Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough Versus Fresnel J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2012;135(1): doi: / Layouts of indirect-cycle plants (a) and DSG plant (b). These figures are screenshots from Thermoflex ® 20. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough Versus Fresnel J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2012;135(1): doi: / Angles definition of a linear Fresnel reflector with horizontal N-S orientation tracking axis [26] Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough Versus Fresnel J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2012;135(1): doi: / Longitudinal and transversal IAM trend as a function of incidence angle Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough Versus Fresnel J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2012;135(1): doi: / Annual maps of OR for PT (top) and LFR (bottom) technology Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough Versus Fresnel J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2012;135(1): doi: / Monthly net electricity production for the technologies investigated Figure Legend:

Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough Versus Fresnel J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2012;135(1): doi: / February 5 (top) and July 2 (bottom), DNI and net power output for the three plant layouts studied Figure Legend: