1 Near-field NO 2 Impacts due to PM Traps for Diesel Engines Tony Servin, P.E. Atmospheric Modeling and Support Section Planning and Technical Support.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Air Quality Division Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality.

Advertisements

Data Collection Methods BluFax: vehicle identification using bluetooth MAC addresses – provides corridor traffic patterns (origin-destination data) and.

Proposal to Reduce Idling Emissions from On-Road Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles Public Workshop March 23, 2005 El Monte, CA California Environmental Protection.

Emission Factor Modeling Graciela Lubertino, HGAC.

Regulations to Restrict Idling of Diesel-Powered Vehicles Philadelphia Diesel Difference June 18, 2007 Arleen Shulman Bureau of Air Quality, Pennsylvania.

Ozone Modeling over the Western U.S. -- Impact of National Controls on Ozone Trends in the Future Rural/Urban Ozone in the Western United States -- March.

California Air Quality Governance Bart Croes, Chief Research Division

TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.

` 1 Source Attribution of Mobile Source Air Toxics Eric M. Fujita, David E. Campbell, William P. Arnott and Barbara Zielinska Division of Atmospheric Sciences.

California’s Experience: Air Quality Successes and Challenges Bart Croes, P.E. Chief, Air Quality Data Branch California Air Resources Board (CARB) April.

GREENING NORTH AMERICA’S TRADE CORRIDORS “HOW TO GREEN NAFTA TRUCKS” April 22, 2008 Improving Profits + Reducing Environmental Impact.

Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.

Modelling Motor Vehicle Emissions

Mobile Source Inventories for SIPs Matt Laurita Air Quality Modeling and Transportation Section EPA Region 4.

Nature of Air Pollution in California

Reducing Emissions from Existing Trucks and Buses

Sohail Ghanchi Energy Technology and Policy The University of Texas at Austin.

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD DIESEL EMISSIONS STANDARDS AL UPTON BUTTE COUNTY FLEET MANAGER  Four separate rules apply to Public Agencies  On-Road.

Overview of the California Air Resources Board Bart Croes, Chief Research Division

South Coast AQMP/SIP Ozone & PM2.5 Control Strategy Laki Tisopulos, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Deputy Executive Officer South Coast Air Quality Management.

ACTIVITIES, NEEDS, AND FUTURE ACTIONS ON INDOOR AIR QUALITY April 26, 2001 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.

1 EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel May 2003 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Informal document.

California Experience in Converting Vehicles to Alternative Fuels New Delhi, India May 2001 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Air Resources Board.

Harikishan Perugu, Ph.D. Heng Wei, Ph.D. PE

Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Air Quality Effects of Trap-Related Emissions John DaMassa April 18, 2002 Originally Presented.

Determining Alternative Futures - Urban Development Effects on Air Quality Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin and Darko Koracin May 2007 Zagreb, Croatia.

Estimate of Air Emissions from Shale Gas Development and Production in North Carolina July 8, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission.

1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.

Issues and Concerns in California Dr. Alan Lloyd, President Emeritus International Council on Clean Transportation Former Chair, California.

2015 INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY CONFERENCE: APRIL 14, 2015 DEVELOPING CALIFORNIA EMISSION INVENTORIES: INNOVATION AND CHALLENGES.

Air Quality & Traffic August 25, 2015.

P. Otorepec, M. Gregorič IVZ RS Use of rutinely collected air pollution and health data on local level for simple evaluation of health impact.

Diesel Emissions Regulation and Control Impact of ARB Regulation.

The Clean Air Act First Clean Air Act passed in 1967: 1970 Amendments established current relationship between states and federal government and required.

1 Meeting Air Quality Goals in California Nancy L. C. Steele, D.Env. The Tender Land November 6, 2004 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.

Why Ozone is Higher on Weekends in the South Coast Air Basin: a 20-Year Perspective Eric Fujita, William Stockwell, Robert Keislar, and Dave Campbell Division.

Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.

Emissions Solutions Al Gray Technical Communicator Cashman Equipment.

1 Microscale Air Dispersion Modeling Community Health Neighborhood Assessment Program Working Draft Do Not Cite or Quote Tony Servin, P.E. October 10,

BUSES BUILT WITH CARE Dave Beebe Assistant General Manager IC Corporation.

Reducing Emissions From Diesel Engines Robert Cross Chief, Mobile Source Control Division California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD.

1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.

Statewide Protocol: Regional Application August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Luis F. Woodhouse.

Weekend/Weekday Ozone Observations in the South Coast Air Basin Phase 1 Report Sponsored by National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Coordinating Research.

Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Roadways Modeling using CAL3QHCR (A Line Source Model) Step-By-Step Procedure.

Proposed Engine Manufacturer Diagnostic (EMD) System Regulation Mobile Source Control Division California Air Resources Board May 20, 2004 Sacramento,

1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.

Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.

Sierra Nevada Ozone Summit June 4, 2008 State Strategies to Reduce Emissions of Ozone Forming Pollutants Kurt Karperos Chief, Air Quality and Transportation.

1 Neighborhood Assessment: Technical Issues to be investigated in the Wilmington Air Quality Study Vlad Isakov Todd Sax May 06, 2003 California Air Resources.

Modeling, Impacts, and Effects Review Dom Ruggeri, P.E., Manager Technical Program Support Section TCEQ, Air Permits Division Austin, Texas September.

1 Open Discussion Technical Challenges for Statewide Application Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May.

San Joaquin Valley APCD Road Modeling Using AERMOD.

Jericho Project Air Quality Assessment. TOPICS METHODOLOGY EMISSION SOURCES RESULTS AND ASSESSMENT MITIGATION AND MONITORING CONCLUSION.

1 Final Regulation Order for Truck and Bus Regulation California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board November 20, 2014.

