User Resources for the: One Health Harmful Algal Bloom System (OHHABS) and National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS) Updated: 06/15/2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Public Health Conceptual Data Model HL7 RIM Harmonization May 2000.
Advertisements

Restructuring the Cancer Programs and Task Force Workgroups.
SEARO –CSR Early Warning and Surveillance System Module Event-based Surveillance.
Introduction of Surveillance and Prevention of H1N1 Flu in Yunnan Department of Public Health of Yunnan Province Speaker : Hu Shou Jing Report Time : Fifteen.
Role of Laboratory in a Foodborne Outbreak Vietnam FETP Foodborne Outbreak Training Course Hanoi, Vietnam June 4, 2009.
Public Health Event Reporting: Lecture Template
Suzanne Wilson, MPH Food and Waterborne Disease Epidemiologist WVDHHR-Division of Infectious Disease Epidemiology November 17, 2010.
CHINESE CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION Epidemiology Investigation for Ebola Virus Disease Lei Zhou, MD, Epidemiologist Public Health Emergency.
Control and response measures Dr. Christina Rundi Ministry of Health, Malaysia Foodborne Outbreak Investigation, Hanoi, 1-5 June 2009.
1 Christopher Melluso Elizabeth Higgins FDA/CVM State of New Mexico Pet Event Tracking Network (PETNet)
Overview of Outbreak Investigations. Goals The goals of this presentation are to: Provide a general overview of the basic steps of disease outbreak investigations.
Investigating Foodborne Disease Outbreaks: The CDC Perspective Ian Williams, PhD, MS Chief, Outbreak Response and Prevention Branch Division of Foodborne,
Dr. Rufaidah Dabbagh Dr Hafsa Raheel. Objectives Understanding the steps to outbreak investigation Discussing new terminology Interpretation of epidemic.
Principles of Outbreak Management
Ecology’s Freshwater Algae Program Lake Steilacoom.
Predicting human dose-response relationships from multiple biological models: Issues with Cryptosporidium parvum Risk Assessment Consortium.
Epidemiology The Basics Only… Adapted with permission from a class presentation developed by Dr. Charles Lynch – University of Iowa, Iowa City.
The Prescription Behavior Surveillance System: Applications of De-identified PDMP Data in Public Health Surveillance Rx Abuse Summit April 23, 2014 Peter.
Community Health Risk Assessment An Assessment of Risk Related to the Oil and Gas Industry in Garfield County Teresa A. Coons, PhD Senior Scientist Saccomanno.
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Centers for Disease Control June 14, 2011 : The Food Safety Modernization Act: Implications.
Monitoring and posting of recreational waters in New Hanover County, North Carolina Jeffrey E. Suggs, R.S., R.E.H.S. Environmental Health Specialist New.
Lauren Lewis, MD, MPH Health Studies Branch Environmental Hazards and Health Effects National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control.
Surveillance Overview Julia Gunn Boston Public Health Commission.
Environmental Health Informatics William Sonntag Office of Environmental Information U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service FSIS Foodborne Illness Investigations: Current Thinking Scott A. Seys, MPH Chief,
Epidemiologic Triads Dr. Abdulaziz Ali Almezam Dr. Salwa A. Tayel & Dr. Mohammad Afzal Mahmood KSU Department of Family & Community Medicine September,
HCT I EPIDEMIOLOGHY. Objectives  Understand the various methods of disease transmission  Identify the process epidemiologists use to determine the cause.
Community and Health emergency Management Dr: Khawla Al-Hoti Family physician. Director of health services, Quriyat Willayt MRCGP,ARAB BOARD, Diploma in.
Papua New Guinea Update 3 rd NIC Meeting 18 – 20 Beijing, China Berry Ropa National CSR Officer Department of Health Papua New Guinea.
