Inner Triplet Protection Strategy LHC & HL-LHC Daniel Wollmann with Inputs from B. Auchmann, G. Ambrosio, R. Denz, P. Fessia, E. Ravaioli, F. Rodrigues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
Advertisements

MQXF Quench Protection Analysis HiLumi workshop – KEK, Tsukuba Vittorio Marinozzi 11/18/2014.
Technical review on UPS power distribution of the LHC Beam Dumping System (LBDS) Anastasia PATSOULI TE-ABT-EC Proposals for LBDS Powering Improvement 1.
MQXF state of work and analysis of HQ experimental current decays with the QLASA model used for MQXF Vittorio Marinozzi 10/28/
Impact of Cu/NonCu on Quench Protection 1 Impact of Cu/NonCu on MQXF Quench Protection G. Ambrosio, V. Marinozzi, E. Todesco Conductor Video Mtg. April.
First draft of the CLIQ test plan for the HQ2b magnet Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to Hugo Bajas & GianLuca Sabbi 02/05/2014.
How to achieve higher redundancy of the UPS for QPS ? -The lack of redundancy concerns the supply lines from UPS to consumer but equally parts of the UPS.
Brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT LHC IR Quad Heaters.
A. Siemko and N. Catalan Lasheras Insulation vacuum and beam vacuum overpressure release – V. Parma Bus bar joints stability and protection – A. Verweij.
MQXF Quench Protection G. Ambrosio on behalf of the MQXF team With special contribution by: S. Izquierdo Bermudez, V. Marinozzi, E. Ravaioli, T. Salmi,
E. Todesco HL-LHC: OUTLOOK ON PROTECTION FOR IR MAGNETS (WP3) E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland CERN, 23 rd April 2015 MPE meeting.
CERN Rüdiger Schmidt FCC week 2015 Long Magnet Stringpage 1 Incident September 19 th Architecture of powering and protection systems for high field.
MQXF protection – comparison between 1 or 2 power supplies Vittorio Marinozzi 06/08/
ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI FISICA NUCLEARE SEZIONE DI MILANO LABORATORIO ACCELERATORI E SUPERCONDUTTIVITA’ APPLICATA Magnet Test LASA, INFN-Milano.
Electromagnetic Compatibility Test for CMS Experiment. Authors C. Rivetta– Fermilab F. Arteche, F. Szoncso, - CERN.
Training LHC Powering R. Denz Quench Protection System R. Denz AT-MEL.
AT-MEL-PM, R. Denz, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 1 QPS system and its risks  Principal risks  General remarks  Quench heater circuits  Quench detection.
AT-MEI-PE, RD, LIUWG 31-JUL R. Denz AT-MEI-PE LHC Luminosity Upgrade Protection of the Inner Triplet, D1, Correctors and Superconducting Links/Leads.
Status of ITER collaboration for Machine Protection I. Romera On behalf of the colleagues who contribute to the project Thanks to: Sigrid, Markus, Rüdiger,
MPP Meeting Sandor Feher Inner Triplet Powering Should include the IR quads and the DFBX especially the power leads. DFBX commissioning doc was.
Modelling and testing of circuit protection of new superconducting magnets for the HL-LHC project 1 st Workshop FTEC 2015 Alejandro Fernandez Navarro.
Circuit Protection: Progress and Challenges at HL-LHC B. Auchmann (WP 7) on behalf of many people in WPs 3, 6, 7, 11 and Mr. Circuit.
5 th Joint Hi-Lumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting 2015 SC Link Protection A.Ballarino 28/10/2015.
Andrzej SIEMKO CERN, Geneva The 2014 Kyoto Workshop on HTS Magnet Technology for High Energy Physics –WAMHTS-2.
D1/D2 Circuit Baseline Update Rationales for Baseline Discussion B. Auchmann, F. Rodriguez Mateos, A. Verweij, D. Wollmann CERN, TE-MPE.
