The National Citizen Survey™ Ashland, VA Summary of Findings November 29, 2011 ©2011 Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc. 3005 30 th St.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Citizen Survey and Neighborhood Feedback City of Wichita District IV Spring/Summer 2013.
Advertisements

February 6, 2008 Phase 2: Achieving our Visions of 2050 In cooperation with:
Citizen Survey Results. Mecklenburg County Citizen Survey  Questions on full range of usage, customer satisfaction, needs, unmet needs, and priorities.
Survey Results September Survey Information There is an error margin of ±3.6 on this survey. South Ogden City sent out 5,300 surveys and received.
BOWLING GREEN CITIZEN CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Fall 2010 – National Citizen Survey.
Customer Satisfaction Surveys 2005/06 7 th August 2006.
Hays City Services Survey 2002 By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. University Center for Survey Research Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas
1 Community Assessment Chapter 13 28/4/2007 Ahmad Adeeb.
1. National Research Center, Inc.2 A turnkey citizen survey service offered by the INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION and NATIONAL RESEARCH.
Alabama 2003 Survey of Rural Land Issues College of Agriculture Auburn University.
2008 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Results May 29, 2009.
2012 Citizen Survey results Background Implementing Our Vision Action Chart Key Drivers Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time What’s Next?
2012 Greater Fargo-Moorhead Community Health Needs Assessment of Residents Results of an April 2012 Survey of Cass County, North Dakota and Clay County,
1 ACCESS to QUALITY CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL and LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES Collaboratively encourages and supports opportunities to focus on the.
Based on Recent Surveys of Anne Arundel County Residents By Dan Nataf Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College www2.aacc.edu/csli.
Community Themes & Strengths Assessment Jason Porter San Antonio Metropolitan Health District.
CITY OF FLUSHING Citizen Survey April 22, Flushing Residents Respond.
Session Learning Objectives Facilities and Grounds by Harry Lorick Identify the benefit of facilities and grounds to the public Analyze the requirements.
CITY OF WENATCHEE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 9, 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Three-Year Housing and Community Development Consolidated.
2014 National Citizen Survey Results Citizen Survey results Implementing Our Vision Background Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time Special.
Albemarle County 2004 Citizen Survey October 6, 2004.
Village of Villa Park Comprehensive Plan Update Public Forum November 5 th, 2008.
Southern Apache County Community Health Survey Spring 2003.
Reigate and Banstead Borough Council Residents survey October 2014 Ania Janz Danielle Collins.
CICOA Aging & In-Home Solutions July 2013 Results of the 2013 Survey.
Kimball Area Community Survey Results. Methodology Mail survey Sample included Kimball, Banner and western Cheyenne Counties  Random sample of 649 households.
Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St. Boulder, CO (303) The National Citizen Survey™ LOWER PROVIDENCE.
2012 CITY OF MIDDLETON SATISFACTION SURVEY WORKING DRAFT - PROPOSAL.
Prepared for: Vancouver Police Department Resident and Business Survey Prepared by: NRG Research Group April 4, 2007.
City of Sarasota 2008 National Citizen Survey Conducted by the National Research Center (NRC) for the City of Sarasota.
2009 Lane County Community Survey Demographic Breakdown.
Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA) November 2, 2009 Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA)
September 2015 Town of the Blue Mountains Citizen Satisfaction Survey.
2012 Community Survey Results Water Issues Conducted by.
Results of March 4-7, 2013 Survey of Anne Arundel County Residents By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
Vital Signs 11: Development and Results of Sustainability Indicators 1 Presentation to NNIP Columbus, Ohio June 21, 2013 Matthew Kachura Research Associate.
Community Attitude Study Village of Glen Ellyn.
Why we do this.. 22% current population over 60 years One persons households – 27% by % of the population will be over 60 years of age by 2031.
STOUR AREA COMMUNITY COMMITTEE 17 July PURPOSE AND CONTENT OF PRESENTATION To provide an Area based analysis to underpin the State of The District.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – FEBRUARY 23, National Citizen Survey Results.
Discussion Materials Prepared for City of Williamsburg, Virginia August 9, 2010 Refunding Opportunities Prepared By Davenport & Company LLC Member NYSE.
1. FY Proposed Budget Jamie Justice, Town Manager & Piet Swart, Finance Director April 26, 2016 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget 2.
2012 Citizen Survey Results Presentation City of Twin Falls, Idaho.
National Citizen Survey 2010 Results. City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for third time Survey.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – APRIL 12, Strategic Action Plan Evaluation Results.
The National Citizen Survey™ Orland Park, IL Summary of Findings May 7, 2012 ©2012 Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc Valmont Road,
CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD 2015 CITIZEN SURVEY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS.
Citizen Survey Hampton City Council July 8, 2009.
Budget Week Results Public Forum Data March 10, 2010.
Ashland, VA Key Findings January 6, 2015 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
Orland Park, IL Key Findings 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
City of Decatur National Citizen Survey 2012 Results City Commission Work Session July 16, 2012.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
Priority Based Budgeting Update Board of County Commissioners Workshop December 10, 2012.
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE Vision, Values and Objectives.
Arapahoe County, CO 2017 Citizen Survey Prepared by: Andrea Rasizer
2010 Citizen Survey Results
2017 Community Survey City of Mountain Brook, Alabama
McKinney, TX Key Findings 2017
City of Huber Heights Public Opinion Survey
Summary of Findings January, 2009
City of Washougal 2016 Community Survey Findings
City of Palo Alto Healthy Cities Performance Measures June 22, 2017
City of Palo Alto Healthy Cities Performance Measures August 24, 2017
Indiana Community Health Needs Assessment
2014 National Citizen Survey Results
The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA
Summary of Findings May 26, 2009
The Eight Domains of WHO/AARP Livable Community for All Ages
Presentation transcript:

The National Citizen Survey™ Ashland, VA Summary of Findings November 29, 2011 ©2011 Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St. Boulder, CO (303)

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.2 The National Citizen Survey™ (The NCS) Background ► ICMA/NRC initiative ▲ Turnkey omnibus citizen survey service ▲ Benchmark comparisons ▲ Over 250 participants in The NCS in over 40 states ▲ Over 500 jurisdictions in full database

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.3 Uses of Survey Results Inform budget, land use, strategic planning decisions Measure government performance Benchmark service ratings Monitor trends in resident opinion Results can be used to:

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.4 Study Background and Methods 2011 Survey: ► Multi-contact mailed survey ► Representative sample of 1,200 residents and households ▲ 383 surveys returned; 34% response rate ► 5% margin of error ► Data statistically weighted to reflect population

The National Citizen Survey™ Community Ratings

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.6 Overall Quality of Community Percent “excellent” or “good” Remain in Ashland for the next five years 87% Would recommend living in Ashland to someone who asks 93% = national benchmark comparison Ashland as a place to live 95% Overall Quality of life in Ashland 92% Neighborhood as a place to live 87% Above above the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ Community Design

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.8 Availability of paths and walking trails 70% Ease of walking 81% Transportation Percent “excellent” or “good” Ease of bicycle travel 73% Traffic Flow on major streets 68% Ease of car travel 77% much above the benchmark Ease of bus travel 36% Much below

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.9 Transportation Services Percent “excellent” or “good” Sidewalk maintenance 75% Traffic signal timing 78% Amount of public parking 62% Street cleaning 82% Street repair 69% much above the benchmark Street lighting 69% Snow removal 71%

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.10 Housing Chart Above the benchmark Similar to the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.11 Land Use, Planning and Zoning 63% Quality of new development in Ashland above the benchmark Percent “excellent” or “good” 80% Overall appearance of Ashland much above the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.12 Economic Sustainability Percent “excellent” or “good” Employment opportunities 39% Overall Quality of businesses and service establishments 69% Shopping opportunities 63% Ashland as a place to work 63% above the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ Public Safety

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.14 Public Safety Felt “very” or “somewhat” safe NeighborhoodDowntown After dark During the day From Violent Crime 90% From Property Crime 75% From Environmental Hazards 86% 97% 86% 81% 96% = national benchmark comparison

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.15 Safety Services Percent “excellent” or “good” Crime prevention 87% Traffic enforcement 82% Police services 86% much above the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.16 Environmental Sustainability 63% Recycled used paper, cans or bottles from home at least once in the prior 12 months Percent “excellent” or “good” 87% Cleanliness of Ashland 86% Quality of overall natural environment 84% Air quality 70% Preservation of natural areas such as open space, farmlands and greenbelts much less than the benchmark much above the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2010 National Research Center, Inc.17 Utility Services Chart ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.17 above the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ Recreation and Wellness

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.19 Parks and Recreation Percent “excellent” or “good” 65% Recreation opportunities Similar to the benchmark 88% Town parks above the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.20 Culture, Arts and Education Cultural and Educational Opportunities Educational opportunities 70% Opportunities to attend cultural activities 70% Percent “excellent” or “good” much above the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.21 Health and Wellness Above the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ Community and Civic Engagement

