Change in Pufs and their RNA InteractionsAnalogous change in transcription factors and their gene regulation Puf binding specificity tends to be conserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phylogenetics workshop: Protein sequence phylogeny week 2 Darren Soanes.
Advertisements

Oct '13-3d. Exam and grades Why is percentile more useful than percentage? How to interpret your %ile: about is the C/B line Depends in.
Genome Evolution. Amos Tanay 2009 Genome evolution Lecture 12: epistasis and the evolution of gene regulation.
Whole Genome Duplications (Polyploidy) Made famous by S. Ohno, who suggested WGD can be a route to evolutionary innovation (focusing on neofunctionalization)
Combined analysis of ChIP- chip data and sequence data Harbison et al. CS 466 Saurabh Sinha.
Gene regulatory network
STRATEGY FOR GENE REGULATION 1.INFORMATION IN NUCLEIC ACID – CIS ELEMENT CIS = NEXT TO; ACTS ONLY ON THAT MOLECULE 2.TRANS FACTOR (USUALLY A PROTEIN) BINDS.
Current Topics of Genomics and Epigenomics. Outline  Motivation for analysis of higher order chromatin structure  Methods for studying long range chromatin.
Yeast - why it simply has a lot to say about human disease.
Genome Evolution. Amos Tanay 2009 Genome evolution Lecture 10: Comparative genomics, non coding sequences.
. Class 1: Introduction. The Tree of Life Source: Alberts et al.
Regulatory networks 10/29/07. Definition of a module Module here has broader meanings than before. A functional module is a discrete entity whose function.
Indiana University Bloomington, IN Junguk Hur Computational Omics Lab School of Informatics Differential location analysis A novel approach to detecting.
BACKGROUND E. coli is a free living, gram negative bacterium which colonizes the lower gut of animals. Since it is a model organism, a lot of experimental.
Transcription and gene regulation
Virus-host interactions
[Bejerano Fall09/10] 1 Thank you for the midterm feedback!
Biological (genomic) information Dan Janies
Cis-regulatory element study in transcriptome Jin Chen CSE Fall
Comparative Genomics II: Functional comparisons Caterino and Hayes, 2007.
Location analysis of transcription factor binding sites Guy Naamati Andrei Grodzovky.
Genetics of mating incompatibility in fungi BIO341F
Regulatory factors 1) Gene copy number 2) Transcriptional control 2-1) Promoters 2-2) Terminators, attenuators and anti-terminators 2-3) Induction and.
Network Analysis and Application Yao Fu
RNA-metabolite interactions (riboswitches). RNA aptamers RNA aptamers are structures that bind specifically to target ligands Many aptamers have been.
“REWIRING STEM CELLS: NEW TECHNIQUE MAY REVOLUTIONIZE UNDERSTANDING OF HOW GENES FUNCTION” AND “IMPORTANT DISCOVERY FOR DIAGNOSIS OF GENETIC DISEASES”.
* only 17% of SNPs implicated in freshwater adaptation map to coding sequences Many, many mapping studies find prevalent noncoding QTLs.
Genetica per Scienze Naturali a.a prof S. Presciuttini 1. The logic of prokaryotic transcriptional regulation In addition to the sigma factors that.
Adaptive evolution in prokaryotic transcriptional regulatory networks M. Madan Babu, PhD NCBI, NLM National Institutes of Health.
Evo - Devo I. Background II. Core Processes III. Weak Linkage Regulation - Types of Regulation Enhancer - upstream activation sequence. Binding site for.
Vidyadhar Karmarkar Genomics and Bioinformatics 414 Life Sciences Building, Huck Institute of Life Sciences.
Anatomy of a Genome Project A.Sequencing 1. De novo vs. ‘resequencing’ 2.Sanger WGS versus ‘next generation’ sequencing 3.High versus low sequence coverage.
Conservation and Evolution of Cis-Regulatory Systems Tal El-Hay Computational Biology Seminar חנוכה תשס"ו December 2005.
Gene co-option the process by which a trait/gene changes function; the gene has been co-opted to do a new job.
Basics of RNA structure. RNA functions Storage/transfer of genetic information Genomes many viruses have RNA genomes single-stranded (ssRNA) e.g., retroviruses.
Current Topics in Evolutionary Genomics Wen-Hsiung Li and Justin Borevitz.
Structure and evolution of prokaryotic transcriptional regulatory networks Group Leader MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Cambridge M. Madan Babu.
Prokaryotes vs Eukaryotes
Recombination breakpoints Family Inheritance Me vs. my brother My dad (my Y)Mom’s dad (uncle’s Y) Human ancestry Disease risk Genomics: Regions  mechanisms.
Introduction to biological molecular networks
RNA Rearrangements in the Spliceosome
Homeotic genes in Drosophila body patterning Department of Biochemistry
Biological Networks. Can a biologist fix a radio? Lazebnik, Cancer Cell, 2002.
Motif Search and RNA Structure Prediction Lesson 9.
Homeotic genes in Drosophila body patterning Genetics Unit, Department of Biochemistry
Robustness, clustering & evolutionary conservation Stefan Wuchty Center of Network Research Department of Physics University of Notre Dame title.
1 What forces constrain/drive protein evolution? Looking at all coding sequences across multiple genomes can shed considerable light on which forces contribute.
Knowledge prior to this research? Questions addressed? Experimental approaches used? and what outcome? Impact of these findings? Future experiments? Research.
