Preliminary analysis of a 16 T sc dipole with cos-theta lay-out INFN team October 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Advertisements

Small scale testing options Collecting material and analysis from J. van Nugteren and G. Kirby.
Development of a Curved Fast Ramped Dipole for FAIR SIS300 P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova Development of a Curved Fast Ramped Dipole for FAIR SIS300 P.Fabbricatore.
1 The Genoa Tracker Solenoids and their Contribution toward a New Design Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Pasquale Fabbricatore.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
EuCARD2 Magnet Status and action plan
Status of CEPC Detector magnet
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,
Magnets for muon collider ring and interaction regions V.V. Kashikhin, FNAL December 03, 2009.
The construction of the model of the curved fast ramped superconducting dipole for FAIR SIS300 synchrotron P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova The construction.
SuperB Meeting, May 2008 Status of the magnetic design of the first quadrupole (QD0) for the SuperB interaction region S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole.
Some considerations and back-of-the-envelope computations on the multipole correctors Giovanni Volpini, CERN, 7 March 2013.
CERN Accelerator School, Erice 2013 Tiepida-2 case-study 3: High field – large aperture magnet for a cable facility TiEpIdA2 design team: I. Mondino: Project.
First approaches J. García, F. Toral, J. Munilla – CIEMAT.
ASC 2014Nb 3 Sn Block Coil Dipoles for a 100 TeV Hadron Collider – G. Sabbi 1 Performance characteristics of Nb 3 Sn block-coil dipoles for a 100 TeV hadron.
Concepts for 20 T dipoles SnowMass Preparation J. Van Nugteren.
Magnetic Design S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers, R. Oort, M. Morsch, E. Rochepault, H. Pan, T. Ki, R. Schlueter (LBNL) Superconducting Undulator Integrated.
R. Bonomi R. Kleindienst J. Munilla Lopez M. Chaibi E. Rogez CERN Accelerator School, Erice 2013 CASE STUDY 1: Group 1C Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 1 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study introduction Paolo Ferracin CERN, Geneva Claire Antoine
Outline: Main characteristics of the FRESCA2 cable Main characteristics of the strand Strand stability, an issue to avoid magnet quench at low field Procurement.
Superconducting Magnet Group Superconducting magnet development for ex-situ NMR LDRD 2003 Paolo Ferracin, Scott Bartlett 03/31/2003.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
GROUP C – Case study no.4 Dr. Nadezda BAGRETS (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) Dr. Andrea CORNACCHINI (CERN EN Dept.) Mr. Miguel FERNANDES (CERN BE.
Magnet design issues & concepts for the new injector P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova Magnet design issues & concepts for the new injector P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova,
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
LARP Collaboration Meeting, April 26-28, 2006Gian Luca Sabbi HQ Design Study (WBS ) LARP Collaboration Meeting April 26-28, 2006 N. Andreev, E.
New options for the new D1 magnet Qingjin Xu
Dipole design at the 16 T frontier - Magnet R&D for a Future Circular Collider (FCC) at Fermilab Alexander Zlobin Fermilab.
Consolidation of the Booster Injection Quadrupole Magnets (part 2) A. Aloev 14 th February 2013.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
Cold test of SIS-300 dipole model Sergey Kozub Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP), Protvino, Moscow region, Russia.
D2 CONFIGURATIONS P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon INFN Genova  Starting from previous studies done at CERN, BNL and BLNL, possile cross sections of D2 dipole.
FCC week March 2015 Marriott Georgetown Hotel D2 for FCC P.Fabbricatore INFN Genova D2 for FCC P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon INFN Genova Presented.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
ECC Clément Lorin – Maria Durante Acknowledgements: Fresca2 team.
4th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting D2 Design, Status, Plan P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon INFN Genova Presented by E.Todesco (CERN)  INFN Genova is.
Case study 1 : Quadrupole for Hi-Lumi LHC upgrade CAS Erice 2013 Group 1B A. Shornikov, T. Spina, Y. Arimoto, P. V. Gade, K. Brodzinski.
Cosine-theta configurations for S.C. Dipole Massimo Sorbi on behalf of: INFN LASA & Genova Team Giovanni Bellomo, Pasquale Fabbricarore, Stefania Farinon,
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
HL-LHC Meeting, November 2013D2 Status and Plans – G. Sabbi 1 D2 Conceptual Design Status and Next Steps G. Sabbi, X. Wang High Luminosity LHC Annual Meeting.
Nb3Sn wiggler development
Update on PANDA solenoid design
Massimo Sorbi on behalf of INFN team:
WORK IN PROGRESS F C C Main Quadrupoles FCC week 2017
Model magnet test results at FNAL
16 T Cosq DIPOLE Mechanical Analysis
Agenda 9:00  - Welcome ASG speaker 9:10 -  Introduction -       P.Fabbricatore 9:25 - The D2   magnets in HL-LHC   -  E. Todesco.
Preliminary Magnetic Analysis of the CCT Magnet for HL-LHC
Development of the Canted Cosine Theta Superconducting Magnet
High Field Hybrid Design
Cosq configuration - Mechanics
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
Bore quench field vs. critical current density
FCC-hh 16 T, 1.9 K INFN Team October 2015.
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
I. Bogdanov, S. Kozub, V. Pokrovsky, L. Shirshov,
11T Dipole for the LHC Collimation upgrade
MQXF coil cross-section status
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 2 Paolo Ferracin European Organization for Nuclear Research.
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN)
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary analysis of a 16 T sc dipole with cos-theta lay-out INFN team October 2015

