Deterministic vs Stochastic simulation Stationary solutions: “dual-Padé” approximation Modeling localized Ca 2+ dynamics: interesting Math questions Victor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adaptive multi-scale model for simulating cardiac conduction Presenter: Jianyu Li, Kechao Xiao.
Advertisements

Calcium Dynamics Basic reference: Keener and Sneyd, Mathematical Physiology.
Nerve Impulses and Reflex Arcs
بسم اللة الرحمن الرحيم Muscle and neuron as excitable tissue.
INTRODUCTION: Biological systems are characterized by significant heterogeneity at multiple scales. The fine scale (local scale) heterogeneity often has.
Computational Biology, Part 17 Biochemical Kinetics I Robert F. Murphy Copyright  1996, All rights reserved.
Department of Chemical Engineering University of California, Los Angeles 2003 AIChE Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA November 17, 2003 Nael H. El-Farra.
Synapses are everywhere neurons synapses Synapse change continuously –From msec –To hours (memory) Lack HH type model for the synapse.
MCell Usage Scenario Project #7 CSE 260 UCSD Nadya Williams
The Integrate and Fire Model Gerstner & Kistler – Figure 4.1 RC circuit Threshold Spike.
Cellular Neuroscience (207) Ian Parker Lecture # 6 - Second messenger and Ca 2+ signaling.
Neuroscience Fundamentals 112C Ian Parker Biophysics of intracellular neuronal signaling Second messenger and Ca 2+ signaling.
Modeling Neurobiological systems, a mathematical approach Weizmann Institute 2004, D. Holcman.
Synaptic Transmission and Neural Integration
Chapter 8 Applications In physics In biology In chemistry In engineering In political sciences In social sciences In business.
Nervous systems. Keywords (reading p ) Nervous system functions Structure of a neuron Sensory, motor, inter- neurons Membrane potential Sodium.
Seth Weinberg Acknowledgements: Xiao Wang, Yan Hao, Gregory Smith
Biology 41.1 nervous System
Synaptic Transmission Lesson 12. Synapses n Communication b/n neurons n Electrical l Electrotonic conduction n Chemical l Ligand / receptor ~
Announcements Slides used at tutorial posted to webpage.
Cells and Their Environment
Local calcium signals (‘puffs’) and their relation to single-channel activity of IP 3 receptors.
Calcium-dependent gating of Voltage-gated ion channels.
Top Score = 101!!!! Ms. Grundvig 2nd top score = 99 Mr. Chapman 3rd top score = Ms. Rodzon Skewness = -.57.
Nonlinear Dynamics in Mesoscopic Chemical Systems Zhonghuai Hou ( 侯中怀 ) Department of Chemical Physics Hefei National Lab of Physical Science at Microscale.
Computational Biology, Part 15 Biochemical Kinetics I Robert F. Murphy Copyright  1996, 1999, 2000, All rights reserved.
The Nervous System (II) Rachel Cohen, Grace Huddleston, Artemis Metaxa, Elisa Rocha.
Lecture 7: Stochastic models of channels, synapses References: Dayan & Abbott, Sects 5.7, 5.8 Gerstner & Kistler, Sect 2.4 C Koch, Biophysics of Computation.
Mathematical Modeling of Signal Transduction Pathways Biplab Bose IIT Guwahati.
Synaptic Transmission and Neural Integration
Nervous System IB Biology. Nervous System In order to survive and reproduce an organism must respond rapidly and appropriately to environmental stimuli.
Graduate Seminar, NJIT June 14, 2012 Analytical & Computational Neuroscience: Lecture 2 Action Potentials and Chemical Synapses Math 430 * Math 635 * Fall.
Structural description of the biological membrane. Physical property of biological membrane.
ACTION POTENTIALS Chapter 11 Part 2 HONORS ANATOMY & PHYSIOLOGY.
8.2 Structures and Processes of the Nervous System
Structures and Processes of the Nervous System – Part 2
TR&D 2: NUMERICAL TOOLS FOR MODELING IN CELL BIOLOGY Software development: Jim Schaff Fei Gao Frank Morgan Math & Physics: Boris Slepchenko Diana Resasco.
Nerve Impulses.
SITES OF SYNAPTIC COMMUNICATION SYNAPSES Created by The North Carolina School of Science and Math.The North Carolina School of Science and Math Copyright.
 Identify the principle parts of the nervous system  Describe the cells that make up the nervous system  Describe what starts and stops a nerve impulse.
Action potential 1. Action potentials arriving at the presynaptic terminal cause voltage- gated Ca2+ channels to open. Ca Presynaptic terminal.
Do Now Complete Part 1 on your worksheets with a partner. A problem for you to solve: – Given that you know the axon sends signals electrically, and that.
Virtual Cell How to model reaction diffusion systems.
The Synapse A synapse is the functional connection between a neuron and a second cell. The second cell is also a neuron in CNS. In the PNS, the second.
Specific Aims Acknowledgements: Andrew McCulloch, Stuart Campbell, Victor Chiu [1] Insel et al. J. Biological Chemistry (2004) 279:19: [2] Saucerman.
Nervous System
Synapses. C. Action potential reaches the end of a presynaptic neuron. F. Voltage gated calcium channels open D. Calcium ions flow into the presynaptic.
 Chapter 48 Gaby Gonzalez Joyce Kim Stephanie Kim.
Biology Main points/Questions 1.What does a neuron look like? 2.Why do membranes have charges? 3.How can these charges change?
The Synapse and Synaptic Transmission
Modeling the Neuromuscular Junction
Diffusion over potential barriers with colored noise
Human Anatomy / Physiology
Monte Carlo methods 10/20/11.
Synaptic transmission
Section 2 Interaction between neurons
Biological Neural Networks
Toward a Biophysical Model of Spike-Time Dependent Plasticity
Neurons, Signals, Synapses
Nerve Impulses.
Neuroscience Fundamentals 112C Ian Parker
Synaptic Transmission
Cell Communication: Neuron.
A junction that mediates information transfer from one neuron:
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Neuronal Signals.
Animals have nervous systems that detect external and internal signals, transmit and integrate information, and produce responses. Neurons.
Adaptation of Ca2+-Triggered Exocytosis in Presynaptic Terminals
Synaptic Transmission and Integration
Transmission of Nerve Signals
Presentation transcript:

