University of Virginia Innovation – How to Make Your Grant New and Unique Grant Writing Workshop American Association for Thoracic Surgery David R. Jones.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Advertisements

UNM CTSC Mentored Career Development Scholars Program 6-Month Progress Report Template (Years 3+) Name Title Department or College.
Yiu-fai Cheung, MD Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine LKS Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China Sharing in GRF.
B IOMEDICAL E NGINEERING Significance & Innovation Dawn M Elliott, PhD.
Website: where you can find all necessary forms! NIH Grant Writing 101 ASCEND March 2015.
Significance and Innovation Significance- The positive effect something is likely to have on other things Innovation- A new and substantially different.
Introduction to Ludwig Center at Harvard Cancer Research Collaborative Joan Brugge, PhD George Demetri, MD.
“Why Are We Bringing The Fish?” Matching Methods and Culture Martha Ann Carey, PhD, RN Kells Consulting Media, PA, USA 72 nd ICP Conference, Paris, France.
Writing a Grant: Focus on Mentored Awards J. Randall Curtis, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine University of Washington, Seattle,
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4
ESP/EMI Teacher Collaboration
Overall Impact versus Significance
Getting Funded: How to write a good grant
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
Evaluation and Policy in Transforming Nursing
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Policy WG NIH policy proposal. Goal: Incorporating global access licensing as one of the additional review criteria Question 1: Should we propose this.
Writing Successful Research Grant Proposals
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
Funding Opportunities “Starter” Grants Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery & Center for Diseases of the Thoracic Aorta Washington University School of Medicine.
Major Non-Consensus Program and its review process design Wang Yue; Li xiaoxuan Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences Zheng yonghe.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
University of Virginia Developing a Research Program in Thoracic Surgery Grant Writing Workshop American Association of Thoracic Surgery David R. Jones.
Writing a research application Ewa Ehrenborg 1. 2 Research application Write a grant application 3-4 students/group Follow-up November 14 th, 21 st and.
1 Introduction to Grant Writing Beth Virnig, PhD Haitao Chu, MD, PhD University of Minnesota, School of Public Health December 11, 2013.
COMPONENTS OF A GOOD GRANT PROPOSAL Philip T. LoVerde.
CSR Peer Review of NIH HIV/AIDS Grant Applications NIH Grantsmanship Workshop Diana Finzi, Ph.D. Chief, Pathogenesis and Basic Research Program Division.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
NIH Grant Project ChemEng 590B 2/21/13. Outline of Project 1.Come up with a creative tissue engineering topic to study, advance, and present via an NIH-style.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
NIH Challenge Grants in Health and Science Research RFA OD
UNM CTSC Mentored Career Development Scholar’s Program 6-Month Progress Report Template (Years 1-3) Name Title Department or College.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHALLENGE GRANT APPLICATIONS Dan Hoyt Survey, Statistics, and Psychometrics(SSP) Core Facility March 11, 2009.
Grant writing 101 The Art of Flawless Packaging Scott K. Powers Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology Scott K. Powers Department of Applied.
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS: TOP 10 REVIEWER CONCERNS AND GOOD/BAD GRANTS Grant Writing for Success LeShawndra N. Price, Ph.D., NIMH, NIH Henry Khachaturian,
G RANTSMANSHIP $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Key Elements in Applying for a Clinical Research Grant Niloofar Afari, PhD Associate Professor University of CA, San Diego Director of Clinical Affairs.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW: GUIDE FOR REVIEW OF RESTRUCTURED GRANT APPLICATIONS.
NIH Grant Application Writing Workshop Significance and Innovation S.P. Sugrue Feb
What’s Included in a Review Irving H. Zucker, Ph.D. University of Nebraska Medical Center A Primer for Potential Reviewers Experimental Biology 2014 San.
Short and Sweet: Selling Your Science in 12 Pages ASBMR Grant Writing Workshop Friday, 15 October 2010 Toronto, ON Jane E. Aubin, Ph.D. Dept of Molecular.
NCI Division of Cancer Prevention Ongoing Activities at Frederick Facilities Presented By: Lori Minasian, M.D. Robert Shoemaker, Ph.D. October 1, 2015.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
What is a Grant? A description of a research project you want to do? A thoughtful explication of a great new research idea? An intellectual magnum opus.
Identifying Strengths and Weaknesses in Your Proposal
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Applying for NSF CAREER Grants
Research and Grant Writing
Grant Writing Information Session
Grant Title PI Name Intended Institute List of Proposed Key Personnel
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat R-series
Writing that First Research Grant
Specific Aims Workshop [NAME] [“TITLE”]
Preparing Research Proposals for NSF and NIH April 20, 2018
Dr. Lani (Chi Chi) Zimmerman, UNMC Dr. Bill Mahoney, IS&T
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
Dissecting the critical “Specific Aims” page of an NIH grant
STAT3, Cten, and lung cancer: Simultaneous excitement and caution
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Specific Aims Workshop [NAME] [“TITLE”]
Bryan M. Burt, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Aritoshi Hattori, MD, Kenji Suzuki, MD 
Dissecting the critical “Specific Aims” page of an NIH grant MADISON HEDRICK, MA
Samuel Kim, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Presentation transcript:

University of Virginia Innovation – How to Make Your Grant New and Unique Grant Writing Workshop American Association for Thoracic Surgery David R. Jones MD George R. Minor Professor of Surgery Division Chief, Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery

University of Virginia Surgeon-Scientist NIH

University of Virginia Innovation

University of Virginia Innovation Definition of the Grading Criteria Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?

University of Virginia Innovation What is the NIH Looking For? New or unique ideas or applications New solutions to problems Novel methodology; particularly unique model systems (in vitro or in vivo) Unique analysis or treatment protocols Paradigm shifts to conventional thinking

University of Virginia Ideas for Innovation Discussions with collaborators Literature Scientific meetings Visiting Professors Research seminars Mentors Over coffee

University of Virginia

Innovation Examples of Innovation Expansion of a known idea which will generate new knowledge Novel animal model systems (i.e. transgenic animals or animals with inducible, organ specific, knock-in/outs) New indications for specific technology New research platforms New research teams that when paired generate innovative research

University of Virginia Innovation Practical Approaches Typically is 1-2 pages of the 12 page proposal Rarely requires a figure Requires solid grantsmanship Contrast with current literature, approaches, theories, paradigms Consider “weaving in” the IMPACT of your innovation Differentiates your science from other more “pedestrian” proposals

University of Virginia Innovation - What it isn’t Expanding one concept already characterized in breast, colon, prostate cancer into lung cancer. Using “exploratory assays” (i.e. gene expression assays) to identify new pathways, etc. Always needs to be a game changer A “Star Wars” concept – (unless you have data to support that)

University of Virginia Innovation - What it is Based on solid preliminary data Starts with your original idea(s), experimental design, new or significantly modified model system (i.e. started years ago) Tells a story, makes a case, etc. An incremental step forward – this is really what the NIH wants to see

University of Virginia Innovation is a street, not a destination

University of Virginia Innovation Summary This category is an attempt by the NIH to do better and more translational science. Start early, it is a process Make the case Innovative, “high-risk:high reward” projects do generate excitement, particularly if preliminary data is supportive. Don’t overstate the innovation Link your ideas and innovation (methodology, thinking, applications, etc.) to the potential IMPACT of your science

University of Virginia Repeating Innovation is Critical to Sustaining Your Research Career Time doing research Preliminary data