Basic points We have performed some studies aimed to verifying the possibility to have on the paper a cos-theta 16 T dipole (only from magnetic point of view) with the given constrains The dipole has been optimized at 16 T including the iron saturation We decided to work on a lay-out with 4 conductor layers

Analytical models Preliminarily to analysis with computer codes, we performed an analytical study considering a dipole done of a 60 degree sector coil. The coil is composed of 4 layers Only one strand is involved for composing two cables: 1) 40 strand cable for the two inner layers; 2) a 20 strand cable for the outer layers The insulation is 0.2 mm any side. The layer to layer insulation is 0.5 mm. The critical current density is 1350 A/mm2 at 16 T and 4.22 K reduced of 5% due to degradation. Cu/SC = 1. The operating temperature is 4.5 K An iron yoke surrounds the coil. The inner diameter of the yoke is 60 mm larger than the outer diameter of the coil. The outer diameter of the yoke is set to 700 mm. On this basis we composed a coil with strands ranging from 0.8 to 1.3 mm looking at the current margin (10% on the load line).

Magnetic field generated by a 60 degree sector coil We applied this formula for any layer. The iron contribution was also included with a formula. The value of relative permeability was set to μ=2 (iron is mostly saturated). The achievable magnetic field with 10% margin on the load line was computed vs the strand dimension. This analysis was done with a peak field of 16.4 T One can see that in order to have 16T we need a coil done with a cable composed of 1.25 mm strand

Strand and cable characteristics Following the analytical studies we developed two models with real cable. The first model (Dip1) was done only involving a 1.25 mm strand (40 strand inner cable, 24 strand outer cable). The second model (Dip2) involves the 1.25 mm strand for inner layers (40 strands) and a 0.7 mm outer layers (40 strands) Inner strand/cableOuter strand/cable Diameter (mm) /0.7 Cu/sc1.0 and 4.22 K (A/mm 2 ) 1350 Cable dimensions (mm) (height,width_i,width_o) 26.0, 2.05, , 2.14, , 1.15, 1.35 Number of strands4024/40 Cable Ins.thickness

Winding Lay-out Dip1 Four layers First layer – 13 turns; 3 blocks; 40 strand cable 1.25 mm Second layer – 27 turns; 3 blocks; 40 strand cable 1.25 mm Third layer – 33 turns; 2 blocks; 24 strands cable 1.25 mm Forth layer – 40 turns; 2 blocks; 24 strands cable 1.25 mm To be noted that we need 284 beam separation !

Results With a current of A the central field is 16 T. The peak field on the inner layer 3° block is T The margin on the load line is 8% This layout does not achieve the specify margin. The maximum achievable bore field at 4.5 K for having 10% margin is 15.5 T

Winding Lay-out Dip2 Four layers First layer – 13 turns; 3 blocks; 40 strand cable 1.25 mm Second layer – 28 turns; 3 blocks; 40 strand cable 1.25 mm Third layer – 54 turns; 2 blocks; 40 strands cable 0.70 mm Forth layer – 62 turns; 2 blocks; 40 strands cable 0.70 mm

Results With a current of A the central field is 16 T. The peak field on the inner layer 3° block is T The margin on the load line is 10% for inner layer block 3, but... 7% for 3° layer block 2. This layout does not achieve the specify margin because the limitation on the third layer done with a cable involving a thinner conductor. A solution can be found with a sligthly larger conductor

Conclusions By involving a 1.25 m strand the 16 T in 50 mm bore could be barely achieved with a 4-layers cos-theta dipole. The thickness of the collared coils is compatible with interbeam distance of about 280 mm A solution with two different cables done with two different strands should be preferred The field quality should be not an issue For a cable involving 1 mm strand the achievable magnetic field at 4.5 K is about 13 T unless the critical current density is increased of 20%. Alternatively to an increase of the critical current density a solution with operating temperature of 1.9 K can be investigated (see next talk)