Deterministic vs Stochastic simulation Stationary solutions: “dual-Padé” approximation Modeling localized Ca 2+ dynamics: interesting Math questions Victor Matveev Department of Mathematical Sciences New Jersey Institute of Technology B(r) r Ca(r) r 1 vs Supported in part by NSF grant DMS

Roles of Ca 2+ in cell physiology 1880s: Ca 2+ triggers muscle contraction (Sydney Ringer) 1950s: Ca 2+ spike in muscle cell (Fatt & Katz) 1960s: Ca 2+ triggers synaptic transmission and facilitation (Katz, Miledi, Rahamimoff) 1960s: Ca 2+ triggers hormone release (William Douglas) 1980s: Ca 2+ triggers T-lymphocyte cytotoxic activity 1980s: Ca 2+ triggers gene transcription (Michael Greenberg) Other functions: cell cycle, apoptosis, fertilization, LTP (learning and memory),…  Ca 2+ signals compartmentalized in time and space

Roles of Ca 2+ in cell physiology ▪ An ideal signal: [Ca 2+ ] out / [Ca 2+ ] in ~10 5 ▪ Multitude of sources and interaction partners ▪ Multiple Ca 2+ pathways  localization of Ca 2+ signals [Ca 2+ ] in =0.1 μM [Ca 2+ ] out =2-10 mM Ca 2+ Signal 1 Signal 2

Processes driven by local Ca 2+ elevation Synaptic transmission Endocrine hormone release Muscle cell contraction Graham Johnson Medical Media Ca 2+

Localized Ca 2+ signaling: exocytosis Action potential (depolarizing pulse) Ca 2+ ions Presynaptic cell (axon) Postsynaptic cell (neuron or muscle) ~40nm Ca 2+ buffers (calbindin, parvalbumin, calmodulin, …)

Localized Ca 2+ signaling: exocytosis Ca 2+ channels open Several Ca 2+ ions bound to release site Presynaptic cell (axon) Postsynaptic cell (neuron or muscle) ~40nm

