SUMMIT COUNTY COUNCIL WORK SESSION -Solid Waste Financials- Jaren Scott Solid Waste Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modern Methods of Solid Household Waste Management
Advertisements

Pescadero Transfer Station Has served the community from 1986 to the Present We cannot afford to lose this asset.
January 20 th, BudgetActual% YTDChange from prior year Ad Valorem Taxes $ 36,469,256$ 27,782, %$ 1,020,143 Sales Taxes 10,781,313 2,638,615.
Prepared by Denese Ballew and Brian Taylor from Land-of-Sky Regional Council Solid Waste Management Study for the Town of Waynesville.
Chapter Seventeen Accounting for State and Local Governments (Part II) Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
San Juan County Solid Waste: Funding. Solid Waste Funding Current Solid Waste Revenue Current Solid Waste Revenue Rate Structure used to collect revenue.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
City Manager’s Proposed Budget for Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 City Council Budget Hearing June 08, 2009.
Building a Recycling Program Through Innovation and Creativity instead of Big Budgets Financial Sustainability – Recycling in the City.
December 23, MISSION STATEMENT To maintain and enhance the quality of life in Kirkwood by providing our customers with safe, reliable, environmentally.
1 Combined Utility System Cost of Service Rate Study Presentation April 6, 2010.
1 Bringing Curbside Recycling to Delaware A Proposal by: The Recycling Public Advisory Council (RPAC) The Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA) The Department.
Local Funding Issues Alameda County, California. Household Hazardous Waste Program Three Drop-off Facilities: Oakland, Hayward, and Livermore Staff rotates.
Fourth Meeting June 26, 2012 "The Cleaner Greener Lincoln initiative will make the City of Lincoln an active leader in the area of sustainability, building.
Statewide Water Needs and future estimated costs September 20, 2011.
Accounting Details We show transfers as a separate line below personnel, operating expense, and capital outlay so true cost of the department before transfer.
2004 Budget Presentation City Commission Budget Study Session July 2, 2003.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA Budget Overview APA Citizens Academy Paul Casey, Assistant City Administrator October 15, 2013.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
LBA ASSOCIATES 2003 Colorado SWANA Annual Mtg CO SOLID WASTE SURVEY  By LBA Associates (with CAFR)  Collected 2002 program data  Disclaimer – quality.
A Comparison of Estimated Costs of Waste Disposal Options Is there a Future for Waste-to-Energy? Jeffrey F. Clunie R. W. Beck, Inc. N O V E M B E R 2 0.
Water & Waste Disposal Loans and Grants The funding purpose is to construct, enlarge, extend or improve water, wastewater and solid waste systems in rural.
Town of Plymouth Solid Waste Management Town of Plymouth Department of Public Works November 26, 2012.
Budget Basics An Overview of the South Seattle Community College Budget Presented to College Council November 18, 2003.
From Solid Waste to Energy: A New Vision For Gainesville-Alachua County Dave Newport Cross Creek Initiative, Inc
Solid Waste Fee Ordinance Hearing NOVEMBER 12, Jefferson County Public Works Solid Waste Division Jefferson County Public Works.
Utilities Department Solid Waste System Tipping Fees November 11, 2008.
ENTERPRISE FUND City of Springfield Trash Fee. FY12 Solid Waste Services Includes: Weekly Trash Collection Bi-Weekly Recycling Collection Bi-Weekly Curbside.
John Angiulli Director PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Citizen Academy September 8 & 15, 2015.
TENTATIVE BUDGET PRESENTATION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 8, 2010.
2013 Business Planning Process. Business Planning Process Guidelines Budget Preparation Preparation of Business Plans Management Review Presentations.
Defeasance of the Solid Waste System Refunding Revenue Bonds Series 2003 Orange County Board of County Commissioners Meeting September 18, 2007 Defeasance.
The Market Development Component Barbara J. Lucks City of Springfield Department of Environmental Services What, Why and How?
Board of County Commissioners October 16, 2012 Solid Waste Study Update.
The Property Tax and Water Finance in Utah. Figure 1 Water Use in Utah by Category during 1995 Total Withdrawls: 4,459 mgd or 5 million acre-feet.
John Angiulli Interim Director PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Citizen Academy October 9 & 16, 2012.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Current Status October 20, 2011 Regional District of Mount Waddington.
Region 2000 Solid Waste Management Initiative January 18, 2007 Virginia’s Region 2000 Local Government Council Briefing Region 2000 Solid Waste Management.
TOWN OF JUPITER Abacoa Property Owner’s Association Annual Meeting November 17, 2010.
City of Parkland Fiscal Year Proposed Budget Commission Workshop August 18, 2010.
1. FY Proposed Budget Jamie Justice, Town Manager & Piet Swart, Finance Director April 26, 2016 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget 2.
Budget Workshop June 8, Millage & Ad Valorem History FY 05/06 – FY 12/13 Proposed 2 $97.4 million 37.8% reduction.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS ASSESSMENT Board of County Commissioners FEBRUARY 24, 2009.
PUBLIC WORKS FY 2012 Proposed Budget May 24, 2012.
Council Improvement Plan Council Meeting 1 June
Do you know? By 2015, an estimated 40-48% of new non-residential construction by value will be green, equating to a $ billion.
TCDC Presentation to WasteMINZ Thames Coromandel District Council.
Transportation and Transit Funding Options. Opportunities (Sales Tax)  Additional Mass Transit Sales Tax (UCA ) (.25%)  Requires countywide.
May 25, 2016 Summit County Council Presentation INTRODUCTION WORK SESSION DISCUSSION SOLID WASTE & RECYCLING COLLECTION FEE REPUBLIC SERVICES CONTRACT.
Department of Financial Services
Strategic Revenue & Expenditure Discussion
Solid Waste Service Update
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Water and Wastewater Rates
Strategic Revenue & Expenditure Discussion
Council’s Tentative Budget for 2017
Mecklenburg County Solid Waste FY 2018.
Solid Waste Division - Operations
2017 Total Revenues were: $9,165, Revenues by program:
Joint Committee Meeting: Highway and Finance & Budget
SWAC – Agenda 3/12/19 Introduction / Approval of Minutes
SWAC – Agenda 1/22/19 1. Introduction / Approval of Minutes
Quarterly Budget Update 2018 first Quarter Report
Quarterly Budget Update 2017 Quarterly Reports
Utilities Department Solid Waste Business Plan and Tipping Fees
No out of pocket cost No payback period Generate $$$ in energy savings Eliminate your electric bill Give you money annually to spend on other things.
SWAC – Agenda 10/23/18 Chapter 6 – Alternative Technology – Draft Findings 2. Chapter 7 – Draft Landfill Disposal Existing Disposal System Disposal Options.
2019 Second Quarter Financial Report Period Ending June 30, 2019
Presentation transcript:

SUMMIT COUNTY COUNCIL WORK SESSION -Solid Waste Financials- Jaren Scott Solid Waste Department

THE PROBLEM: FINDING SOLUTIONS FOR THE FUNDING OF THE SOLID WASTE DIVISION LONG- TERM

RECENT CHANGES:  Increased tipping fees from $25 to $30/ton ($275,000 in increased revenue for 2015)  Economy has picked back up. Total tons in 2014 were 52,865. YTD=51,615 tons.  Loss in commodity values (white goods from $220/ton to $55/ton) = less recycling.  Started new cell development

Landfill Enterprise Only *Projected/Requested (using average of 55,000 tons/yr)

Waste Collection Only *Requested/Projected

ALL Solid Waste (Landfill + Collections) *Projected/Requested (using average of 55,000 tons/yr)

Capital and Closure Needs  2015: $854,293  ($560,000 for Henefer Land Acquisition, $150,000 for New Cell Construction, $144,293 Closure)  2016: $1,546,293  ($200,000 cell development, $1,020,000 green waste, $182,000-Collections Weber Transfer Remodel, $144,293 Closure)  2017: $924,293  ($765,000 New Cell Construction, $15,000 Transfer Station Design, $144,293 Closure)  2018: $1,019,293  ($875,000 Transfer Station Construction, $144,293 Closure)

Additional Revenue Possibility  Snyderville Basin Water Reclamation District (SBWRD). 8,000 tons of biosolids  Approx. $240,000 in revenue, depending on terms  Looking for a long-term contract (~20 years)  Key Component of a Green Waste/Composting Program  Ability to compost/mono-fill/landfill the material.  Reliable income that could be bonded against  $2-$4million depending on the years bonded for

Options  Do Nothing (Continue to run deficit and balance using the general fund)  Change Tipping Fees (Only has impact on landfill enterprise fund)  Implement Waste Management Fee (as discussed in 2014, to impact the enterprise, the Collections, or both)  Make Solid Waste (Landfill & Collections) Self-Sustaining through a combination of both tipping fees and a waste management fee.

Adjusting Tipping Fees  The average annual deficit for the enterprise fund is $615,000  It would take an increase of $11.20/ton ($11.20x55,000=$616,000)  Bringing our tipping fees to $41.20  Northern Utah average=$31.20 (see next slide)  Would that high of a rate push our waste to neighboring counties?  I recommend a hybrid approach  A tipping fee increase of $3/ton ($3x55,000= $165,000)  Institute a waste management fee of $24/household/year (20,000x$24=$480,000)

Rate Comparison SUMMIT COUNTY= $30  Salt Lake County: $31.35/ton  Transjordan: $29/ton  Wasatch Integrated: $30/ton  South Utah County: $35/ton  North Pointe (Northern Utah County) $33.50/ton  Logan landfill $29/ton.  Weber County $32/ton  Average: $31.40

Making the Solid Waste Division (Landfill & Collections) Self-Sustaining  The average annual deficit for the entire division is: $3,200,000  A tipping fee increase of $3/ton ($3x55,000= $165,000)  20,000 households x$13 x 12 months totals $3,120,000  Fee Billing allows future opportunities for opt-out/opt-in (green- waste/more recycling).  Allows Solid Waste to be billed as a utility and not funded from the general fund.  Could be any combination and implemented over time.

 If the Solid Waste Division becomes self- sustaining, general fund dollars would be available for transportation and other capital needs.