Dr. David Mowat June 22, 2005 Federal, Provincial & Local Roles Surveillance of Risk Factors and Determinants of Chronic Diseases.
Food and Drug Administration & Outbreaks
Quarantine and Movement Control Zones, Areas, and Premises Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control (2014)
James C. Gibeaut Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Presented to: Coastal Engineering Research.
PHEP Capabilities John Erickson, Special Assistant Washington State Department of Health
Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health
CIFOR Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response CIFOR Guidelines and CIFOR Toolkit Donald J. Sharp, MD, DTM&H Food Safety Office National Center for.
Basics of Study Design in Foodborne Illness Outbreak Investigations Instructor Name Job Title Organization.
Basics of Study Design in Foodborne Illness Outbreak Investigations Instructor Name Job Title Organization.
Surveillance During Animal Disease Emergencies Overview.
Public Health Laboratory Department of Public Health Ministry of Health National Early Warning Alert Response Surveillance (NEWARS) Sonam.
TM Coordinating the Functions, Uses and Activities of Systems and Organizations Involved in Public Health Surveillance John W. Loonsk, M.D. Director Information.
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD  readings Epidemiology and Risk Assessment (4th of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
Outlines At the completion of this lecture the student will be able to identify the concept and related terms of: Infection- Infection control-
Epidemiologic Triads Dr. Salwa A. Tayel & Dr. Mohammad Afzal Mahmood KSU Department of Family & Community Medicine September, September 2013Epidemiological.
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Preparedness for Biological Emergencies 27 April 2004 Jeffrey S. Duchin, M.D. Chief, Communicable Disease.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Epidemiology Part 2: Epidemiology in an FAD Outbreak Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance,
Environmental Health Role in Investigation & Control of Food Poisoning & Gastrointestinal Infections Hilary Byrne Belfast City Council.
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 24 Public Health Surveillance.
CDR Tarah S. Somers Commander US PHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry May 2016 Environmental Health Nurse Agency for Toxic Substances and.
Lesson 3 Page 1 of 24 Lesson 3 Considerations in Planning Public Health Surveillance.
Introduction to the Canadian Food Safety System Roles and Responsibilities in Food Surveillance December 9, 2013 Samuel Godefroy, Ph.D. Director General,
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 10 Field Epidemiology.
October 4, 2004 Building Steps for Canada’s New Integrated Enteric Pathogen Surveillance Program 12th Annual APHEO Conference October 4, 2004 Niagara Falls,
Dan O’Halloran, MPH NEARS Coordinator
Outbreak Investigation
Understanding Epidemiology
NEARS: Identifying environmental factors contributing to foodborne illness outbreaks Laura Brown, Ph.D. Division of Emergency and Environmental Health.
Partnerships for Pandemic & Bioterrorism Incidents
Lessons Learned and Planning for Harmful Algal Blooms
North Carolina’s Role in Preparedness
Disease Detective Team!
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
Structure and Terminology
Introduction to public health surveillance
A Regional Perspective on Developing Children’s Environmental Health Indicators: The North American Experience Workshop on Environmental Threats to the.
Using Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis in California
North Carolina’s Role in Preparedness A Brief Overview
Perspectives from Los Angeles County Tuberculosis Control Program
Presentation transcript:

User Resources for the: One Health Harmful Algal Bloom System (OHHABS) and National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS) Updated: 06/15/2016

Purpose of the OHHABS and NORS Informational Resources  The information presented in these slides is intended to serve as a resource for local, state, and territorial public health authorities.  These slides are intended to provide technical information about reporting to the One Health Harmful Algal Bloom System (OHHABS) and the National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS).

Content  One Health Harmful Algal Bloom System (OHHABS)  National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS)  Linked Systems: OHHABS and NORS  Permission Models  User Types

One Health Harmful Algal Bloom System (OHHABS)

Source: UCSB Biolum - DinoflagellateSource: CA Water Boards - Cyanobacteria  Harmful algal bloom (HAB) – overgrowth of phytoplankton (cyanobacteria or microalgae) that can cause harm to animals, people, or the local ecology  Occur in warm, nutrient rich fresh or marine waters  Adverse effects:  Economic (e.g., beach closures, shellfish harvest closures)  Ecologic (e.g., oxygen depletion, sunlight deprivation)  Health (e.g., human and animal illnesses) Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs)

Source: David Zapotosky Source: USGS Source: Jill Siegrist  Exposure pathways: ingestion (water or food), inhalation, dermal contact  One Health issue – humans, animals, and the environment  Emerging public health issue  Warming climate, nutrient pollution  Challenges: identifying and characterizing HAB-associated illnesses  To learn more about HAB-associated illnesses, visit HABs and Public Health

Adapted from:  The health of humans is connected to the health of animals and the environment.  Animals share susceptibility to some diseases and environmental hazards such as harmful algal blooms (HABs); animal illnesses may serve as early warnings for potential human illness.  Successful public health interventions require the cooperation of the human health, veterinary health, and environmental health communities. One Health

 Electronic reporting system launched in 2016  Web-based, password-protected system  Not a real-time notification or case investigation system  Event-based, not for routine water monitoring  Used by local, state, and territorial public health partners for voluntary reporting of HAB events or HAB-associated human and animal illnesses to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)  Collects data on foodborne or waterborne HAB events in fresh and marine water settings:  HAB events (environmental data)  HAB-associated human cases of illness  HAB-associated animal cases of illness  OHHABS fills a gap in health surveillance, and will inform understanding of HAB occurrences and HAB-associated illnesses  For more information, visit the OHHABS website One Health Harmful Algal Bloom System (OHHABS)

Acknowledgments A special thanks to the OHHABS working group of state and federal partners for contributing to the development and success of OHHABS!

 OHHABS reports contain forms  Environmental form (only one form per report)  Human form (one or multiple forms per report)  Animal form (one or multiple forms per report) OHHABS Reports

* Not all data are required in OHHABS Form Type Types of Data Collected Environmental Form Location of the HAB event Observed water body characteristics Advisories and health warnings Laboratory testing – event sample testing Pathogens or toxins detected Other data systems that contain associated information Seafood catch or harvest location for HAB-associated foodborne illnesses Human Form General case information (e.g., sex, age in years) Exposures (e.g., activities, duration) Signs and symptoms of illness Medical and health history Clinical testing Pathogens or toxins detected in clinical samples Animal Form General case information (e.g., type of animal, single/group of animals) Exposures (e.g. activities, duration) Signs of illness Health information (e.g., veterinary treatment) Clinical testing Pathogen or toxins detected in clinical samples Types of Data Collected in an OHHABS Report*

HAB Event and Case Definitions  HAB event and case definitions standardize how OHHABS report data will be classified by CDC  Assessments of the level of evidence that a HAB event or associated illness occurred  Developed through discussions with state and federal partners  Definitions for:  HAB Event (Suspect, Confirmed)  Human Case (Suspect, Probable, Confirmed)  Animal Case (Suspect, Probable, Confirmed)  Definitions can be found at

2. Report only environmental data 1.Report environmental data, human case data, and animal case data Ways to Create a Report in OHHABS

4. Report animal case data with environmental data 3. Report human case data with environmental data Ways to Create a Report in OHHABS (continued)

 OHHABS resources are available at  Guidance materials  Getting Started and Technical Features Guidance  Environmental Form Guidance  Human Form Guidance  Animal Form Guidance  Foodborne Illness Guidance  Multistate Reporting Guidance  Event and case definitions  Paper & fillable PDF forms  Data dictionary  For more information about HAB events and HAB associated illnesses, please visit OHHABS Resources

National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS)

 Electronic reporting system launched in 2009  Web-based, password-protected system  Not a real-time notification or outbreak investigation system  Used by local, state, and territorial public health partners for voluntary outbreak reporting to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)  Outbreaks: two or more human cases of illness epidemiologically linked by time, exposure and illness characteristics  Collects aggregate data on:  Waterborne disease outbreaks  Foodborne disease outbreaks  Enteric disease outbreaks transmitted by other transmission modes including animal contact, person-to-person contact, environmental contamination, and unknown modes of transmission  Outbreak data provide information about national outbreak trends and learning lessons for preventing future outbreaks.  For more information, visit the NORS website National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS)

Linked systems: OHHABS and NORS

 OHHABS and NORS are linked in two ways: 1.Can both collect different types data for HAB-associated outbreaks that together will inform public health understanding and prevention efforts  NORS collects aggregate outbreak data (≥ two human cases of illness)  OHHABS collects environmental data, human case data, and animal case data 2.Share technical reporting features  HAB-associated outbreaks may be reported to both OHHABS and NORS  Data about the outbreak are collected differently in each system How are OHHABS and NORS Linked?