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.23 Community Inclusiveness Percent “excellent” or “good” 86% Ashland as a place to retire 71% Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds 50% Availability of affordable quality child care 87% Sense of community 92% Ashland as a place to raise children above the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.24 Civic Activity 72% of respondents felt opportunities to participate in community matters were “excellent” or “good” 79% of respondents felt that opportunities to volunteer were “excellent” or “good” Percent “excellent” or “good” above the benchmark much above the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ Town of Ashland Government

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.26 Public Trust Percent “excellent” or “good” 66% The overall direction that Ashland is taking 67% Job Ashland government does at welcoming citizen involvement 62% Value of services for the taxes paid to Ashland 86% Overall image or reputation of Ashland much above the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.27 Town of Ashland Employees Percent “excellent” or “good” Responsiveness 88% Overall impression 81% Knowledge 87% Courtesy 85% above the benchmark

The National Citizen Survey™ From Data to Action

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.29 Resident priorities National Benchmark Comparisons “Key Drivers” Key Driver Analysis (KDA) Cornerstone of customer satisfaction research in the private sectorCornerstone of customer satisfaction research in the private sector Tells what service evaluations best predict how well you do overallTells what service evaluations best predict how well you do overall Focuses managers and staff on activities that could “get the most bang for the buck”Focuses managers and staff on activities that could “get the most bang for the buck”

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc. 30 Environmental Sustainability Community Design Civic Engagement Street repair Economic development Code enforcement Planning and zoning Snow removal Sidewalk maintenance Preservation of natural areas Storm drainage Garbage collection Recycling Recreation and Wellness Town parks Public information Public Safety Traffic enforcement Police services Street lighting Street cleaning Traffic signal timing Legend Above Benchmark Similar to Benchmark Below Benchmark Key Driver Overall Quality of Services Ashland Action Chart™

The National Citizen Survey™ Custom Questions

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.32 Policy questions Custom Question 1 If the Town were to have to further reduce services, to what extent do you support or oppose each of the following changes? “Strongly” or “Somewhat” support Increase the time to answer citizen complaints for code enforcement issues61% Eliminate special events (e.g. Bluemont Concert Series)42% Reduce park maintenance29% Eliminate some extra police services offered such as vacation house check, business night check and locked door opening28% Reduce the level of street and roadway maintenance/brush and leaf pick-up25%

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.33 Policy questions Custom Question 2 The Town currently does not charge an extra fee for solid waste or recycling pick-up services. Due to increasing costs, the Town will need to reconsider how to provide this service. Which one of the following options best describes how you would like the Town to handle solid waste and recycling pick-up services? (Please select one) Percent of respondents Pay an annual fee to the Town for solid waste and recycling services.44% Discontinue solid waste and recycling service and allow citizens to manage their own solid waste by using Hanover County21% Increase the real estate or personal property tax rate to cover the cost.18% Pay nothing more, but instead cut funding for police, parks & recreation, and street maintenance.17% Total100%

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.34 Policy questions Custom Question 3 The Town could consider creating new recreation amenities. Please indicate the increased tax amount, if any, that you would be willing to pay per year for the construction and operation of such facilities. $0 per year $25 per year $50 per year $100 per year $200 per yearTotal Outdoor multi-use pool expansion or replacement58%34%6%2%0%100% Additional walking/biking trails45%39%8% 0%100% A community center55%37%7%1%0%100% Athletic fields59%34%5%2%0%100%

The National Citizen Survey™ Subgroup Comparisons

The National Citizen Survey™ Demographic Subgroup Comparisons ► Home Ownership ▲ Owners gave generally higher ratings ▲ Renters gave higher ratings for employment opportunities and Ashland as a place to work ► Annual household income ▲ Higher income residents gave generally higher ratings and reported more civic engagement ▲ Those with lower incomes gave higher ratings for the availability of affordable quality food and preventive health services ► Race/ethnicity ▲ Non-white residents gave higher ratings to their neighborhoods as a place to live ▲ Whites gave higher ratings in general, and gave higher ratings for opportunities such as cultural activities, recreation, social events and opportunities to volunteer ► Age ▲ Older (55+) residents reported more civic engagement ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.36

The National Citizen Survey™ ©2011 National Research Center, Inc.37 Conclusions Public safety services Appearance and economic vitality Public trust Highlights Opportunities Public information services Recycling Public Transportation

The National Citizen Survey™ Questions?

Thank you! National Research Center, Inc