Page 1 Lecture 15 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO Claire Max AY 289 March 3, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geminis Future AO Program A Decade of AO Evolution at Gemini Recent AO Program Highlights Doug Simons Gemini Observatory.
Advertisements

Subaru AO in future. Outline Overview of AO systems at Mauna Kea and in the world. Ongoing plan of AOS at Subaru and Mauna Kea. What’s in future.
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 Fourier-Based Predictive AO Schemes for Tomographic AO systems S. Mark Ammons Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 31, 2013.
Page 1 Lecture 17 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO Claire Max AY 289 UC Santa Cruz March 7, 2013.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
An Introduction to Adaptive Optics Presented by Julian C. Christou Gemini Observatory.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
The Need for Contiguous Fields NGAO Team Meeting, Waimea January 22, 2007 Claire Max.
Widening the Scope of Adaptive Optics Matthew Britton.
ASTRO 2233 Fall 2010 Adaptive Optics, Interferometry and Planet Detection Lecture 16 Thursday October 21, 2010.
Keck Next Generation Adaptive Optics Team Meeting 6 1 Optical Relay and Field Rotation (WBS , ) Brian Bauman April 26, 2007.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
A Short Presentation of Ongoing AO Work at Lund Observatory Mette Owner-Petersen Lund Observatory Workshop for “Forskarskolen i Rymdteknik” Gothenburg.
Tomography for Multi-guidestar Adaptive Optics An Architecture for Real-Time Hardware Implementation Donald Gavel, Marc Reinig, and Carlos Cabrera UCO/Lick.
The Noise Propagator for Laser Tomography Adaptive Optics Don Gavel NGAO Telecon October 8, 2008.
Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012.
Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era
MCAO A Pot Pourri: AO vs HST, the Gemini MCAO and AO for ELTs Francois Rigaut, Gemini GSMT SWG, IfA, 12/04/2002.
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics Ground layer wavefront reconstruction using dynamically refocused Rayleigh laser beacons C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart,
Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Beyond Basic AO
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
AO4ELT - Paris Giant Magellan Telescope Project Science Drivers & AO Requirements Patrick McCarthy - GMT Director Phil Hinz & Michael Hart - GMT.
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
1 Manal Chebbo, Alastair Basden, Richard Myers, Nazim Bharmal, Tim Morris, Thierry Fusco, Jean-Francois Sauvage Fast E2E simulation tools and calibration.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
NSF Center for Adaptive Optics UCO Lick Observatory Laboratory for Adaptive Optics Tomographic algorithm for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems Donald.
Viewing the Universe through distorted lenses: Adaptive optics in astronomy Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute & JHU.
Low order modes sensing for LGS MCAO with a single NGS S. Esposito, P. M. Gori, G. Brusa Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri Italy Conf. AO4ELT June.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Optics for AO.
February 2013 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics (GLAO) Experiment on Mauna Kea Doug Toomey.
Future Plan of Subaru Adaptive Optics
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
Ground Layer AO at ESO’s VLT Claire Max Interim Director UC Observatories September 14, 2014.
1 MCAO at CfAO meeting M. Le Louarn CfAO - UC Santa Cruz Nov
AO4ELT, June Wide Field AO simulation for ELT: Fourier and E2E approaches C. Petit*, T. Fusco*, B. Neichel**, J.-F. Sauvage*, J.-M. Conan* * ONERA/PHASE.
Shack-Hartmann tomographic wavefront reconstruction using LGS: Analysis of spot elongation and fratricide effect Clélia Robert 1, Jean-Marc Conan 1, Damien.
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
Introduction of RAVEN Internal meeting on future instrument projects at Subaru Shin Oya ( Subaru Telescope/NAOJ) ‏ Hilo.
Experimental results of tomographic reconstruction on ONERA laboratory WFAO bench A. Costille*, C. Petit*, J.-M. Conan*, T. Fusco*, C. Kulcsár**, H.-F.
Wide-field wavefront sensing in Solar Adaptive Optics - its modeling and its effects on reconstruction Clémentine Béchet, Michel Tallon, Iciar Montilla,
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
GLAO Workshop Leiden April 2005 Remko Stuik Leiden Observatory.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Atmospheric Turbulence: r 0,  0,  0 François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Adaptive Optics in the.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Wavefront sensors, correctors François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era basics of AO Neptune François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa.
Wide field telescope using spherical mirrors Jim Burge and Roger Angel University of Arizona Tucson, AZ Jim
Overview Science drivers AO Infrastructure at WHT GLAS technicalities Current status of development GLAS: Ground-layer Laser Adaptive optics System.
Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Optics for AO
Subaru GLAO Simulation
AO4ELT, Paris A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory.
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes Center for Adaptive Optics.
François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 GSMT AO Simulations.
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Computationally Efficient Wavefront Reconstruction for Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics (MCAO) Brent Ellerbroek AURA New Initiatives Office IPAM Workshop.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Basics of AO.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Beyond Basic AO François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

