22 April 2016 Ensuring a fair hearing- matters involving persons with a mental illness, cognitive impairment or intellectual disability Hearings in the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER TOO MANY RIGHTS AND NOT ENOUGH RESOLUTION Adrian Slater These slides and related presentation do not constitute legal.
Advertisements

The right to a fair hearing before the Mental Health Review Board – what it means and how to ensure it Catherine Leslie Lawyer / Pro Bono Coordinator Mental.
Regional Center Fair Hearing Process
How to Lose a Tribunal in Ten Easy Steps Louise Elster, Solicitor Just Employment Law.
1 FIFTH ANNUAL COAT CONFERENCE NSW CHAPTER DEALING WITH DIFFICULTIES IN THE ABSENCE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION The Hearing Process In the Absence of Legal.
Delivering local determinations and setting sanctions Speakers: Simon Bird Deputy President The Adjudication Panel for England Mark Jones Principal Legal.
 The strengths of tribunals include the following. 1) More specialised than most courts- Their jurisdiction is limited either to a specific area of law.
D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION - A COMPARISON. The legal system presents individuals with a range of ways in which they can resolve disputes. Taking a case to court.
Last Topic - Administrative Tribunals
Last Topic - Difference between State and Nation
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
Law Library Four Courts Dublin 7. December Types of Appeal Conventional – S.933 – Assessment is excessive Specific - S Time limits S.195 -
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Mental Health and Employment Law – an overview Daire Murphy Employment Legal Adviser Law Centre (NI) 8 October 2014.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS
1 Consent for treatment A summary guide for health practitioners about obtaining consent for treatment Bridie Woolnough Resolution Officer Health Care.
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
HR Advice Line Queries. “How can I create or introduce a fair pay rise and bonus system for Practice Staff?” As GPs are independent contractors it is.
Victorian Law Reform Commission Final Guardianship Report For Victorian Legal Assistance Forum 19 July 2012 John Chesterman Acting Public Advocate, Manager.
Chapter is based on two parties battling to win the case, each acting as the adversary of the other. ROLE: to provide a procedure for the parties.
Stages of an Arbitration Arbitration Week in Palestine Session #4 December 9,
2008 Commissioners Indaba 19 – 21 st November 2008 Sun City, North West Province HOW to CONDUCT ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS RANDALL van VOORE.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
10th Annual AIJA Tribunals Conference Melbourne Session 8: Current Practical Matters of Interest to Tribunals and Tribunal Members Lawyers in Tribunal.
What does the VLRC do? The VLRC is a independent government funded organisation that monitors and coordinates law reform in Victoria. The major responsibility.
The Eighth Asian Bioethics Conference Biotechnology, Culture, and Human Values in Asia and Beyond Confidentiality and Genetic data: Ethical and Legal Rights.
The Romsey Decision – What it did and what it means John Rantino | Partner.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
Legal Capacity Reform in the Republic of Ireland Dr. Eilionóir Flynn, Centre for Disability Law and Policy National University of Ireland Galway.
Unit 3 Seminar! K. Austin Zimmer Any question from Unit 2! Please make sure you have completed your Unit 1 & 2 Papers!
ROAD ACCIDENT FUND VENDOR BRIEFING SESSION RAF/ 2013 /00009 Date: 27 May 2013 Time: 11:00.
Choice and Control in my life Round table Discussion on legal Capacity legislation Belfast, 26 th November Betreuungsgesetz of 1992 – the German Example.
The Adversary System.  To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible  Controlled by.
Unit 4 Area of Study 1 Booklet 1.3 Answers. Advantages of ADR ADR (mediation, conciliation, arbitration) is a MUCH LESS FORMAL compared to the adversarial.
Calloway County Schools CONFIDENTIALITY TRAINING Protection of Personal Information School Year
 We use the Adversary system of trial.  HOWEVER, the Coroner’s Court, Family Court, Children’s Cases Program, some tribunals and some alternative methods.
Expert Evidence and Tribunals Presented by Josephine Kelly Senior Member, Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Cth)
The Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council National Association of Welfare Rights Advisers 5 March 2010 Bob Chapman.
VCE Legal Studies: Evaluating the role of the court as a law-maker
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Legal advocacy for people who have a cognitive impairment Philip Grano Legal Officer Office of the Public Advocate.
The Adversary System Part I Chapter 7. Learning Intention Explain the processes and procedures for the resolution of criminal cases and civil disputes.
Bridie Woolnough Resolution Officer Health Care Complaints Commission
HIPPA laws Merck.com. Health care practitioners have a duty to keep personal medical information confidential. Communication between the patient and doctor.
SOAR CONFERENCE “Innovative Projects and Resources for the Self- represented Litigant” November 5, 2015.
TRIBUNAL ADVOCACY Doug Humphreys Principal Member Veteran’s Review Board.
// Ensuring a fair hearing- matters involving persons with a mental illness, cognitive impairment or intellectual disability National Disability.
Law LA1: The Civil Process Tribunals Unit 1 - AS.
An overview of the process of Guardianship Do I need to think about this, what is the process and who can assist me? Emma Heagney civil solicitor Legal.
Kids' legal rights in medical care, your obligations and risk minimisation 27 April 2017.
Agenda What is Corporate Governance?
ROAD ACCIDENT FUND VENDOR BRIEFING SESSION RAF/ 2013 /00009
Also known as the ‘accusatorial’ system.
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
Community Support Worker
Catherine Pape, Specialist SLT and lay member of SENTW
Unit 3 Rights & Justice Area of study 1 – The Victorian criminal justice system 50% Area of study 2 – The Victorian civil justice system – 50%
Rules of Evidence Miss Orr.
Today we will… Identify the four Founding Principles of the Scottish Parliament.
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
Justice in the Criminal Justice System
Key Knowledge The purposes and appropriateness of consumer affairs Victoria in resolving civil disputes Key Skills Discuss and justify the appropriateness.
Tribal Court Family Code Development: A Practical Guide
Responsibilities of Key Personnel in a Civil Trial
Review and Regulation List, VCAT
Hearing Officer Guidelines
Presentation transcript:

22 April 2016 Ensuring a fair hearing- matters involving persons with a mental illness, cognitive impairment or intellectual disability Hearings in the Guardianship List at VCAT

How VCAT conducts hearings in the guardianship list – the law 2 Minimise formality, technicality, time (VCAT Act) Not bound by the rules of evidence (VCAT Act) Must allow a party reasonable opportunity to call or give evidence, examine, cross examine witnesses(VCAT act) Bound by the rules of natural justice – no bias, fair hearing (VCAT Act)

How VCAT conducts hearings in the guardianship list – practical issues 3 Preferred attendance of the proposed represented person Most parties self-represented Technical medical, health practitioner,expert evidence Parties may not have read or understood the expert evidence Possibly technical legal issues Family tensions Privacy issues

4 Three situations relevant to fairness of the hearing Parties may not have seen or understood the expert evidence before the hearing and usually the expert does not attend The capacity of the proposed represented person is a central issue - she/he may not have seen or understood the expert evidence, may disagree with it Sometimes the Tribunal member meets privately with the proposed represented person

Parties have not seen the evidence before the hearing Usually no legal representation Tribunal’s task to ensure hearing is fair Explain the significance of the evidence Give copies (are there privacy issues?) Summarise the evidence Test the evidence Ask if they have questions If possible, telephone the witness to answer questions Adjourn if necessary – for questions or another opinion Weight to be given expert evidence

Proposed represented person and evidence about their capacity Explain the significance of the evidence Summarise the evidence Mention all the evidence – can be confronting for parties Test the evidence Allow PRP to ask questions about it, deal with any disagreement frankly Telephone the expert with questions or adjourn if necessary Fair hearing does not mean accepting everything the PRP says Weigh evidence of all parties

Private meeting with the proposed represented person Why meet privately? Managing this procedure Why isn’t it a breach of the fair hearing rule? Purposes of the guardianship legislation – protection of the PRP, wishes of the PRP Any problems?