Localized Ca 2+ signaling: exocytosis Exocytosis (fusion) Neurotransmitter receptors/channels Presynaptic cell (axon) Postsynaptic cell (neuron or muscle) ~40nm

Localized Ca 2+ signaling: exocytosis Neurotranmitter binds to postsynaptic receptors Neurotransmitter receptors/channels Presynaptic cell (axon) Postsynaptic cell (neuron or muscle) ~40nm

Localized Ca 2+ signaling: exocytosis Postsynaptic ion channels open Neurotransmitter receptors/channels Presynaptic cell (axon) Postsynaptic cell (neuron or muscle) ~40nm

Localized Ca 2+ signaling: exocytosis Endocrine cell T-lymphocyte Blood stream Alien cell Chemical synapseNeuromuscular junction Myocyte Neuron SR

Localized Ca 2+ signaling: exocytosis Ca 2+ “nanodomain” Area of elevated [Ca 2+ ] > 10 μM within ~ nm of the Ca 2+ channel 1981: Ca 2+ microdomain hypothesis (Rodolfo Llinas)

Interest in modeling local Ca 2+ dynamics Single-channel Ca 2+ domains with sharp gradients physiologically relevant Ca 2+ -sensitive exocytosis steps still debated Complex dynamics: Ca 2+ is strongly buffered Limited resolution of Ca 2+ imaging Interpreting imaging requires modeling (Ca 2+ dyes are buffers) 1980s: First “Ca 2+ domain” simulations: Simon & Llinas, Chad & Eckert, Fogelson & Zucker, Neher

Deterministic vs Stochastic simulation Stationary solutions: beyond asymptotics Modeling cell Ca 2+ dynamics: challenges and open problems vs VCell, CalC, …Mcell, Smoldyn, …

Deterministic solver: CalC Simple and efficient Allows parameter sensitivity analysis All standard geometries implemented Cartesian 1D, 2D, 3D Spherical 1D, 2D, 3D Cylindrical 2D, 3D Polar 1D, 2D Arbitrary number of buffers Flow control & MATLAB integration New features: 2-to-1 Ca 2+ buffers Non-linear boundary flux (pumps) Spherical obstacles

Deterministic approach: “mass-action” Ca 2+ ions Presynaptic cell (axon) Postsynaptic cell (neuron or muscle) ~40nm Ca 2+ buffers (calbindin, parvalbumin, calmodulin, …) V0V0

 Nanodomains form and collapse within 10  s  Stationary solution is a good approximation Deterministic simulation: Ca 2+ nanodomain Buffer: 100  M, D B =0.05  m 2 /ms, k - /k + =1  M Current: I Ca = 0.5 pA Ca 2+ Movie / Animation (will be shown at talk)

Deterministic vs Stochastic simulation Deterministic vs. Stochastic Simulation VCell, CalC, …Mcell, Smoldyn, … vs

 Number of Ca 2+ ions (1 ms pulse, I Ca =0.2 pA): N Ca ~600  Most Ca 2+ quickly buffered: only ~30 free ions  Ca 2+ binding reactions are non-linear  Two sources of stochasticity: 1. Stochastic channel gating: can be combined with deterministic Ca 2+ dynamics 2. Stochastic diffusion and reaction Significance of stochastic fluctuations: Stochastic Approach 1 pA  3121 ions per ms

Stochastic modeling of Ca dynamics Simulation using Smoldyn (  Buffer molecules  Ca 2+ ions  Bound buffer Release sensor 200 nm Channel location

Deterministic vs Stochastic simulation Modchang Nadkarni Bartol Triampo Sejnowski Levine Rappel (2010) “Comparison of deterministic & stochastic simulations…” Physical Biology Stochastic (MCell) vs. Deterministic: difference < 20% Greater discrepancy for small concentrations and release probability Rigorous analysis of this comparison is lacking Deterministic vs. Stochastic Simulation VCell, CalC,.. MCell, Smoldyn, … vs

Mass action works much better than expected! Monte-Carlo: 40,000 Smoldyn iterations (N Ca =312: 1ms 0.1pA pulse) Vs. Weinberg and Smith (2014) Biophys J: Mobile buffers increase fluctuations Ca 2+ sensor I Ca =0.1pA I Ca =0

