 (projected outcomes) T3 (continuation after first year) T5 (projected outcomes) Source: HESA PIs 2013/14

Learning Environment - T3 (continuation after first year) v.s. T5 (projected outcomes) T5 (projected outcomes) Russell Group Source: HESA PIs 2013/14 T3 (continuation after first year)

Learning Environment - T3 (continuation after first year) v.s. T5 (projected outcomes) T3 (continuation after first year) T5 (projected outcomes) Russell Group University Alliance Source: HESA PIs 2013/14

Learning Environment - T3 (continuation after first year) v.s. T5 (projected outcomes) T3 (continuation after first year) T5 (projected outcomes) Russell Group University Alliance Guild HE Source: HESA PIs 2013/14

Learning Environment - T3 (continuation after first year) v.s. T5 (projected outcomes) T3 (continuation after first year) T5 (projected outcomes) Russell Group University Alliance Guild HE MillionPlus Source: HESA PIs 2013/14

Learning Environment - T3 (continuation after first year) v.s. T5 (projected outcomes) T3 (continuation after first year) T5 (projected outcomes) Source: HESA PIs 2013/14

Learning Environment - T3 (continuation after first year) v.s. T5 (projected outcomes) T3 (continuation after first year) T5 (projected outcomes) Loughborough Swansea Source: HESA PIs 2013/14

Student Outcomes - Employment metrics Graduate destinations HESA PI Employment Guild HE Source: HESA PIs 2013/14; DLHE

Student Outcomes - Employment metrics Graduate destinations HESA PI Employment MillionPlus Guild HE Source: HESA PIs 2013/14; DLHE

Student Outcomes - Employment metrics Graduate destinations HESA PI Employment University Alliance MillionPlus Guild HE Source: HESA PIs 2013/14; DLHE

Student Outcomes - Employment metrics Graduate destinations HESA PI Employment Russell Group University Alliance MillionPlus Guild HE Source: HESA PIs 2013/14; DLHE

Student Outcomes - Employment metrics Graduate destinations HESA PI Employment Source: HESA PIs 2013/14; DLHE

Student Outcomes - Employment metrics Graduate destinations HESA PI Employment 46% 12% Source: HESA PIs 2013/14; DLHE

Student Outcomes - Employment metrics Graduate destinations HESA PI Employment 46% 12% ‘take account of … students’ characteristics and the subject they study’ Source: HESA PIs 2013/14; DLHE

Benchmarks and significance Benchmarks – given the characteristics of the students recruited to an institution, what is the expected performance based on the performance of the rest of the sector No widening participation or geographic factors Benchmarks involving entry standards – potential issues FactorNSSNon-continuationEmployment Subject  Entry qualifications  Age on entry  Ethnicity  Gender  Disability 

Student outcomes relative to benchmark Graduate destinations distance from benchmark HESA PI Employment E1 distance from benchmark Source: HESA PIs 2013/14; DLHE

Student outcomes relative to benchmark Graduate destinations distance from benchmark HESA PI Employment E1 distance from benchmark Swansea Loughborough Source: HESA PIs 2013/14; DLHE

Who performs well against benchmark? – Learning Environment and Teaching Quality

Student Outcomes and Teaching Quality

Significance tests (3 standard deviations) Institutions which are significantly above benchmark assessment in: Three out of three aspects: Loughborough, Swansea Three out of three aspects: Loughborough, Swansea Two out of three aspects (and neutral on 3 rd ): Aston, Coventry, Heriot-Watt, Huddersfield, Lancaster, Nottingham Trent Two out of three aspects (and neutral on 3 rd ): Aston, Coventry, Heriot-Watt, Huddersfield, Lancaster, Nottingham Trent

An overall picture How to give an overall picture of teaching excellence as framed by the TEF? Using three indicators as before: Q22 as a proxy for Teaching Quality T5 projected outcomes as a proxy for Learning Environment Graduate destination as a proxy for Student Outcomes and Learning Gain Working at an overall level without breaking down into detailed cohorts - one year’s data Relative teaching performance measures – performance relative to benchmark – to ‘take account of differences in student characteristics and mixture of subjects taught’. Z score each metric to form a common scale, combine with equal weights and scale from 100

Absolute Teaching Performance Key: Russell Group, University Alliance, MillionPlus, Guild HE

Relative Teaching Performance Key: Russell Group, University Alliance, MillionPlus, Guild HE

Relative Teaching Performance (using E1a) Key: Russell Group, University Alliance, MillionPlus, Guild HE

Relative Teaching Performance Key: Russell Group, University Alliance, MillionPlus, Guild HE

Relative Teaching Performance Outstanding Excellent Meets expectations Swansea Loughborough

Market share of non-UK Undergraduates (First Degree; order is relative teaching performance) Outstanding Excellent Meets expectations Source: HESA (THE WUR data)

Market share of non-UK Masters (order is relative teaching performance) Outstanding Excellent Meets expectations Source: HESA (THE WUR data)

Non-UK Undergraduate market share by region (order is relative teaching performance) Key: London, Midlands, N England, N Ireland, Scotland, S England, Wales Outstanding Excellent Meets expectations Source: HESA (THE WUR data)

Non-UK Masters market share by region (order is relative teaching performance) Outstanding Excellent Meets expectations Key: London, Midlands, N England, N Ireland, Scotland, S England, Wales Source: HESA (THE WUR data)

REF 2014 with intensity TEF Russell Group Teaching Excellence and REF

REF 2014 with intensity TEF Russell Group University Alliance Teaching Excellence and REF

REF 2014 with intensity TEF Russell Group University Alliance MillionPlus Teaching Excellence and REF

REF 2014 with intensity TEF Russell Group University Alliance MillionPlus Guild HE Teaching Excellence and REF

REF 2014 with intensity TEF Russell Group University Alliance MillionPlus Guild HE Teaching Excellence and REF

REF 2014 with intensity TEF Loughborough Swansea Kent Bath Surrey Teaching Excellence and REF

Summary Teaching Excellence Framework proposes an alternative perspective on quality

Summary Teaching Excellence Framework proposes an alternative perspective on quality Highlights diverse institutions

Summary Teaching Excellence Framework proposes an alternative perspective on quality Highlights diverse institutions ‘Non- aligned’ Interpretation and communication Midlands Northern England Clarity and transparency of judgements