30th Space Wing Team Vandenberg - HAWKS 1 California Airborne Toxic Control Measures for Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines John Gilliland.

Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.

November 16, Retrospective Analysis of Ambient and Emissions Data and Refinement of Study Hypotheses –Task 1: Review of Available Emissions Data.

1 DRAFT Report for Air Quality Analysis on Cumulative Emissions, Barrio Logan Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support.

October 22,  26 routes: 23 regular and 3 special needs  26 regular drivers  10 spare drivers  Total Fleet: 34 licensed buses  Average age.

Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.

Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.

NJDEP Air Toxics Program Olga Boyko NJDEP Division of Air Quality Health Effects of Air Pollution Workshop Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.

N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,

Proposed Research Plan Fiscal Year Today’s Proposed Action Approve Fiscal Year Research Plan Allocate $6 million in four research.

Environmental Quality Board May 16, 2007

AIR POLLUTION Page: 540 Figure 19.4 Haze, smoke (particulate matter), and other pollutants cover the Los Angeles skyline during the summer of 2009.

Roadway Modeling using CAL3QHCR (A Line Source Model)

Service contract: The impact of changes in vehicle fleet composition and exhaust treatment technology on the attainment of the ambient air quality limit.

Air Pollutants 200 Air pollutants are recognized and assessed by the USEPA Listed in the Clean Air Act.

Presentation transcript:

1 Near-field NO 2 Impacts due to PM Traps for Diesel Engines Tony Servin, P.E. Atmospheric Modeling and Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 14, 2004 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency NOxOneHr051304a.ppt

2 Presentation Format Summary of Nearfield NO 2 Results Idling School Buses Details High Volume Freeway Details

3 NO 2 Ambient Air Quality Standards

4 NO x Emission Source Configurations Scenarios –Idling School Buses (20 buses) –High Volume Freeway (26,312 trucks/day) Consistent with… Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles, Air Resources Board, 2000

5 Model Assumptions for NO x Exhaust Emissions Old / Screening PM Traps: No –10% NO 2 /NO x PM Traps: Yes –50% NO 2 /NO x –90% Penetration 2010 Fleet Ozone Limiting Method –Screening Level Analysis w/ High Ambient Data New / Refined PM Traps: No –10% NO 2 /NO x PM Traps: Yes –40% NO 2 /NO x –90% Penetration 2010 Fleet Ozone Limiting Method –Refined: Hourly Ambient Data to Estimate NO 2 from NO x

6 1-Hour NO 2 Results

7 Annual NO 2 Results

8 Idling School Buses Details

9 Idling School Buses 20 buses queued 5 at a time Five minute idle time Idle at 8 am and 2 pm NOx emissions (EMFAC2002 V2.2) –Idle: 80.7 g/hr –Running 17.9 g/mile at 5 mph for 60 m Hourly Ambient Data and Met. Data –2002 Los Angeles North Main ISCST3 Model with Rural Dispersion

10 Idling School Buses 1-Hour Results

11 Idling School Buses - 1-Hour Results Overall Top 3 Maximum

12 Idling School Buses - 1-Hour Results 3 Highest Above Ambient Impacts + Ambient

13 Idling School Buses Annual Screening Results

14 High Volume Freeway Details

15 High Volume Freeway 26,312 trucks per day average –99th percentile for 2000 in California 189,936 vehicle per day total weekday NO x emissions (EMFAC2002 V2.2) –vehicle type, vehicle speed, ambient temperature, and relative humidity –2010 fleet emissions with 90% penetration Hourly Ambient Data and Met. Data –2002 North Long Beach CAL3QHCR

16 Receptors at 20 meters from Edge

17 Weekday Diurnal Traffic Volume 189,936 vehicles per day (Caltrans 2000)

18 Weekend Diurnal Traffic Volume 117,262 vehicles per day (Caltrans 2000)

19 Long Beach Freeway Vehicle Speed (Caltrans)

20 Average North Long Beach Temperature and Relative Humidity

21 Weekday Diurnal NOx Emissions

22 Weekend Diurnal NOx Emissions

23 High Volume Freeway 1-Hour Results Table 3 – Refined 1-Hour NO 2 Impacts for High Volume Freeway Particulate ControlMaximum (b) Note W/O Traps (10% NO 2 )150 ppb(a) W/Traps (40% NO 2 )180 ppb(a) Notes: (a) One Hour California State Standard for NO 2 is 250 ppb (b) Ambient NO 2 is included as background

24 High Vol. Freeway - 1-Hour Results Overall Top 3 Maximum

25 High Vol. Freeway - 1-Hour Results 3 Highest Above Ambient Impacts + Ambient

26 High Volume Freeway Annual Screening Results Table 4 – Screening Above Ambient Annual Average NO 2 Impacts for High Volume Freeway Particulate ControlMaximum (b) Note W/O Traps (10% NO 2 ) 18 ppb(a) W/Traps (50% NO 2 ) 18 ppb(a) Notes: (a) Annual Average Federal Standard is 53 ppb NO 2 (b) Receptor located 20 meters from edge of freeway

27 Summary of New Refined Analysis

28 Summary – 1 Hr NO 2 Table 5 – Summary of 1-Hour NO 2 Impacts due to Particulate Traps (a), (b) Scenario PM Traps: No (10% NO 2 /NO x ) PM Traps: Yes (40% NO 2 /NO x ) Idling School Buses (c) 120 ppb170 ppb Freeway (d) 150 ppb180 ppb (a) These results include ambient hourly NO 2 as background. (b) The California State standard for 1-Hr NO 2 is 250 ppb. (c) Idling School Buses include 20 buses idling for 5 minutes with hourly O 3. (d) High Volume Freeway is for 26,312 trucks per day with hourly O 3.