Mass action kinetics: issues Mass action kinetics not exact: Issue 1: Continuous limit (  V  0) Issue 2: Correlations between N Ca and N B Issue 3: Variance in N Ca

Mass action issue #1: spatial scale Exact for  V  0 Fails for  V  0 Exact VV N Ca =4 N B =5

Mass action issue #1: spatial scale Fails for  V  0 VV N Ca =4 N B =5 Number of pairs: N pair = N Ca  N B =  V 2  Ca  B Concentration of pairs: N pair /  V =  V  Ca  B  0 Fail!  V V

Mass action issue #1: spatial scale K int (|  |) – interaction kernel |||| 1 nm Assumes B and Ca not correlated Mass action = coarse-grain over interaction radius

Mass action kinetics: issues Mass action kinetics not exact: Issue 1: Continuous limit (  V  0) Issue 2: Correlations between N Ca and N B Issue 3: Variance in N Ca

Mass action issue #2: correlation Ca   N Ca  : average number of Ca 2+ ions B   N B  : average number of B molecules Average number of Ca-B pairs:  N Ca  N B    N Ca    N B  !! VV N Ca N B Mass action = independence

Mass action kinetics: issues Mass action kinetics not exact: Issue 1: Continuous limit (  V  0) Issue 2: Correlations between N Ca and N B Issue 3: Variance in N Ca

Mass action issue #3: variance Ca 2+  N Ca   δ Stochastic  Set diffusion aside; consider local reactions: Incorrect logic…  N Ca  Deterministic 

Mass action issue #3: variance  N Ca   δ Stochastic  Consider argument #2:  N Ca  Deterministic  Ca 2+ Need rigorous analysis… Set diffusion aside; consider local reactions:

Deterministic vs Stochastic simulation Deterministic vs. Stochastic Simulation vs

Mass action vs Monte-Carlo: issues Mass action kinetics not exact: Issue 1: Continuous limit (  V  0): also an issue with Monte-Carlo Issue 2: Correlations between N Ca and N B : main source of discrepancy Issue 3: Variance in N Ca : not an issue!

Stochastic reaction-diffusion simulation algorithms Time-based particle Brownian reaction dynamics (MCell, Smoldyn) Unlimited spatial resolution (not coarse-grained) Inexact bi-molecular reaction Coarse-grained Gillespie solvers (STEPS, MesoRD, SmartCell) Exact local reaction (Gillespie in each sub-volume) Finite spatial resolution; accurate but inexact reaction-diffusion integration Event-based particle Brownian dynamics and reaction (CDS, GFRD) Unlimited spatial resolution (not coarse-grained) More accurate bi-molecular reaction, excluded volume effects Computationally expensive (D  t) 1/2

Mass action issues: rigorous analysis Erban, Chapman, Maini (2007) “Practical guide to stochastic simulations of reaction-diffusion processes” arXiv Erban & Chapman (2009) Phys Biol “Stochastic modeling of reaction-diffusion processes”

Deterministic vs Stochastic: rigorous analysis Erban, Chapman, Maini (2007) “Practical guide to stochastic simulations of reaction-diffusion processes” arXiv Erban & Chapman (2009) Phys Biol “Stochastic modeling of reaction-diffusion processes”

Deterministic vs Stochastic: rigorous analysis But... such reaction are physically impossible! Erban, Chapman, Maini (2007) “Practical guide to stochastic simulations of reaction-diffusion processes” arXiv

Mass action issues: rigorous analysis Erban, Chapman, Maini (2007) “Practical guide to stochastic simulations of reaction-diffusion processes” arXiv

Mass action issues: rigorous analysis Erban, Chapman, Maini (2007) “Practical guide to stochastic simulations of reaction-diffusion processes” arXiv

Mass action issues: rigorous analysis Erban, Chapman, Maini (2007) “Practical guide to stochastic simulations of reaction-diffusion processes” arXiv

Mass action issues: rigorous analysis Erban, Chapman, Maini (2007) “Practical guide to stochastic simulations of reaction-diffusion processes” arXiv