Shared Technical Reporting Features for OHHABS and NORS

Technical Definitions  Reporting structure – describes the organization of state, territorial, or local public health agencies or users in OHHABS or NORS  Reporting site – refers any state or territory that reports in OHHABS or NORS  Agency – refers to a reporting group geographically or functionally organized within a reporting site (e.g., state county, state region)  User type – describes the functions a user can have in OHHABS or NORS (e.g., managing other user accounts, editing reports, viewing reports)  Permissions – describes the way that a reporting site manages and views reports and users  Permissions model – refers to the way report and user management are organized in a reporting site.  The permissions model allows reporting sites to have the flexibility to centralize or share the reporting burden across agencies and at the local, state, or territory levels.  Each reporting site set up its permissions model in 2009 based on administrative needs.

 There are three different types of permissions models for reporting sites  The type of permissions model affects how users manage and view reports in their reporting site  A reporting site can have  Single agency (Option 1)  Multiple agencies (Options 2 and 3)  Only two levels of agencies are allowed in a reporting site  For more information about your state’s permission model, contact your state’s NORS or OHHABS administrator or the CDC NORS Team at Permission Models

 State A is the example for the Option 1 Permission Model  State A is organized with one State Agency that reports to OHHABS or NORS  In State A, all users in the State Agency can:  View all reports in the State Agency Option 1 Permission Model

 State B is the example for the Option 2 Permission Model  State B is organized with several Regional Agencies within a State Agency  All Regional Agencies and the State Agency report to OHHABS and NORS  In State B, users in the State Agency can:  View all reports in the State Agency  View all reports in the Regional Agencies  In State B, users in the Regional Agency can:  View all reports in their Regional Agency but not reports created by State Agency users or users in other Regional Agencies Option 2 Permission Model

 State C is the example for the Option 3 Permission Model  State C is organized with several Regional Agencies and County Agencies  There is no State Agency  The County Agencies are within a Regional Agency  In State C, users in the Regional Agency can:  View only their Regional Agency’s reports  View the all County Agencies’ reports within their Regional Agency  In State C, users in the County Agency can:  View only their County Agency’s reports Option 3 Permission Model

OHHABS and NORS User Types  There are three different user options for OHHABS and NORS: 1.OHHABS and NORS user – user can access both systems 2.OHHABS only user – user can access only OHHABS 3.NORS only user – user can access only NORS  User types in OHHABS and NORS can perform different functions (e.g., managing other user accounts, editing reports, viewing reports)  Reports a user can view and manage depends on the site’s permissions model, user agency, and user type  There are four different User Types that can perform different functions:  Reporting Site Administrator (RSA)  Agency Administrator (AA)  Read-Write (RW)  Read-Only (RO)  An OHHABS and NORS user can have different user types in each system (e.g., a user can be an OHHABS RSA and a NORS RW)

Permissions Reporting Site Administrator (RSA) Agency Administrator (AA) Read-Write (RW)Read-Only (RO) User Management Manage Users Across Their Reporting Site  Manage Users Across Their Agency  Report Management Create a New Report  Delete Their Report  View Reports Across Their Agency Manage Reports Across Their Reporting Site  Manage Reports Across Their Agency  Manage Their Own Reports  Overview of User Type Functions

 To gain access to OHHABS or NORS, please contact your OHHABS Reporting Site Administrator (RSA) or NORS Reporting Site Administrator (RSA)  For states or territories that have not yet assigned an OHHABS RSA, the NORS RSA will be automatically assigned as an OHHABS RSA  For assistance identifying your state’s NORS or OHHABS RSA, please contact  For additional questions about OHHABS, please visit or contact OHHABS and NORS User Support