TE-MPE -EI 23/6/2011,Antonopoulou Evangelia RQS circuit Simulation results of Quench Antonopoulou Evangelia June 2011 Thanks to E. Ravaioli.
Advanced simulations of events in the RB circuit Short circuit to ground Quench of a dipole provoked by the quench heaters Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to.
QPS Signal Analysis Case studies from MPP and QPS Bob Flora.
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
Main dipole circuit simulations Behavior and performance analysis PSpice models Simulation results Comparison with QPS data Ongoing activities Emmanuele.
TE-MPE –EI, TE - MPE - TM 8/12/2011, Antonopoulou Evelina RQS circuit Simulation results Antonopoulou Evelina December 2011 Thanks to E. Ravaioli.
Tiina Salmi and Antti Stenvall, Tampere University of technology, Finland FCCW2016 Roma, April 13 th, 2016 Quench protection of the 16T dipoles for the.
Comparison of magnet designs from a circuit protection point of view Arjan Verweij, CERN, TE-MPE with input from M. Prioli, R. Schmidt, and A. Siemko A.
MQXFSM1 results Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev 10 June 2015LARP meeting.
Logo area HL LHC IT STRING M. Bajko CERN TE-TM and QXF Review.
Machine Protection Review, Markus Zerlauth, 12 th April Magnet powering system and beam dump requests Markus Zerlauth, AB-CO-IN.
Hardware Commissioning Review, R. Denz, 12-May Superconducting circuits: what remains to be done during hardware commissioning R. Denz AT-MEL-PM.
Cold powering test results of the 11 T cosθ model magnets at CERN Gerard Willering With thanks to Jerome Feuvrier, Vincent Desbiolles, Hugo Bajas, Marta.
09/05/ Modelling and testing of circuit protection of new superconducting magnets for the HL-LHC project 2 nd Workshop of the Spanish Traineeship.
Modelling and testing of circuit protection of new superconducting magnets for the HL-LHC project
Power Supply and Energy Extraction System for the CBM magnet
S. Feher MICE Magnet Readiness Review RAL, June 28th, 2016
HL-LHC IT STRING and Series test of SC link
D1 and D2 powering and protection
STEAM Applications Part I The circuit point of view
The HL-LHC Circuits: Global View and Open Questions
State of discussions in preparation for the HL-LHC Circuits Review
Superconducting Circuits, a generic view
Circuits description and requirements
Protection of FCC 16 T dipoles
MMI^2T limits for magnets, what are they and how where they developed
Potential failure scenarios that can lead to very fast orbit changes and machine protection requirements for HL-LHC operation Daniel Wollmann with input.
Powering the LHC Magnets
FMEA of a CLIQ-based protection of D1
Update on circuit protection simulations of the HL-LHC Inner Triplet circuit Matthias Mentink, Circuit specifics + STEAM simulations: Samer Yammine, LEDET.
Quench Protection Measurements & Analysis
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
Detailed global view on protection and detection of the circuits
3 issues identified in review
Power Supply and Energy Extraction System for the CBM magnet
Machine Protection Xu Hongliang.
Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev
MQXFS1e – PH-to-Coil hipot tests
Nb3Sn QPS strategies How to protect.
Long term behavior of MQXFS1
Simulations of failure cases 1st STEAM Workshop June 2019
Hi-pot results summary
ECR on pole order of the HL-LHC IT circuit and resulting implications
R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP Acknowledgements: J. Steckert
J. Fleiter, S. C. Hopkins, A. Ballarino
Presentation transcript:

Inner Triplet Protection Strategy LHC & HL-LHC Daniel Wollmann with Inputs from B. Auchmann, G. Ambrosio, R. Denz, P. Fessia, E. Ravaioli, F. Rodrigues Mateos, G. Sabbi, E. Todesco, A. Verweij, M. Zerlauth International Review of the Inner Triplet Quadrupoles (MQXF) for HL-LHC CERN

Outline  LHC inner triplet protection  Protection Scheme  Heater Redundancy  Protection Hardware  Protection Strategy for HL-LHC IT  Circuit layout  Failure cases OH+CLIQ  Failure cases OH D. Wollmann2

Schematics of LHC IT protection as today A quench in the superconducting circuits is detected and all the quench heaters are fired as soon as one of the following signals exceeds the threshold. URES,Q1=U1,Q1+U2,Q1 URES,Q2=U1,Q2+U2,Q2 URES,Q3=U1,Q3+U2,Q3 D. Wollmann3

Heater Redundancy – IT LHC as today  Two heater circuits per magnet, each covering 2 poles per magnet.  8 heater circuits per triplet circuit.  In case of quench all heaters are fired for the circuit.  Operation not allowed in case a failure detected in one heater circuit  beam dump & automatic ramp down. D. Wollmann4 Courtesy: A. Erokhin

Protection Hardware - IT LHC as today  Quench detection HW  Redundant Boards A / B (Q1, Q3, Q2a/b), comparing voltages via redundant voltage tabs (1oo2 logic)  total 6 detectors per triplet  1oo6 fires all heaters  Lead protection (8x) (1oo8 fires all heaters)  Powered by two independent UPS.  Quench Heater Power Supplies  4 x 2 heater power supplies.  Charging voltage: 900 V (+-450 V)  Capacitance: 7.05 mF  Powering evenly distributed onto two independent UPS. D. Wollmann5 Courtesy R. Denz

Advantages of IT protection via OH + CLIQ as compared to OH only for HL-LHC (as concluded after internal workshop and circuit review)  Reduced hot spot temperature  Lower thermal stresses  Increased diverse redundancy (two independent systems, no common mode of failure)  Bigger margin as detection/protection assumptions have not yet been validated in full size magnets.  Experience operating the LHC shows that heaters can fail in time and the importance of redundant heater circuits.  Heater power supplies fail (~1 per 1000 per year) D. Wollmann6

Protection Strategy IT HL-LHC  Failure case studies performed for OH + CLIQ and OH (by E. Ravaioli).  New quench detection system under development for Nb3Sn magnets  Eight channel device with circuit current dependent detection settings.  First to be used in 11T dipole.  Typically used in 1oo2 scheme.  Redundant voltage tabs including tabs for symmetric quench protection required (see A. Verweij, circuit review)(see A. Verweij, circuit review)  Alternative detection schemes are under study.  Use of LHC type quench heater power supplies with improved reaction time. Correct functionality supervised and regularly executed.  Parallel diodes separating protection of each magnet in the circuit, required with and without CLIQ. D. Wollmann7 Courtesy E. Ravaioli

Summary of failure cases - (OH+CLIQ) Courtesy E. Ravaioli Failure Hot-spot temperature Voltage to ground Turn to Turn V Current through parallel diodes Comment One QH supply (2 strips) not triggered====Parallel diodes Two QH supplies (4 strips) not triggered====Parallel diodes CLIQ capacitor in open circuit===500 A for <100msCapacitors in parallel, Parallel diodes CLIQ capacitor in short circuit===1000 A for <100msCapacitors in series, Parallel diodes One CLIQ unit triggered spuriously===2000 A for <100msUnits interlocked One CLIQ unit not triggered +70 K (300 K) = +20 V (54 V) 2500 A for <100ms Double trigger, voltage monitor, parallel diodes One CLIQ unit and one QH supply not triggered +70 K (300 K) = +30 V (65 V) 2500 A for <100msQH connection scheme One parallel element disconnected===500 A for <100ms One lead of the parallel elements disconnected ===500 A for <100ms Two leads of the parallel elements disconnected probability is nihil Monitoring currents in the circuit during each discharge Entire CLIQ unit in short circuitprobability is nihil Capacitors in series, Protected CLIQ chargers, QH One CLIQ unit not triggered and one lead of the parallel elements disconnected probability is nihil Monitoring currents in the circuit during each discharge One CLIQ unit and all QH protecting the same magnet not triggered probability is nihilRedundant triggers for CLIQ and QH

Summary of failure cases - (OH only) Courtesy E. Ravaioli Failure Hot-spot temperature Voltage to ground Turn to turn V Current through parallel diodes Comment One QH supply (2 strips) not triggered +25 K (350 K) +150 V (570 V) +10 V (65 V) To be studiedParallel diodes Two QH supplies (4 strips) not triggered +40 K (360 K) +250 V (670 V) +15 V (71 V) To be studiedParallel diodes One QH unit triggered spuriouslyTo be studied One parallel element disconnectedTo be studied One lead of the parallel elements disconnected To be studied Two leads of the parallel elements disconnected probability is nihil Monitoring currents in the circuit during each discharge One QH unit not triggered and one lead of the parallel elements disconnected probability is nihil Monitoring currents in the circuit during each discharge All QH protecting the same magnet not triggered probability is nihilRedundant triggers for CLIQ and QH