Mass action works much better than expected! Monte-Carlo: 40,000 Smoldyn iterations (N Ca =300: 1ms 0.1pA pulse) Vs. Hypothesis: correlations very small unless N ca  5 Ca 2+ sensor I Ca =0.1pA I Ca =0

Deterministic vs stochastic simulation Conclusion: Agreement better than expected Monte-Carlo and Mass-action approaches share common problems Monte-Carlo: reaction and diffusion cannot be combined “exactly” Homo-species reactions: deterministic approach suffers because of variance Hetero-species reactions: deterministic approach suffers because of correlations Need to examine size of correlations between Ca 2+ and Buffer Deterministic vs. Stochastic Simulation vs

Deterministic vs stochastic simulation Stationary solutions: beyond asymptotics Modeling cell Ca 2+ dynamics: challenges and open problems B(r) r Ca(r) r BTBT vs

Ca 2+ Modeling cell Ca 2+ dynamics Good modeling approach: Simulate stochastic channel opening/closing Simulate Ca 2+ dynamics deterministically

Modeling cell Ca 2+ dynamics Good modeling approach: Simulate stochastic channel opening/closing Simulate Ca 2+ dynamics deterministically

Modeling cell Ca 2+ dynamics Good modeling approach: Simulate stochastic channel opening/closing Use steady-state Ca 2+ solution near each open channel Nguyen Mathias Smith (2005) Bull Math Biol, 67(3):

Stationary solutions Ca 2+ B(r) r Ca(r) r BTBT

Non-dimensionalized equations for equilibrium Smith, Wagner, Keizer Biophys J (1996); Smith Dai Miura Sherman SIAM (2001) B(r) r Ca(r) r BTBT b(  )  c(  )  1

Stationary solution: asymptotic approximations Neher (1998); Smith, Wagner, Keizer Biophys J (1996); Smith Dai Miura Sherman SIAM (2001) b(  )  c(  )  1

Stationary solutions: alternative approach Problems with asymptotic approximations: Poor performance unless <<1 and/or  <<1 Hard to extend to complex buffers (2Ca 2+ + B  B ** ) Alternative approach: “Dual-Padé Approximation”

Alternative approach: “Dual-Padé” approximation b(  )  1 b o = ? b(x) x 1 b o = ? Large  behavior: x=1/ 

Stationary approximation: alternative approach b(  )  c(  )  1 This problem is hard: Nonlinear Singular (regular sing’ty at 0) Not autonomous BVP, not IVP “Weak” BC at  =0 Additional constraint: 0  b  1 ?   Channel location

Stationary approximation: alternative approach b(  )  1 b o = ? Finite radius of convergence for any b o

Stationary approximation: alternative approach b(  )  1 b o >0 Large  behavior: x=1/  b(x) x 1 b o = ? Finite radius of convergence for any b o

Stationary approximation: alternative approach b(  )  1 b o = ? Large  behavior: x=1/  b(x) x 1 b o = ? Asymptotic series exists Finite radius of convergence for any b o

Stationary solution: rational approximation b(  )  1 b o = ? Large  behavior: x=1/  b(x) x 1 b o = ?

Rational approximation: lowest order b(  )  1 b o = ? Large  behavior: x=1/  b(x) x 1 b o = ?

Rational approximation: lowest order

RBA: µ=1,  =0.1

Rational approximation: lowest order EBA: µ=0.1,  =1 RBA: µ=1,  =0.1

Rational approximation: lowest order RBA: µ=1,  =0.1 EBA: µ=0.1,  =1 Padé: µ=1,  =1

Rational approximation: second order RBA: µ=1,  =0.1 EBA: µ=0.1,  =1 Padé: µ=1,  =1

Rational approximation: third order, =  =1 Note: Rapid Buffer Approximation still superior for <<1,  =O(1): allows arbitrary set of channel and buffers All coefficients A k, B k obtained in closed form (muPad in MATLAB)

Stationary solutions: “Dual Padé” approximation Simplify expressions for coefficients for  2 nd order Analysis of singularities in complex plane More accurate Ansatz? Extension to “complex” (2-to-1) buffers (2Ca+B  B ** ) Stationary Ca 2+ nanodomain approximations