JDES TEST DATA 2012-2013. SCHOOL WIDE DATA – ALL SUBJECTS 2013 Reading92% ELA89% Mathematics84% Science75% Social Studies75%

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Advertisements

Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
CCRPI Trends and Achievement Gap Details. Pioneer RESA Evaluation & Assessment.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Norton Park Elementary Math Data Overview for 3 rd grade By: Amanda Gilbert.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
DISTRICT MCAS RESULTS November 19, Charts by Grade vs. The State Charts by Grade Comparing 2001 through 2007 Longitudinal Comparisons CONTENTS.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Eagle Ridge Elementary Data Presentation. Eagle Ridge: CRCT Data Review (3-5) Subject Gains/Losses Reading86%87%+1 Language Arts86%82%-4 Math81%69%-12.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION State Board of Education Update on Student Performance First Analysis of Smarter Balanced Results September.
Partnership Support Organization Preliminary School Report--High School Only July 2007.
Annual Student Performance Report September
 Any high stakes testing report  AMRT Reports  Science Assessments Today we will go over an ARMT report.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
Milestones EOG Assessments – Domains Social Studies History Geography Government/Civics Economics Mathematics Operations & Algebraic Thinking Measurement.
Georgia Milestone EOG information
State of the School Hapeville Charter Middle School Presented by Ms. Marcia Lowe, principal Ms. Stacy Henry, institutional researcher Ms. Sabrina Barnes,
School Climate and Culture- A Family Affair CCRPI-A Family Affair.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
MARIETTA HIGH SCHOOL. PURPOSE The purpose of this presentation is to look at aggregated and disaggregated data and gather teacher input in regards to.
SIP Reading Goal Our Reality: An average of 78% of the students met standard on the state reading assessment in Our SMART Goal: The average.
HALL HIGH SCHOOL Academic Indicators Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards (reading, math, science) 2002………………………………..43%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..42%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..48%2007…………………………
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM Haymon-Morris Middle School NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
F LEXIBLE LEARNING PLAN R EVIEW E VALUATION D EVELOPMENT Haley Smith August 28, 2014.
State Data Comparisons FY12, FY13, FY14. CRCT – Third Grade Grade 3 JDES 2012 State 2012 JDES 2013 State 2013 JDES 2014 State 2014 Reading
SMART Test Scores Spring 2014 Cathy Varnadoe. Jeff Davis Primary School SMART Results for Reading 2014 Does Not Meet 70 & Above (Meets) 85 & Above (Exceeds)
Test Scores Comparison completed using Spring CRCT reports Natalie Hayes.
Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check percent proficient.
Panter Elementary Title I Agenda Meet and Greet Invitation to provide input on the development of: Family-School Compacts (What can I do at.
Presented to West Manor Administration and Faculty By: Felicia Belcher April 16, 2014.
Millbrae Elementary School District
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Objectives Define what Title I is and why it is important to be a Title I school Highlight your rights as a Title I parent Describe ways you can be involved.
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Principal’s Coffee: Booksin Elementary SBAC Results
Teacher SLTs
Gloria Ladson-Billings University of Wisconsin
Teacher SLTs
Hickory Public Schools Accountability Update - Math
State of the School Hapeville Charter Middle School
2015 End of Course Examinations
IT’S ALL ABOUT GROWTH!. Hemet Unified School District’s Use of Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
PBMA 2016 Learning Gains.
2017 State Assessment Highlights
Please silence your electronic devices.
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Lauren Kinsella Dr. Wright ITEC 7305
ECHOLS COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL April 12, 2016 Middle School Teachers
Teacher SLTs
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
CAASPP Results Kern County.
College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades
Simi Valley Unified School District CAASPP Data
Education Services October 3, 2017.
PARCC Results Spring 2018 Administration
Data Overview Shiver Elementary School Faculty and Staff July 21, 2013
Willie J. Williams Middle School For Staff Use July 14, 2014
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Teacher SLTs
Measuring College and Career Readiness
MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.
Mayra Perez, Ed. D. October 10, 2016
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

JDES TEST DATA

SCHOOL WIDE DATA – ALL SUBJECTS 2013 Reading92% ELA89% Mathematics84% Science75% Social Studies75%

STATE TARGET VS SCHOOL SCORE State Target 2013Actual School Score 2013 Reading – 94%Reading – 92% ELA – 92.3%ELA – 89% Math – 86.8%Math – 84% Science – 80.3%Science – 75% Social Studies – 79.3%Social Studies – 75%

3 RD GRADE Reading Spring TestingPercentages Did Not Meet Standards11.6% Met Standards51.9% Exceeded Standards36.5% Overall Percentage88.4% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility 2013 (ALL)94% ESEA Flexibility 2014 (ALL)94.6%

3 RD GRADE English/Language ArtsPercentages Did Not Meet Standards17.9% Met Standards50.0% Exceeded Standards32.1% Overall82.1% % Exceeded ESEA Flexibity % ESEA Flexibility %

3 RD GRADE MathPercentages Did Not Meet Standards28.9% Met Standards37.0% Exceeded Standards34.0% Overall71.0% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility % ESEA Flexibility %

3 RD GRADE SciencePercentages Did Not Meet Standards28% Met Standards47% Exceeded Standards25% Overall72% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility ESEA Flexibility

3 RD GRADE Social StudiesPercentages Did Not Meet Standards24.2% Met Standards54.7% Exceeded Standards21.2% Overall75.9% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility ESEA Flexibility

4 TH GRADE ReadingPercentages Did Not Meet Standards11.7% Met Standards50.5% Exceeded Standards37.9% Overall88.4% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility % ESEA Flexibility %

4 TH GRADE English/Language ArtsPercentages Did Not Meet Standards13% Met Standards59.1% Exceeded Standards27.9% Overall87.0% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility % ESEA Flexibility %

4 TH GRADE MathPercentages Did Not Meet Standards18.3% Met Standards60.1% Exceeded Standards21.6% Overall81.7% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility % ESEA Flexibility %

4 TH GRADE SciencePercentages Did Not Meet Standards26.3% Met Standards48.8% Exceeded Standards24.9% Overall73.7% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility % ESEA Flexibility %

4 TH GRADE Social StudiesPercentages Did Not Meet Standards33.3% Met Standards60.1% Exceeded Standards6.6% Overall66.7% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility % ESEA Flexibility %

5 TH GRADE Reading Spring TestingPercentages Did Not Meet Standards3.0% Met Standards55.7% Exceeded Standards41.4% Overall97.0% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility % ESEA Flexibility %

5 TH GRADE English/Language ArtsPercentages Did Not Meet Standards2.4% Met Standards55.0% Exceeded Standards42.6% Overall97.6% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility % ESEA Flexibility %

5 TH GRADE MathPercentages Did Not Meet Standards1.4% Met Standards38.1% Exceeded Standards60.5% Overall98.6% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility ESEA Flexibility

5 TH GRADE SciencePercentages Did Not Meet Standards20.5% Met Standards51.4% Exceeded Standards28.2% Overall79.6% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility ESEA Flexibility

5 TH GRADE Social StudiesPercentages Did Not Meet Standards17.7% Met Standards62.3% Exceeded Standards20.0% Overall82.3% % Exceeded % ESEA Flexibility % ESEA Flexibility %

2012 VS 2013 (ELA) JDES ELA2012 Scores2013 Scores ALL9089 Black Hispanic White SWD EL ED8885.3

2012 VS 2013 (READING) READING ALL Black7984 Hispanic White SWD EL ED

2012 VS 2013 (MATH) MATH ALL84 Black Hispanic White SWD EL ED

2012 VS 2013 (SCIENCE) SCIENCE ALL Black Hispanic65 White SWD EL ED6769.6

2012 VS 2013 (SOCIAL STUDIES) Social Studies ALL Black Hispanic White SWD EL ED

STATE TARGET VS SCHOOL SCORE (ELA) ENGLISH2013 State Target 2013 JDES Actual Score ALL Black Hispanic White SWD EL ED8985.3

STATE TARGET VS SCHOOL SCORE (READING) READING2013 State Target 2013 JDES Actual Score ALL9491 Black Hispanic White SWD EL ED

STATE TARGET VS SCHOOL SCORE (MATH) MATH2013 State Target 2013 JDES Actual Score ALL Black Hispanic White SWD EL ED

STATE TARGET VS SCHOOL SCORE (SCIENCE) SCIENCE2013 State Target 2013 JDES Actual Score ALL Black Hispanic White SWD EL ED

STATE TARGET VS SCHOOL SCORE Social Studies2013 State Target 2013 JDES Actual Score ALL Black Hispanic White SWD EL ED

5 TH GRADE WRITING TEST Didn’t Meet Standards – 35% Met Standards – 56% Exceeded Standards – 9% *Met school goal of increasing percentage of students exceeding. 5 th graders went from 2% exceeding in 2012 to 9% exceeding in In addition, NO th graders exceeded when they took the 4 th grade predictor test in 2012.

3 RD GRADE WRITING TEST DATA

LEXILE MEASURES Lexile Measures School YearPercent of 3 rd grade with Lexile measure greater than 650 Percent of 5th grade with Lexile measure greater than

CCRPI INDICATORS Percentage of Students in 5 th Grade Passing Four or More Classes *We do not have access to this because we changed Student Information Systems %

CCRPI INDICATORS Percent of Special Education Students Served in General Education

CCRPI INDICATORS Percent of CRCT Assessments Scoring at the Exceeds Level % %

CCRPI INDICATORS Percent of EL with positive movement from one Performance Band to a higher Performance Band as measured by the ACCESS % %