Thanks you for your attention! Question? D. Wollmann10

Compatibility between SC link and MQXF protection system – Magnet current discharge  In order to assure the protection of the magnet’s hot-spot against overheating, the current in the magnet circuit has to be discharged in a few hundred millisecond (at nominal current, about 200 ms). The choice of the quench protection system (only outer QH; outer and inner QH; outer QH and CLIQ; outer and inner QH and CLIQ) changes the discharge time only by a few tens of millisecond.  Following the recommendation of the HL-LHC Circuit Review, the busbars of the superconducting link need to be designed to operate in this condition without interference to the busbars of other circuits. The electro-magnetic coupling between busbars of different circuits should be studied in detail to assure no spurious quench detection is triggered after a quench in an MQXF magnet. D. Wollmann11

Compatibility between SC link and MQXF protection system – CLIQ system  CLIQ introduces an oscillating current with a peak of about 1.5 kA and a frequency of about 12 Hz.  Overcurrent: The charging polarity of the CLIQ units can be chosen so as to introduce a first peak lower than the initial current in the circuit. At nominal current, the current in the circuit is rapidly discharged and the second peak is also lower than the initial current (see figure below). Thus, CLIQ introduces no overcurrent in the superconducting link main busbars.  Overvoltage: The voltage across each cold mass of the circuit (Q1, Q2a, Q2b, Q3) is limited by the presence of the parallel diodes and of the crowbars of the power supplies. Thus, CLIQ introduces no overvoltage across the superconducting link main busbars.  Electro-magnetic interference: The amplitude of the current changes introduced by CLIQ is lower than that developed during the discharge of the magnet. Thus, using only QH or QH+CLIQ does not change the peak dI/dt of the current through the superconducting link. D. Wollmann12

Simulated currents in the circuit Hot-spot temperature T hot ~230 K CLIQ units for Q2a/Q2b Charging voltage: 1000 V Capacitance: 40 mF CLIQ units for Q1/Q3 Charging voltage: 600 V Capacitance: 40 mF Q2a/Q2b Q1/Q3 CLIQ Diodes Currents through the SC Link (no fault case) Main leads: Magnet current ± AC oscillations, 1.5 kA, 12 Hz Trim leads: Their initial current + AC pulse, 500 A, 12 Hz Courtesy E. Ravaioli

Connection scheme that compensates the voltages induced by CLIQ and QH Connecting in series 2 strips attached to different poles reduces the effects of failures (hot-spot temperature, voltage distribution) LF4 HF4 LF1 LF2 LF3 HF1 HF2 HF3 HF4 IN1 IN2 IN3 IN4 IN3 Only a quarter of the circuits shown Each QH supply is connected to 2 strips in series Standard LHC quench heater power supply Charging voltage: 900 V Voltage to ground: ±450 V Capacitance: 7.05 mF Courtesy E. Ravaioli, and G. Sabbi Proposed QH Connection Scheme

Peak Temperatures and Voltages Scenarios: OL heaters YYYYF1F2 IL heaters YYNNNN CLIQ YNYNNN Hot-spot Temp.K Coil-GroundV Turn-TurnV Layer-LayerV Mid-planeV G. Ambrosio - MQXF International Review15 Assumptions: DetectionmV100 Verificationms10 Heater switch delayms5 CircuitSingle Power Converter for Inner Triplet Energy extractionNO Dynamic effect on inductanceYES Quench backYES Quench propagation OL-ILYES, simulated Failure scenarios: F1one OL-HF circuit ( = 2 strips) F2one OL-HF circuit and one OL-LF circuit, on the same coil and same side (= 4 strips) Simulations performed with Tales by E. Ravaioli Note: Coil to QH voltage never below 450 V in all configurations (place of thinnest insulation)