Page 1 Lecture 15 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO Claire Max AY 289 March 3, 2016

Page 2 Outline of lecture What is AO tomography? Applications of AO tomography –Laser tomography AO –Multi-conjugate AO (MCAO) –Multi-object AO (MOAO) –Ground-layer AO (GLAO) Much of this lecture is based on presentations by Don Gavel, Lisa Poyneer, Francois Rigaut, and Olivier Guyon. Thanks!

3 Limitations for AO systems with one guide star Isoplanatic Angle Limits the corrected field 00 h r0r0

4 Limitations for AO systems with one guide star Cone effect

5 Limitations for AO systems with one guide star Cone effect 1.Missing turbulence outside and above cone 2.Spherical wave “stretching” of wavefront More severe for larger telescope diameters h r0r0

Fundamental problem to solve: Isoplanatic Angle If we assume perfect on-axis correction, and a single turbulent layer at altitude h, the variance (sq. radian) is : σ 2 = 1.03 (θ/θ 0 ) 5/3 Θ = angle to optical axis, θ 0 = isoplanatic angle: θ 0 = 0.31 (r 0 / ) D = 8 m, r 0 = 0.8 m, = 5 km => θ 0 = 10” h

Page 7 Francois Rigaut’s diagrams of tomography for AO 90 km “Missing” Data Credit: Rigaut, MCAO for Dummies

Page 8 What is Tomography ? 2. Wider field of view, no cone effect 90 km Credit: Rigaut, MCAO for Dummies Tomography lets you reconstruct turbulence in the entire cylinder of air above the telescope mirror

Page 9 Concept of a metapupil Can be made larger than “real” telescope pupil Increased field of view due to overlap of fields toward multiple guide stars

10 Each wavefront sensor measures the integral of index variation along the ray lines The line integral along z determines the k z =0 Fourier spatial frequency component Projections at several angles sample the k x,k y,k z volume kXkX kZkZ Fourier slice theorem in tomography (Kak, Computer Aided Tomography, 1988) How tomography works: from Don Gavel Fourier Transform x - z plane k x - k z plane

11 kXkX kZkZ How tomography works: from Don Gavel Fourier Transform x - z plane k x - k z plane The larger the telescope’s primary mirror, the wider the range of angles accessible for measurement In Fourier space, this means that the “bow-tie” becomes wider More information about the full volume of turbulence above the telescope

Page 12 y How tomography works: some math Assume we measure y with our wavefront sensors Want to solve for x = value of  OPD) The equations are underdetermined – there are more unknown voxel values than measured phases  blind modes. Need a few natural guide stars to determine these. where y = vector of all WFS measurements x = value of  OPD) at each voxel in turbulent volume above telescope x A is a forward propagator

Page 13 y x Solve for the full turbulence above the telescope using the back-propagator y x A T is a back propagator along rays back toward the guidestars y = vector of all WFS measurements x = value of  OPD) at each voxel in turbulent volume above telescope Use iterative algorithms to converge on the solution.