A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraints using 29 mammals Kerstin Lindblad-Toh et al Presentation by Robert Lewis and Kaylee Wells.
Knowledge prior to this research? Questions addressed? Experimental approaches used? and what outcome? Impact of these findings? Future experiments? Research.
Algorithms and Computational Biology Lab, Department of Computer Science and & Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan Network Biology.
Developmental rewiring via new gene origination Yong Edward Zhang Computational & Evolutionary Genomics Group Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics.
1 How do regulatory networks evolve? Module = group of genes co-regulated by the same regulatory system * Evolution of individual gene targets Gain or.
Last time … * Constraint on transcription factor binding sites Sites with the most ‘information content’ generally evolve slowest * Stabilizing selection.
12.4 Mutations Changes in the genetic material Mistake in copying, carcinogens Single gene = gene mutation Entire chromosome = chromosomal mutation.
High-throughput data used in bioinformatics
Adaptation: from genes to traits
12.4 Mutations Changes in the genetic material
Control of Gene Expression
Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile of the cognate transcription factor. Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile.
A Zero-Knowledge Based Introduction to Biology
From Prescription to Transcription: Genome Sequence as Drug Target
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Hierarchical structure in the yeast transcription regulatory network.
Evolutionary genetics
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)
Static properties of transcription factors (TFs) within the hierarchical framework. Static properties of transcription factors (TFs) within the hierarchical.
Transcriptional Rewiring of Fungal Galactose-Metabolism Circuitry
An integrated NHR network.
Dynamic regulatory map and static network for yeast response to AA starvation. Dynamic regulatory map and static network for yeast response to AA starvation.
Presentation transcript:

Change in Pufs and their RNA InteractionsAnalogous change in transcription factors and their gene regulation Puf binding specificity tends to be conserved more so than interactions with specific RNAs 123 – Tuch et al. The evolution of combinatorial gene regulation in fungi. PLoS Biol – Borneman et al. Divergence of transcription factor binding sites across related yeast species. Science – Cain et al. A conserved transcriptional regulator governs fungal morphology in widely diverged species. Genetics – Schmidt et al. Five-vertebrate ChIP-seq reveals the evolutionary dynamics of transcription factor binding. Science 2010 Puf binding specificity has changed over evolution 150 – Baker et al. Extensive DNA-binding specificity divergence of a conserved transcription regulator. PNAS – Lavoie et al. Evolutionary tinkering with conserved components of a transcriptional regulatory network. PLoS Biol 2010 Binding specificity of Puf3 in Saccharomycotina co-evolved with its targets (-2C preference) 64 – Gasch et al. Conservation and evolution of cis-regulatory systems in ascomycete fungi. PLoS Biol – Lavoie et al. Evolutionary tinkering with conserved components of a transcriptional regulatory network. PLoS Biol – Kuo et al. Coevolution within a transcriptional network by compensatory trans and cis mutations. Genome Res 2010 Many RNA targets of Puf proteins tend to be conserved over millions of years but change over long evolutionary time 64 – Gasch et al. Conservation and evolution of cis-regulatory systems in ascomycete fungi. PLoS Biol – Hogues et al. Transcription factor substitution during the evolution of fungal ribosome regulation. Mol Cell – Tanay et al. Conservation and evolability in regulatory networks: the evolution of ribosomal regulation in yeast. PNAS 2005 Conserved Puf targets tend to encode functionally related proteins, and each set of related targets tend to be gained or lost in a coordinated fashion, thus acting as a unit or module 64 – Gasch et al. Conservation and evolution of cis-regulatory systems in ascomycete fungi. PLoS Biol – Lavoie et al. Evolutionary tinkering with conserved components of a transcriptional regulatory network. PLoS Biol – Hogues et al. Transcription factor substitution during the evolution of fungal ribosome regulation. Mol Cell – Ihmels et al. Rewiring of the yeast transcriptional network through the evolution of motif usage. Science – Habib et al. A functional selection model explains evolutionary robustness despite plasticity in regulatory networks. Mol Syst Biol 2012 Pufs can be co-opted to regulate new target RNAs 64 – Gasch et al. Conservation and evolution of cis-regulatory systems in ascomycete fungi. PLoS Biol – Tuch et al. The evolution of combinatorial gene regulation in fungi. PLoS Biol – Habib et al. A functional selection model explains evolutionary robustness despite plasticity in regulatory networks. Mol Syst Biol – Martchenko et al. Transcriptional rewiring of fungal galactose metabolism circuitry. Curr Biol 2007 Gain of Puf targets can bring modules together at different times in history, potentially for co-regulated expression 11 – Lavoie et al. Rearrangements of the transcriptional regulatory networks of metabolic pathways in fungi. Curr Opin Microbiol – Lavoie et al. Evolutionary tinkering with conserved components of a transcriptional regulatory network. PLoS Biol – Hogues et al. Transcription factor substitution during the evolution of fungal ribosome regulation. Mol Cell – Ihmels et al. Rewiring of the yeast transcriptional network through the evolution of motif usage. Science 200 Puf targets can change independently of changes in Puf copy number, but copy number changes have been followed by changes in RNA targets or RNA binding specificity 158 – Hittinger and Carroll. Gene duplication and the adaptive evolution of a classic genetic switch. Nature – Perez et al. How duplicated transcription regulators can diversify to govern the expression of nonoverlapping sets of genes. Genes Dev 2014