Page 14 LGS Related Problems: “Null modes” Five “Null Modes” are not seen by LGS (Tilt indetermination problem) Need 3 well spread tip-tilt stars to control these modes Tilt Anisoplanatism : Low order modes (e.g. focus) more important than Tip-Tilt at altitude → Dynamic Plate Scale changes Credit: Rigaut, MCAO for Dummies

Page 15 Outline of lecture Review of AO tomography concepts AO applications of tomography –Laser tomography AO –Multi-conjugate AO (MCAO) –Multi-object AO (MOAO) –Ground-layer AO (GLAO)

Page 16 Laser Tomography AO: Fixes Cone Effect Narrow field, cone effect fixed one DM Corrected field: 10’s of arc sec

Page 17 Multi-Conjugate AO: Wider Field Correction Corrects over wider field, at a penalty in peak Strehl ≤ 2 DMs Corrected field: up to ~2 arc min

Page 18 Multi-Object AO: Wider Field but only correct objects you are interested in Correct over narrow field of view located anywhere w/in wide field of regard One DM for each object of interest Multiple Narrow Field DMs Corrected field: N x 10’s of arc sec

Page 19 Ground Layer AO: Widest field, only modest AO correction Quite modest correction over a much wider field of view One DM conjugate to ground Corrected field: arc min

Page 20 Corrected fields of view vary depending on method MethodCorrected field of view Laser Tomography AOLTAO10’s of arc sec Multi-Object AOMOAON x 10’s of arc sec Multi-Conjugate AOMCAO≤ about 2 arc min Ground Layer AOGLAOA few to 10 arc min

Page 21 Outline of lecture Review of AO tomography concepts AO applications of tomography –Multi-conjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) –Multi-object adaptive optics (MOAO) –Ground-layer AO (GLAO)

Page 22 What is multiconjugate AO? Deformable mirror Turbulence Layers Credit: Rigaut, MCAO for Dummies

Page 23 Deformable mirrors Turbulence Layers Credit: Rigaut, MCAO for Dummies What is multiconjugate AO?

Page 24 Difference between Laser Tomography AO and MCAO Laser Tomography AO can be done with only 1 deformable mirror If used with multiple laser guide stars, reduces cone effect MCAO uses multiple DMs, increases field of view

Page 25 WFSs Guide Stars DM2 Telescope High Altitude Layer Ground Layer DM1 WFC “Star Oriented” MCAO Each WFS looks at one star Global Reconstruction n GS, n WFS, m DMs 1 Real Time Controller The correction applied at each DM is computed using all the input data. Credit: N. Devaney

Page 26 MCAO Simulations, 3 guide stars 3 guide stars, FoV = 1.5 arc min 3 guide stars, FoV = 1 arc min Credit: N. Devaney Optimum guide star separation: about one isoplanatic angle Strehl at 2.2 μ m

First operational MCAO system: GEMS at Gemini South 8m telescope

Page 28 GEMS image of star formation in Orion

Orion star forming region: Compare GEMS MCAO with ALTAIR single conjugate AO on Gemini North Telescope ALTAIRGEMS

Page 30 GEMS MCAO: very good uniformity across 87” x 87” field Credit: Rigaut et al. 2013

Page 31 Outline of lecture Review of AO tomography concepts AO applications of tomography –Multi-conjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) –Multi-object adaptive optics (MOAO) –Ground-layer AO (GLAO)

Page 32 Distinctions between multi-conjugate and multi-object AO DMs conjugate to different altitudes in the atmosphere Guide star light is corrected by DMs before its wavefront is measured Only one DM per object, conjugate to ground Guide star light doesn’t bounce off small MEMS DMs in multi-object spectrograph ? 1-2 arc min Closed-Loop Open-Loop

Page 33 Multi-Object AO Correct over multiple narrow fields of view located anywhere w/in wide field of regard In most versions, each spectrograph or imager has its own MEMS AO mirror, which laser guide star lights doesn’t bounce off of Hence this scheme is called “open loop”: DM doesn’t correct laser guide star wavefronts before LGS light goes to wavefront sensors In one version, each LGS also has its own MEMS correction

Page 34 Science with MOAO: multiple deployable spatially resolved spectrographs A MEMS DM underneath each high-redshift galaxy, feeding a narrow-field spatially resolved spectrograph (IFU) No need to do AO correction on the blank spaces between the galaxies

Page 35 Why does MOAO work if there is only one deformable mirror in the science path? Tomography lets you measure the turbulence throughout the volume above the telescope 90 km

Page 36 Why does MOAO work if there is only one deformable mirror in the science path? Tomography lets you measure the turbulence throughout the volume above the telescope In the direction to each galaxy, you can then project out the turbulence you need to cancel out for that galaxy 90 km

Page 37 Existing MOAO Demonstration Systems CANARY (Durham, Obs. de Paris, ONERA, ESO) –MOAO demonstrator for E-ELT –On William Herschel Telescope –First NGS, then Rayleigh guide stars RAVEN (U Victoria, Subaru, INO, Canadian NRC) –MOAO demonstrator for Subaru telescope –3 NGS wavefront sensors –Field of regard > 2.7 arc min

Page 39 Both E-ELT and TMT have done early designs for MOAO systems Artist’s sketch of EAGLE MOAO system for E-ELT One of the constraints is that the spectrographs are very large! Hard (and expensive) to fit in a lot of them

Page 40 Outline of lecture Review of AO tomography concepts AO applications of tomography –Multi-conjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) –Multi-object adaptive optics (MOAO) –Ground-layer AO (GLAO)

Page 41 Ground layer AO: do tomography, but only use 1 DM (conjugate to ground layer) Credit: J-M Conan GLAO uses 1 ground-conjugated DM, corrects near-ground turbulence

Page 42 Correcting just the ground layer gives a very large isoplanatic angle Strehl = 0.38 at θ = θ 0 θ 0 is isoplanatic angle θ 0 is weighted by high-altitude turbulence (z 5/3 ) If turbulence is only at low altitude, overlap is very high. If you only correct the low altitude turbulence, the isoplanatic angle will be large (but the correction will be only modest) Telescope Common Path

Page 43 Credit: A. Tokovinin time

Page 44 Many observatories have ambitious GLAO projects planned Near term on medium sized telescopes: SOAR (4.25m), William Herschel Telescope (4.2m), MMT (6.5m) Medium term on VLT (8m), LBT (2x8m) Longer term on Giant Magellan Telescope etc. Is it worth the large investment “just” to decrease “seeing” disk by factor of 1.5 to 2 ? –Large spectrographs can take advantage of smaller image (smaller slit) –Potential improved SNR for background-limited point sources

Page 45 GLAO on the MMT Telescope Michael Hart et al., 5 Rayleigh laser guide stars FWHM decreased from 0.85 arc sec to 0.28 arc sec (!)

Page 46 GLAO on the MMT Telescope Michael Hart et al., 5 Rayleigh laser guide stars

Page 48 Summary Tomography: a way to measure the full volume of turbulence above the telescope Once you have measured the turbulence there are several ways to do the wavefront correction –Laser Tomography AO: Multiple laser guide stars, 1 DM, corrects cone effect. Narrow field. –Multi-conjugate AO: Multiple DMs, each optically conjugate to a different layer in atmosphere. Wider field of view. –Multi-object AO: Correct many individual objects, each over a small field. Each has very good correction. Wider field of regard. –Ground-layer AO: Correct just ground layer turbulence. Very large field of view but only modest correction. All four methods will be used in the future

Page 49 Corrected fields of view vary depending on method MethodCorrected field of view Laser Tomography AOLTAO10’s of arc sec Multi-Object AOMOAON x 10’s of arc sec Multi-Conjugate AOMCAO≤ about 2 arc min Ground Layer AOGLAOA few to 10 arc min